Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence comparison

Gigamon and Broadcom are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. Gigamon is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.5, while Broadcom is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.0. Gigamon holds a 2.9% mindshare in EM, compared to Broadcom’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Gigamon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Read 9 Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline reviews

6,561 Views
262 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 28 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews

1,725 Views
932 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence are competitive in network observation and automation. Gigamon appears to lead in feature richness while OPS/MVS excels in automation capabilities, appealing to those integrating automation within existing infrastructures.

Features: Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline offers comprehensive network visibility, advanced threat detection, and seamless integration with security tools. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence provides intelligent automation with strong machine learning functionalities and effective infrastructure management.

Room for Improvement: Gigamon could enhance usability with more intuitive interfaces and expand automation capabilities. Additional customization options for complex environments may broaden its appeal. Meanwhile, OPS/MVS could improve scalability across larger networks and refine system integration processes. A streamlined interface with reduced complexity could enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline has a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer support, aiding smooth integration into networks. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence requires more customer interaction due to its customizability, but is supported by in-depth customer service for its flexible deployment model.

Pricing and ROI: Gigamon demands higher upfront costs yet offers significant ROI through advanced security and performance monitoring. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence features a scalable pricing model, providing notable ROI via automation efficiencies, leading to potential long-term savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (43rd), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (32nd), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (44th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (33rd), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (26th), Network Packet Broker (NPB) (1st), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (16th)

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Management (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is 2.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 4.0%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence	4.0%
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline	2.9%
Other	93.1%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

TuanNguyen13

Senior Relationship Banker at Joint stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of V

Experience boosts operational efficiency while performance sees room for improvement

I don't have specific information on whether it was purchased on the AWS marketplace or somewhere else. I am working with Dynatrace Operator. I am also working with Algosec, Alluvio, CrowdStrike, Firemon, Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline, and other solutions. I think it's a good tool, and I am satisfied with it. We have not stored cloud workloads with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline yet; we are still on-premises. The technical support takes about one to two hours to respond, which is acceptable. I am satisfied with the scalability of the product. The interface is good.

Read full review

Sakkamon Rapeepisarn

System Programmer at Krungsri

Automation has improved alerts and file handling but script-based setup still needs simplification

OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is the automation tool I use. I think OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is good for creating complex rules because it's coding, but it takes time to learn how to use it. OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence works well if you know the syntax very well and you have experience in creating scripts or REXX syntax; it would be very good and is a good tool, but it takes time to learn, so that is for experienced staff to work with. I would rate the product a six from one to ten. I cannot think of any additional features in the next release of OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has high stability."

"It is a good product. It provides network visibility, which is important. Gigamon can bring some optimizations to my network. It is helpful for security inspection, and it makes my firewall work fast because my firewall doesn't have to do the inspection of the SSL connections, for example."

"The most valuable feature is NetFlow."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the encryption feature. From a security perspective, the solution hasn't significantly strengthened our security posture. However, it has greatly improved performance by streamlining encryption processes and avoiding encryption at multiple layers. This has also simplified troubleshooting, as we can whitelist certain processes."

"The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability."

"We use Gigamon for network visibility."

"The solution is straightforward to set up."

"It is a good product, it provides network visibility, which is important, Gigamon can bring some optimizations to my network, it is helpful for security inspection, and it makes my firewall work fast because my firewall doesn't have to do the inspection of the SSL connections, for example."

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline pros

"It works, and as far as the scheduling piece, it is wonderfully well-written and I use it all the time."

"With the automation pieces we can bring this region up or take this region down, and it allows us to always meet our time critical requirements."

"OPS/MVS is much more intuitive to use, especially compared to Netview/SA/GDPS."

"OPSMVS has made it possible to run our IT systems with fewer staff, due to the level of automation that we are able to use."

"It's a very stable product. I very much like the SSM stuff in it. The rules engine, it's awesome."

"For the mainframe it's a really good automation tool, it's been really solid for what we needed it for, and it's been flexible and scalable across the enterprise."

"The performance of it is beyond exceptional."

"Because we can define complex commands, the training of new operators is quicker. We can also put checks in place, that will prevent user errors."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

Cons

"In terms of improvement, while the initial setup is not overly complicated, we did encounter a few issues."

"The graphical user interface could be improved."

"The security should be improved."

"Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good."

"It only inspects a specific kind of traffic. There should be different kinds of use cases."

"It only inspects a specific kind of traffic."

"The Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline should have a feature showing the traffic flow within its platform. Currently, customers have to use separate tools for monitoring, which is inconvenient. If it had its visibility feature, it would make monitoring easier and more complete without needing extra tools."

