Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs ZoneAlarm comparison

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) and ZoneAlarm are both solutions in the Anti-Malware Tools category. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while ZoneAlarm is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.5. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) holds a 0.7% mindshare in Anti-Malware Tools, compared to ZoneAlarm’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of ZoneAlarm users who would recommend it.

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Read 62 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) reviews

7,457 Views
671 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

ZoneAlarm

Read 13 ZoneAlarm reviews

1,883 Views
1,563 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

ZoneAlarm

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

ZoneAlarm and Check Point Harmony SASE are competing in the network security solutions category. ZoneAlarm's simplified pricing makes it attractive for budget-conscious users, but Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more comprehensive feature set, lending it an edge for enterprises seeking advanced protection.

Features: ZoneAlarm provides robust firewall protection, anti-ransomware capabilities, and secure browsing, making it ideal for personal and small business use. It ensures two-way firewall security alongside antivirus/antispyware functionalities. Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced threat prevention, secure remote access, and a unified security approach, suitable for enterprises with complex networks. It also includes advanced malware protection, URL filtering, and zero-trust network access.

Room for Improvement: ZoneAlarm could enhance its documentation clarity and reduce update frequency, making it more user-friendly. Additionally, integration with other security platforms could be improved. Check Point Harmony SASE may benefit from a simplified pricing model to appeal to smaller enterprises. Also, the solution could streamline its setup process, particularly for less tech-savvy users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ZoneAlarm is recognized for its straightforward setup and responsive customer support, simplifying individual and small business deployments. Meanwhile, Check Point Harmony SASE offers a streamlined cloud-based model with sophisticated management tools and reliable customer service, accommodating larger organizational needs with extensive customization options.

Pricing and ROI: ZoneAlarm presents cost-effective solutions with significant ROI for its target market, mainly personal and small businesses. In contrast, Check Point Harmony SASE, despite a higher initial cost, provides extensive security functionalities deemed valuable for a positive long-term ROI in corporate environments requiring comprehensive protection measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (6th), Firewalls (16th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (7th), ZTNA as a Service (5th), ZTNA (3rd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (6th)

ZoneAlarm

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ZoneAlarm is 2.2%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)	0.7%
ZoneAlarm	2.2%
Other	97.1%

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

Nasseer Qureshi

Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group

Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies. Additionally, a mobile-specific client or lightweight agent would be helpful for securing access from smartphones, especially in BYOD environments. We would appreciate more granular reporting and analytics, including better drill-down capabilities to investigate specific users or app activity. The logs are comprehensive, but filtering them can sometimes feel messy. The user interface on the management portal could be more intuitive, especially when managing multiple sites or remote offices. Some of the policy configuration steps are nested and could be streamlined.

Read full review

Bala_Krishna

Director at esupport Solutions Pvt ltd

Security suite has protected individual devices from threats, while installation and network features require improvements

BIG-IP is actually the LTM, Link Load Balancer, which comes with ASM, meaning Application Security Module. It consists of multiple modules, such as ASM, SWG, and a domain DNS manager. ZoneAlarm allows defining trusted and public networks, which helps maintain security in public Wi-Fi environments. It offers comprehensive protection, securing PCs against threats. Users do not experience any system slowdowns while scanning. Harmony Browser protects all your browsing activity and is bundled with Harmony Endpoint and Harmony Connect. It provides a small but effective security layer and sometimes comes packaged with the larger Harmony suite.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, the unified agent covers endpoints as well as prevents web browser attacks."

"I rate the overall product as ten out of ten."

"The solution has many valuable aspects, including anti-Phishing, which blocks phishing attacks in all applications (email, messaging, and social networks)."

"One of the most valuable features found using Harmony is being able to monitor in a simple and orderly way."

"The reports give a simple overview of the traffic pattern within the organization."

"The scalability is good, and I'd give it an eight out of ten."

"The solution offers ATP features and management features."

"The product has a reasonably high pricing."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pros

"It is easy to use through interfaces and easy to configure each of the customizations we created based on the characteristics that we wanted."

"The phone access scan stands out as the most valuable feature for me."

"The solution maintains reasonable scalability."

"ZoneAlarm protects all computers from viruses, spyware, and hackers."

"It is quick and easy to configure."

"It gives us security for the users' mobiles and ends up protecting us in a significant way."

"The product's most valuable feature is the detection engine due to its ability to identify threats."

"Personally, I find the Game Mode of the Firewall very useful."

More ZoneAlarm pros

Cons

"The product needs to work on the integration of alerts with different SIEM or security solutions."

"The suspend feature needs more control."

"Harmony lacks this ability when anything more than a vanilla access policy is used (we use layers and source user objects in our policy which make this impossible according to Check Point)."

"The connectivity issue can be improved as at times it lags when connecting to their server."

"I don't know if it is technically feasible, however, if the Desktop App could be used as a Web App or a Chrome Extension it would be very nice."

