HackerOne vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

HackerOne and Qualys are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. HackerOne is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.5, while Qualys is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.9. HackerOne holds a 0.7% mindshare in VM, compared to Qualys’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of HackerOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

HackerOne

Read 8 HackerOne reviews

4,307 Views
732 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 35 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

4,977 Views
1,841 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

HackerOne

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

HackerOne and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management are competitors in cybersecurity, focusing on vulnerability management and asset protection. While HackerOne is favored for its bug bounty program, Qualys excels in asset discovery and comprehensive security features.

Features: HackerOne offers a robust bug bounty platform, leveraging a diverse hacker community to identify vulnerabilities, and provides third-party integrations for seamless operations. Its fast verification process for vulnerability reports is vital for swift action. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management excels with detailed asset discovery using cloud agents and IP-based scanning, dynamic tagging for easy asset management, and comprehensive risk assessment that enhances cybersecurity posture.

Room for Improvement: HackerOne could enhance its platform by expanding support for diverse vulnerability types beyond application security, optimizing third-party tool integrations, and improving alert accuracy to minimize false reports. Qualys requires user interface simplification, improved initial setup for better orientation, and reduced complexity in its extensive feature set for more straightforward user operation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HackerOne is appreciated for its straightforward deployment and prompt customer support, ensuring rapid integration with existing systems. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, while more complex in deployment due to its extensive capabilities, benefits from dedicated support that facilitates a smooth transition and comprehensive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: HackerOne offers a cost-effective setup with its pay-for-vulnerability model, providing immediate returns, making it appealing for quick cybersecurity wins. Qualys, though initially more expensive, offers enhanced long-term ROI through its extensive security features and deep cybersecurity insights, justifying its higher investment for comprehensive asset management.

To learn more, read our detailed HackerOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HackerOne

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

29th

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Bug Bounty Platforms (1st), Penetration Testing Services (2nd), AI Observability (10th)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

10th

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Patch Management (4th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Software Supply Chain Security (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of HackerOne is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	1.4%
HackerOne	0.7%
Other	97.9%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Ruphus Muita

Senior ICT Security Consultant at Applied Principles Limited

Has improved my motivation to submit bugs consistently through fast response and clear filtering

I think HackerOne can be improved by allowing new users to gain access to certain programs that are only open to known, renowned users. Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities. I am currently satisfied with the rewards, response time, and other aspects of the platform, so I don't have anything else to add about the necessary improvements. I give HackerOne a nine out of ten because if new hackers are given more opportunities, it could be a perfect 10 for me. However, the reason I gave a nine is that I don't have much to complain about; I specifically love the program and don't have many concerns.

Read full review

Arshad N. R.

Cyber Security Specialist at UBS Financial

Customized dashboards and quick deployment support comprehensive asset management

We use the True Risk Score for vulnerability prioritization, though we do not solely rely upon it since some assets may be decommissioned soon or not in use. From Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, we primarily focus on internet-facing assets. We have created separate tasks for internet-facing assets and track the True Risk dashboard specifically for these assets. If the True Risk Score is higher for any internet-facing assets, then we take action accordingly. The True Risk Score is very helpful for prioritization. The initial setup was straightforward and easy. We needed to create customized tags, group them twice, and validate whether the operating system detection was true positive or false positive. We encountered some false positives, which required coordination with the IT team for verification. In six months, we had approximately 20-25 machines that needed verification on a weekly basis. We coordinated with the IT team to identify the exact operating system specifications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HackerOne is a very good platform with the trust of different companies including Shopify, PayPal, and Uber, which creates a stronger brand perception and competitive market positioning."

"The most valuable feature of HackerOne is its variety of programs. These programs provide depth into various areas, such as mobile, API, and websites."

"Using HackerOne has definitely improved the security of my web application, identifying security gaps I didn't realize as a web developer."

"Apart from getting all the bug bounty opportunities, we also get the chance to practice in a safe environment, like a demo setup. These features are great for beginners who want to explore bug bounties in the future."

"HackerOne has been the right fit for our current situation from both a functionality and cost-effectiveness perspective."

"It helps me to get new sales, profits, and other benefits."

"The fast verification process impacts my motivation significantly because a quick response keeps me motivated, and if I'm going to try and hunt bugs today, I would appreciate a response within the day or at least within a few days."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

More HackerOne pros

"It de-duplicates findings and helps you understand what the vulnerabilities from your external scans and your external attack surface management are and how they connect to the vulnerabilities on your internal scans."

"The scanning results are pretty good, and some insights are quite valuable."

"We have a diverse organization with a robust infrastructure of more than 300,000 assets. By creating unauthorized lists and rules in the Qualys CSAM module, I can block certain software from being used in the organization."

"I mainly appreciate Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management for its patch management capabilities, which are essential in my job for deploying patches and remediating vulnerabilities."

"I use it primarily with tagging, asset counts, and groups that we can put them in, and we also use it to tell if a device has been merged and seen in Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, so that's beneficial for us too."

"We have had zero attacks since we enabled all the features in Qualys CSAM."

"Authorized and unauthorized software visibility is the best feature for me."

"I would rate Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer."

"One limitation is that if a finding has been reported on HackerOne and was also reported earlier by another user or outsider, the platform is not able to collate that information together."

"One issue I've experienced is traffic. Many people try to participate when an opportunity with a bounty of around 1,000-15,000 dollars comes up. In this case, the first person to report the vulnerability gets the bounty. If a second person reports the same vulnerability, they are marked as duplicated instead of receiving some recognition. The second person also invested time finding the issue, so I think this can be improved."

"The ability to view the conversation between the triagers and the programs will be really good."

