FortiMonitor vs Nexthink comparison

Read 47 Nexthink reviews

6,492 Views
5,843 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FortiMonitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Nexthink and FortiMonitor are competing products in the IT operations management space. While Nexthink excels in pricing, FortiMonitor stands out for its robust feature set.

Features: Nexthink focuses on endpoint performance with applications like experience scoring, real-time monitoring, and remote actions, which aid in self-healing scenarios. FortiMonitor emphasizes network health, offering comprehensive network monitoring, strong integration capabilities with other Fortinet products, and detailed traffic analysis.

Room for Improvement: Nexthink can enhance its scalability for larger enterprises, improve integration with third-party applications, and provide more granular user analytics. FortiMonitor could improve support for new vendors more rapidly, simplify user interface for broader user levels, and enhance documentation for setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nexthink provides straightforward deployment and has a strong customer support system with a focus on user adaptability. FortiMonitor offers flexible cloud-based deployments and strong integration capabilities but aims more at enterprise-level scalability, offering comprehensive support for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Nexthink provides competitive pricing and delivers significant ROI by improving IT efficiency through reduced mean time to resolve (MTTR) issues. FortiMonitor might be more costly but offers substantial ROI thanks to its advanced network monitoring capabilities that ensure robust network infrastructure health. The decision between the two could hinge on whether an organization values comprehensive monitoring features or a more cost-effective solution.

To learn more, read our detailed FortiMonitor vs. Nexthink Report (Updated: June 2026).

FortiMonitor vs. Nexthink

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FortiMonitor

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (37th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (40th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (17th)

Nexthink

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of FortiMonitor is 2.9%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nexthink is 13.9%, down from 24.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nexthink	13.9%
FortiMonitor	2.9%
Other	83.2%

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2677554

Network Engineer III at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing diverse networks with detailed alerts enhances device oversight

FortiManager is very helpful in managing our networks. We use it to manage 20 farms and various networks with hundreds of devices. The version we are using provides more detail than the older dashboard. We appreciate the alerting capabilities, which are integrated with SolarWinds to notify our team via SMS.

Read full review

Puneet-Singh

Assistant consultant at TCS

Proactive analytics have improved device performance and optimized disk space and support workflows

Nexthink offers many features, with the best being Flow, which encompasses almost everything. We have Nexthink Workspace and Spark, allowing integration with Teams so users can find solutions without going to the service desk, rectifying issues in chat. Nexthink Infinity has brought a lot of benefits to us. There has been a very good change from integration. Integrating ServiceNow with Nexthink automates problem ticket and incident generation, enabling the team to proactively know the kinds of problem statements we are receiving. For the integration with Teams, we have not completed it yet, but we are in the planning phase, and once done, we will observe the results. Nexthink has the capability of integrating with most third-party applications, which is a great feature. With the remediation actions we have in Nexthink, it has provided great self-heal capabilities along with proactiveness. By looking at the dashboards and identifying problem statements, we can share this information with the end-user computing teams to fix issues. Nexthink has significantly helped us enhance our DEX score from 74 to 80. When I talk about features that led to the improvement of our score from 74 to 80, there were earlier issues with device performance and reliability not being addressed. Noting these, we identified devices lacking free disk space and low RAM capacity contributing to high memory usage or excessive CPU usage. Disabling unnecessary startup applications brought us to a new DEX score of almost 80.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FortiMonitor offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, allowing me to track network traffic in and out effectively."

"In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's migrating to one dashboard for us system engineers. We can keep an eye on traffic, blocked sites, and the health of our hardware. That last part, about knowing if something's going to fail soon, is super important. It gives us time to sort things out before any big problems happen. As a system engineer, I need to keep tabs on everything – temperature, monitoring systems, and network operations. This data is really handy because it helps me ensure our site runs smoothly, whether it's turning systems on or off. Just last night, there was a system failure, but thanks to real-time monitoring, I quickly identified the problem and got the necessary replacement parts."

"FortiMonitor has a very intuitive dashboard, which makes it particularly helpful for analyzing traffic, alerts, and other information."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is what the devices are used for. We have big backups for our Cradlepoint solutions, but FortiMonitor is a great routing device and we love working with them."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is the overall ability to monitor the health of the environment."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The solution helps to see client infrastructure. It has many boxes and blinks green or red when the station goes up or down. We have different domains for the device groups that we monitor."

