Checkmarx One vs Virsec Security Platform comparison

Checkmarx and Virsec Systems are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Checkmarx is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.1, while Virsec Systems is ranked #100. Checkmarx holds a 1.6% mindshare in VM, compared to Virsec Systems’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virsec Systems users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

22,245 Views
2,669 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Virsec Security Platform

Read 1 Virsec Security Platform review

1,696 Views
475 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Virsec Security Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Virsec Security Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Tenable, Qualys and others in Vulnerability Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (1st)

Virsec Security Platform

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

100th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 1.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virsec Security Platform is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	1.6%
Virsec Security Platform	0.3%
Other	98.1%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

KevinMcCarthy

Security Manager at Klearnow

Helps with Zero-day protection

We use the solution for Zero-day protection. The solution stops any kind of remote code execution. The tool's dashboard needs to load since it is not responsive and takes time to load. I have been using the product for a year. I would rate the tool's stability a six out of ten. I would…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The consistency of code showed our team where they are inconsistent or where they have made simple omissions."

"The only thing I like is that Checkmarx does not need to compile."

"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."

"The most valuable feature is that it actually identifies the different criteria you can set to meet whatever standards you're trying to get your system accredited for."

"Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."

"The UI is user-friendly."

"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."

"Once you implement Checkmarx One, you can be sure that you're getting value from the solution almost immediately because Checkmarx One also handles false positives very effectively, saving you time and saving your developers time."

More Checkmarx One pros

"We use the solution for Zero-day protection."

Cons

"This product requires you to create your own rulesets. You have to do a lot of customization."

"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."

"They should make it more container-friendly and optimized for the CI pipeline. They should make it a little less heavy."

"They should make it more container-friendly and optimized for the CI pipeline. They should make it a little less heavy. Right now, it requires a SQL database, and the way the tool works is that it has an engine and then it has an analysis database in which it stores the information. So, it is pretty heavy from that perspective because you have to have a full SQL Server. They're working on something called Checkmarx Light, which is a slim-down version. They haven't released it yet, but that's what we need. There should be something a little more slimmed down that can just run the analysis and output the results in a format that's readable as opposed to having a full, really big, and thick deployment with a full database server."

"I think the CxAudit tool has room for improvement. At the beginning you can choose a scan of a project, but in any event the project must be scanned again (wasting time)."

"The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."

"Checkmarx needs to be more scalable for large enterprise companies."

"Presently they support micro-services, but the supporting methodology of the micro-services is not good enough at the moment."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The tool's dashboard needs to load since it is not responsive and takes time to load."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is costly."

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"It's relatively expensive."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

22%

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmarx?

One way Checkmarx One could be improved is if it could automatically run scans every month after implementation. If it is possible to set it in the SAST portal to scan the repositories automaticall...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 37% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

TrendAI Vision One – Cloud Security vs Virsec Security Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Morphisec vs Virsec Security Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs Virsec Security Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Jscrambler vs Virsec Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More Virsec Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

May 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

May 2026

Download Virsec Security Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Virsec

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Virsec Security Platform offers advanced protection for applications by ensuring real-time detection and prevention of unknown threats. It integrates seamlessly across environments to provide robust, runtime security for critical workloads.

Specializing in memory-based attack prevention, Virsec ensures precise threat identification and mitigation with minimal impact on performance. Its deterministic approach identifies malicious activity with high accuracy, safeguarding against exploits and zero-day attacks. Trust is enhanced through transparency and actionable insights, making it a preferred choice for protecting sensitive applications.

What are the most important features of Virsec Security Platform?

Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP): Provides real-time security to prevent vulnerabilities during operation.
Memory Exploit Detection: Identifies and mitigates memory-based threats effectively.
Web Application Security: Delivers comprehensive protection against web threats.
Scalable Deployment: Easily integrates with existing infrastructure for wide-ranging protection.
Insightful Reporting: Offers detailed reports for informed decision-making.

What are the benefits and ROI of using Virsec Security Platform?

Enhanced Security Posture: Mitigates risks with pinpoint accuracy, reducing downtime.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers the total cost of ownership by minimizing breaches.
Seamless Integration: Reduces complexity and enhances existing defenses.
Improved Reliability: Increases confidence in application security through constant monitoring.
Real-time Threat Detection: Provides immediate alerts, allowing swift response to incidents.

Virsec Security Platform is particularly beneficial in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where data protection is critical. Its implementation enhances compliance with industry standards and offers peace of mind by protecting sensitive data against sophisticated threats. The platform's adaptability to diverse environments ensures consistent, reliable security across platforms, making it an ideal fit for industries demanding robust protection measures.

Virsec Systems

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Broadcom, Allstate, Department of Homeland Security

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Tenable, Qualys and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.