Cortex XSIAM vs Swimlane comparison

The compared Palo Alto Networks and Swimlane solutions aren't in the same category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #17 in SIEM , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 2.8% mindshare in the category. Swimlane is ranked #18 in SOAR , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Swimlane users who would recommend it.

Cortex XSIAM

Read 11 Cortex XSIAM reviews

2,201 Views
1,564 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Swimlane

Read 6 Swimlane reviews

1,515 Views
1,090 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cortex XSIAM

Swimlane

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cortex XSIAM and Swimlane based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Microsoft and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM).

To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XSIAM

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (17th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (6th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (7th)

Swimlane

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (18th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Cortex XSIAM is designed for Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and holds a mindshare of 2.8%, up 0.6% compared to last year.
Swimlane, on the other hand, focuses on Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR), holds 3.4% mindshare, up 3.1% since last year.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Forrest Stevens

Senior Manager - Security Operations at First Advantage Corporation

A robust security operation that ensures achieving automation, stability, and scalability

There is room for improvement in some areas, and I would highlight three key aspects. Firstly, the Attack Surface Management (ASM) module could benefit from more contextual depth. Currently, it tends to provide a broad overview without enriched context, and there's room for enhancement in this regard. Secondly, further integration capabilities with various other software products that can seamlessly tie into Cortex XSIAM would be advantageous. This would enhance its versatility and interoperability within a broader ecosystem. Regarding performance, there's potential for optimization. When multiple tabs are open in Cortex XSIAM, it can experience slowdowns, leading to longer load times for web pages. It's worth noting that this isn't a severe issue, and it doesn't entail waiting for extended periods, but there is room for improvement in terms of performance optimization.

Read full review

Srikanth Nuthalapati

Software Engineering Manager at Deloitte

Great support, scalable, and easier to code

The stability of the solution has room for improvement. I would like Swimlane to provide a single space where we can go to code, build, and automate. Where we have a provision to create tables, playbooks, and tables to produce results, connect all the dots, and make the flow automated. This would make it much easier to navigate than having to jump to different places. I would like to have a single button to click that would start me on the journey of creating my own code from the ground up, from the workflow algorithm to the automation process. This would be simpler than what I had with Splunk Phantom, where I had to piece things together and connect the dots to get the full picture. With this new feature, I could create the full picture with just one button click.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The flexibility for creating manual workflows stands out."

"It does a better job of identifying anomalies that are more likely to be incidents of compromise without as many false positives or false negatives."

"One of the valued aspects of the product is its use of artificial intelligence to detect security vulnerabilities."

"The automation capabilities significantly improve response times by allowing us to respond to incidents from a single dashboard rather than navigating multiple dashboards."

"One of the valued aspects of the product is its use of artificial intelligence to detect security vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable features of Cortex XSIAM are the machine learning used to identify threats, the complexity of the environment of products, and efficiency."

"Its ability to deliver a substantial amount of security intelligence greatly enhances and optimizes our security operations program."

"The flexibility for creating manual workflows stands out."

More Cortex XSIAM pros

"Our primary goal was to reduce analyst time, and we have been successful in that."

"Swimlane is a very effective way to represent workflows involving multiple users."

"The technical support from Swimlane is very good."

"Swimlane enables two SOC analysts to work efficiently as much as ten analysts would without Swimlane, which translates to significant manpower savings."

"It provides us with a single portal for our logs from different solutions."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the support."

Cons

"I would rate the overall stability a six or seven, as we have only used it for a few months and need a year of experience to provide a full assessment."

"The first impression is that XSIAM would be more expensive than others we tried."

"Further integration capabilities with various other software products that can seamlessly tie into Cortex XSIAM would be advantageous."

"Cortex could improve the detection and online resolution of security vulnerabilities."

"I am not sure if any improvements are needed right now."

"The standard integrations are very limited, and the integrations available are not listed in the marketplace."

"The support could be a bit faster."

"There is room for improvement in expanding integrations to include more cybersecurity solutions."

More Cortex XSIAM cons

"There is a need for enhanced version control in Swimlane. Currently, our version does not support it, making it tough to move changes between environments during significant updates."

