Imprivata OneSign vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Imprivata and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Imprivata is ranked #18, while Ping Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Imprivata holds a 2.1% mindshare in SSO, compared to Ping Identity’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Imprivata users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Imprivata OneSign

Read 3 Imprivata OneSign reviews

872 Views
468 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 29 Ping Identity Platform reviews

3,282 Views
2,344 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Imprivata OneSign

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Imprivata OneSign and Ping Identity Platform are compared based on user reviews in identity management solutions. Imprivata OneSign has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Ping Identity Platform leads in features.

Features: Imprivata OneSign offers advanced authentication capabilities, seamless integration with various applications, and enhancement of security. Ping Identity Platform provides extensive identity management features, strong authentication options, and seamless SSO capabilities, making it a robust solution for complex environments.

Room For Improvement: Imprivata OneSign needs better reporting tools, more intuitive administration functionalities, and faster customer service response. Ping Identity Platform needs improved customer service response times, a more simplified setup process, and more user-friendly documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imprivata OneSign is praised for a straightforward deployment process but has slower customer service responses. Ping Identity Platform deployment is more complicated but benefits from extensive documentation and support, though quicker service is desired.

Pricing and ROI: Imprivata OneSign is noted for competitive pricing and satisfactory ROI, while Ping Identity Platform delivers significant ROI through its comprehensive feature set, justifying the higher initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Imprivata OneSign vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Imprivata OneSign vs. Ping Identity Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Imprivata OneSign

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (5th), Data Governance (8th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Access Management (2nd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Imprivata OneSign is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 7.7%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Iszaini Sejet

Finance & Admin at a pharma/biotech company with 1-10 employees

Positive impact on password management through AI-powered single sign-on

The best features of Imprivata OneSign include the single sign-on with its own AI, meaning that customers don't have to modify their coding. The AI remembers the password and login, so when users enter the system, the AI will input the login and password automatically. The beauty of Imprivata OneSign is that it can use single sign-on with legacy systems such as mainframe terminal products. Most of the latest single sign-on solutions cannot use mainframe systems. Imprivata OneSign helps customers minimize their work in remembering passwords and enhances their security.

Read full review

MAHESHKUMAR7

Cyber Security Engineer at TECHMINDZ DIGITAL CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED

Offers multi-factor authentication and application support side of PingFederate but application only supports specific protocols

A lot of teams work with technical support, but I work with it for user issues only. You might need support with things like application swaps, application names, and application URLs. I didn't know where to find those in Ping Identity, so I contacted technical support for those issues. The support team is very clever and active. They provide end-to-end support once an issue is created. I have worked with most of the support team. I also work with the support team because I work with the operations team. I provide 24/7 support to production and non-production environments. I coordinate with application and network teams to troubleshoot critical tickets and issues related to Ping Identity solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."

"It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."

"Imprivata OneSign helps customers minimize their work in remembering passwords and enhances their security."

"From a security perspective, I highly value the product's biometric authentication methods such as FIDO, FaceID, YubiKey, and the mobile app."

"I like PingFederate."

"It is a scalable solution."

"Setting up the infrastructure with Ping Identity Platform is very easy compared to other IAM products."

"We use the product to run different reports."

"It provides ease of connecting all our devices."

"The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."

"It is a very stable solution."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"They should have a landing page."

"Imprivata OneSign should have a landing page because most customers prefer this feature, which is currently a strong point for competitors."

"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."

"In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex."

"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."

"Ping Identity Platform must improve its UI since its management console is complicated."

"Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement."

"They could enhance the product's device tracking for better zero-trust security would be beneficial. Currently, it tracks IPs well but lacks detailed device information, which is crucial from a security standpoint."

"PingAccess can only have one token provider, and you cannot enable two different token providers simultaneously."

"One significant challenge was ensuring smooth user migration during system upgrades in Ping."

"Some colleagues have mentioned API connectivity, data security, and privacy issues."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."

"The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"The product is costly."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

28%

Healthcare Company

24%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 28% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 10% of the time

Evidian Enterprise SSO vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

Keeper vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

More Imprivata OneSign Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 21% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 9% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

April 2025

Download Imprivata OneSign product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

May 2025

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Imprivata OneSign delivers fast, secure no-click-access to the applications and information that care providers need, whenever and wherever they need it.

Security and regulatory compliance requirements mandate user authentication technology for accessing workstations and applications. As a result, care providers need to enter unique usernames and passwords (or PINs) for order signing, documentation signing, medication reconciliation and most other applications throughout their workflow. These laborious login requirements can disrupt clinical focus and obstruct patient care.

Imprivata

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Imprivata OneSign vs. Ping Identity Platform

April 2025

Free Report: Imprivata OneSign vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Imprivata OneSign vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Imprivata OneSign vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.