HPE StoreEasy vs IBM FlashSystem comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.6% mindshare in N, compared to IBM’s 12.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE StoreEasy

Read 12 HPE StoreEasy reviews

1,237 Views
1,237 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM FlashSystem

Read 112 IBM FlashSystem reviews

8,010 Views
3,124 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

HPE StoreEasy

IBM FlashSystem

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

IBM FlashSystem and HPE StoreEasy compete in the enterprise storage category. IBM FlashSystem has the edge in performance, while HPE StoreEasy is more competitive in pricing.

Features: IBM FlashSystem offers high performance, low latency, and virtualization capabilities, making it a robust choice for businesses seeking advanced storage solutions. Its compression technology and high IOPS rates significantly enhance performance for critical applications. HPE StoreEasy is known for its storage reliability, ease of deployment, and compatibility with virtual machines, providing a solid feature set for businesses focused on seamless integration with existing infrastructure.

Room for Improvement: IBM FlashSystem could improve its scalability, replication features, and cost-effectiveness. Users also desire more detailed reporting and better monitoring tools. In contrast, HPE StoreEasy needs to improve technical support, offer better scalability options, and address cloud storage access limitations. Users also report challenges with migrating large datasets and potential compatibility issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both IBM FlashSystem and HPE StoreEasy are mainly deployed on-premises, with IBM having some hybrid cloud capabilities. IBM's customer service enjoys high ratings, though technical support feedback varies. HPE StoreEasy offers strong customer service but requires improvements in its technical support infrastructure to keep up with changing customer needs.

Pricing and ROI: IBM FlashSystem is perceived as a premium choice with higher initial costs but offers robust performance and comprehensive features that lead to strong ROI in performance-critical environments. HPE StoreEasy provides a budget-friendly alternative with lower initial costs, making it appealing to businesses focusing on cost-efficiency and delivering favorable ROI, particularly for SMBs.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE StoreEasy

Ranking in NAS

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM FlashSystem

Ranking in NAS

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE StoreEasy is 4.6%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FlashSystem is 12.5%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS

Featured Reviews

MervynMorgan

IT Storage Engineer at Unixque Solutions Pty Ltd

Effortless backup and capacity management with seamless implementation

In our organization, we use HPE StoreEasy for tasks that require backing up data and maintaining capacity. It's a solution we use almost daily for these purposes HPE StoreEasy has helped us with easy implementation, maintenance, and administration. The most beneficial feature of HPE StoreEasy…

Read full review

OmarIsmail1

Infrastructure Technical Specialist II at Clicks Group

Offers high performance and dependable support for fast storage needs

The most valuable feature of IBM FlashSystem is its robust back code. When integrated properly into the environment and configured according to the guidelines, it provides a very solid infrastructure that does the job on demand. Additionally, IBM FlashSystem offers competitive pricing and reliable performance. The hardware is dependable, ensuring that it functions effectively when the setup is done correctly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HPE StoreEasy is a stable and high-performing solution that HPE supports effectively."

"The tool's data protection capabilities are robust."

"I like the user quotas, integrations, and separations for storage."

"StoreEasy offers reliable file services, which is a critical factor for customers looking for solid infrastructure."

"I like the tool's provisioning feature and OneView."

"The most valuable feature of HPE StoreEasy is the storing of virtual machines."

"It is easy to manage. There is a management console that comes with StoreEasy. It simplifies managing storage permission. There is snapshot scheduling as well. The updates and everything else is good."

"The most beneficial feature of HPE StoreEasy for us is its easy implementation and maintenance."

More HPE StoreEasy pros

"The speed of the unit is its best feature. It performs very well."

"The most crucial feature of IBM FlashSystem is compression."

"The most valuable features are flexibility and performance."

"The initial setup is straightforward and can be done in an hour and a half by one person."

"Speed (IOPS/second) – It is most vital for applications that need low latency and high speed for transferring the data."

"The most valuable features are deduplication and compression, which together, enable you to have more space."

"The all-flash storage has tier replication capabilities."

