No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

FatPipe SD-WAN vs Huawei Enterprise Routers comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FatPipe SD-WAN
Ranking in WAN Edge
20th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (23rd)
Huawei Enterprise Routers
Ranking in WAN Edge
15th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Routers (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the WAN Edge category, the mindshare of FatPipe SD-WAN is 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huawei Enterprise Routers is 2.4%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
WAN Edge Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Huawei Enterprise Routers2.4%
FatPipe SD-WAN1.6%
Other96.0%
WAN Edge
 

Featured Reviews

Akshay Kharkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at Manschaft IT Pvt Ltd
Beneficial technology, reliable, and simple deployment
Our client has a data center and all the applications servers and servers are in their data center. We design a solution, for all their branches. If they wanted to access the internet or the applications, they route traffic to their data center and then can access these applications with FatPipe…
EP
Network Engineer at Technical University of Crete
Reliable border connectivity with responsive support but there's room for more intuitive documentation
The documentation is somewhat lacking and not easy to navigate. There are some errors and misleading information. The general appearance of the company site is also not user-friendly for downloading firmware. Firmware updates should be more straightforward. More security features would be appreciated, however, they should be easy to understand and implement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of FatPipe SD-WAN is it's based on SD-WAN technology."
"My advice to others is if you are looking for an SD-WAN solution then FatPipe SD-WAN is a good choice."
"I have been able to connect the solution to many platforms such as Windows, Apple, and Android."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The solution offers good customer support, ease of deployment, and good performance."
"The scalability is good."
"The best feature about Huawei is the cost, particularly when you compare it to Cisco which has a much more expensive licensing model."
"Based on my experience of about four years, I think that Huawei Enterprise Routers are pretty stable."
"We've had a good experience with Huawei Routers."
"The most valuable feature of Huawei Enterprise Routers is if have two networks at different geographical locations with a great deal of distance they work together as if they are on the same cloud network."
 

Cons

"FatPipe SD-WAN can improve the price to scale the solution."
"The internet speed reduces throughout the day. The tool is not stable."
"It would be better if the vendor provided support for small enterprises."
"The only problem I see is configuration loss."
"The product’s performance could be better."
"The solution's technical support could be improved."
"The configuration is complex and should be simplified."
"If Huawei can use its own OEM processor, it could be a good step up for future use in the network devices."
"I have an issue with Huawei; when we can't solve a project problem, support will say, "Oh, this will be from next year, we don't want to create support, for example, Huawei Router.""
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"There are additional licensing costs. I am aware of additional licenses and which services are added to the router."
"The price of the solution is fair."
"Huawei offers a cheaper enterprise router solution than Cisco."
"The solution's price is reasonable."
"The price is reasonable compared to Cisco's."
"The tool's licensing is yearly."
"Huawei Enterprise Routers’s cost is average. I rate its pricing a five out of ten."
"These routers are not too expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Edge solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Media Company
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Retailer
9%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Construction Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huawei Enterprise Routers?
The product is very cheap and offers a huge discount as they are trying to enter the market. However, you have to pay extra for some services and support.
What needs improvement with Huawei Enterprise Routers?
The documentation is somewhat lacking and not easy to navigate. There are some errors and misleading information. The general appearance of the company site is also not user-friendly for downloadin...
What is your primary use case for Huawei Enterprise Routers?
Huawei Enterprise Routers are used as our main border routers to connect us to our ISP.
 

Also Known As

FatPipe Symphony, Symphony, FatPipe Symphony SD-WAN, Symphony SD-WAN
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Bus Online, VisionChina Media Inc. (VisionChina), China Network Television (CNTV), Chengdu Shuangliu International Airport, ABC, BovenIJ hospital
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Check Point Software Technologies and others in WAN Edge. Updated: August 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.