No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Gupshup vs Quadient Inspire comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Gupshup
Ranking in Customer Communications Management (CCM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Conversation Intelligence Software (3rd), AI Customer Experience Personalization (9th), AI Customer Support (8th), AI Sales & Marketing (7th)
Quadient Inspire
Ranking in Customer Communications Management (CCM)
1st
Average Rating
9.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Customer Communications Management (CCM) category, the mindshare of Gupshup is 1.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quadient Inspire is 20.8%, up from 17.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Communications Management (CCM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Quadient Inspire20.8%
Gupshup1.6%
Other77.6%
Customer Communications Management (CCM)
 

Featured Reviews

Sanket Dofe - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at Wynisco
Partner program has reduced messaging costs and now supports reliable, large scale communication
I believe Gupshup could improve in several areas. Since our partnership involves working at scale for multiple WhatsApp Business API numbers over their infrastructure, I noticed that Gupshup also provides WhatsApp Business API for single consumers, which I saw on their website and documentation. They charge additionally per message or template message on top of the actual WhatsApp Business APIs messaging rate. For example, sending a WhatsApp marketing template costs around $1.50, and Gupshup adds their own service fee per message, around 20 to 30 cents. For a single consumer working at scale and sending thousands of messages daily, this can become concerning. They should implement a solution where it could be a one-off payment instead of per message payment, allowing single consumers to leverage their service better. What would make it a 10? A better engineering team that solves problems and knows the ins and outs instead of just doing patch fixes would be ideal for me. Being a tech-focused person, I believe the system we rely on should be totally reliable and the people working on it should be reliable as well.
SP
Solutions Architect at Customer Centrics
Flexible, easy to use, and has fast output generation
Based on current market trends, Quadient has ticked all the boxes. For the next release, I would like to see more features in the Evolve Cloud offering. The Evolve Platform will be a game changer for Quadient as it will attract more enterprise customers who want to move their CCM platform to the cloud. The other CCM platform has its offering in the cloud, but it has some limited use cases.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Gupshup has impacted my organization very positively; it is a good platform, very reliable, and this is the first platform that we have used where we did not feel any need to switch over to any competitor because Gupshup is everything it markets itself to be."
"Gupshup has positively impacted my organization by helping me increase the user base from an existing point of view from zero to 0.6x in a span of three months."
"I believe Gupshup has made the process of integrating WhatsApp for customers more agile."
"The return on investment has been tremendous."
"In my experience, the best features Gupshup offers include the ability for a user with no prior knowledge of code to also use this platform if they are creative."
"At BookMyShow, I typically achieved delivery rates above 95%, read rates between 60 to 80%, and click-through rates noticeably higher than other comparable tools."
"We have achieved a 97 to 98 percent successful delivery rate for business-critical OTPs and transactional notifications."
"My main use case with Gupshup was flawless; it was very user-friendly, and I personally loved using it."
"There's good flexibility in terms of integrating with other ecosystems."
"The Inspire single solution was by far a better option."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it is truly multi-channel and completely modular."
"The most valuable feature we have found is the speed to produce files and the number of files that can be sent at one time."
"In the past, we used other VDPs and we moved to Inspire Designer due to its ease of use, flexibility, and processing speed."
"The feature we use on every job is the NS Splitter, which enables us to impose jobs two up on SRA3 paper seamlessly, allowing us to maximize print layout and costs savings."
"Quadient Inspire has improved our efficiency all round in the data processing department; we have been able to take on jobs that we couldn't do before the implementation of Quadient Inspire and it has sped up the processing of data in an unbelievable fashion."
"Inspire is fast, reliable, and pretty unlimited in what you can do."
 

Cons

"I would appreciate more granular error code documentation for edge case API delivery failures, deeper out-of-the-box integration with cloud monitoring tools such as AWS CloudWatch or DataDog for native metric scraping, and a more responsive administrative console when querying massive historical message logs."
"Sometimes it stays in the pending part and it might not get approval from the Meta side, so that is one thing which needs to be improved."
"Gupshup could be improved by adding more selection of templates."
"The main thing the support team should do is give immediate resolution, not take a day or two or three days."
"My feedback regarding Gupshup is that during the DLT setting of IDs in the SMS and WhatsApp section, whatever is written in the portal has to be precise."
"What would make it a 10? A better engineering team that solves problems and knows the ins and outs instead of just doing patch fixes would be ideal for me."
"I think Gupshup could be improved with online support or WhatsApp support so that we can talk directly with an agent, instead of working only by email."
"If I suggest an improvement, I would desire to see deeper analytics."
"Documentation could always use some improvement, especially on something this complex and varied."
"The licensing and setup costs historically have been a roadblock, but there have been improvements on this over the years as things move into the cloud."
"One improvement would be to make the training modules or university free for users, as not all companies will pay for their employees to do the training and get the certificates."
"For the next release, I would like to see more features in the Evolve Cloud offering."
"Imposition would be the area that we would like to see improved."
"In the (near) future I would love to be able to merge Excel XLS data with the same level of ease that we can currently merge CSV data sources (including text attributes, which are lost when using the CSV format)."
"The de-bug/help system is quite ambiguous at times and only works if you know where to look, but I find that its search facility is perhaps not as extensive as it might be and often returns fairly random results unless the search terms used are very specific."
"I feel the scripting modules are very powerful but are difficult to use if you do not have the programming knowledge."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I can tell from my personal experience that if you know how to use the software, the return on investment comes in a really short time."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Communications Management (CCM) solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Construction Company
11%
University
11%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Insurance Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Gupshup?
The pricing part was taken care of by the finance team, so we do not have any idea about the pricing part.
What needs improvement with Gupshup?
One thing I feel is that creating a template takes a bit of time for us. After creation, the approval part takes time. Sometimes it stays in the pending part and it might not get approval from the ...
What is your primary use case for Gupshup?
I have been using Gupshup since the beginning of my journey with GITAM for communications. It helped me in sending all WhatsApp bulk messages to all targeted students and parents. The main purpose ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
GMC Software Inspire
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Aetna, Allstate, Bradesco, Stralfors, Ping An Bank, KPMG, Aegon, Allison Payment Systems, TenStep, Pacific Life, Metlife, Transamerica, Societe Generale, Canacord Genuity, Pondres, Heeter, DTS Communicate, Melbourne Mail Management, Eximia, Brightsource, Salem One, Epsilon Data Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Gupshup vs. Quadient Inspire and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.