Centreon vs Dell CloudIQ comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and Dell Technologies are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Centreon is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.7, while Dell Technologies is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.3. Centreon holds a 1.5% mindshare in IM, compared to Dell Technologies’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Dell Technologies users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,143 Views
6,400 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Dell CloudIQ

Read 10 Dell CloudIQ reviews

2,973 Views
2,884 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Centreon

Dell CloudIQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and Dell CloudIQ compete in the network monitoring category. Centreon has the upper hand in integration and customization capabilities, providing flexible options for varied networks, whereas CloudIQ performs better in hardware-specific environments with user-friendly interfaces.

Features: Centreon excels in offering a unified platform for monitoring diverse networks, allowing significant customization and seamless integration with other platforms. It provides predictive metrics and detailed reporting, enabling proactive issue management. Dell CloudIQ simplifies hardware management within Dell environments, using intuitive color-coded alerts and AI-driven predictive maintenance, excelling in monitoring storage and server health.

Room for Improvement: Centreon needs improvements in web application monitoring, downtime management, and alert precision. Enhancing its mobile app and automation capabilities would add value. Dell CloudIQ could benefit from supporting a broader range of hardware beyond Dell products and improving its reporting abilities to compete effectively in more diverse environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon supports diverse deployment models but faces criticism for tech support, which could be improved with more extended availability and faster response times. Its customer service includes potential direct vendor interactions. Dell CloudIQ, easy to deploy within Dell setups, benefits from the seamless integration of existing Dell service contracts, though this may limit effectiveness in heterogeneous IT ecosystems.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon, as an open-source solution, offers cost-effectiveness, though enterprise features may incur additional costs and present challenges in scalability due to its licensing model. It provides high ROI through time-saving features. CloudIQ bundled with Dell products ensures a cost-free monitoring solution within those environments, offering value when integrated with Dell services but potentially less ROI for organizations using diverse infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Dell CloudIQ Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Dell CloudIQ

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (22nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th)

Dell CloudIQ

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

37th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell CloudIQ is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.5%
Dell CloudIQ	0.9%
Other	97.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Haseeb Sheikh

Senior Manager Enterprise Solutions at a media company with 201-500 employees

Proactive monitoring has improved availability and capacity reporting for my infrastructure

The current features including availability, performance, and capacity are good enough, and I think more of better alerting along with improved thresholds of alerts should be implemented. It is helpful, but it should also include the capability to detect zero-day attacks if there are any. I think the remediation could have been better. For example, if I am upgrading my firmware or BIOS or firmware of the infrastructure, it should give me exact CVSS scores and remediation data provided against the CVSS scores. I think the Dell CloudIQ app could be more interactive. If there is a possibility that I can open tickets or SRs via the Dell CloudIQ app, that would be a good feature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a great product, it's very flexible."

"We have all our tickets inside Centreon in real-time and can monitor a lot of ELP and CLN in real-time for application purposes."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to build an abstraction of service visualization. You can add services to an entity called Business Activities and you can see the state of these activities."

"Centreon's most valuable feature is Opsgenie."

"The single-pane view provides us a view of all of our network infrastructure, and it is one of the most important tools that we use to see the status of our customers' networks."

"Centreon is a really capable tool that increases efficiency and gives you more information."

"What we like about it is that, whereas with Nagios, by design, if you have five or six data centers, you have to open five or six web pages to see what's going on, In Centreon, this is all included in one page, a single site, one dashboard. You don't have to jump from one specific dashboard to the other."

"We can proactively see what is going on in the network, so most of the time we notice problems before our customers do."

More Centreon pros

"The tool for forecasting capacity is valuable."

"Fewer vulnerabilities have been observed in the four years we have used the solution."

"The dashboard is clear and user-friendly."

"I rate CloudIQ a ten out of ten."

"Our company uses the solution for forecasting capacity and performance via cloud visualization that is maintained by Dell."

"CloudIQ allows us to monitor our servers centrally, and we can receive notifications in case of issues, like a potential hard drive failure."

"This solution would be very helpful for anybody that is solely using Dell equipment."

"We chose this solution because it is a free product offered from Dell which you can use to monitor, manage and optimize cybersecurity."

More Dell CloudIQ pros

Cons

"Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed."

