Carbonite Server vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication comparison

OpenText and Nakivo are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #56, while Nakivo is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to Nakivo’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of Nakivo users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

2,242 Views
1,614 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Read 93 NAKIVO Backup & Replication reviews

4,582 Views
3,986 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Carbonite Server compete in the backup and recovery space. While NAKIVO often receives positive feedback for its pricing model, Carbonite Server is noted for its comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher price for some users.

Features: NAKIVO Backup & Replication includes efficient data backup, advanced VM replication, and cloud platform integration. Carbonite Server distinguishes itself with robust disaster recovery, strong data encryption, and reliability across both physical and virtual environments.

Room for Improvement: NAKIVO could enhance its support for larger environments and improve integration with physical servers. It may also benefit from boosting data transfer speeds. Carbonite Server might focus on streamlining its deployment process, offering more flexible licensing options, and simplifying its user interface to enhance usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NAKIVO has a simple and quick deployment process requiring minimal IT resources, with responsive customer service. Carbonite Server, while complex to deploy due to its extensive features, provides comprehensive support to ensure smooth implementation.

Pricing and ROI: NAKIVO Backup & Replication is known for a lower setup cost, providing rapid ROI, especially suitable for small to mid-sized enterprises. Carbonite Server involves a higher initial investment, perceived as delivering substantial ROI through its advanced and robust backup solutions for enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

56th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (46th)

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

12th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NAKIVO Backup & Replication is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NAKIVO Backup & Replication	1.2%
Carbonite Server	1.0%
Other	97.8%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

EDERLEY TERRERO

Business Consulting at Gestion IT

Has improved customer satisfaction through reliable replication and flexible deployment

NAKIVO Backup & Replication has positively impacted my organization and my customers because it is not expensive and easy to use. I can see all the backup and replication processes, and I can protect all my customer data. It's the best solution when compared with others. The time savings and customer satisfaction demonstrate specific positive outcomes. The customers are happy with the solution and appreciate that it is not expensive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

More Carbonite Server pros

"For my purpose, I find VM Backup to be the most useful, as it gives me the ability to create image-based, incremental backups of VMware, Hyper-V, and Nutanix AHV VMs."

"The back-up and restore functions work great and it's easy to use."

"It was also very easy to configure backups to be sent offsite to a separate repository for disaster recovery needs."

"They reply immediately to any query raised from us as a technician or consultant and they know the pulse of the market and keep updating the features in such a big way."

"Nakivo gives users confidence in knowing that if something happens with their application server, exchange server, or other applications, they can recover it easily and quickly."

"We have been able to set up a failover site that has replicas of our critical VMs, updated every hour with only changed data, and the speed of the backup is excellent, allowing replicas to be updated without affecting production workloads."

"All in all, NAKIVO helped us save a lot of time."

"Nakivo has been instrumental in strengthening our data security infrastructure."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pros

Cons

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"I would love to see compatibility with KVM Backup."

"They had given a feature of real-time replication which they stopped in NAKIVO."

"The way encryption is currently working could be improved. Currently, it's not possible to encrypt the backup to an NFS share directly. It needs to have the encryption within the Transporter/VM to enable encryption, which isn't optimal. So I'm hoping that in the near future this function will be implemented."

"There are features that we would like to be integrated such as the ability to exclude directories, the creation of an image for bare metal restore as well as the creation of Plesk integration to use NAKIVO as a Plesk backup tool."

"Updating VM Tools on a replicated VM could be better."

"Using an independent bootable media to restore full physical machines would enable physical machines that may be serving as Nakivo Director or Transport machines to be reliably restored to service without undue delay, ensuring that an enterprise's local environment remains intact."

"Their product is good and it meets our requirements, however, new features are also most welcome and we never hesitated to try new features."

"The upgrade process is a bit dated and could use some changes."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open source."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"Its price is reasonable."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"The product is quite cheap compared to other products on the market, but despite this, it is rich in features both at the level of backup and recovery as well as at the level of additional options."

"Nakivo is cheaper per machine and per backup."

"From the perspective of Indian users, the cost is a little bit high."

"This product provides good value for the price."

"Nakivo has a good price-performance ratio."

"The prices are high."

"I think the price is competitive. However, for some projects, it can be a bit much for price-sensitive small businesses."

"Talk to the sales department about all of the possibilities, as they will help you to find the best solution for your setup."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?

Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nakivo?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is very positive. The pricing is very low, and the licensing process makes it easy to obtain any quote.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nakivo?

NAKIVO Backup & Replication has been improving lately as they have released many updates, and it seems to work excellently at this moment. There will always be emerging needs, such as AI, which...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Storage Protect vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 12% of the time

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 5% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 5% of the time

Rubrik vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

Synology DSM vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

February 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

March 2026

Download NAKIVO Backup & Replication product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

No data available

Overview

Carbonite Server securely replicates data to the local backup server while securing a second copy in the cloud. Granular restore and local failover options ensure rapid recovery and minimal data loss. With integrated hardware and cloud failover for critical systems, Carbonite Server provides reliable data protection.

OpenText

NAKIVO Backup & Replication delivers rapid deployment and intuitive management across environments like Windows, Linux, and NAS. It is known for fast VM recovery, robust data protection, and cloud integration with competitive pricing.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication supports diverse IT landscapes, offering efficient deduplication, offsite backups, and policy-based replication. Its granular file restores, effective compression, and seamless cloud integration make it a preferred choice for minimizing downtime and enhancing business resilience. Users highlight its security measures, flexible deployment options, and automatic backups as core strengths. However, further enhancements in interface refinement, storage array integrations, and broadened support for virtual technologies and physical machine backups could enhance user satisfaction. Users seek improved control over alerts, better reporting capabilities, and optimized deduplication and compression.

What are the key features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Fast VM Recovery: Minimal downtime with quick restore options for virtual machines.
Deduplication & Compression: Efficient data storage through advanced deduplication techniques and compression.
Cloud Integration: Seamless operations with cloud platforms like AWS for flexible backup solutions.
Policy-Based Replication: Automated replication policies ensuring consistent and reliable data backup.
Granular File Restores: Restore specific files without needing full system recovery, saving time and resources.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Competitive Pricing: Cost-effective solution with robust features.
Ease of Use: Intuitive management for a hassle-free experience.
Reliable Performance: Consistent results in protecting and recovering data.
Strong Support: Responsive customer service catering to user needs.

In industries like technology and finance, NAKIVO Backup & Replication is essential for securing virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V. Its deployment on NAS devices and capability for offsite backups to cloud platforms like AWS are appreciated. Organizations utilize it for backup, replication, and recovery of virtual machines using daily and incremental methods, ensuring efficient data protection and disaster recovery processes.

Nakivo

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, Fujifilm, Eiffage

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

March 2026

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.