Cisco UCS Manager vs Dell CloudIQ comparison

Cisco and Dell Technologies are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.8, while Dell Technologies is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.5. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in IM, compared to Dell Technologies’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Dell Technologies users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

2,294 Views
2,088 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Dell CloudIQ

Read 10 Dell CloudIQ reviews

1,629 Views
1,564 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

Dell CloudIQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Cisco UCS Manager and Dell CloudIQ are competing products in the enterprise IT management software category. Cisco UCS Manager seems to have the upper hand in terms of network management and customer support, while Dell CloudIQ is advantageous with its robust analytics capabilities, offering enhanced value with predictive insights.

Features: Cisco UCS Manager provides unified management of computing resources, centralized dashboard access, and simplified network management. Dell CloudIQ offers predictive analytics, comprehensive monitoring, and performance optimization. Cisco UCS Manager's network integration capabilities are notable, whereas Dell CloudIQ stands out for its advanced analytical features.

Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS Manager could enhance its predictive capabilities, offer more flexible access models, and provide more seamless updates. Dell CloudIQ can improve through better customer service consistency, reduce dependency on cloud infrastructure, and enhance initial setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS Manager offers a straightforward hardware-based deployment model with strong customer support. Dell CloudIQ benefits from a cloud-based deployment, providing flexible access but with varying customer service experiences. Cisco UCS Manager's direct configuration contrasts with Dell CloudIQ's seamless updates and predictive capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS Manager typically involves a higher initial setup cost but delivers consistent ROI through integrated system management. Dell CloudIQ's cloud subscription model offers a scalable cost structure and enhanced ROI facilitated by proactive insights. Cisco UCS Manager appeals to those valuing upfront investment in cohesive systems, while Dell CloudIQ attracts those seeking ongoing value through operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. Dell CloudIQ Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. Dell CloudIQ

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Dell CloudIQ

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell CloudIQ is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS Manager	1.3%
Dell CloudIQ	0.9%
Other	97.8%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sidi Abdul

CTO at Next Technologies Ltd

Service profiles simplify management and streamline network and storage processes

The most valuable features are the service profiles and the unified management of both network and storage. With UCS, it's quite easy to deploy. Whenever there's a failure of any component, it's very easy to swap because you just disassociate that profile, remove the faulty blade, connect the new blade, and associate that profile, maintaining the same MAC address and worldwide port name. Everything remains the same, and it's only the hardware that you're replacing. This makes it very easy for me to manage and troubleshoot.

Read full review

Haseeb Sheikh

Senior Manager Enterprise Solutions at a media company with 201-500 employees

Proactive monitoring has improved availability and capacity reporting for my infrastructure

The current features including availability, performance, and capacity are good enough, and I think more of better alerting along with improved thresholds of alerts should be implemented. It is helpful, but it should also include the capability to detect zero-day attacks if there are any. I think the remediation could have been better. For example, if I am upgrading my firmware or BIOS or firmware of the infrastructure, it should give me exact CVSS scores and remediation data provided against the CVSS scores. I think the Dell CloudIQ app could be more interactive. If there is a possibility that I can open tickets or SRs via the Dell CloudIQ app, that would be a good feature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From a usability and functionality perspective, Cisco UCS Manager is very good."

"The reporting functionality will give you any report you want."

"The most valuable features of Cisco UCS Manager include the visibility it provides and the ease of identifying issues within the Cisco environment."

"Technical support has been good so far. We haven't had any issues with them. We're satisfied with the level of service they provide our company."

"When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time."

"The interface is ergonomic and native. We can use UCS Manager to do all the configurations for the servers, including storage, networking, and all the other components we need inside the fabric. It's simple and flexible."

"We can configure the Cisco UCS Manager, the profiles and interactions with the resource we manage."

"For the blade architecture and ease of use, I consider Cisco UCS Manager the best option on the market at the moment."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"The dashboard is clear and user-friendly."

"Mobile application is the most valuable feature for us. We can monitor all the storages on our phones. It's really good."

"Some of the most valuable features of CloudIQ include its health status alerts, which allow you to see quickly if there is something that needs immediate attention, preventing the need to check each system individually."

"The dashboard is clear and user-friendly."

"Has really nice roll-up dashboards."

"It's convenient because you can access it from a mobile device without needing a laptop."

"CloudIQ allows us to monitor our servers centrally, and we can receive notifications in case of issues, like a potential hard drive failure."

"I rate CloudIQ a ten out of ten."

More Dell CloudIQ pros

Cons

"Its user interface can be improved. It can be more user-friendly."

"Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones."

"The interface and the way it is constructed is very complex. They should work to simplify it. It's quite difficult for somebody who doesn't know the product very well. Users should be able to get proficient with it faster. There's definitely room for improvement there."

"The primary challenge we face is identifying the correct version to deploy during firmware upgrades or compute updates."

"What's lacking in Cisco UCS Manager is the performance dashboard. If a blade has any performance issues, you should be able to create a dashboard on Cisco UCS Manager. Currently, this feature isn't present."

"The installation and upgrade sytems need to be improved."

"The integration with other solutions could be better. I think Cisco can only integrate using Intersight. There is a second interface available as a SaaS platform, in the cloud, or on-premise. It's based on the Redfish protocol, which is standard for all the B-series servers in the market. We can integrate other solutions using API."

"I would like to see improved visibility into the operating system, enabling us to identify issues directly from the operating system itself."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards."

"There is a need for improvement in predictive maintenance, which I assume is somewhat AI-driven."

"In terms of improvement, they should enhance the product range."

"I think the remediation could have been better."

"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."

"The main limitation of CloudIQ is that it is intended to be used exclusively with Dell hardware."

"If you have a heterogeneous environment, there might be some limitations in coverage since CloudIQ is primarily designed for Dell-based infrastructures."

"It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards."

More Dell CloudIQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"I believe it is a free product because we don't pay for it."

"The solution is more expensive than NetApp which offers file systems in various price ranges."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell CloudIQ?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Dell CloudIQ?

I moved to a new organization where I am also using Dell CloudIQ. I use Dell CloudIQ to monitor PowerStore as well as Dell PowerEdge servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Dell CloudIQ?

For performance analytics, I have my own NMS in-house that I use. I have deployed a VApp on-premises with all of the servers and storage integrated, and it sends telemetry data directly to Dell. My...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 62% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 29% of the time

HPE OneView vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 9% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 6% of the time

VirtualWisdom vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 5% of the time

More Dell CloudIQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

February 2026

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

January 2026

Download Dell CloudIQ product report

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

CloudIQ is a no cost Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) offering that provides a simple monitoring interface for an unlimited number of Unity systems. CloudIQ accesses data in near real time to enable monitoring and troubleshooting for Unity systems.

Dell Technologies

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

North Carolina State University

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. Dell CloudIQ

January 2026

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. Dell CloudIQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. Dell CloudIQ and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. Dell CloudIQ report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.