


Mimecast Advanced Email Security and Check Point Web Gateway both operate in the cybersecurity space. Mimecast seems to have the upper hand in email security features, while Check Point offers more comprehensive web security.
Features: Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers crucial features like sandboxing, email filtering, and integration with Microsoft 365. It also provides high-level security through precise handling of attachments and links. Check Point Web Gateway offers cloud-based deployment, URL filtering, and application control, combined with antivirus capabilities to enhance overall security and rapid deployment.
Room for Improvement: Mimecast users suggest improving detection rates, phishing email reporting, and technical support. Pricing is also a common concern. Check Point would benefit from interface improvements, faster support, and increased scalability, while pricing remains a point of discussion for both solutions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mimecast is primarily deployed in cloud environments, which adds flexibility but may impair customer service speed, relying mostly on documentation. Check Point, with its preference for on-premises deployments, provides comprehensive support, though response times could be quicker.
Pricing and ROI: Both solutions are deemed expensive, with Mimecast being more costly. The ROI of Mimecast is debated against Microsoft's alternatives, while Check Point offers a competitive pricing model against Fortinet and Palo Alto, though it still ranks high in price. Both deliver significant protection but provide a challenging ROI to quantify financially.
With iboss, whenever you turn on your laptop, the iboss agent automatically connects to the iboss cloud, enforcing all security policies. So with respect to the security side, it strengthens measures.
Deploying iboss leads to good return on investment, estimated around 70% to 80%.
I have seen some cost effectiveness from iboss; it has reduced certain support requirements, making it a more hands-off solution.
There is definitely a return on investment when using Mimecast, as it blocks phishing emails, reducing the risk of significant financial losses.
The ROI which companies see should be able to justify buying Mimecast Advanced Email Security.
The biggest impact Mimecast Advanced Email Security has had is on the cybersecurity environment, being the first to scan emails for malicious content.
They are very fast, responsive, and knowledgeable.
The quality of the support is fantastic.
We had promising discussions about resolving these issues, but no real action followed.
Our organization has private engineers who are certified by Check Point.
Support personnel are hesitant to engage in remote sessions, preferring to share documentation via email.
The customer support for Mimecast Advanced Email Security is excellent.
We instantly get customer support from Mimecast Advanced Email Security whenever there is a requirement.
They are also able to meet on-demand requirements based on your contract with them, and can easily provide adequate resources and scalability.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
If I start seeing sluggishness or anything like that, I just reach out to my rep, and they connect with their dev team, typically resolving it the same day.
The cloud solution can be scalable, but in most cases, it is not because it is bound to specific firewalls.
It handles email flow very smoothly, and we never face any issues with email delivery as our organization grows or email volume increases.
If Mimecast Email Security introduces API solutions, it will dominate the market.
While our user base remains around 2,200, I believe it can adapt to much larger requirements as needed, based on discussions with others managing larger organizations.
It's been pretty solid; I've never had an outage with them, and if I ever had, it's only been once out of the seven years.
We've experienced zero downtime.
Our biggest problem with their service was it did not recognize the device despite our ClearPass sending information to the iboss box.
Mimecast Advanced Email Security is very stable, reliable, and quite accurate.
They confirm it's a good solution where only one or two rare emails get through, while the rest are properly blocked without any issues.
When it comes to stability and reliability, we have not faced any notable issues with Mimecast Advanced Email Security for our customers.
It is not as intuitive as the rest of the platform.
iboss's single pane of glass console gives centralized visibility into web traffic, user activity, security policies, and alerts from one dashboard.
We also had a problem with a transition when we upgraded from one appliance of theirs to another, but their engineer lost a good deal of our data.
Deployment issues on Linux have been noted, especially with agents on endpoints.
Check Point asks for the registered mail ID and number, which sometimes you can't quickly provide when under pressure because your client's network is down.
Support for operational technology (OT) is not as comprehensive in Check Point Web Gateway as it is in competing products.
When you buy an XDR provider, they give you a complete holistic story around it, showing what has happened, which email somebody has clicked on, whether there have been any changes, and whether there is any network activity.
Instead of reactive measures, it could proactively identify spam domains and prevent them from derailing mail flow.
These days, traditional email security does not work as effectively. With AI emerging, traditional email security is less effective.
It offers the same features you would get from a vendor that charges 250,000 British pounds for a fraction of the price.
The following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs.
Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern.
The pricing and discounts for Check Point Web Gateway are similar to Fortinet, making it cost-effective with fair pricing.
Fortinet is the cheaper product, while Palo Alto and Check Point Web Gateway are similarly priced.
The pricing is higher for Mimecast, particularly for the Indian market, where it is considered expensive.
We focus on the security side of it, but we do not have a massive IT team, and the product really reduces any issues where IT has to step in and handle something.
Regarding the price, I think that in terms of similar products, it is pretty much in the same line, so I think it's reasonable.
The solution's mental health function can detect if someone needs help.
