

Wrike and Freshservice compete in the project management and IT service management categories. Wrike seems to have the upper hand in handling complex projects due to its comprehensive project management features, while Freshservice stands out for simplicity and ease of use in IT-related tasks.
Features: Wrike includes dynamic task assignment, real-time updates, Gantt charts, collaboration tools, and various app integrations. Its intuitive folder structure and robust time-tracking functionalities are particularly valued by users. Freshservice emphasizes service and incident management with features such as workflow automation, asset management, and strong integration capabilities. It offers a user-friendly design and mobile accessibility, allowing agents to efficiently manage service requests.
Room for Improvement: Wrike could enhance its mobile app functionality, custom notifications, and handling of complex project dependencies. There's also room for better budget tracking and a more intuitive user interface. For Freshservice, improvements could be made in customization options, reporting, and integration with Linux and Microsoft platforms. More detailed automation and workflow management features are also desired.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Wrike and Freshservice support multiple deployment options, including public cloud, private cloud, and on-premises environments, accommodating various organizational IT infrastructures. Customer service receives high marks for both platforms, with Wrike users praising detailed and proactive support that complements its complex features.
Pricing and ROI: Wrike offers a range of pricing plans, though enterprise-level features can be costly for users with extensive license needs. The investment is often seen as worthwhile due to its powerful features and potential ROI. Freshservice is noted for its transparent pricing and flexible plans, appealing to businesses in search of IT service management solutions. While Freshservice is generally cost-effective, there are concerns about its price in certain markets compared to its feature set. Both tools deliver significant organizational and efficiency returns, but Freshservice's straightforward cost structure can be more financially manageable for some businesses.
Faster resolution means the average ticket resolution time decreased by roughly twenty-five to thirty percent since alerts are automatically converted into tickets and routed to the right team.
Automation has contributed significantly, resulting in reduced resource counts, which equates to savings in money and time.
With using Freshservice, only two technicians are needed per one shift, but without Freshservice, for the same company size, we need about four technicians per shift, so it saved money and time.
Ultimately, we saw a 77% reduction in average resolution times with a return on investment realized within 6 months.
However, they have improved over the period of two years.
Their documentation is also good, making setup easy without needing frequent support requests.
As our organization has grown and ticket volume related to AWS resources increased, Freshservice handled the extra load without any performance issues.
It offers global performance with multi-region data centers to ensure faster responses while adhering to strong security and compliance standards such as GDPR and SOC 2.
Freshservice is easy to use for scalability.
The service runs smoothly most of the time, and performance has been consistent even when ticket volumes and AWS alerts are high.
Freshservice is quite stable as they host it on AWS.
Freshservice provides a stable environment for our needs.
There's limited experience with the CMDB or asset management features.
Asset management can definitely be improved because it doesn't pick up every single device on the network or every single piece of information.
Reporting is useful, but the customization is still restricted, and it would be great to build more detailed reports that combine multiple data sources, especially for cloud-related operations.
Switching from previous ITSM tools has led to a 50% reduction in licensing costs.
The solution offers flat licensing and appears to be cost-effective.
The price was very comfortable for our organization to proceed with the migration from Freshdesk to Freshservice.
The most valuable features include ticket routing, automation in triage, data control, and flat licensing.
Incident management is very helpful, and the system is straightforward, making it easy to use for our enterprise-level company.
Overall, Freshservice provides cutting-edge AI automation for agents and end-users, effortless no-code workflows and ITIL-aligned operations, robust asset, incident, change, problem, and major incident management backed by the live CMDB, unified service desk with self-service and multi-channel support, and strong analytics reporting features, making it a powerful tool for any IT function.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Freshservice | 0.7% |
| Wrike | 2.7% |
| Other | 96.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Freshservice specializes in user-friendliness and seamless integration, facilitating IT operations with AI-driven ticketing and flexible asset management, essential for diverse organizations.
Known for its comprehensive automation and integration with platforms like AWS, Freshservice enhances IT tasks with flexible workflows and intuitive dashboards. Its self-service portal and effective incident management promote efficient service delivery and SLA compliance, making it vital for IT teams. However, users seek enhanced customization and integration with Microsoft and Google, along with improved analytics and project management features.
What are the essential features of Freshservice?Freshservice is widely implemented in IT service management, supporting ticketing, incident management, and change management. It assists in customer service, internal support, and integrates with Azure and AWS. Significant for HR service centers and knowledge bases, it enables workflow automation and reporting, centralizing service operations for enhanced visibility and tracking across departments.
Wrike offers dynamic project management capabilities with Gantt charts and time tracking, ensuring efficient collaboration and task customization. It integrates with Google Apps and features mobile accessibility for enhanced user engagement.
Wrike's platform facilitates seamless project and task management, time tracking, and collaboration across IT, marketing, and other departments. It supports project timelines and uses customizable dashboards for efficient task management. Despite a steep learning curve, its integration capabilities and mobile access provide a competitive edge. Users highlight areas for improvement like exporting datasets and better mobile app functionality but value its flexible task assignment and management features.
What are Wrike's Key Features?Wrike is widely used in industries like AEC and property management, where it supports project timelines, ticketing, communication, and reporting. Global companies employ Wrike for workflow management, onboarding tasks, and utilizing views like Kanban to manage tasks efficiently.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.