"The initial setup and deployment are complex."

"I would like to see improvements in the minor bugs that occur with each update, as some features might have issues."

"We faced a lot of issues with the product’s stability."

"The stability of the solution has room for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Since Palo Alto is trying to get as many new customers as possible, they're offering very competitive pricing."

"The product cost could be considered value for money compared to other solutions in the market, though it is quite high."

"The solution is expensive compared to its competitors."

"The solution comes at a significant cost."

"In terms of pricing, we found Cortex XSIAM to offer a very reasonable and competitive rate."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cortex XSIAM?

It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cortex XSIAM?

Cortex XSIAM is pretty expensive, and the licensing process is not very comfortable. CrowdStrike licensing is easier and follows an annual recurring revenue model, unlike Cortex XSIAM.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cortex XSIAM?

Cortex XSIAM is pretty expensive, and the licensing process is not very comfortable compared to CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike offers an annual recurring revenue option that Cortex XSIAM does not provide.

See all answers

What do you like most about Swimlane?

It provides us with a single portal for our logs from different solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Swimlane?

There is a need for enhanced version control in Swimlane. Currently, our version does not support it, making it tough to move changes between environments during significant updates. Furthermore, d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Swimlane?

We have been using Swimlane for security automation within our company. All the ingestions, automations, and everything within our department goes through Swimlane.

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Cortex XSIAM

Compared 39% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Cortex XSIAM

Compared 15% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Cortex XSIAM

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Cortex XSIAM

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XSIAM

Compared 6% of the time

More Cortex XSIAM Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 25% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 17% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 14% of the time

Tines vs Swimlane

Compared 14% of the time

More Swimlane Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

March 2025

Download Cortex XSIAM product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

March 2025

Download Swimlane product report

Overview

Cortex XSIAM acts as a critical element for SOC foundations, integrating SIEM and EDR capabilities, valued for threat detection and seamless security orchestration with Palo Alto Networks products.

Organizations find Cortex XSIAM beneficial for SOC foundations due to its capability to integrate SIEM and EDR tools, facilitating data collection, detection, and response. It connects with third-party data sources while reducing management effort and offering cost-effective alternatives to competitors like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro. Featuring automation and integration with Palo Alto Networks products, Cortex XSIAM enhances threat detection. Unified architecture allows a comprehensive view of attacks, further supported by machine learning and integration with existing vendor solutions, ensuring that users gain insights without significant manual log analysis.

What are Cortex XSIAM's key features?

Security Orchestration: Streamlines processes across security operations.
Automation and Response: Efficient incident response management.
Detection Enrichment: Enhances identification of threats.
Centralized Endpoint Security: Comprehensive protection and monitoring of endpoints.
Forensic Investigation: Automated investigation to expedite threat analysis.

What benefits are evident in Cortex XSIAM reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides economical options compared to other market players.
Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly integrates with multiple data sources and vendors.
Reduced Management Effort: Simplifies the administration of security operations.
Enhanced Threat Detection: Strengthens identification and remediation processes.

Industries implement Cortex XSIAM mainly in technology-driven sectors where centralized endpoint protection and automation of forensic investigation are paramount. By integrating several third-party systems for incident response, companies in competitive markets leverage its attributes for heightened operational security efficiency. However, users note areas for improvement, such as Attack Surface Management and integration enhancements, to better suit tech-heavy industries needing extensive connectivity with cybersecurity solutions.

Palo Alto Networks

Swimlane is a leader in security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR). By automating time-intensive, manual processes and operational workflows and delivering powerful, consolidated analytics, real time dashboards and reporting from across your security infrastructure, Swimlane maximizes the incident response capabilities of over-burdened and understaffed security operations.

Swimlane was founded to deliver scalable innovative and flexible security solutions to organizations struggling with alert fatigue, vendor proliferation and chronic staffing shortages. Swimlane is at the forefront of the growing market for security automation and orchestration solutions that automate and organize security processes in repeatable ways to get the most out of available resources and accelerate incident response.

Swimlane

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

LinkedIn, TransUnion, Citrix, Aetna, Perspecta

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Microsoft and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.