No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Elastic Path vs SAP Commerce Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Path
Ranking in eCommerce Platforms
16th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Commerce Cloud
Ranking in eCommerce Platforms
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the eCommerce Platforms category, the mindshare of Elastic Path is 1.4%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Commerce Cloud is 4.8%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eCommerce Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SAP Commerce Cloud4.8%
Elastic Path1.4%
Other93.8%
eCommerce Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

JG
Team lead at Nulogic
Provides flexible infrastructure and has good stability
I use the solution to create a B2B e-commerce platform The solution provided a flexible infrastructure with ease of use for creating a proposal for the company. The solution's most valuable feature is the ability to create a B2B platform. It has all the essential features, including payment…
Anton Karzhavin - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Of Business Analysis at EffectiveSoft
Platform has supported global rollouts and has delivered faster, more reliable commerce journeys
In my view, SAP Commerce Cloud can be improved as it currently feels too heavy, with customers nowadays expecting solutions to be deployed in months rather than years. This is the most significant issue with SAP Commerce Cloud, which caters primarily to Fortune 500 companies and falls short for mid-sized businesses. I do not have a clear idea on which specific feature they should implement to better serve the smaller business market, despite their several past attempts. Regarding potential improvements for SAP Commerce Cloud, I am not the best person to discuss deployments as I lack a DevOps background. However, I believe the primary enhancement should be in their vision and communication of product benefits. Personally, I have found SAP salespeople to be less friendly compared to their Salesforce counterparts. Their inflexibility regarding discounts and offers might be an area for improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."
"Its dashboards, business features, and user-friendliness of a lot of business interfaces are valuable. We work on B2B projects, and it is the most efficient software solution for B2B. The B2B accelerator is very much appreciated by our customers because it has some use cases that are ready for production. For some projects, we proposed the SAP Hybris solution because it was sufficient for use cases related to product management and data quality. With other e-commerce platforms, we would have needed integration with another product information management software."
"Some of the most valuable features are its personalized offering, promotion engine, and customer support module."
"We like that this solution gives our B2B clients a lot of functionality straight 'out of the box', meaning that they don't need to carry out a lot of configuration to be able to use it."
"SAP Commerce Cloud has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to launch our website within six months as an omnichannel platform, providing production support readily available and quick product loading, which was crucial for our startup company."
"SAP Hybris provides us with all of the e-commerce features that a client could need."
"SAP Hybris Commerce is a very advanced e-commerce platform compared to other platforms such as WebSphere Commerce, Oracle Commerce, and others."
"This e-commerce solution represents 70% of the company's income."
"It's a good product in terms of scalability, functionality, and flexibility."
 

Cons

"They should provide integration with social networking sites."
"Hybris is not currently using microservices."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the product search. There will be multiple criteria to search products and there will be a number of products in different categories. The question is how soon can I find the product which I'm looking for. The search can be improved."
"They need to use microservices to make it more scalable, but it's acceptable for now."
"Since it comes as an overall package, the license cost is high, and you might or might not use the Solr integration, which allows breaking it based on the use cases to reduce some cost or burden on the companies purchasing the product."
"A public cloud solution of this software would open great possibilities."
"The main issue for improvement with SAP Commerce Cloud is the UX/UI and the fact that it's difficult to change it because of technical constraints, which makes it insufficient as it currently exists."
"The product should be accessible to all types of customer, not just the big ones."
"Like every other SAP solution, it is very heavy."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."
"This is an expensive solution."
"The solution is expensive."
"SAP Hybris is expensive, which is why only the large clients use it. At the same time, I think that the return on investment warrants it."
"I don't know the cost, but it can be expensive."
"The solution is very expensive in Turkey."
"The product is expensive. I would rate its price a seven out of ten. The solution's licensing is yearly."
"The price is too high."
"The price is quite high."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eCommerce Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user9726 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Oct 5, 2013
WCS vs Hybris vs ATG - Feature Smackdown
They say "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder", so if you are a purist in one of these technologies you would probably never agree to my comparison matrix, However these are my personal opinion, From my experience standpoint I have longest exposure to WCS Commerce Suite and the least with ATG…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with SAP Hybris Commerce?
To improve SAP Commerce Cloud, you can remove the monolith architecture to break it into microservices. Since it comes as an overall package, the license cost is high, and you might or might not us...
What is your primary use case for SAP Hybris Commerce?
SAP Commerce Cloud was designed to create an e-commerce platform, specifically a shopping website. I have been working in the cart, checkout, and payments journey, using the accelerator storefront,...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Hybris Commerce?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for SAP Commerce Cloud has been significant; only a global company can typically afford Hybris. Many clients share discomfort with revenue-dep...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP Hybris Commerce, Hybris, SAP Hybris on AWS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Garmin, TimeInc, Agfa, LVMH, Virgin Media, TeliaSonera, Western Union, LifeWay, Kiabi, TIBCO
NHS 24
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe, Salesforce, commercetools and others in eCommerce Platforms. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.