Kiteworks vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection comparison

Kiteworks and Mimecast are both solutions in the Secure Email Gateway (SEG) category. Kiteworks is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Mimecast is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. Kiteworks holds a 0.7% mindshare in SEG, compared to Mimecast’s 16.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Mimecast users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

3,236 Views
97 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mimecast Email and Collabor...

Read 39 Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection reviews

5,792 Views
1,969 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

Mimecast Email and Collabor...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 11, 2026

Kiteworks and Mimecast Advanced Email Security are both competitive solutions in the secure communication space. Kiteworks holds the upper hand in user-friendly collaboration and data protection, while Mimecast is preferred for its comprehensive threat prevention features.

Features: Kiteworks stands out for secure file sharing, regulatory compliance, and seamless collaboration tools. Mimecast is recognized for its email security through robust threat intelligence, ransomware protection, and advanced email threat mitigation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could enhance its mobile access, provide better insights into external sharing, and improve its administrative controls. Mimecast could focus on making its setup process more user-friendly, integrate more seamlessly with third-party platforms, and expand its reporting capabilities to offer deeper insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks offers a straightforward deployment focused on seamless integration and reliable support. Mimecast provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment with commendable scalability and well-structured training resources.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks offers cost-effective solutions with promising ROI due to its pricing model. Mimecast, while higher in cost, offers substantial ROI through its extensive threat prevention capabilities, justifying the investment in enhanced security.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (16th), Email Security (29th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (5th), Content Collaboration Platforms (13th)

Mimecast Email and Collabor...

Ranking in Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Office 365 Protection (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Secure Email Gateway (SEG) category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection is 16.5%, up from 11.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Secure Email Gateway (SEG) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Mimecast Advanced Email Security	16.5%
Kiteworks	0.7%
Other	82.8%

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

Test Logix

Email Security Engineer at Logic Infosecurity

Experience high detection and user-friendly policies with reliable email security implementation

The system is not user-friendly because you have to create policies that are mapped in a dictionary. As an IT engineer, I understand how it works, but explaining it to another IT person can be difficult. Having more user-friendly dashboards would improve the work experience. In Mimecast Email Security, checking policies in the dictionary or gateway is very complicated, and not everyone understands this process. If you examine the Check Point portal, it's user-friendly with easily accessible tabs that anyone can explore. With Mimecast Email Security, making changes might impact existing mailboxes. The portal is complicated compared to Check Point's user-friendly interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution can be used remotely; it's easy to upload and share files."

"I like Kiteworks or Accellion because it's continuously upgraded. I also know that it probably works with a lot of clients."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth."

"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"Scalability is impressive."

More Kiteworks pros

"The solution's performance is good."

"It does a good job for us, and its admin console is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is real-time alerts."

"The interface of this solution is very easy to navigate and user-friendly. There is no delivery in email and other communications, making it reliable. The configuration is relatively easy."

"Mimecast has some good support services in place."

"We're now certain business-critical mail is perfectly protected in multiple ways."

"The solution is scalable."

"I recommend Mimecast based on customer requirements and budget."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection pros

Cons

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

"I would like to see immediate releases of fixes because now it takes at least a week. If that time span can be reduced to one day or two days, that would be very helpful for users so that things are sorted and transactions work smoothly."

"File location could be improved."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

"There is no offboarding process for end-users in Kiteworks. It's a manual process. There is no automated syncing with LDAP and checking to see if the account is still active. It's a manual process to get people out of here, which isn't the best way."

More Kiteworks cons

"Mimecast need to ensure that the body text format is correctly handled and that images are properly embedded in the body text."

"While it's quick and easy, the initial setup could be more user-friendly."

"The solution's console interface was recently changed for the admins, but the previous one was much better because we could open tabs on it."

"Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competition in the Indian market, and the local presence is lacking as they do not have a local representative currently."

"As a user, the user interface of the management console could be upgraded, for example."

"The price of the solution is expensive. It can improve by reducing the price."

"Many of our users complain that the system is blocking too many attachments. It's a good practice from a security perspective, but our users think Mimecast is doing too much. It might be something we'll have to adjust."

"External security features need improvement."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"The product has good pricing in terms of return on investment."

"I'm always going to say the price needs to be lower, but it's reasonable."

"Compared to the other solutions in the market, Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection's pricing is fine."

"The solution is expensive."

"Compared to the other products in the market, it is neither cheap but nor very expensive. I would rate it somewhere in the middle, 5 out of 10."

"The customers can select the license packages as per their requirements."

"It is a bit expensive."

"For what it is, the product is overpriced."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

The interface of this solution is very easy to navigate and user-friendly. There is no delivery in email and other communications, making it reliable. The configuration is relatively easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

Do you know anything about the pricing and cost of the Mimecast Email Security?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

There is room for improvement since new threats are emerging. Considering the availability of new features would be worthwhile. Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 12% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 7% of the time

FileCloud vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Barracuda Email Protection vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Abnormal Security vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

January 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

January 2026

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection report

Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection product report

Also Known As

Accellion

Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection, Mimecast Web Security, Mimecast Mailbox Continuity, Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Overview

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Kiteworks

Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers advanced features like sandboxing, email archiving, and phishing protection. It's known for integration with Microsoft 365 and user-friendly admin management, making it a robust choice for secure communications.

Focused on safeguarding emails, Mimecast Advanced Email Security integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, providing features such as sandboxing, spam filtering, and email archiving. It delivers comprehensive protection against phishing, identity threats, and impersonation attempts. Administrators benefit from the ability to monitor external communications and customize configurations, enhancing email security. Users appreciate the intuitive admin console and responsive support team. Although it faces challenges in threat detection rates and administration complexity, its capabilities in email monitoring, spam filtering, and URL inspection remain valued by enterprises seeking reliable email security that supports compliance needs.

What key features should users explore?

Sandboxing: Analyzes attachments in a secure environment to detect threats.
Email Archiving: Provides secure long-term storage of emails for compliance.
Spam Filtering: Prevents unsolicited emails from clogging the inbox.
URL Inspection: Checks links in emails for malicious content.
Phishing Protection: Guards against deceptive tactics to protect sensitive data.

What benefits can impact ROI?

Regulatory Compliance: Facilitates adherence to standards such as HIPAA.
Integration: Enhances existing systems with seamless Microsoft 365 integration.
Support: Offers a responsive support team to resolve issues promptly.
Email Security: Improves threat prevention with effective spam and phishing protections.

Mimecast Advanced Email Security is implemented across industries to protect against email threats like phishing, spam, and malicious attachments. It serves as both a gateway and an archiving tool, supporting compliance in healthcare and finance by offering features like URL protection and data loss prevention. Enterprises leverage its capabilities to secure inbound and outbound communications effectively.

Mimecast

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Azizi Developments, Affinity Credit Union, Aftercare, Al Abbar Group

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

December 2025

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection report.

See our list of best Secure Email Gateway (SEG) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.