"I think Centreon's security could be improved by leveraging AI. That's where things are heading in the industry."

"I would like to see more plugins. That is something it needs. There is also room for improvement through dynamic thresholds, or self-discover thresholds. I would also like to see a discovery feature that could map the whole network environment and automatically suggest things."

"Sometimes, when the GUI and some of the search fields are being reset, and I return to the page, then I have to set them again. Therefore, some improvement on the UI and the filtering is needed."

"I would like to see an improvement of the communication with big data systems, because Centreon is a monitoring system. In our point of view, Centreon should be a part of a source for a big data system, not a big data system itself. So, it should be easier to add data from the Centreon system to a big data system. For example, it should be able to teach machine learning."

"Centreon introduced network discovery in the most recent update. However, it doesn't work well. Our previous monitoring tool could discover networking equipment on the network and identify the relationships between the devices."

"This solution lacks service monitoring in the cloud."

"The reporting has room for improvement."

More Centreon cons

"In terms of improvement, they should enhance the product range."

"It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards."

"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."

"I think the remediation could have been better."

"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."

"Getting through support has become a difficult thing. Dell's support has degraded since they took over EMC. It's a bit difficult to use."

"The process of upgrading could be streamlined."

"PowerScale is the only file system offered and that is limiting."

More Dell CloudIQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"For more complex tasks, we use prepaid support days and ask Centreon to come onsite."

"It's quite expensive when you use the Enterprise version, but if you compare it to other providers, it's more like a middle-of-the-line product. It's always good to have a price that is lower, but I would say the price is okay because we get very good support and if we have any other issues we can always contact them. There has never been a time when I didn't get help from them."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

"The pricing is acceptable."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"The solution is more expensive than NetApp which offers file systems in various price ranges."

"I believe it is a free product because we don't pay for it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell CloudIQ?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Dell CloudIQ?

I moved to a new organization where I am also using Dell CloudIQ. I use Dell CloudIQ to monitor PowerStore as well as Dell PowerEdge servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Dell CloudIQ?

For performance analytics, I have my own NMS in-house that I use. I have deployed a VApp on-premises with all of the servers and storage integrated, and it sends telemetry data directly to Dell. My...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 20% of the time

HPE OneView vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 7% of the time

VirtualWisdom vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 6% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 5% of the time

More Dell CloudIQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

September 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

August 2026

Download Dell CloudIQ product report

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Dell CloudIQ offers advanced health status alerts, AI-driven predictive capabilities, and centralized monitoring, enhancing storage management through comprehensive visibility and operational efficiency. Its user-friendly dashboards and mobile access create a seamless experience for IT professionals.

Dell CloudIQ empowers organizations with cutting-edge features designed to streamline storage management. Health status alerts utilize a traffic light indicator system, while AI predictive capabilities enhance operational efficiency. The tool provides capacity forecasting and a comprehensive view of storage devices, facilitating updates for compliance and optimization. Centralized monitoring delivers timely issue notifications, and its dashboards, accessible via mobile, provide user-friendly navigation. CloudIQ's availability and capacity reporting features help prevent unplanned outages, offering visibility of storage devices and alerts for faults.

What key features make Dell CloudIQ stand out?

Health Status Alerts: Use traffic light indicators for immediate visibility.
AI Predictive Capabilities: Increase operational efficiency with smart insights.
Capacity Forecasting: Plan effectively with long-term storage capacity insights.
Centralized Monitoring: Consolidates data for informed decision-making.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Simplify navigation with mobile access.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Efficient Monitoring: Real-time alerts and notifications reduce downtime.
Enhanced Performance: Improve storage management with actionable insights.
Predictive Maintenance: Prevent issues before they arise, saving time and resources.
Cost Management: Efficient resource allocation leads to cost reduction.
Comprehensive Integration: Monitor diverse environments with ease.

In industries like healthcare and finance, Dell CloudIQ plays a crucial role in managing complex storage environments. Teams leverage its forecasting capabilities and comprehensive dashboards to maintain high performance and security standards. By supporting virtual infrastructures, Dell CloudIQ assists in delivering optimal storage solutions while addressing critical needs.

Dell Technologies

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

North Carolina State University

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Dell CloudIQ

September 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Dell CloudIQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Dell CloudIQ and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Dell CloudIQ report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.