Catchpoint vs FortiMonitor comparison

Catchpoint and Fortinet are both solutions in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category. Catchpoint is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5, while Fortinet is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. Catchpoint holds a 4.8% mindshare in DEM, compared to Fortinet’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 23 Catchpoint reviews

4,526 Views
815 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FortiMonitor

Read 15 FortiMonitor reviews

4,084 Views
531 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

FortiMonitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Catchpoint and FortiMonitor compete in the digital experience monitoring space. Catchpoint has an edge in extensive monitoring features, while FortiMonitor stands out for its cost-effectiveness.

Features: Catchpoint provides robust analytics, detailed monitoring options, and extensive integrations suitable for businesses needing comprehensive visibility. FortiMonitor is recognized for its cost-efficient features, real-time alerts, and flexibility, which cater to organizations prioritizing rapid responses.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint could improve in cost accessibility, deployment complexity, and user interface simplicity. FortiMonitor might enhance its analytical capabilities, depth of monitoring options, and extend integration possibilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint supports a streamlined deployment with extensive support for swift integration. FortiMonitor offers straightforward deployment with reliable customer service, though it may lack some advanced options present in Catchpoint.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint's setup cost is higher and is justified by comprehensive features, offering significant ROI for those needing in-depth analytics. FortiMonitor requires a lower initial investment and caters to budget-conscious companies, promising quicker ROI due to minimal setup needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. FortiMonitor Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. FortiMonitor

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,960 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

21st

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th)

FortiMonitor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

37th

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (39th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 4.8%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FortiMonitor is 2.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Catchpoint	4.8%
FortiMonitor	2.9%
Other	92.3%

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

Featured Reviews

Chethan Premsingh

Manager, Observability Automation & Service Operations at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Proactive monitoring has reduced downtime and now identifies traffic issues before customers notice

I think Catchpoint can be improved because it is competitively a little costlier. I understand that Catchpoint provides the best solution, but comparatively, if I compare it with Uptrends, New Relic, DataDog, and ThousandEyes, Catchpoint does multiple things, but it comes with a cost. That is one of the areas you can leverage use cases based on customer requirements and come up with a better pricing model. The existing ones are good, but for our use case from Zoom, we were just looking for our endpoints to be monitored every minute, and that cost us a lot compared to the existing tool that we were using. That area is something to look for improvement.

Read full review

reviewer2677554

Network Engineer III at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing diverse networks with detailed alerts enhances device oversight

FortiManager is very helpful in managing our networks. We use it to manage 20 farms and various networks with hundreds of devices. The version we are using provides more detail than the older dashboard. We appreciate the alerting capabilities, which are integrated with SolarWinds to notify our team via SMS.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn."

"After using Catchpoint, we were close to 90 percent, where out of ten incidents, just one incident came from a customer, and the remaining were detected by internal sources, especially with Catchpoint."

"Catchpoint has everything you could want in a synthetic tool, and many things that you didn't know you wanted but you are ecstatic to have."

"Catchpoint is very great software for troubleshooting APIs, websites, availability, and other third-party services such as CDNs, which makes it stand out."

"Catchpoint has positively impacted our organization by providing reliable visibility into performance and availability of our Jira and Confluence environments, giving us confidence that critical user journeys are being continuously monitored."

"Catchpoint has impacted my organization positively by speeding up the process in detecting issues much earlier, even before the business reaches out."

"Catchpoint provides a great amount of information."

"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."

More Catchpoint pros

"It provides the best firewall features."

"Overall, I would recommend FortiMonitor to others."

"FortiMonitor is really easy to use for monitoring the logs on FortiGate...It is a stable product."

"With FortiMonitor, you can get all the logs of the traffic information of the destination or the source."

"The tool continuously improves, adapting to support new vendors and technologies. Importantly, it automates the process, triggering alerts when devices require attention, and eliminating the need for manual intervention."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is the overall ability to monitor the health of the environment."

"FortiMonitor offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, allowing me to track network traffic in and out effectively."

"Fortinet's customer support is very good."

More FortiMonitor pros

Cons

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"Trending needs improvement. Currently, out-of-the-box, they provide only seven days availability. So, we have to do queries and we have to go into a separate analysis module, we have to run lot of queries to long-term trends."

"Currently, Catchpoint is migrating to a new user interface. My colleagues and I feel that the old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature. My company receives all the alerts and notifications it needs, but the page doesn't update automatically. You need to manually refresh the page, so every five minutes you need to refresh it to see the most updated information. If there's an automated page refresh feature, that would help my company. It's a feature that Grafana has. The page auto-refreshes in Grafana, so you don't have to manually refresh the page. If that feature is implemented in Catchpoint, it'll be useful for the users. Another area for improvement in the tool is you have to do a manual task, for example, when you have a notification for a market, you get a zip code that the user could have entered, but if the zip code is incorrect, you have to manually go into Catchpoint and update that parameter, so that manual step is another area in the tool that needs improvement."

"I think Catchpoint can be improved because it is competitively a little costlier."

"We would like the script creation feature of this solution to be improved, as it currently requires a complicated manual process to update the scripts."

"For some larger workflows, I think the product could improve in a few areas."

"The only thing that occasionally bugs me about Catchpoint is some aspects of the UI."

More Catchpoint cons

"Sometimes, we get corruption when upgrading from firmware to the new generation, causing a lot of issues."

