Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CrowdStrike Observability vs Elastic Security comparison

CrowdStrike and Elastic are both solutions in the Log Management category. CrowdStrike is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.7, while Elastic is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.8. CrowdStrike holds a 0.5% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Elastic’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Elastic users who would recommend it.
CrowdStrike Observability
Read 4 CrowdStrike Observability reviews
  • 793 Views
  • 777 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Elastic Security
Read 65 Elastic Security reviews
  • 11,565 Views
  • 6,592 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CrowdStrike Observability and Elastic Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Security Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Security
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Observability
Ranking in Log Management
41st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Elastic Security
Ranking in Log Management
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (16th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (7th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Observability is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Security is 2.9%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

ManelAlvarez - PeerSpot reviewer
Protection improves through superior global visibility and robust cloud integration
CrowdStrike Observability is especially useful when using a multi-cloud environment. Although it is expensive, the protection level it provides justifies the price. For users on Google Cloud, I prefer using Google's GTI technology. Overall, I would rate CrowdStrike Observability as nine out of ten. I rate the overall solution as nine.
Read full review
SyedAli17 - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized monitoring improves security posture through rapid data processing
The processing part of Elastic Security is very interesting for us since we handle almost 7,000 to 8,000 alerts per minute. We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data. Additionally, Elastic Security helps improve the security posture of Pakistan through centralized visibility and real-time processing.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The intelligence database provided by CrowdStrike is very impressive."
"The price is worth it."
"The intelligence database provided by CrowdStrike is very impressive."
"I find the most effective feature of CrowdStrike Observability to be its cloud vision and attack surface vision, which enhance network traffic analysis."
"The log aggregation and correlation of data are notable features that enhance our operations."
"It's a good platform and the very best in the current market. We looked at the Forester report from December 2022 where it was said to be a leader."
"We've found the initial setup to be quite straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Elastic Security is that you can install agents, and they are not separately licensed."
"The intelligence of the system has been very impressive. It's not quite AI, but the technical bit where it correlates information, based on the seen attacks within an organization is good."
"The feature that we have found the most valuable is scalability."
"The most valuable features are the speed, detail, and visualization. It has the latest standards."
"It is the best open-source product for people working in SO, managing and analyzing logs."
"Elastic Security is a highly flexible platform that can be implemented anywhere."
More Elastic Security pros
 

Cons

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial. Currently, there is a default ninety-day backup period."
"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."
"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial."
"The customer service is not satisfactory for me. The support is only available in English, and my users in LATAM regions such as Peru and Colombia require local language support, which is not currently provided."
"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."
"Continuous upgrades can be quite inconvenient. My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently."
"There isn't really a very good user experience. You need a lot of training."
"I would like the process of retrieving archived data and viewing it in Kibana to be simplified."
"The solution should generate an automatic product that integrates with ELK Stack to use artificial intelligence."
"We'd like better premium support."
"The tool needs to integrate with legacy servers. Big companies can have legacy servers that may not always be updated."
"Their visuals and graphs need to be better."
"The solution needs to be more reactive to investigations. We need to be able to detect and prevent any attacks before it can damage our infrastructure. Currently, this solution doesn't offer that."
More Elastic Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The base product is open-source but if you need advanced security features then you need to pay for the subscription. Elastic Security's price is reasonable in some cases and in other cases it's not."
"Compared to other products such as Dynatrace, this is one of the cheaper options."
"The price is reasonable. It probably costs the same as ArcSight and LogRhythm SIEM. FortiSIEM might cost less than Elastic Security. There are no hidden or additional costs."
"This is an open-source product, so there are no costs."
"The product offers an amazing pricing structure. Price-wise, the product is very competitive."
"The pricing is in the middle. I think it is not an expensive experience if we compare it with big names, for example, QRadar, and also Oxide. I think Elastic Security is quite cheap. I would rate the pricing of this solution a five out of ten."
"I find it better than Splunk in terms of cost-effectiveness. For cost-effectiveness, I would rate it a nine out of 10."
"Affordable but with additional costs"
More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Observability?
The areas of CrowdStrike Observability that have room for improvement include the approach towards customer issues, where resolution takes time. When raising a ticket for a customer, it takes time ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Observability?
The typical use case for CrowdStrike Observability is for customers who are looking for the best protection for their endpoints, data, and overall EDR and XDR solution. CrowdStrike Observability wo...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering CrowdStrike Observability?
The complete portfolio of CrowdStrike Observability includes multiple solutions for various customers. I am currently on medical leave due to an accident that required surgery. My previous position...
See all answers
Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...
See all answers
What do you like most about Elastic Security?
Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?
I am satisfied with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing cost. It is a pure 10.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Wazuh vs CrowdStrike Observability Logo
Wazuh vs CrowdStrike Observability
Compared 24% of the time
Datadog vs CrowdStrike Observability Logo
Datadog vs CrowdStrike Observability
Compared 23% of the time
Amazon OpenSearch Service vs CrowdStrike Observability Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service vs CrowdStrike Observability
Compared 13% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs CrowdStrike Observability Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs CrowdStrike Observability
Compared 9% of the time
ManageEngine Log360 vs CrowdStrike Observability Logo
ManageEngine Log360 vs CrowdStrike Observability
Compared 7% of the time
More CrowdStrike Observability Competitors
Wazuh vs Elastic Security Logo
Wazuh vs Elastic Security
Compared 17% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security
Compared 7% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security
Compared 7% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security
Compared 6% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Elastic Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Elastic Security
Compared 6% of the time
More Elastic Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Log Management
July 2025
CrowdStrike Observability reportDownload CrowdStrike Observability product report
Buyer's Guide
Elastic Security
August 2025
Elastic Security reportDownload Elastic Security product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash
 

Overview

Unify security, log management, and observability with the new CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale module, the next evolution of Humio, including the all-new managed Falcon Complete LogScale service.

CrowdStrike
Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.


Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

  • The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
  • It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
  • With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Elastic
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care
Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Security
July 2025
Free Report: CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Security
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CrowdStrike Observability vs. Elastic Security report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.