"In order to have to bypass the login using the website, a good feature for Perimeter 81 to have is a login instance in the Perimeter 81 application. I'm using a Mac and we don't have that functionality."

"The user interface on the management portal could be more intuitive, especially when managing multiple sites or remote offices."

"They could improve on the available public documentation."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) cons

"ZoneAlarm should be a light application that does not take too much memory in mobile phones."

"They should release a single update with all the necessary characteristics to avoid being in a cycle of consecutive updates."

"We'd like better performance of the network equipment. There are high-speed environments where an immediate response is required."

"Currently, the client is only available for the Windows Operating System but it would be good if it were released for Mac OS as well."

"Some of our users say that the interface is a little bit outdated for 2020, and want it to be more modern and cozy."

"They need to update and improve the features available for Mac."

"I would like it to be integrated with the Check Point centralization solution like Infinity Portal. It would be great to be able to manage it through the same website."

"Perhaps the primary area for potential enhancement is to make it faster, ensuring a more seamless experience while maintaining robust security features."

More ZoneAlarm cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is good, especially when you compare it to other firewall or UTM solutions from FortiGate or SonicWall, where you would have to invest about four hundred thousand rupees for 100 users over a three-year period."

"Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing."

"The product is neither cheap nor expensive."

"Annual licenses cost $30 to $40 each."

"I consider the product to be a medium-priced solution. There are no additional costs attached to the tool."

"Perimeter 81 charges separately for gateways and VPN connectivity, but compared to Azure, it seemed more reasonable."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The pricing of Check Point is relatively high when compared to other competitors like Palo Alto and Fortinet. While Palo Alto may be on the higher side in terms of cost, Check Point's pricing is similar to that of Fortinet. In some cases, Check Point offers better value for the features it provides. We initially considered other options but ultimately decided to purchase hardware that came with three years of iOS. This approach eliminated the need for any additional costs associated with Check Point. I would rate it 10 out of 10."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pricing and cost advice

"We use the free version of the software, but it can be upgraded to the paid Extreme Security edition."

"This is a freeware product and I recommend using it."

"The pricing is reasonable, with a yearly renewal license costing seventy dollars."

"We have to pay a yearly licensing fee for ZoneAlarm, which is cheap."

"I rate the product pricing a seven out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Hospitality Company

11%

Educational Organization

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	53
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Harmony Connect?

The product's initial setup phase is very simple.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Harmony Connect?

I am not aware of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing, but I would say the setup cost is our resource, and we have invested many hours into this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Harmony Connect?

When I'm raising a ticket for Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81), it's a bit technical for non-technical people. It could have been clearer and easier for them to raise a ticket becau...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ZoneAlarm?

ZoneAlarm has an acceptable price. Not much detail can be provided as I am not the one to judge the price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ZoneAlarm?

Check Point support needs improvement. Currently rated at 9 out of 10, more support is required. There are some concerns on support that need addressing. The integration of new products with their ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ZoneAlarm?

I work with vendors such as F5 and deal with F5 as a reseller. I work with F5 BIG-IP regarding F5 Shape Security. BIG-IP Advanced WAF is what I work with regarding BIG-IP DNS or BIG-IP AFM. Advance...

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 10% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 8% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 5% of the time

Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 5% of the time

OpenVPN Access Server vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ZoneAlarm

Compared 32% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs ZoneAlarm

Compared 9% of the time

Bitdefender Security for AWS vs ZoneAlarm

Compared 6% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs ZoneAlarm

Compared 6% of the time

Avira Antivirus vs ZoneAlarm

Compared 6% of the time

More ZoneAlarm Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

February 2026

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) product report

Buyer's Guide

ZoneAlarm

January 2026

Download ZoneAlarm product report

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE

No data available

Overview

Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.

Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.

What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?

Split Tunneling: Manages internet traffic more efficiently by routing only necessary data through the VPN.
MFA: Provides an additional layer of security through multi-factor authentication.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure connections by validating every user and device.
ThreatCloud: Enhances protection with real-time threat intelligence.
Firewall as a Service: Protects against unauthorized access and threats.
Secure Web Gateway: Prevents phishing attacks and unauthorized internet access.

How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?

Improved Security: Real-time threat intelligence and robust authentication minimize risks.
Centralized Management: Simplifies control over network security and policies.
Optimized Connectivity: Efficient traffic routing enhances user experience.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing IT infrastructure, enhancing strategic security deployment.

Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

ZoneAlarm protects you by preventing hackers from remotely accessing and controlling your device, and lets you know which apps have excessive permissions so you can decide whether they threaten your privacy.

Check Point Software Technologies

Sample Customers

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith

Terma, Optix, Samsung Research Amercia, SF Police Credit Union, Independence Care System, Mattias Thomsen, Carmel Partners, Desert Research Institute, CRIF, FXCM Inc, US State Agency

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm

December 2025

Free Report: Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ZoneAlarm report.

See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.