

Checkmarx One and Wiz are key competitors in the application and cloud security space. Wiz appears to have the upper hand due to its contextual risk evaluation and efficient cloud-native deployment strategy.
Features: Checkmarx One provides robust static application security testing, comprehensive scanning for both compiled and uncompiled code, and integration with key repositories. It also offers language support that aids developers by providing code analysis without requiring compilation. Wiz is noted for its contextual risk evaluation, using its Security Graph to prioritize remediation efforts. Additionally, it specializes in addressing cloud-specific security gaps through automated attack path analysis and quickly protects vulnerable assets.
Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One users report issues with false positives and seek expanded language support along with more flexible licensing. It also faces criticisms for complex custom rule setups and high resource demands. Wiz needs enhanced reporting, better logging integrations, and improved executive dashboards. Users also mention the need for enhanced container security and risk assessment capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers on-premises and hybrid cloud setups which accommodate various infrastructure needs but can be resource-intensive. Wiz offers efficient public cloud deployment, reducing the need for complex setups. Checkmarx provides quality technical support but has been noted for occasional delays, whereas Wiz is praised for responsive and proactive customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is relatively costly with a complex licensing model that might benefit from flexibility; however, users often justify its cost with its broad feature set and improved security capabilities. Wiz's pricing model is simpler, though still among the higher range. Its ROI is often offset by cloud security features, with users finding value in enhanced security oversight despite the cost.
Overall, between the fast scanning, automation, automatic reporting, and easy detection, it has reduced manual effort enough that we did not need an extra reviewer, even as our codebase or team size grew.
Based on my interactions with the clients, I can tell that there is a return on investment because if something is not profitable and it's not helping to save costs or vulnerabilities, clients wouldn't come back to renew their license year after year.
We have seen ROI from Wiz and we continued to see value in Wiz.
I think we're reaching the point where we'll see a return on investment, and we'll be there by the end of the year.
We estimate a cost reduction of around 35% to 50%, or even more, due to consolidating our security management into one platform.
If you raise a support case with Checkmarx, it is handled smoothly.
The customer support team is amazing and they provide on-phone call, email support, and on-website support.
I have relied on Checkmarx One customer support hundreds of times for several things, and Checkmarx One support is very proactive and very responsive.
On a scale from 1 to 10, I would give Wiz's support a 10.
The vendor was readily available to assist us over calls, clarifying both technical aspects and theoretical insights.
If I were to put Wiz support on a scale from one to ten, I would give them a ten.
Approximately four billion lines of code are being scanned monthly.
Since it is cloud-based, the infrastructure and PaaS, IaaS, and SaaS are taken care of by the cloud marketplace.
Checkmarx One's scalability has changed my organization because the strong collaboration between the development and security team helps us to do things much faster.
We have deployed Wiz in three organizations on AWS, each with approximately 70 to 80 accounts, totaling more than 120 accounts.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Our environment quadrupled in size. We didn’t have to make any adjustments or configuration changes; it just accommodated the growth.
I would rate the stability of this solution a nine on a scale of 1 to 10 where one is low stability and 10 is high.
Checkmarx One is often down when the cloud provider experiences issues.
The stability of Wiz has been good, with no downtime, bugs, or glitches.
The services were stable, and we did not experience any downtime.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten.
Integration into the IDE being used would be beneficial so that code does not need to be uploaded to the website and an IDE-friendly report could be generated.
It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from.
If you can improve the speed optimization, it takes around 30 to 40 minutes for checking a build. If you can make it within five minutes or 10 minutes, that would be great.
We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately.
One significant area for improvement would be increasing automation. While they excel at identifying issues, we need assistance in minimizing the human hours required for tasks.
Adding AI-driven features could significantly assist developers in addressing vulnerabilities more efficiently, thereby improving deployment times and adherence to deadlines.
For a small team under 50 developers, normal expenses come under 30 to 60K.
Due to the number of years I've implemented Checkmarx One, there are rebates and discounts from the OEM which makes it a lot more profitable.
The pricing should be reasonable, matching what we are paying for.
We are paying 250k per year.
In some cases, it has a very aggressive price, so very cheap.
I don’t think there’s anyone else out there offering the same level, scale, or efficiency.
Since replacing the previous tool, SAST and SCA scans are conducted in a couple of minutes instead of hours or days.
The best features Checkmarx One offers, over the past years, include broad language and technical support that Checkmarx provides, covering most languages.
Checkmarx One has positively impacted our organization as we tend to find vulnerabilities very early in the development cycle.
The ability to scan every layer without agents is a huge selling point because we're multi-agent.
The feature leads to minimal false positives and a low volume of alerts, which is highly valuable for our operations.
It's highly customizable, allowing us to manage many custom features effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Wiz | 5.0% |
| Checkmarx One | 1.6% |
| Other | 93.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.
Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.
What are the key features of Checkmarx One?Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.
Wiz offers cloud security management with key capabilities in visibility, risk prioritization, and comprehensive analysis. It supports multi-cloud environments, ensuring robust integration and streamlining security tasks effectively.
Known for its advanced features like CSPM module, Security Graph, and Threat Intelligence, Wiz enables cloud integration while minimizing false positives. Its agentless deployment and high-risk analysis granularity improve operational efficiency. Users note desires for better reporting, more security features, enhanced integration, notably for APIs and cloud services like Kubernetes. Challenges include dashboard customization limits, remediation automation, scanning frequency, and cost concerns, particularly in Brazil. Users adopt Wiz for tasks including cloud security posture management, vulnerability identification, automated security measures, and integrating security tools, effectively managing security in AWS, Azure, and GCP.
What are the key features of Wiz?Companies in industries with complex cloud architectures, like finance and healthcare, leverage Wiz for its multi-cloud support, managing risks and compliance efficiently. Its integration with container technologies aids sectors reliant on Kubernetes. Retailers benefit from visibility into misconfigurations, ensuring robust customer data protection.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.