

KiSSFLOW and SS&C Blue Prism are competing in the workflow automation platform category. SS&C Blue Prism holds a strategic advantage with its robust automation features, while KiSSFLOW is appealing for its pricing and ease of use, especially for smaller businesses.
Features: KiSSFLOW provides customizable workflows, drag-and-drop builders, and easy integration options, targeting mid-sized enterprises. SS&C Blue Prism offers advanced robotics capabilities, scalability for large enterprises, and comprehensive automation tools for complex business needs.
Room for Improvement: KiSSFLOW could enhance its automation depth and interoperability with larger systems and expand its AI capabilities. SS&C Blue Prism may improve its user interface for better accessibility to non-technical users, simplify its deployment process, and offer more competitive pricing for mid-sized businesses.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KiSSFLOW is recognized for its straightforward deployment and responsive support, ensuring smooth integration and ongoing assistance. SS&C Blue Prism has a more detailed deployment due to its extensive feature set, supported by a robust infrastructure designed for complex installations.
Pricing and ROI: KiSSFLOW is noted for its competitive pricing structure, providing affordable options for growing businesses with a quick return on investment. SS&C Blue Prism, despite higher initial costs, offers strong ROI through substantial long-term productivity gains and process automation efficiencies for large-scale implementations.
It saved a lot of money, with 50 to 60% of our cost saved, especially through automation.
I have more time to work on meaningful tasks since automation has been very helpful in automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks.
They provide very detailed responses that enable us to handle any issues effectively.
The response times were slow to turn around.
It is scalable from the solution perspective.
I found it to be high on stability, and I would rate it at nine.
The solution is generally stable, though we have faced issues with increased transaction loads causing latency and occasional hang-ups.
It was not developed in a consumption-based manner, however, rather in a fixed-price licensing model that did not account for volumes.
The pricing model was not modern, as it wasn't designed on a consumption basis or as a service basis.
The licensing cost can be a bit expensive compared to its competitors.
Overall, my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that for large organizations and medium organizations, it is very cost-effective.
The control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, is to be the most useful.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SS&C Blue Prism | 1.1% |
| KiSSFLOW | 1.0% |
| Other | 97.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
SS&C Blue Prism, renowned for its language capabilities and workflow design, supports detailed automation building, enhancing productivity. Despite some challenges like cost and limited integration, it offers substantial potential in automating diverse processes.
SS&C Blue Prism offers strong capabilities in document reading and a straightforward workflow design, making it accessible with basic BPM knowledge. Detailed automation design in the studio and effective monitoring in the control room are notable features. While facing higher costs and a steeper learning curve, it supports process mining and generative AI initiatives, crucial for industries aiming at transformation and activation services. Limited external system integration and lack of agile delivery encourage a strategic approach in its deployment.
What are the key features?
What ROI should users expect?
SS&C Blue Prism finds its application across industries. In service industries, it automates repetitive tasks while supporting migration projects. Within the insurance sector, it helps automate claims handling and pricing by integrating data efficiently. Companies use it when transitioning processes, such as upgrading systems from older versions to new applications.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.