"I think the current features are really good for me, nothing else comes to mind right now. Maybe some small improvements could be made in the customization and configuration part of the UI to make it easier or more intuitive. Customizable UI options, like we saw in the demo, could be helpful for everyone. But in our operational environment, having clear health status and system details is crucial for us system engineers. One feature I'd really like to see is a credential management system. It would help us keep track of who's logged in and how many times, which is important due to user restrictions. Sometimes, we need to manage logins more efficiently, like logging off other users to free up credentials. So having a feature like that would be really helpful."

"The solution's initial setup process is time-consuming."

"Additionally, there are no AI features in FortiMonitor, which might be an area for enhancement."

"FortiMonitor's monitoring could be much better. It should be like, in Palo Alto."

". Enhancements in the dashboard, such as clearer alerting, maintenance window management, software version tracking, and better visualization, would be beneficial."

"We use FortiToken, and it's a pain to use because you have to send things through your phone and then confirm by email. Only after this can you log in. It's dual-factor authentication. I wish that I could just log in or bring up a dashboard where I could log in from."

"There is room for improvement in the FortiMonitor report. It is not ideal for showcasing to tech customers or managers, especially when trying to display high CPU usage from logins within a specific range of months or the most recent month."

More FortiMonitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The tool's pricing model in Vietnam is a bit high. I rate the product price as an eight out of ten."

"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."

"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."

"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."

"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."

"FortiMonitor's price is very high."

"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."

"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I am not directly involved in pricing, but the pricing is very decent.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

Catchpoint can be improved by supporting some of the APIs and other technical testing with some kind of metric validations as well. I do not have anything more to add about the needed improvements,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Catchpoint?

My main use case for Catchpoint is mostly automating. I use Catchpoint automatically for automated monitoring of our various UIs and also the backend APIs. We rely on Chrome and Selenium and JavaSc...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot less work to stand up and maintain. It's also a lot easier to use and onboard n...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?

FortiMonitor does save time but not significantly on costs, as there are still expenses related to procurement, installation, and licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FortiMonitor?

There are areas for improvement that FortiManager is addressing. We have not yet upgraded to the latest software versions, being a full revision behind, but we plan to update soon since the current...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds Pingdom vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 7% of the time

ThousandEyes vs FortiMonitor

Compared 6% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs FortiMonitor

Compared 5% of the time

NinjaOne vs FortiMonitor

Compared 2% of the time

More FortiMonitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

July 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

July 2026

Download FortiMonitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

Panopta

Overview

Catchpoint is a robust monitoring solution offering synthetic and real user monitoring, network performance analysis, and root cause identification. It enhances response times, reduces downtime, and improves user experience through advanced features and support.

Catchpoint provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities that ensure application availability and improve user experience. By delivering synthetic and real user monitoring, API tracking, and cloud network performance insights, it enables companies to diagnose issues, maintain service reliability, and anticipate problems. Organizations can effectively simulate user actions, monitor endpoints, and obtain actionable insights for diverse applications and websites, supporting seamless digital transactions.

What are the key features of Catchpoint?

Synthetic and Real User Monitoring: Offers comprehensive insights into performance and user interactions.
Root Cause Analysis: Identifies issues quickly to minimize downtime and improve service reliability.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides tailored views for performance metrics and test results.
Alert Notifications: Keeps teams informed of potential issues with timely alerts.
Network Performance Monitoring: Tracks cloud and local network performance for optimal operation.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Savings: Optimizes performance to reduce operational costs and enhance ROI.
Improved SLA Management: Helps maintain service level agreements with reduced false alerts.
Enhanced User Experience: Delivers consistent and responsive applications to users.
Operational Efficiency: Automates processes for minimizing manual intervention.

Catchpoint is implemented across industries for proactive performance monitoring, ensuring digital platform reliability and superior user experience. Its tools enable companies to track application availability and network performance, utilizing global coverage to deliver crucial insights for decision-making processes.

Catchpoint

FortiMonitor excels in user monitoring and network operations, with its central management and intuitive dashboard. Known for reducing administrative costs and enhancing security awareness, it also provides seamless integration with other devices.

FortiMonitor supports dual-factor authentication, alert systems, and system health monitoring, proving essential for technical teams managing infrastructures and FortiGate activities. Despite its benefits, there are areas like compatibility and pricing where improvements are sought. It offers high-level monitoring, customizable dashboards, and alert capabilities which are critical in busy environments, especially for detecting harmful activities and ensuring efficient CPU utilization.

What features enhance FortiMonitor's efficiency?

User Monitoring: Monitors end users and logs effectively.
Traffic Analysis: Offers comprehensive insights into network traffic.
Dual-factor Authentication: Enhances security with two-step verification.
Centralized Management: Streamlines operations with an intuitive dashboard.
Proactive Alerts: Provides redundancy and instant notifications for potential issues.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with other devices for continuity.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Cost Reduction: Lowers administrative costs significantly.
Security Awareness: Improves security management efficiency.
Data Continuity: Ensures continuous operations with automated vendor configuration.
Efficiency Gains: Adapts to new vendors and enhances CPU utilization.

FortiMonitor is widely implemented in industries for end-user monitoring, security tracking, and infrastructure management. It's crucial for environments needing high-level monitoring and identifying hardware problems, where proactive management and customizable dashboards are key to maintaining operations.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. FortiMonitor

June 2026

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. FortiMonitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. FortiMonitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. FortiMonitor report.

See our list of best Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.