"Overall, I would recommend FortiMonitor to others."

More FortiMonitor pros

"Nexthink is a great tool for device analytics, providing complete insight into devices and great solutions with many integrations that simplify work."

"With this solution we are able to link issues to automatic actions that will solve the problem."

"I like everything about this product."

"The return on investment is great."

"Nexthink allows our customers to have visibility into their whole environment and security. And it lets you install the agent as a package for selected users instead of every user. This helps cut down on the delay involved in a bulk installation."

"Number of service incidents dropped by more than 20%."

"This solution is improved each time there is a version update."

"The DEX scores help because they give an overview of how well an organization is doing across the industry compared to other organizations."

More Nexthink pros

Cons

"We use FortiToken, and it's a pain to use because you have to send things through your phone and then confirm by email. Only after this can you log in. It's dual-factor authentication. I wish that I could just log in or bring up a dashboard where I could log in from."

". Enhancements in the dashboard, such as clearer alerting, maintenance window management, software version tracking, and better visualization, would be beneficial."

"FortiMonitor could improve by having compatibility with other operating systems, such as Linux."

"FortiMonitor needs to improve its alert system."

"Sometimes, during high CPU usage, we cannot access FortiMonitor and must refresh it."

"I think the current features are really good for me, nothing else comes to mind right now. Maybe some small improvements could be made in the customization and configuration part of the UI to make it easier or more intuitive. Customizable UI options, like we saw in the demo, could be helpful for everyone. But in our operational environment, having clear health status and system details is crucial for us system engineers. One feature I'd really like to see is a credential management system. It would help us keep track of who's logged in and how many times, which is important due to user restrictions. Sometimes, we need to manage logins more efficiently, like logging off other users to free up credentials. So having a feature like that would be really helpful."

"Additionally, there are no AI features in FortiMonitor, which might be an area for enhancement."

"There is room for improvement in the FortiMonitor report. It is not ideal for showcasing to tech customers or managers, especially when trying to display high CPU usage from logins within a specific range of months or the most recent month."

More FortiMonitor cons

"I think Nexthink could be improved regarding its proprietary query language, as it sometimes makes it difficult to create queries."

"There could be improvements in monitoring user sentiments."

"There could be a streamlined NQL and SQL query functionality, as it can be complex. An easier way to modify queries would be beneficial for the product."

"The next release could use some improvement in the tools that are provided."

"In our company, we can't deploy anything from Nexthink the way we can deploy from any other endpoint solutions. It is not possible to create any dashboard in Nexthink...One should be able to schedule monitoring in Nexthink."

"Customer support for Nexthink is a pain point due to unclear SLAs and requests for logs that are not needed. We have checked things from our end, but sometimes simple solutions are made overly complex."

"The stability of this solution could be greatly improved to avoid performance issues."

"I feel there is some gap in the application interfaces of Nexthink."

More Nexthink cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing model in Vietnam is a bit high. I rate the product price as an eight out of ten."

"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."

"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."

"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."

"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."

"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."

"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."

"FortiMonitor's price is very high."

"There are certain layers when it comes to pricing. The product has three layers and these layers are associated with certain sources. For example, the top layer have the premium services and the bottom layer has the basic services."

"I have seen it help improve the user experience scores. This helped clients to save costs on another tool that they were trying to deploy in order to improve the user experience by just deploying some scripts. We were able to identify the issues and help them remediate those using our help. The process does not take much time and it provided background on end user performance. Therefore, they were able to save a lot, e.g., for approximately 50,000 endpoints at two dollars per machine per year, that is about $100,000 in savings."

"Nexthink can pay for itself quickly if you identify and complete the most valuable use cases. The tool can do so much that to purely compare the price in a static way to other tools in your arsenal would be a mistake. If you do a more dynamic comparison that’s based on the overall functionality and use cases possible then it comes out cheaper. You need to consider it a relative measurement against potential use cases, size of the organization, maturity of organization, etc."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten. The tool's pricing model is pay-as-you-use."

"With this implementation of the Act and Engage module, I believe that there is a one-time fee for a two-month period, which is for the support team to make additional customizations."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot less work to stand up and maintain. It's also a lot easier to use and onboard n...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?

FortiMonitor does save time but not significantly on costs, as there are still expenses related to procurement, installation, and licensing.