"However, I reduced my rating by one mark because a proper internal triage team should be in place, not as a replacement for internal security controls."

"Response time can be improved. The HackerOne Trust team can be slow to respond sometimes. They're not using AI, which could help reduce the number of duplicate reports."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne."

"Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities."

More HackerOne cons

"In the best practice for categorizing assets with the C-SAM module in Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, I see potential for improvement with integration of other CMDB systems in creating a relationship with Qualys and other solutions."

"The UI needs improvement as it can become overwhelming after prolonged use."

"The UI and menu navigation has improved significantly, however, the menus could still be clunky, making navigation within the assets challenging."

"In our reporting, we faced a challenge syncing with cloud devices."

"Further research and development are needed to enhance integration with other cloud agents and products, particularly improving communication with external products and vendors."

"Qualys could improve by enhancing its dynamic tagging and role-based access control features, and by refining its user interface for a more intuitive and efficient user experience."

"We've received very poor guidance from them, especially after learning several things we need to fix during the Qualys conference."

"There can be further simplification to reduce the overall noise and provide ESAM-related data."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."

"The solution is free."

"Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations."

"The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution."

"The pricing for Qualys CSAM is nominal."

"Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers."

"It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price."

"The pricing for Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management is reasonable, with an annual subscription costing around $1,000 per year or a monthly subscription starting at approximately $72 per month, depending on the specific package and features included."

"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."

"The pricing is market-competitive."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?

I have not experienced any costs since I use HackerOne independently, just logging into the site, hunting bugs, and submitting them without any expenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HackerOne?

HackerOne has trust from companies such as Shopify, PayPal, and Uber, which provides a stronger brand perception and competitive market positioning. However, I reduced my rating by one mark because...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HackerOne?

I use HackerOne for the bug bounty platform to find security issues. When we discover vulnerabilities, we receive awards for them. Before testing any new payment API for public release, we can have...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I'm not entirely sure about the pricing; I don't know.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process. Knowing that you can't update any of the packages until you've done the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I primarily use it for a small, single-site, multi-source setup with multi-WAN inputs. I have a main fiber connection and a couple of failovers while managing different networks across different se...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bugcrowd vs HackerOne

Compared 35% of the time

Synack vs HackerOne

Compared 13% of the time

YesWeHack vs HackerOne

Compared 7% of the time

Intigriti vs HackerOne

Compared 6% of the time

Crowdcurity vs HackerOne

Compared 4% of the time

More HackerOne Competitors

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

Bitsight vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne

March 2026

Download HackerOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

March 2026

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Also Known As

HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management

No data available

Overview

HackerOne leads in offensive security with a platform that expertly identifies and remedies security vulnerabilities using AI and a vast researcher community. Trusted by industry giants, it integrates bug bounties, vulnerability disclosure, and code security in software development.

The HackerOne Platform offers a comprehensive suite of services, combining advanced AI technology with the skills of a global security researcher community to address complex security challenges. It facilitates an understanding of vulnerabilities, promoting better remediation practices across software lifecycles. Notable clients include Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and U.S. Department of Defense. Recognized for innovation and workplace excellence, HackerOne continues to set standards in security solutions.

What key features does HackerOne offer?

Skilled Hacker Community: Access a large pool of expert security researchers.
Third-Party Integrations: Seamless compatibility with various tools like payment systems and project management applications.
Bug Bounty Programs: Incentivized vulnerability discovery across industries.
Direct Communication: Facilitates dialogue for better understanding of vulnerabilities.
Safe Practice Environments: Supports learning for both beginners and seasoned professionals.

Why is HackerOne beneficial for your needs?

Speed of Delivery: Quickly identifies and resolves security issues.
Responsive Support: Reliable assistance enhances user experience.
Transparency in Communication: Clear reporting processes aid in issue resolution.
Income Opportunities: Bug bounties offer financial incentives.

HackerOne finds significant applications in various sectors with its focus on vulnerability assessment, testing, and responsible disclosure. Organizations utilize it for ethical hacking and efficient vulnerability coordination, making it essential in cybersecurity strategies. The platform's reliability is evident in its ability to identify and document security threats effectively.

HackerOne

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides key features including asset inventory management, end-of-life tracking, dynamic tagging, and integration with CMDB, offering extensive visibility and support for proactive threat response.

Qualys offers comprehensive visibility across hardware and software assets, aiding in tracking unauthorized applications and facilitating automated vulnerability remediation. Its user-friendly interface and dynamic risk scoring enhance security posture management. Users leverage it for vulnerability management and compliance, benefiting from real-time risk identification and efficient operations in cloud and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Asset Inventory Management: Provides detailed visibility over hardware and software assets.
End-of-Life Tracking: Helps identify technical debt by pinpointing outdated hardware and software.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows flexible classification and categorization of assets.
Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects risks as they arise, enhancing threat response capabilities.
CMDB Integration: Streamlines data integration for comprehensive asset insights.

What benefits should users look for in Qualys reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enables proactive threat management and streamlined operations.
Efficient Remediation: Automates vulnerability management and patch deployment.
User-Friendly Operations: Simplifies cybersecurity operations with an intuitive interface.
Comprehensive Asset Visibility: Offers unparalleled insight into organizational assets.
Scalable Solutions: Facilitates asset tracking across cloud and on-premises environments.

Cybersecurity teams in various industries, such as financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing, utilize Qualys to manage technical debt through end-of-life tracking and facilitate robust patch management. It supports compliance and visibility initiatives, essential for maintaining data integrity and operational security in dynamic environments.

Qualys

Sample Customers

Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and the U.S. Department of Defense

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

March 2026

Free Report: HackerOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about HackerOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HackerOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.