Genpact Cora SeQuence vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Genpact and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Genpact is ranked #38, while SAP is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. Genpact holds a 0.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAP’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Genpact users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Genpact Cora SeQuence

Read 2 Genpact Cora SeQuence reviews

375 Views
217 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 60 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

6,695 Views
4,434 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Genpact Cora SeQuence

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Genpact Cora SeQuence and SAP Signavio Process Manager are competing in process management and optimization. SAP Signavio Process Manager appears to have an advantage due to greater functionality and integration capabilities, despite higher costs, whereas Genpact Cora SeQuence scores higher in pricing and customer service satisfaction.

Features: Genpact Cora SeQuence offers flexible process modeling, analytics-driven insights, and agile workflow facilitation. SAP Signavio Process Manager provides comprehensive process modeling, collaborative design capabilities, and seamless integration with other SAP tools, supporting complex process mapping.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Signavio Process Manager is efficient in cloud deployment with extensive support, thorough documentation, and a responsive service team. Genpact Cora SeQuence allows straightforward deployment and garners high ratings for direct and accessible customer service, although SAP's setup might require more configuration, their knowledgeable support assists during onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: Genpact Cora SeQuence is recognized for cost-effectiveness, yielding good ROI with lower setup costs and shorter implementation times. SAP Signavio Process Manager has a higher upfront cost but offers significant ROI due to superior features and extensive process improvement potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Genpact Cora SeQuence

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

38th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Genpact Cora SeQuence is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 7.7%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Helgi Jonsson

Prosthetics Quality Center Manager with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime.

I suggest that before you purchase a solution, you understand their business well, and before selecting a supplier to understand what they are targeting. Too many companies go into this with complex procedures and processes,not understanding it and trying to model it as it goes. So, in the end, they end up with a solution that it is not what they aimed for in the beginning.

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very stable. There is no downtime."

"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."

"A complete business project management suite which seems to open endless possibility."

"We could increase the transparency and speed for the new ERP introduction. The status and changes by the new system are now clear to everybody and it is a great tool to train the people."

"The ability to leave comments in the Collaboration Hub is a good and easy way for the employees to give feedback on the processes."

"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."

"We can use workflow manager to create forms."

"One of the most valuable features is ease of use which has really been a good thing to put into the business. People like tools that they can just pick up and use straight-away."

"This is one of the best solutions and it is easy to implement."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Signavio Process Manager is the ability to do business process models."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."

"The setup and configuration is complex."

"Its reporting feature could have customization options."

"I would like to see the inclusion of some document management functionality so that we don't need to integrate with a second solution to accommodate this."

"After SAP acquired Signavio, the prices increased significantly, making it too expensive for our small company to afford."

"There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting."

"For me, given I've got a lot of experience working with BPMN and other process management tools, in terms of the interface, I think there's a little bit more that can be improved to match what the conventional BPMN offers. I've been constantly trying to give this feedback to Signavio, to let them know that it needs to be more coherent with the original BPMN version of the stencil."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"The free trial needs to have more options for end users, such as including Process Intelligence as a trial version."

"I think the biggest selling point that Signavio talks about is its collaborative aspect. However, there's still a lot more improvement in terms of what they can do, how they receive comments, address comments, whether they actually provide feedback, etc. There is still a little bit more improvement to be made on those areas."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot."

"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."

"This solution provides really great value for the money."

"Comparatively, it is a bit costly when you look at similar tools with similar features."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."

"The product is expensive."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

After SAP acquired Signavio, the prices increased significantly, making it too expensive for our small company to afford.

See all answers

Comparisons

Appian vs Genpact Cora SeQuence

Compared 100% of the time

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 31% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

May 2025

Download Genpact Cora SeQuence product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2025

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

Sequence is a BPMS (Business Process Management Software) solution. Its development environment provides an environment for designing forms, tasks, messages, system integration, and flow connections. Sequence processes are, by default, operated from within a Microsoft SharePoint site. Sequence supports integration with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services to enable managers to analyze performance and determine trends relating to KPIs and SLAs. In addition to integrating with Microsoft Office, SharePoint, and Dynamics products, it can be integrated with external systems through protocols such as web services, WCF. It also enables connection to enterprise applications such as SAP and Oracle.Â The product's architecture enables IT personnel to make changes to processes without taking them offline.

Genpact

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sample Customers

South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2025

Free Report: Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.