


Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Elastic Security compete in the cybersecurity automation and analytics category. Cortex XSOAR stands out due to its strong automation and integration capabilities, while Elastic Security has an advantage with its speed and open-source flexibility.
Features: Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is well-regarded for its robust automation, versatile playbooks, and seamless integration within various security infrastructures. Users highlight its scalability and diverse scripting support. Elastic Security is noted for its open-source nature, flexibility, and strong indexing capabilities, offering enhanced data visualization and infrastructure monitoring which are beneficial for fast response situations.
Room for Improvement: Customers of Cortex XSOAR seek a simpler setup process, reduced licensing complexities, and improvements in integration and cost-effectiveness. Elastic Security users desire better documentation, enhanced anomaly detection features, and more user-friendly functionalities, alongside increased AI integration and streamlined alert management processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cortex XSOAR is deployed across public, private, and hybrid clouds, but users report mixed experiences with customer support concerning responsiveness. Elastic Security can be deployed in various environments and is praised for its responsive and knowledgeable technical support, providing a more reliable customer service experience.
Pricing and ROI: Cortex XSOAR is often viewed as costly, which may be prohibitive for smaller businesses, but its automation brings significant ROI for mature SOCs. Elastic Security, being open-source, is perceived as more cost-effective and suitable for SMEs, providing an appealing price point while maintaining substantial flexibility and scalability.
Since we started working with Torq, I am handling much fewer alerts. It is becoming really easy for me to handle an alert.
We have seen a return on investment, targeting a $600,000 ROI for the year.
By the time we officially bought Torq, we already had two workflows that were very helpful to us.
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
We are positioning Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, which can be used in the SOC and do a lot of automation for the customer.
My impression of their technical support during the initial setup was that they were helpful, responded within a reasonable timeframe, and provided exactly what we needed.
The speed and quality of their answers have been pretty good, as I usually get a response within 24 hours, and they follow up well.
We can always get an answer, and the support team are experts in their own system.
Support is prompt and helpful.
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
I have not faced any difficulties with Elastic Security, as we have a pretty good support service from them.
Eight out of ten times, they provide valuable help.
Their support has been better than Anomali's and they are more responsive.
The technical support provided by Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is good.
Our case management is super scalable.
In terms of scalability, you can do as long as you can build it, and they can support it.
Regarding the ability of the solution to grow in your work environment, if it is scalable, if it fits your business requirements, and if there is room to scale up, the answer is yes, for sure.
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
Elastic Security is quite scalable.
The scalability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR supports our growth and security needs because we can integrate various tools and continuously add more capability.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has very good application capabilities and is highly scalable.
The issues with scalability arise from the speed of some integrations, as not all are perfectly tuned by Palo.
We have been using Torq for one and a half years, but we have experienced no downtime.
Most of the time, the system is stable as long as the components that they integrate with are stable.
I have never faced any downtime or issues.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
The system works smoothly even when I navigate deep into the playbook section.
I would rate the stability and reliability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR as a nine.
Torq should offer default templates that can directly scan firewall data and automate actions.
The AI value depends on maturity. Real value depends heavily on telemetry, integration depth, and workflow design, all of which rely on how mature customers are in their SOC department.
It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
Machine learning algorithms become better with time; as they ingest a huge volume of data, they become better.
The deployment requires integration and the development of integration modules.
One of the significant issues we encounter is system slowdown when we receive an influx of alerts, which inhibits how quickly we can access the information needed for investigation.
To improve the solution, it needs to have complete features that are low-code, no-code, and should be plug-and-play.
When they bring more and more value into the platform, it makes more sense to pay that price, but still, it is expensive.
Before deciding to implement Torq, I considered that compared to our old case management platform, Torq was a much better price and had a lot better value for what you get out of the platform, which was a key consideration for the company.
It is an expensive solution, not an inexpensive solution, but we get through the flexibility.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
For customers, it is zero versus $20 million, which is why they have to make a decision.
Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management has significantly benefited us by integrating the case management platform with the automation, which saves time compared to managing multiple point solutions across our security stack.
The fact that I can build whatever I want within my own imagination and skills without relying on code is the best thing about Torq.
You can copy and paste a cURL command. If you have documentation or APIs, you usually have an example on the side. You basically have all the information on how the API call should be. You can just copy that and paste it into a step, and it will just build the step for you.
Elastic Security offers good insight regarding alerts, reports, and cases.
Elastic Security offers advanced features such as machine learning and integration with ChatGPT.
We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data.
Execution of automatic tasks for collecting, enriching, and correlating security events from hundreds of different technologies.
If I already have an established process, I do not have to change my process to fit into the tool. I can modify the tool to fit into my process, which makes things considerably easier.
We have implemented automation features, such as automated responses to email threats and automatic configuration of target devices for blocking specific IPs.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR | 8.7% |
| Torq | 3.8% |
| Elastic Security | 5.0% |
| Other | 82.5% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 40 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 26 |
Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.
Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.
What are the key features of Torq?In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.
Elastic Security stands out for its speed, scalability, and intuitive interface. It integrates seamlessly with Elasticsearch and Kibana, providing efficient data indexing, centralized log management, and intelligent threat identification, all while being open-source.
Elastic Security offers robust capabilities in security monitoring, threat identification, and SIEM functionalities. Its open-source nature enhances scalability, facilitating log aggregation and infrastructure monitoring. Users appreciate the intuitive dashboards and machine learning integration, which aid in proactive security measures and anomaly detection. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in documentation, scalability, and configuration complexity. High data volume pricing and limited machine learning support are concerns, while dashboard enhancement and seamless integration with existing systems are desirable. The platform is widely used for alerting suspicious activities, analyzing logs from firewalls and Active Directory, and providing endpoint protection. It serves as a key tool for security awareness and auditing, integrating effectively with technologies like Kibana and OpenShift.
What are the most notable features of Elastic Security?Organizations deploy Elastic Security across industries for log aggregation and security monitoring, detecting unauthorized access, and analyzing system logs. It is essential for infrastructure monitoring and integrates effectively with systems such as Fluentd and OpenShift, supporting comprehensive security views across enterprise environments.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR enhances security operations automation and integration. Users rely on its incident management capabilities and machine learning to improve response times and efficiency.
Cortex XSOAR stands out for its capability to automate and orchestrate security tasks through customizable playbooks and robust third-party integrations. Its analytics offer insights into incidents, while machine learning prioritizes alerts and reduces false positives. Despite its powerful features, users note room for improvement in documentation, interface design, and integration capabilities. Cost and complexity in setup and deployment are also concerns. Users in security operations centers benefit significantly from automated data enrichment, streamlined incident response, and efficient handling of threats like phishing and endpoint management.
What are the key features of Cortex XSOAR?Cortex XSOAR is implemented across industries for automating and streamlining security operations. Organizations use it to create playbooks, integrate with security tools, and automate repetitive tasks, thereby improving the efficiency of their security operations centers and incident management processes.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.