What needs improvement with FortiMonitor?

There are areas for improvement that FortiManager is addressing. We have not yet upgraded to the latest software versions, being a full revision behind, but we plan to update soon since the current...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nexthink?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was very easy. It was the best option when it comes to costing.

What needs improvement with Nexthink?

Nexthink is a perfect application for now. It appears to be working very well. No improvements are needed for now. I am also learning how to use more features and what I can do with them, as there ...

What is your primary use case for Nexthink?

My main use case for Nexthink is reinstalling SCCM when Software Center is not working. I can obtain insights into network-related issues or crashes that occur when applications are not functioning...

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 7% of the time

ThousandEyes vs FortiMonitor

Compared 6% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs FortiMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs FortiMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

More FortiMonitor Competitors

SysTrack vs Nexthink

Compared 20% of the time

ControlUp vs Nexthink

Compared 14% of the time

Alluvio Aternity vs Nexthink

Compared 10% of the time

Adaptiva vs Nexthink

Compared 9% of the time

More Nexthink Competitors

Product Reports

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

July 2026

Download FortiMonitor product report

Download Nexthink product report

July 2026

Also Known As

Panopta

No data available

Overview

FortiMonitor excels in user monitoring and network operations, with its central management and intuitive dashboard. Known for reducing administrative costs and enhancing security awareness, it also provides seamless integration with other devices.

FortiMonitor supports dual-factor authentication, alert systems, and system health monitoring, proving essential for technical teams managing infrastructures and FortiGate activities. Despite its benefits, there are areas like compatibility and pricing where improvements are sought. It offers high-level monitoring, customizable dashboards, and alert capabilities which are critical in busy environments, especially for detecting harmful activities and ensuring efficient CPU utilization.

What features enhance FortiMonitor's efficiency?

User Monitoring: Monitors end users and logs effectively.
Traffic Analysis: Offers comprehensive insights into network traffic.
Dual-factor Authentication: Enhances security with two-step verification.
Centralized Management: Streamlines operations with an intuitive dashboard.
Proactive Alerts: Provides redundancy and instant notifications for potential issues.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with other devices for continuity.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Cost Reduction: Lowers administrative costs significantly.
Security Awareness: Improves security management efficiency.
Data Continuity: Ensures continuous operations with automated vendor configuration.
Efficiency Gains: Adapts to new vendors and enhances CPU utilization.

FortiMonitor is widely implemented in industries for end-user monitoring, security tracking, and infrastructure management. It's crucial for environments needing high-level monitoring and identifying hardware problems, where proactive management and customizable dashboards are key to maintaining operations.

Fortinet

Nexthink offers real-time digital experience management with features like live dashboards, remote actions, and AI-driven insights, aimed at improving user engagement and IT infrastructure management.

Nexthink caters to organizations seeking to enhance digital experiences by offering dynamic campaigns, comprehensive reporting, and seamless ServiceNow integration. Its AI Assistant, device monitoring, and automation features support efficient decision-making and rapid issue resolution. While offering real-time analytics and proactive troubleshooting, Nexthink users have identified areas for improvement, such as enhancing query language flexibility and third-party integrations. They seek better automation, customer support, and pricing strategies to optimize Nexthink's potential. Enhanced monitoring and integration capabilities are also desired to bolster IT productivity and infrastructure management.

What are the key features of Nexthink?

Live Dashboards: Provides real-time data visualization for quick insights.
Dynamic Campaigns: Enables personalized user engagement initiatives.
Remote Actions: Facilitates seamless IT issue troubleshooting and resolution.
Device View: Offers deep insight into endpoint device performance.
AI Assistant: Provides guided queries and problem-solving suggestions.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Proactive Issue Identification: Reduces downtime by anticipating potential disruptions.
Enhanced User Experience: Improves employee satisfaction and productivity.
Efficient IT Management: Streamlines operations and reduces resource expenditure.
Compliance and Security: Ensures adherence to industry standards.
Automation and Integration: Boosts performance with smooth, integrated workflows.

Organizations in sectors like IT services, finance, and healthcare leverage Nexthink for digital experience improvement, endpoint monitoring, and automated incident resolution. They employ its real-time analytics for compliance and security management and utilize its automation capabilities to ensure seamless IT service management and employee productivity enhancement.

Sample Customers

SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard

https://www.nexthink.com/custo...