Cortex XSIAM vs Swimlane comparison

Read 10 Swimlane reviews

1,487 Views
1,413 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Cortex XSIAM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cortex XSIAM and Swimlane based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, IBM and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM).

To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XSIAM

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (12th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (7th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (7th)

Swimlane

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (10th), AI-Powered Security Automation (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Cortex XSIAM is designed for Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and holds a mindshare of 2.1%, down 2.5% compared to last year.
Swimlane, on the other hand, focuses on Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR), holds 2.9% mindshare, down 3.3% since last year.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cortex XSIAM	2.1%
Splunk Enterprise Security	7.1%
Wazuh	6.4%
Other	84.4%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Swimlane	2.9%
Microsoft Sentinel	12.4%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR	9.0%
Other	75.7%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2666148

Associate Director at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration challenges highlight the need for manual workflows

The standard integrations are very limited, and the integrations available are not listed in the marketplace. Obtaining validation for integrations from Palo Alto takes around eight months, which is quite long. The solution would benefit from having more standard playbooks and templates available, as in other partners. Currently, everything must be created from scratch. In terms of incident response automation, it is quite poor due to the lack of integration with all security tools, making manual intervention necessary.

Read full review

MoumitaDas

Software Engineer III at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Task persistence and integration ease have been key benefits

The best part of Swimlane is the persistent notifications and its ease of integration, requiring minimal coding. While it lacks response features, it can be integrated with messaging or queue services to achieve this. Any incident response requires additional integration since Swimlane itself doesn't react to incidents. Real-time data in terms of persistence is configurable, and without config, tasks persist indefinitely until completion. If using Appian versions below 11, integration features for Swimlane aren't available. By default, Swimlane lacks built-in intelligence, needing coding for integration. Although the Swimlane is beneficial and reduces manpower requirements, it's hindered by its lack of exposure. If exposed through services or endpoints, its functionality could be accessed without needing a local standalone application. On a scale of one to ten, this solution deserves a rating of nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since implementing Cortex XSIAM, incident response times have been significantly reduced by approximately twenty percent."

"Cortex XSIAM enhances our ability to apply endpoint protection policies, implement restrictions, conduct scans, and engage in sandboxing."

"The most valuable features of Cortex XSIAM are the machine learning used to identify threats, the complexity of the environment of products, and efficiency."

"The product integrates seamlessly with third-party solutions."

"It does a better job of identifying anomalies that are more likely to be incidents of compromise without as many false positives or false negatives."

"One of the valued aspects of the product is its use of artificial intelligence to detect security vulnerabilities."

"The way the solution responds to detections and warnings is really impressive."

"One of the valued aspects of the product is its use of artificial intelligence to detect security vulnerabilities."

More Cortex XSIAM pros

"Swimlane enables two SOC analysts to work efficiently as much as ten analysts would without Swimlane, which translates to significant manpower savings."

"Swimlane saves us 80 to 90 percent of our time by quickly helping us design the journey and efficiently passing information to various components."

"On a scale of one to ten, this solution deserves a rating of nine."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the support."

"The technical support from Swimlane is very good."

"We are using it for a SOAR platform at a Cyber Security company which is MSSP."

"Swimlane is a very effective way to represent workflows involving multiple users."

"Our primary goal was to reduce analyst time, and we have been successful in that."

More Swimlane pros

Cons

"The support could be a bit faster."

"Cortex XSIAM is on the expensive side and requires substantial improvement in pricing."

"It could provide more integration with a large variety of products."

"The standard integrations are very limited, and the integrations available are not listed in the marketplace. Obtaining validation for integrations from Palo Alto takes around eight months, which is quite long."

"Cortex XSIAM needs improvements in terms of data onboarding, parsers, and third-party integration supports."

"The platform isn't very developer-friendly and it should provide more flexibility and ease."

"Cortex could improve the detection and online resolution of security vulnerabilities."

"There is room for improvement in expanding integrations to include more cybersecurity solutions."

More Cortex XSIAM cons

"We faced a lot of issues with the product’s stability."

"There is a need for enhanced version control in Swimlane. Currently, our version does not support it, making it tough to move changes between environments during significant updates."

"Swimlane is not scalable because it is not exposed. Currently, it's a manual component that requires configuration through coding."

"I would prefer to have more colors added to represent different risks or notations, which can be used for the prioritization of risks and the significance of information."

"I would like to see improvements in the minor bugs that occur with each update, as some features might have issues."

