No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Conga CPQ vs Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Conga Contract Lifecycle Ma...
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Contract Management Software (1st)
Conga CPQ
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Product Configuration and Quoting category, the mindshare of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is 5.9%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Conga CPQ is 2.3%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Product Configuration and Quoting Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)5.9%
Conga CPQ2.3%
Other91.8%
Product Configuration and Quoting
 

Featured Reviews

Sakshi Thakur - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Automation has transformed complex contract lifecycles and now supports high-volume workflows
The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types. For that small business, Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) does not work well because it is a bit complicated. Sometimes all customers need is a click of a button to go in and do things, and Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is a bit complicated for such kinds of businesses. There are definitely areas where Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be easier to use for smaller businesses, particularly making processes more streamlined and user-friendly.
reviewer2853033 - PeerSpot reviewer
Salesforce Technical Lead at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees
Configuring complex customized quotes has improved flexibility but still needs smoother approvals
There are many out-of-the-box features available in Conga CPQ compared to other CPQ systems, and we can easily customize the entire CPQ itself using many customizations and APIs that are not available in other systems. Out-of-the-box APIs are the best features that Conga CPQ offers, as everything can be customizable. The product bulk loader is a feature that has helped my team significantly. For instance, in other CPQ systems, implementing similar features requires extensive customization. However, with Conga CPQ, using the Add Multi-Prod API, we only need a CSV file with product codes and quantities. We check for any active price list items and prepare a wrapper class to input data to that API, which simplifies creating a cart with products. Conga CPQ positively impacts my organization with many ongoing projects involving its features. People appreciate its extensive features and the support from the Conga team, who respond immediately to any cases we raise.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The automation and document generation in Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) have made things easier for my team, saving time and reducing errors."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) positively impacted my organization because we did not have to manually enter customer details such as their name, where they work, or their address."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has delivered measurable improvements in both time and cost savings for our organization, significantly reducing manual processing time, shortening contract turnaround times from days to hours, minimizing compliance risk, and improving overall operational efficiency and resource utilization."
"The best feature Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) offers is its reliability, which is more dependable compared to Conga Composer, and this main feature allows us to arrange things with more conditions."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization by making the contract lifecycle easier for customers when quotes get created."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization by significantly decreasing the time required for generating contracts and agreements for customers."
"After they shifted from manual work to automation, their sales, business, and revenue have all increased."
"Since we have pre-approved templates and standard clauses in Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), we can use them wherever we want, and it provides very faster contract creation with reduced legal risk."
"For complex pricing and orders, if organizations want more efficiency and error tracking, Conga CPQ is a strong choice."
"Conga CPQ offers the best features, particularly pricing, allowing me to achieve complex pricing with ease, such as using the totaling callback and base price callback."
"There are many out-of-the-box features available in Conga CPQ compared to other CPQ systems, and we can easily customize the entire CPQ itself using many customizations and APIs that are not available in other systems."
 

Cons

"Secondly, users have reported that X-Author is not functioning consistently, so if we could have an easier feature for accepting or rejecting changes, that would be beneficial from a user perspective."
"To improve Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), there are just a couple of things that need to be fixed."
"The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) can be improved by closing the workflow automation and also leveraging AI."
"I chose a rating of seven out of ten because there are many areas for improvement for Conga; it is not a complete solution yet."
"I have not seen a return on investment from Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), as it was a waste of time; I spent a long time trying to get it to work, and it was not adopted by the users, ultimately failing to live up to what I had promised to the business."
"I have not used Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) deeply, but I know that document generation still has some improvements that need to be implemented."
"Template management could be more user-friendly."
"However, I am currently facing many difficulties with data synchronization, and it has several loopholes not working as expected in Turbo, such as validation callbacks working fine in Turbo but failing in RLP."
"There are a few manual steps we need to take, such as handling a complex approval process in Conga CPQ."
"After converting to Conga LP revenue life cycle platform, we identified several areas for improvement. We run into more sync issues and data synchronization problems."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Product Configuration and Quoting solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Legal Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise25
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
Regarding pricing, it is a little bit higher, but when we go for bulk purchase, we do receive some discounts.
What needs improvement with Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be improved as sometimes when we click on the document, it indicates success without generating a document, requiring us to check the logs. Having a ...
What is your primary use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
My main use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is generating documents, so once we click on a button, the document should be generated in the back end and that should sit in the not...
What needs improvement with Conga CPQ?
Conga CPQ could be improved as it has recently launched Conga RLP, a Revenue Lifecycle Platform, to enhance performance. However, I am currently facing many difficulties with data synchronization, ...
What is your primary use case for Conga CPQ?
I use out-of-the-box objects like price list item and price list to create a product and show it in the catalog, such as category, category hierarchy, and product hierarchy, while using attributes ...
What advice do you have for others considering Conga CPQ?
I would rate Conga CPQ an eight out of ten. I chose eight out of ten for Conga CPQ because, as I mentioned, I can handle complex pricing and approvals effectively. However, the two points deducted ...
 

Also Known As

The Apttus Intelligent Cloud, Conga CLM AI
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Akamai Technologies, Axis Stars, BlackBaud, Cadence, Ceridian, Citrix
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Conga CPQ vs. Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.