

Fortra's Digital Guardian and Trellix DLP are in competition within the data protection industry. Fortra's Digital Guardian is perceived better in terms of pricing and support, while Trellix DLP is valued for its comprehensive feature set that appeals to many users.
Features: Fortra's Digital Guardian includes advanced data discovery and classification, dynamic policy enforcement, and robust threat protection. Trellix DLP offers intricate data protection features, customizable policy controls, and seamless integration capabilities, providing a more extensive feature set according to users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortra's Digital Guardian offers flexible deployment with cloud and on-premises options and responsive customer service. Trellix DLP emphasizes seamless installation and strong technical support with its hybrid deployment options, perceived by users as straightforward.
Pricing and ROI: Fortra's Digital Guardian is noted for competitive setup costs and favorable ROI. Trellix DLP, though higher in initial cost, is justified by its feature-rich offering, which contributes to long-term ROI, with users recognizing the value offered despite the higher price.
It is reliable, it has a broad scope, and the vendor is easy to reach out to and makes it easy to request assistance.
It doesn't block my workflows, saving me from wasting hours of troubleshooting security blocks that could happen with other tools.
I see some return on investment with Fortra's Digital Guardian since the license is based on the endpoints, which is where you can save.
We estimate that we have saved around fifty thousand dollars annually by preventing potential breaches and reducing manual compliance work.
The benefits our customers see from using Trellix DLP include cost reduction, given its competitive pricing in India.
For others looking into using Fortra's Digital Guardian, I would suggest learning the steps for monitoring and maintaining the server, especially policy configuration, since it is quite tricky and includes a lot of processes.
Technical support from Fortra can vary; sometimes I encounter great engineers with high experience who can resolve issues quickly, but other times I face less experienced engineers which can cause delays in issue resolution.
I have never had to contact Fortra's Digital Guardian's customer support because the software has never crashed or caused any issues on my machine.
We received prompt technical support and remote sessions when necessary.
Trellix's technical support deserves a perfect rating, and I would rate it ten out of ten compared to other solutions.
The support from both the vendor and Trellix is excellent.
Even when my laptop is under heavy load, running multiple instances of automated browsers via Selenium, PyCharm, and handling background API requests, the agent remains stable and completely unnoticeable.
While there are limits, we attempt to work around them, sometimes needing to collaborate with Fortra's Digital Guardian engineers to find solutions.
Trellix DLP is very scalable, especially with the cloud version as everything is managed in the cloud.
It's a bit of a fallback, and I know they are working on improving scalability.
I would rate the scalability of Trellix DLP between eight to nine out of ten.
Fortra's Digital Guardian is stable; it doesn't have a negative effect on my system performance.
With the move to cloud provisioning, that is not a big problem anymore due to scalability on Trellix's side.
The agents are the main issue as they can behave inconsistently across different versions of operating systems.
Product stability is not a major concern; I would rate it 99% stable.
System reporting and default system reporting are not totally usable and require customization to be practical.
Fortra's Digital Guardian does have some mishaps and imperfections, but it has been really helpful for us as a DLP tool.
I give Fortra's Digital Guardian a seven because it doesn't compromise my system performance, but I don't get any visibility about what's happening and I don't know which criteria are used for preventing data leaks or classifying my files as sensitive or not sensitive.
Having someone within a region who understands the countries and how they approach data and information security is sometimes where the problem lies.
Improved compatibility with Mac OS is needed due to ineffective policy applications.
The product also faces challenges with high CPU and memory utilization, impacting endpoint performance.
It used to be in the middle, tending towards the high end, especially in South Africa, where we need to convert from dollars to rands, making things very expensive quickly.
The solution is currently affordable and not considered expensive.
The pricing for Trellix DLP is good, and it always wins when compared to other solutions.
Fortra's Digital Guardian can detect any user activity after installation and commissioning without the need for policy implementation; it just works by system default.
With this file tagging, everything that needs to be controlled or monitored is blocked for any file transfer because once the file is tagged by Fortra's Digital Guardian, that tag remains wherever the file is placed.
Fortra's Digital Guardian's lightweight nature impacts my productivity and workflow positively because it delivers enterprise security without hurting developer productivity, and the system performance remains stable.
Trellix products are manageable through a centralized control center, meeting requirements from frameworks like PCI DSS.
Additionally, it supports integration with third-party solutions and agents, providing a versatile and user-friendly management experience.
These features are very useful for protecting company confidential data from being copied to another remote location or other sites.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Trellix DLP | 2.5% |
| Fortra's Digital Guardian | 1.3% |
| Other | 96.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Fortra's Digital Guardian is celebrated for its robust data protection, especially in data loss prevention across various endpoints. It enhances organizational efficiency, streamlines workflows, and provides deep insights via advanced analytics and real-time alerts, significantly improving data security and compliance management. Ideal for monitoring, customizing policies, and guarding against internal and external threats.
Trellix DLP offers comprehensive data protection with advanced management features, ensuring compliance and data security across endpoints and networks. It integrates seamlessly into existing systems with centralized management for effective monitoring, data classification, and incident prevention.
Trellix DLP provides a robust data loss prevention platform that includes endpoint protection, web and network security, and customizable reporting through its centralized ePolicy Orchestrator. With machine learning capabilities, it enhances data classification and monitoring, ensuring protection across devices, cloud services, and applications. Trellix also supports compliance with security frameworks and integrates with third-party solutions, providing ease of installation via API services. Despite some areas needing improvement, such as support and Mac OS compatibility, Trellix remains a strong choice for organizations prioritizing data protection.
What Are Trellix DLP's Key Features?In industries like manufacturing, Trellix DLP is used for incident monitoring and protection against data leaks, particularly of sensitive personal and financial information. Organizations benefit from its capabilities to block unauthorized uploads and monitor document movements effectively, while also leveraging its third-party integrations and application monitoring features for comprehensive data security measures.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.