"One of the disadvantages of Swimlane is that to manage the platform, we need hardcore developers."

"The stability of the solution has room for improvement."

"The initial setup and deployment are complex."

More Swimlane cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution comes at a significant cost."

"The solution is expensive compared to its competitors."

"The product cost could be considered value for money compared to other solutions in the market, though it is quite high."

"Since Palo Alto is trying to get as many new customers as possible, they're offering very competitive pricing."

"In terms of pricing, we found Cortex XSIAM to offer a very reasonable and competitive rate."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cortex XSIAM?

I did not participate in pricing discussions for Cortex XSIAM solutions, so I cannot provide a review regarding prices for this solution.

What needs improvement with Cortex XSIAM?

Cortex XSIAM is on the expensive side and requires substantial improvement in pricing. There are other features that could be improved, including integration with vendors such as CyberArk. I would ...

What is your primary use case for Cortex XSIAM?

With Cortex XSIAM, we installed an agent on Active Directory on-premise. We connected our Firewalls to the Data Lake and the Active Directory, and protected the Firewalls with another authenticatio...

What needs improvement with Swimlane?

One of the disadvantages of Swimlane is that to manage the platform, we need hardcore developers. We have recently seen new products such as Tines and Blink Ops coming into the market, where a pers...

What is your primary use case for Swimlane?

We are using Swimlane for automation purposes and security orchestration. We are using Swimlane's Playbook Automation. One of the major playbooks that we use in Swimlane is for phishing email autom...

What advice do you have for others considering Swimlane?

I would rate Swimlane a seven out of ten as a product.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Cortex XSIAM

Comparisons

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Cortex XSIAM

Compared 11% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Cortex XSIAM

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XSIAM

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Cortex XSIAM

Compared 6% of the time

More Cortex XSIAM Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 20% of the time

Tines vs Swimlane

Compared 15% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 12% of the time

Torq vs Swimlane

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Resilient vs Swimlane

Compared 4% of the time

More Swimlane Competitors

Product Reports

Cortex XSIAM

Download Cortex XSIAM product report

Download Swimlane product report

Overview

Cortex XSIAM acts as a critical element for SOC foundations, integrating SIEM and EDR capabilities, valued for threat detection and seamless security orchestration with Palo Alto Networks products.

Organizations find Cortex XSIAM beneficial for SOC foundations due to its capability to integrate SIEM and EDR tools, facilitating data collection, detection, and response. It connects with third-party data sources while reducing management effort and offering cost-effective alternatives to competitors like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro. Featuring automation and integration with Palo Alto Networks products, Cortex XSIAM enhances threat detection. Unified architecture allows a comprehensive view of attacks, further supported by machine learning and integration with existing vendor solutions, ensuring that users gain insights without significant manual log analysis.

What are Cortex XSIAM's key features?

Security Orchestration: Streamlines processes across security operations.
Automation and Response: Efficient incident response management.
Detection Enrichment: Enhances identification of threats.
Centralized Endpoint Security: Comprehensive protection and monitoring of endpoints.
Forensic Investigation: Automated investigation to expedite threat analysis.

What benefits are evident in Cortex XSIAM reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides economical options compared to other market players.
Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly integrates with multiple data sources and vendors.
Reduced Management Effort: Simplifies the administration of security operations.
Enhanced Threat Detection: Strengthens identification and remediation processes.

Industries implement Cortex XSIAM mainly in technology-driven sectors where centralized endpoint protection and automation of forensic investigation are paramount. By integrating several third-party systems for incident response, companies in competitive markets leverage its attributes for heightened operational security efficiency. However, users note areas for improvement, such as Attack Surface Management and integration enhancements, to better suit tech-heavy industries needing extensive connectivity with cybersecurity solutions.

Palo Alto Networks

Swimlane is a leader in security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR). By automating time-intensive, manual processes and operational workflows and delivering powerful, consolidated analytics, real time dashboards and reporting from across your security infrastructure, Swimlane maximizes the incident response capabilities of over-burdened and understaffed security operations.

Swimlane was founded to deliver scalable innovative and flexible security solutions to organizations struggling with alert fatigue, vendor proliferation and chronic staffing shortages. Swimlane is at the forefront of the growing market for security automation and orchestration solutions that automate and organize security processes in repeatable ways to get the most out of available resources and accelerate incident response.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

LinkedIn, TransUnion, Citrix, Aetna, Perspecta

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)