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline cons

"My impressions on OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is that it's quite difficult to use, as it relies mainly on the coding syntax and doesn't provide an easy-to-use GUI."

"It needs to have more compatibility/interfaces to other vendors’ products."

"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."

"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."

"The new release addressed some shortcomings of the product."

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"I think, for me, I’d like to see more of its web base."

"Some of the command sequences are too long."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution as expensive, around an eight or nine out of ten. There are other competitive solutions available."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The solution is highly-priced."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Logistics Company

Educational Organization

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good. They need to improve their performance.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

I am working with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Firemon, and I have been working with it for a year.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

See all answers

What needs improvement with OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

My impressions on OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is that it's quite difficult to use, as it relies mainly on the coding syntax and doesn't provide an easy-to-use GUI. OPS_MVS should have an easy-t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

We use the auto-purge transaction for some transactions that run very long, and we also use automation to open and close files in CICS as well.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

See all answers

Comparisons

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 4% of the time

Niagara Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 4% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 3% of the time

Grafana vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 3% of the time

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Competitors

BMC AMI Ops vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 13% of the time

IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 11% of the time

CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 10% of the time

BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 2% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Event Monitoring

May 2026

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline report

Download Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline product report

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

April 2026

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Also Known As

Gigamon, GigaSecure

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

Overview

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline boosts network visibility and performance through features like NetFlow and deduplication, facilitating data flow insights and improved security. It supports traffic monitoring and management across various infrastructures.

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline enhances network management by offering features such as NetFlow, deduplication, header stripping, and packet filtering. These capabilities are instrumental in optimizing performance, offering users stability and improved encryption processes. Despite its robust hardware capabilities, it requires enhancements in security, filtering, and delivery time for hardware. Users note challenges with monitoring cloud networks and insufficient cluster capacity. There is also a call for improved interface design and internal traffic flow visualization.

What are the essential features of Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

NetFlow: Provides comprehensive visibility into network traffic for informed decision-making.
Deduplication: Reduces unnecessary data replication, enhancing performance and efficiency.
Header Stripping: Streamlines data packets by removing unnecessary headers, improving speed.
Packet Filtering: Enables selective traffic analysis for targeted network insights.
Traffic Aggregation: Consolidates and transforms network data, aiding detailed packet analysis.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

Enhanced Security: Improves data integrity and threat detection capabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines traffic monitoring and performance processes.
Improved Data Insights: Offers comprehensive data flow analysis for better decision-making.
Hardware Stability: Provides reliable performance with robust hardware support.
Encryption Optimization: Simplifies the encryption process for secure data handling.

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline finds application across industries for network visibility and management. It is used extensively for traffic monitoring, SSL inspection, mobile network oversight, and data center operations. Organizations leverage its capabilities to address network issues, enhance security, and streamline performance monitoring processes. Its ability to group traffic aids significantly in problem-solving and SSL detection.

Gigamon

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is designed for effective mainframe automation with flexibility and user convenience, offering tools for synchronized operations and comprehensive platform automation.

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence provides robust automation features that streamline mainframe operations, enhancing task synchronization and minimizing manual interventions. Its adaptability across multiple platforms, integration capabilities, and support for ad hoc operations ensure an efficient automation environment. However, users identify potential improvements in setup, third-party compatibility, graphical interfaces, and documentation. While it serves diverse automation needs, enhancing web interfaces and API accessibility could further improve user experience.

What are the key features of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

Automatic IPL and Shutdown: Ensures orderly system startups and shutdowns.
System State Manager: Offers synchronized task operations for consistent system states.
OPSLOG: Enables message filtering to streamline communications.
Global Variables: Facilitates script customization and variable management.
OPS/REXX Support: Supports ad hoc operations for versatility in automation tasks.

What benefits and ROI can organizations expect?

Labor Minimization: Reduces manual task handling through automation.
Comprehensive Integration: Seamless connection with legacy applications for smooth operations.
Resource Control: Efficient management of resources across LPARs.
Enhanced Workflow Management: Improved automation of time-critical functions.

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is widely deployed in industries requiring high-level automation for mainframe environments. Organizations benefit from its capabilities in message suppression, system activity monitoring, startup and shutdown management, and resource control. Its efficient automation helps in inventory control and ensures seamless function integrations within diverse operational settings.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Amica Insurance, College of William & Mary, Gamma, IntercontinentalExchange, OppenheimerFunds

Tieto

Buyer's Guide

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

April 2026

Free Report: Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Find out what your peers are saying about Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.