No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

HPE BladeSystem vs Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
140
Ranking in other categories
Blade Servers (3rd)
Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

TA
CTO at Miraj
Centralized modular platform has improved data center management and supports mission-critical workloads
The main area for improvement I see is the training process. When you use anything, how easily it is to manage is very important in hyper-converged solutions. If you compare it with VMware, it is very familiar. HPE Converged, however, is very large to understand for a new person. I am talking about training and management perspective, and user management. A system integrator and any system engineer who will operate and manage the system should find it easy to understand any configuration part and understanding part, which is currently a little bit tough. In Virtual Connect, we need some improvement. If we are going to move to hybrid, we need to easily move VM transactions from on-premises to cloud. We require a good, more easy process for day-to-day activities. Performance-wise, HPE BladeSystem is good regarding its ability to support mission-critical applications. However, reliability is all dependent on the core and memories, which will centrally control the entire blade and hyper-converged. We require more reliable things because if something goes down in the controller and center control, it is very tough to manage. We require a centralized image that will be replicated to any other device immediately, and all configurations and everything will come as soon as possible.
it_user477012 - PeerSpot reviewer
Support Engineer-Enterprise System at a tech services company
Easy to deploy and produces better performance with less maintenance
We have separate compute module know as FSM for management Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance. Integrated DVD/CD ROM. Five years. No issues to date. It is every important that you should be very clear with your future plans. We have had no scalability issues to date.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For what we use blades for, it was, and still is, the best solution."
"It's a good product, it's reliable, the performance is good."
"HPE BladeSystem provides excellent technical support from their team."
"Currently, we're using HPE BladeSystem BL460, but we're planning to migrate to the Synergy System as part of our strategy since the OEM support for the BL460 will eventually end. The most valuable features are its high computing capability and availability. Additionally, the ability to manage all resources from a single dashboard using the OneView solution that comes with the HP Converge system is incredibly beneficial. The efficientand unique environment makes it an excellent fit for our needs."
"I have recommended my clients to HPE, rather than other companies, HPE would give good support, and I'm very happy with that."
"If you're looking for a solution that has near 100% uptime, these blades provide that."
"Their support is amazing; if there is any issue, within a couple of hours they will ship the box from another country and it will be here."
"By implementing VMware on our systems, we increased the utilisation of resources, and the hardware is highly performant with no failures."
"Overall, the product has great value for money."
"The technical support is very good."
"Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance."
"Central management of all blade servers and performance: It helps us to access blade servers remotely even at boot time, as well, when we can access the BIOS setup remotely."
"The form factor is good for medium-level application hosting and does not take up too much space in the DC."
"The servers have enabled us to run critical applications, backup of critical data, and storage systems on the same products without downtime issues that could otherwise be caused by hardware or software issues."
"Excellent support in case of any failure (and I am not saying this because I worked for IBM)"
"We replaced five 42U server racks with two IBM S Series Blade Center chassis."
 

Cons

"The management is great but there are other competitors that are implementing a better approach."
"I’ve had some recent issues when doing hardware and simple memory upgrades. When I pull out and put back a blade, the system has a tendency to shut down random blades in the chassis."
"We require more reliable things because if something goes down in the controller and center control, it is very tough to manage."
"I would say that the licensing model is probably the one biggest caveat I have."
"BladeSystem is an old-fashioned server and not very well developed for new features and new areas of data centers, which is not very good for enterprise companies."
"Number of supported VLANs on virtual connect technology limits the number of VLANs you can deploy in your network."
"There are limitations in writing exploiter features because of the sanctions."
"We sometimes have compatibility issues depending on the browser that you are using. For example, sometimes you have to switch between Edge, Mozilla, Internet Explorer, or Chrome to have things operating correctly."
"The storage part of this product needs to be improved."
"Because this is an old IBM blade chassis model and servers, we faced a couple of issues during VMware implementation."
"Firmware updates are troublesome and difficult."
"If we talk about scalability, it is quite expensive, especially when you need to buy more blades."
"Performance is good, but on heavily non-linear workloads, they tend to have some issues."
"It was quite unfortunate that I lost data while using this blade server."
"Need some level of technical knowledge to configure it."
"It needs better management software."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have been satisfied with the price. However, there are additional costs for support."
"There is a one-time purchase for the HPE BladeSystem."
"The price of HPE BladeSystem could improve. They need to reduce the price to be able to compete better with other vendors, such as Dell."
"We have an annual license."
"With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."
"I don't have access to your financial information or the specific details of this solution's pricing. There are no additional fees. It is the hardware and the support."
"I would recommend this solution for large enterprises. Medium-sized companies would find it difficult to afford the HPE BladeSystem's overall capital expenses."
"Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
14%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise40
Large Enterprise104
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?
For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?
With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...
What needs improvement with HPE BladeSystem?
The main area for improvement I see is the training process. When you use anything, how easily it is to manage is very important in hyper-converged solutions. If you compare it with VMware, it is v...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem
Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

EMIS Health
Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: July 2026.
908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.