Check Point Power-1 [EOL] vs Cisco Meraki MX comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and Cisco are both solutions in the Firewalls category. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

Check Point Power-1 [EOL]

Read 2 Check Point Power-1 [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki MX

Read 80 Cisco Meraki MX reviews

13,687 Views
12,866 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Check Point Power-1 [EOL]

Cisco Meraki MX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point Power-1 [EOL] and Cisco Meraki MX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Netgate, Cisco and others in Firewalls.

To learn more, read our detailed Firewalls Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Firewalls

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Power-1 [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco Meraki MX

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Firewalls (10th), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (6th)

Featured Reviews

William Cambronero

Consultant at ITQS

Good intrusion prevention, firewall, and VPN capabilities

Check Point Power-1 (EOL) has reached the end of its useful life, yet at the time, they could to make some changes such as: * Integration in the cloud. It is the new trend, however, Check Point has already contemplated this and already has its own cloud device. * Automation. As the automatic creation and application of policies, this would have been very beneficial. * Multi-factor authentication would have been a plus in security at the time. They must also make some improvements in their support departments since they do not comply with the SLAs that they provide.

Read full review

Md Rafique

it support at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized security management has simplified daily monitoring and remote troubleshooting

One area that could be improved is providing more advanced reporting and analytics within the dashboard, especially more detailed historical data and customizable reports. It would also be useful to have greater flexibility for advanced firewall and security configuration without making the interface more complex. Better customization and more detailed troubleshooting information would also help administrators. Another improvement would be more granular control over alerts and notifications, so administrators can prioritize critical security and network events without being overwhelmed by less important alerts. More detailed historical analysis and easier integration with third-party security and monitoring tools would also be valuable. Overall, I would keep the simplicity of the Meraki dashboard while adding more advanced options for administrators who need deeper control and visibility. One additional improvement would be better support for integration with third-party security and monitoring platforms. More flexible APIs, deeper SIEM integration, and more detailed security analytics would make Cisco Meraki MX even more useful for organizations with a broader security stack, while the simplicity and centralized management are already strong points.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In my opinion it is right product at enterprise level network to protect the user and server from external and internal threats and attacks"

"The VPN allows users to connect remotely and securely."

"Since it has an integrated dashboard for all the products, customers can get complete network analytics regarding what the user is doing, monitoring, and observing."

"Site to Site VPN: The device can establish a VPN connection to multiple sites in a mesh environment in seconds, and without complex VPN knowledge."

"I've been in this industry for 40 years and this is the simplest and easiest product that I've ever used."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the ease of management of the dashboard."

"It is very easy to configure."

"Meraki products are very solid and seem to work in harsh environments very well."

"WAN optimization is the best feature of the solution."

"Easy to administer and saves time when you have many smaller locations that you have to manage."

More Cisco Meraki MX pros

Cons

"Multi-factor authentication would have been a plus in security at the time."

"I have to pay Check Point for every new service I integrate in the firewall and it also has license related issue which needs to renew every years."

"It would be nice to get detailed logging information without third-party software."

"The client-side VPN is weak. The product could be improved with deployment templates."

"There are a few things that are odd that I can do with other firewall products that I can't do with a Meraki."

"We feel that Cisco provides smaller features, with fewer possibilities versus other solutions out there."

"The solution's pricing should be reduced."

"The hardware solution for Cisco Meraki MX comes with a higher price."

"The product could incorporate tools like ThousandEyes into the system so we can see things directly."

"We face a lot of challenges with hybrid and distributed enterprise networks across the US and Canada."

More Cisco Meraki MX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price could be lower, but compared to the TCO of other products, it's not really that expensive."

"It can always improve pricewise regarding throughput."

"The larger MX products are on the expensive side."

"The price of Meraki MX is between $8 and $1,200. Additionally, we typically purchase a three-year enterprise license, and we pay approximately $899 and mark it up a bit."

"The pricing could always be improved — especially with the shape the economy is in at the moment."

"It is an expensive solution. There is a five-year licensing requirement. We already renewed licenses for all our devices."

"Meraki MX's pricing is cheaper as compared to Cisco's standalone products."

"In my country, the product is cheap compared to the UK because of the differences in taxes."

More Cisco Meraki MX pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Fortigate 60d vs. Meraki MX67 for a small company without a dedicated IT Department

We have Meraki Mx devices now, we are looking to replace them. But that is because the Meraki MX platform lacks SSL Inspection, Granular Firewall rules (Block only, no allow setting), client vpn re...

See all answers

Which is better - Meraki MX or Cisco ASA Firewall?

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software is the operating software for the Cisco ASA suite. It supports network security and firewall options. We researched both Meraki and ASA. We liked t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Meraki MX?

I find the pricing for Cisco Meraki MX reasonable and competitive given the features provided and the target market. I believe it is acceptable.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonicWall TZ vs Check Point Power-1 [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

WatchGuard Firebox vs Check Point Power-1 [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs Check Point Power-1 [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) vs Check Point Power-1 [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Sophos UTM vs Check Point Power-1 [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Check Point Power-1 [EOL] Competitors

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 30% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 6% of the time

Sophos Firewall vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 5% of the time

SonicWall TZ vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Meraki MX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Firewalls

September 2026

Download Check Point Power-1 [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MX

September 2026

Download Cisco Meraki MX product report

Also Known As

No data available

MX64, MX64W, MX84, MX100, MX400, MX600

Overview

Check Point Power-1 is the first security appliance to provide simple and flexible field performance upgradability. It has world class performance up to 25 Gbps in convenient 2-U form factor and flexible multi-function security appliance provides expandability and investment protection.

Check Point Software Technologies

Cisco Meraki MX offers cloud-managed security with user-friendly setup and efficient management, enhancing VPN and firewall functionalities for businesses.

Cisco Meraki MX is known for its robust cloud-based network management, featuring AutoVPN, SD-WAN, and advanced security. Its centralized control over firewall, traffic shaping, and monitoring ensures excellent connectivity and security. The interface allows easy management by non-technical staff, offering remote access and seamless network performance through real-time alerts and troubleshooting. It supports global connectivity with minimal effort, addressing needs across small to enterprise environments. Despite its strengths, users point out areas needing improvement like load balancing, VPN features, more flexible logging, and session capabilities. Pricing, integration limits, and licensing need enhancement.

What are the key features of Cisco Meraki MX?

AutoVPN: Enables automatic VPN configuration for secure, site-to-site connections.
SD-WAN: Optimizes traffic routes for increased performance and reliability.
Advanced Security: Offers unified threat management, intrusion prevention, and content filtering.
Centralized Management: Simplifies operations with remote monitoring and configuration.
Traffic Shaping: Prioritizes critical business applications to maximize performance.

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Deployment: Simplified installation reduces setup time and cost.
Real-Time Alerts: Ensures proactive issue identification and resolution.
Scalability: Supports growth with seamless integration and management of multiple sites.
Global Connectivity: Maintains efficient connections across geographic locations with minimal effort.

In industries like retail, finance, and education, Cisco Meraki MX provides enhanced security and connectivity. Retail chains benefit from easy VPN setups for secure multi-site networking, while educational institutions find value in its ability to manage large campuses efficiently. Financial services leverage its robust security features to protect sensitive data, ensuring compliance and trust.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, Independence Care System, Hotel Nikko, Courtagen Life Sciences, Carmel Partners

Hyatt, ONS

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Netgate, Cisco and others in Firewalls. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Firewalls vendors and best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.