

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM).
Swimlane saves us 80 to 90 percent of our time by quickly helping us design the journey and efficiently passing information to various components.
We have seen a return on investment; with the same number of engineers, we now handle double the number of customers, even with the new, larger customers requiring dedicated teams.
If everything is automated, we can filter out false positives or true positives, allowing for UI customization where the SOC analysts can trigger notifications and actions with buttons to create another playbook or automate using cron jobs, saving time for the SOC analyst team.
With premium support, core Palo Alto technical experts handle issues directly.
It is ineffective in terms of responding to basic queries and addressing future requirements.
I had a dedicated person allocated for supporting, and even with them, it was very good.
When I raise a ticket, they reply within half an hour with an initial response, signifying that an agent has been assigned and is working on the issue.
They are attentive, responsive, and work to resolve issues efficiently.
They provided assistance within the same hour.
Without proper integration, scaling up with more servers is meaningless.
The SOC team is responsible for fully managing Cortex XSIAM.
Cortex XSIAM is highly scalable.
Swimlane should have the capability to be moved out of Appian and integrated with other platforms.
Standalone deployments are available for fewer users, ensuring Swimlane can handle multiple users without crashing.
We did not encounter issues even when managing thousands of alerts, as scalability is only limited by our instance's server capacity.
The product was easy to install and set up and worked right.
With continuous integration that the colleagues probably are doing, it is becoming better and better.
Overall, Cortex XSIAM is stable.
I haven't seen any production issue or anything coming up because of Swimlane.
We encountered issues requiring restarts and losing alerts.
The version we had was kind of buggy, but support indicated we just needed to do updates to resolve the issues.
Obtaining validation for integrations from Palo Alto takes around eight months, which is quite long.
Cortex XSIAM needs improvements in terms of data onboarding, parsers, and third-party integration supports.
Cortex XSIAM is on the expensive side and requires substantial improvement in pricing.
Despite being advertised as a no-code tool, it remains code-reliant, demanding users to build solutions through coding.
In the orchestration tab, it would be helpful to have a list of playbooks where a particular asset or connector is used.
Colors can be used for the prioritization of risks and the significance of information.
The first impression is that XSIAM would be more expensive than others we tried.
The product is very expensive.
Cortex XSIAM is pretty expensive, and the licensing process is not very comfortable.
Swimlane is cheaper than other SOAR platforms.
In terms of pricing, Swimlane is on the slightly expensive side.
the pricing was very nice with a great discount.
The advanced visualization capabilities of the product are important for understanding security trends in an organization.
To have Cortex XSIAM available is to basically have integration of all log sources, all alerting, and so on and so forth from firewalls and different tools, to get everything in one place, and afterwards to be able to build on the information that is coming.
One of the valued aspects of the product is its use of artificial intelligence to detect security vulnerabilities.
Its integration capabilities allow connections to various platforms, enhancing its usability.
It helps in clearly identifying the roles, timeline, and actions involved in the workflow, offering a comprehensive depiction of the entire process.
As a solution architect, I use various software, and the most important thing is that Swimlane is an easily designed and learnable software.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XSIAM | 1.6% |
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 7.6% |
| IBM Security QRadar | 5.5% |
| Other | 85.3% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Swimlane | 2.6% |
| Microsoft Sentinel | 9.3% |
| Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR | 8.9% |
| Other | 79.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Cortex XSIAM acts as a critical element for SOC foundations, integrating SIEM and EDR capabilities, valued for threat detection and seamless security orchestration with Palo Alto Networks products.
Organizations find Cortex XSIAM beneficial for SOC foundations due to its capability to integrate SIEM and EDR tools, facilitating data collection, detection, and response. It connects with third-party data sources while reducing management effort and offering cost-effective alternatives to competitors like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro. Featuring automation and integration with Palo Alto Networks products, Cortex XSIAM enhances threat detection. Unified architecture allows a comprehensive view of attacks, further supported by machine learning and integration with existing vendor solutions, ensuring that users gain insights without significant manual log analysis.
What are Cortex XSIAM's key features?
What benefits are evident in Cortex XSIAM reviews?
Industries implement Cortex XSIAM mainly in technology-driven sectors where centralized endpoint protection and automation of forensic investigation are paramount. By integrating several third-party systems for incident response, companies in competitive markets leverage its attributes for heightened operational security efficiency. However, users note areas for improvement, such as Attack Surface Management and integration enhancements, to better suit tech-heavy industries needing extensive connectivity with cybersecurity solutions.
Swimlane provides a centralized platform for security orchestration, automation, and response. It enhances operational efficiency and reduces workloads through drag-and-drop task automation and integration capabilities.
Swimlane empowers IT teams by streamlining tasks with minimal coding, offering extensive customization, and enabling efficient incident response. Its features include centralized logging, visual workflow representation, and integration with third-party tools. Swimlane's task persistence and case management improve operational control but face issues with stability and latency. While marketed as a no-code platform, setup complexity requires skilled developers. Enhancing search, AI, and scalability is vital for improved usage in multinational environments.
What are Swimlane's essential features?In industries like IT and security, Swimlane serves as a SOAR platform for incident management and enriched alert integration. It's used for designing customer journey architectures and task assignments in multinational environments, despite requiring improvements in its initial setup and orchestration.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.