"The speed and the ease of installation are the most valuable features."

More IBM FlashSystem pros

Cons

"When I configure the StoreEasy in a complex environment I have problems finding compatibility with all the software."

"We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included."

"The areas of HPE StoreEasy that need improvement are scalability and migration."

"I would like to improve the tool's technical support. I would also like to see the product's hybrid cloud version."

"The support of HPE StoreEasy can improve its responsiveness. Dell support is better."

"There could be improvements in providing more hardening options on the operating system side, similar to iLO's security scoreboard."

"There is a default Windows installation. Sometimes, when it crashes, the HPE support team asks the customer to reinstall it. That is the only issue customers are facing."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

More HPE StoreEasy cons

"The array level RAID does not seem available."

"In IBM FlashSystem, data reduction is an area with shortcomings where improvements can be made in the future."

"It has room for improvement in the area of stability."

"The storage capacity of this solution could be improved."

"They don't offer subscription-based payments."

"GUI interface should be enhanced more as there is some issues in copy services."

"I think the only thing the developers can look at, is that it is limited to 25 gigabytes currently. In the next release they might want to increase that."

"The technical support in my region is satisfactory but it could improve. Support is very important for customers and downtime is very critical for us. We would like onsite or complete technical support which can help us to minimize our downtime or if problems occur."

More IBM FlashSystem cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of HPE StoreEasy is approximately $15,000 to $20,000 and it is a one-time purchase. The price is similar to competitors, such as Dell."

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. You need to pay additional costs for the solution."

"This is an economical solution for the company and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"Based on what I hear from our customers, it is not very expensive. From the cost perspective, I see nobody complaining about its cost."

"The solution requires a license and could be less expensive."

"IBM V7000 has a new license and price structure which provides intuitive licensing based on the functions customers wish to enable and use the most."

"The price of IBM FlashSystem is reasonable."

"The cost is pretty high in terms of licensing. We pay at least $100,000 USD in licensing fees for the storage."

"The pricing may be a bit higher than other brands. If you compare the IBM FlashSystems in midrange with Dell EMC in midrange, IBM costs a bit more, but I prefer IBM because it has more specs that I can benefit from."

"The tool is cost-efficient."

"I would rate the pricing of this solution a four out of five."

"The cost of the IBM FlashSystem is lower than the HPE solution."

More IBM FlashSystem pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE StoreEasy?

HPE StoreEasy is competitively priced compared to competitors. It offers configuration options, such as different processor powers, to adapt to the client's needs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE StoreEasy?

The product is stable, running on Windows Server ( /products/windows-server-reviews ) with updates from HPE, including those for iLO. There could be improvements in providing more hardening options...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE StoreEasy?

I use HPE StoreEasy ( /products/hpe-storeeasy-reviews ) to provide file sharing to our business users. We are a logistics business, specifically a port.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM FlashSystem?

It is simple to make an update.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem?

Many factors affect purchasing directly from IBM, often involving a multi-step process. Customers, especially in banking, often use the latest devices as they are upgrading, indicating they do not ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem?

The deduplication technology in IBM FlashSystem needs significant improvement. Other vendors like NetApp ( /products/netapp-41749-reviews ) offer better deduplication technology, which is noticeabl...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 50% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 27% of the time

IBM Scale-out NAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 9% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 6% of the time

FreeNAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE StoreEasy Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 22% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 9% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

NetApp AFF vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM FlashSystem Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

August 2025

Download HPE StoreEasy product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM FlashSystem

August 2025

Download IBM FlashSystem product report

Also Known As

HP StoreEasy

IBM Storwize

Overview

HP StoreEasy Storage is the #1 NAS product family under $15K USD range in units. Count on optimized, efficient, secure and highly available storage that simply addresses file and application storage challenges, no matter the size of your business. Straightforward features and new enhancements mean simpler installation and monitoring of utilization and health status.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.

IBM

Sample Customers

John Lewis, HPE IT, Comline AG, AmeriPride Services

Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

July 2025

Free Report: HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE StoreEasy vs. IBM FlashSystem report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.