It's given us a lot more visibility into our computer assets that may be infected with viruses and also shows us people who have unusually large uploads or might be engaging in high-risk activities, such as searches or going to sites not categorized by their web crawler.
iboss was the best solution for us because, no matter what domain you were in, everything is under a single pane of glass, which is exactly what we wanted.
It provides behavioral analysis and a Copilot feature implemented in the management console, allowing users to receive assistance in an automated format.
We are satisfied with the effectiveness of the multi-layered defense approach in Check Point Web Gateway.
We are using the real-time threat intelligence feature. It helps to manage web threats effectively with qualified alarms.
There was a signature phishing scam on the internet, but Mimecast Advanced Email Security caught it before it came to fruition and instantly blocked that signature-based phishing scam.
It easily generates reports about the kinds of emails coming in weekly and classifies them into various categories, making it very helpful to analyze and ensure our email gateway remains safe and secure by updating all security patches.
The best features of Mimecast Advanced Email Security are strong phishing and spam filtering, URL malicious link protection, attachment inspection, impersonation and business email compromise protection, flexible email security policies, and good visibility into the email activity.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point Web Gateway | 1.6% |
| Zscaler Internet Access | 9.8% |
| Cisco Umbrella | 9.5% |
| Other | 79.1% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Mimecast Advanced Email Security | 14.5% |
| Proofpoint Email Protection | 16.7% |
| Microsoft Defender for Office 365 | 12.4% |
| Other | 56.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
iboss is the Zero Trust SASE platform that gives organizations complete visibility and governance over their AI, data, and applications through one unified platform, one console, one policy engine, and one data lake.
Your endpoints may already stop malware. Your data and application activity can still be invisible. iboss decrypts and understands every connection, then turns that signal into answers security leaders can act on.
The platform leads with three capabilities in this order: AI Security and Visibility, Data Security and Visibility, and App Visibility and Control. Zero Trust Network Access, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN sit underneath as the access fabric that carries those three. Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.
What are the most important features of Iboss?
- AI Security and Visibility: conversation capture, shadow-AI discovery, AI DLP, and agent governance across Claude, Co-Work, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, and emerging services.
- Data Security and Visibility: full SSL/TLS decryption, deep content inspection, MIP label compliance, and one-click compliance reporting.
- App Visibility and Control: signatureless CASB, dual risk scoring, in-app controls, and SSPM for major SaaS.
- Containerized Zero Trust SASE: dedicated containers, isolated SSL keys, one console, one policy engine, one data lake.
- Access fabric: ZTNA, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN under the same platform.
What benefits should users consider in reviews?
- Complete visibility over AI, data, and applications from one platform instead of separate point tools.
- Encrypted traffic is inspected by default so data decisions use content and context together.
- Shadow SaaS and new web tools appear as they are used, with enforceable controls in one console.
- Native data sovereignty through dedicated containers, in-region inspection, and per-customer SSL key custody.
- Scale proven in published materials: 10M+ users, 100+ countries, 150B+ transactions, 2.5B+ threats blocked.
Economic buyers are CISOs, CIOs, and VPs of Security. Champions include security architects, network and infrastructure leaders, SecOps, and GRC. Primary segments: enterprise and business, financial services, government (including FedRAMP Gov Cloud), healthcare, manufacturing, legal and professional services, retail and hospitality, and MSP/MSSP partners. Education, including K-12, is one vertical among these.
Check Point Web Gateway is designed for network security with a focus on protecting against threats like malware and phishing. It offers cloud deployment, URL filtering, malware protection, and real-time threat intelligence.
Check Point Web Gateway ensures stable performance through a cloud-based infrastructure and offers a range of capabilities such as URL filtering, application control, and malware protection. It supports granular policies and real-time threat intelligence, playing a crucial role in enhancing web traffic filtering and compliance enforcement. The gateway provides intuitive security management features, including antivirus, DLP, encryption detection, and behavioral analysis. While it supports role-based access control and prevents access to malicious websites, there is room for improvement in response times and documentation. Users find challenges in interface appeal, deployment complexities, and authentication policy management. Cost and scalability concerns exist, with a need for enhanced mobile integration and endpoint accessibility.
What are the key features of Check Point Web Gateway?In industries such as banking and e-commerce, Check Point Web Gateway is used widely for securing network infrastructures against data breaches and ensuring compliance. Its multi-layer architecture supports seamless integration with site-to-site VPNs and user access management, enhancing overall security.
Mimecast Email Security protects organizations against phishing, malware, business email compromise, and impersonation attacks, with detection built on 20 years of experience and over 1.3 billion emails inspected daily. It's available as a secure email gateway (MX-based) for full control over complex, multi-region environments, or via API integration with Microsoft 365, which deploys in hours with no MX changes. Administrators get a single console for policy management, monitoring external communications, and customizing configurations, and can pair it with Mimecast Cloud Archive for long-term email retention and compliance.
What key features should users explore?
What benefits can impact ROI?
Industries and use cases
Mimecast Email Security is used across industries, including healthcare and finance, to secure inbound and outbound communications and support compliance requirements. Enterprises use it as a gateway, an API-based layer on top of Microsoft 365, or both, depending on how much control versus deployment speed they need.
We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.