No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs CloudBees comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security enhances network efficiency and risk mitigation, delivering a 35%-55% ROI increase and user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
6.7
CloudBees offers reliable support and automation, enhancing ROI and efficiency in deployments and security audits over Jenkins.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.0
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security's customer support is reliable and proactive, earning high user ratings for efficiency and responsiveness.
Sentiment score
6.4
CloudBees offers responsive customer service and technical support, though some users report recurring issues and suggest prioritizing user needs.
I would rate the support for Check Point CloudGuard Code Security as good because we can quickly email support about any problems we encounter, and they reply instantly to provide help.
IT security and network analyst at Revenu Québec
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security offers scalable solutions for diverse cloud configurations, supporting numerous users without performance issues.
Sentiment score
7.5
CloudBees efficiently scales across environments, supporting microservices and integrations, with users praising its operational flexibility and adaptability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is praised for its stability and effectiveness, requiring proper installation for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
6.6
CloudBees stability is generally rated high, but setup, upgrades, and scaling present challenges affecting overall user satisfaction.
The deployment can take a couple of hours or a couple of minutes.
Senior Qe Lead at Cognizant
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security requires better documentation, integration, and cost transparency, with noted weaknesses in security features and user training.
CloudBees users seek improved error previews, faster resolutions, better UI, AI integration, and enhanced tool integration and performance.
All the features we have on the firewall on the on-premises side, we also have under CloudGuard such as IPS, Anti-Bot, and all these blades are set up in our CloudGuard.
IT security and network analyst at Revenu Québec
If possible, we could sort the logs so we can get the exact error on one page.
Senior Qe Lead at Cognizant
 

Setup Cost

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security pricing varies by user count and company size, with mixed feedback on affordability and licensing.
Enterprise users justify CloudBees' high pricing due to valuable benefits, appreciated licensing model, and core product features.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security improves threat detection and control with automation, AI, and support for multiple code languages.
CloudBees excels with user-friendly interface, strong integrations, scalability, security, and features, ideal for complex CI/CD management.
The most valuable features of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security include our approach to manage it via the management we have on-premises, and we also deploy the same extension management of CloudGuard to manage all the virtual systems on Azure.
IT security and network analyst at Revenu Québec
The integration part is good. We can use multiple things by integrating with CI/CD pipelines, and this is very feasible for us.
Senior Qe Lead at Cognizant
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard Code...
Ranking in DevSecOps
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (28th)
CloudBees
Ranking in DevSecOps
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (7th), Configuration Management (10th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd), Feature Management (1st), AI Software Development (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is 3.5%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudBees is 3.5%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
DevSecOps Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CloudBees3.5%
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security3.5%
Other93.0%
DevSecOps
 

Featured Reviews

Mamadou Fallou Diagne - PeerSpot reviewer
IT security and network analyst at Revenu Québec
Management team gains substantial protection while navigating ongoing configuration challenges
The most valuable features of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security include our approach to manage it via the management we have on-premises, and we also deploy the same extension management of CloudGuard to manage all the virtual systems on Azure. We effectively use artificial intelligence with Check Point CloudGuard Code Security, as we have teams that work with AI and we frequently manage our firewalls using AI along with the CloudGuard and all virtual systems.
KishoreKumar4 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Qe Lead at Cognizant
Consistent automation has improved deployments and supports efficient client-facing workflows
Deployment and other processes are feasible for me, making this a smooth process. The integration part is good. We can use multiple things by integrating with CI/CD pipelines, and this is very feasible for us. This allows us to do our work easily. The productivity is very good. CloudBees is a good and efficient tool. We can work in client-facing scenarios, and since clients have provided these types of tools, we are able to work on them effectively.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Security Firm
17%
Construction Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Construction Company
16%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Spectral?
There are still areas for improvement with Check Point CloudGuard Code Security. All the features we have on the firewall on the on-premises side, we also have under CloudGuard such as IPS, Anti-Bo...
What is your primary use case for Spectral?
My team and I work with Check Point CloudGuard Code Security and handle all related tasks, including deploying virtual machines and configuring all aspects. Our security team's roles include networ...
What needs improvement with CloudBees?
For CloudBees, I can suggest that the log is very high, which is very hectic for us when trying to find which error is coming. This creates complexity. If possible, we could sort the logs so we can...
What is your primary use case for CloudBees?
We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.
What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?
We can upload the JAR file and deploy at the Jenkins level during our deployment. These types of labels and IDs can be deployed using CloudBees. Once we click to start the build, it automatically r...
 

Also Known As

Spectral
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Doddle, Bangalore International Airport, Grupo financiero ACOBO, DigitalTrack
Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. CloudBees and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.