Carbonite Server vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Nutanix are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

5,008 Views
3,355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Read 6 Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

Carbonite Server and Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] are competing products in the backup solutions market. Carbonite Server may have an edge in pricing and support satisfaction, while Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] stands out with its feature set, which users believe justifies its cost.

Features: Carbonite Server is valued for its straightforward backup processes, reliable recovery capabilities, and simplicity. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] offers seamless integration with Nutanix infrastructure, scalable storage capabilities, and comprehensive features enhancing long-term value.

Room for Improvement: Carbonite Server could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities, expanded storage options, and feature enhancements to match high-end competitors. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] needs improvement in customer support visibility, cost efficiency, and a more streamlined user interface for broader appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Carbonite Server provides a straightforward deployment experience and effective customer support. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] excels in smooth integration within Nutanix environments, but its customer service is less emphasized.

Pricing and ROI: Carbonite Server typically offers a lower setup cost, appealing for smaller budgets with positive feedback on ROI. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] has higher initial costs but provides substantial long-term value through comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (54th), Cloud Backup (37th)

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

Ingvar Ingason

Channel Sales Manager at Arrow Electronics

An affordable product that offers a reasonably good technical support

I rate the product's initial setup phase an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup phase. The product's installation phase took me around two weeks. On average, it usually takes about a week or two to deploy when everything is in place. The solution is deployed on a hybrid cloud from Azure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The advice that I have for people looking into using Carbonite Server is that it seems reliable and easy to use."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

"The solution is very stable."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

More Carbonite Server pros

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."

"We find the ease of use valuable."

"Our primary use case for the solution is to back up our devices and equipment for employees and some equipment in airport software."

"We use this solution as an integrated backup solution and it is integrated from the backup provider to the Nutanix solution."

"Nutanix has its own backup system known as HYCU, as well as its own virtual server."

"Nutanix, in my opinion, will eventually take over."

"Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is useful for those who run an infrastructure where there might arise a need to do some transition or want to opt for digital transformation."

"Nutanix can converge legacy-style rack mount servers, so it is highly scalable."

More Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] pros

Cons

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet; its public cloud support can be improved."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

More Carbonite Server cons

"Nutanix is not secure enough, and it needs to be more resilient."

"This solution could be improved with regards to the hosts that integrate with the platform itself. Each of the hosts integrated with the storage and networking only provide one instance of a backup."

"I would like to see the multi-cloud improve."

"It could be cheaper."

"The solution's setup process should be simplified."

"The pricing could be improved. It's an expensive solution."

"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The solution could be cheaper and they should include more education or marketing materials for users to understand how to use the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The solution is open source."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"Its price is reasonable."

"Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is fairly priced."

"While Nutanix Mine is extremely expensive for small businesses, it is a very cost-effective product for enterprise businesses."

"I rate the pricing a five out of ten because the price is average."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is affordable or low, and ten is expensive or high, I rate the price as two."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

11%

Educational Organization

University

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

NetApp SnapCenter vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Arcserve UDP vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Storage Protect vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

October 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2026

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

Nutanix Mine

Overview

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is a turnkey solution that makes backup infrastructure simple and invisible by combining the Nutanix Cloud Platform technology with leading enterprise backup software for dedicated data backup and recovery.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.