No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Kyriba vs Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kyriba
Ranking in Financial Performance and Strategy Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Planning and Budgeti...
Ranking in Financial Performance and Strategy Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Financial Performance and Strategy Management category, the mindshare of Kyriba is 2.6%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is 9.0%, up from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Financial Performance and Strategy Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud9.0%
Kyriba2.6%
Other88.4%
Financial Performance and Strategy Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2837166 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Treasury teams have streamlined cash pooling and now close complex intercompany books faster
Since Kyriba is more of a bolt-on, I suggest that more adapters are developed with ERP solutions, specifically S/4, as my idea for improvement. In cases of integration, the adapters were available, but the data sets had to be realigned. The structures in which SAP S/4 operates and the structures in Kyriba had to be mapped. If those can be developed out of the box, it would certainly smoothen the overall implementation experience. Additionally, moving open AR/AP positions from SAP S/4 to Kyriba is done as a batch load, meaning on request. If those interfaces are developed in real-time, so that real-time positions are always moved over to Kyriba, it would enhance the process even further because then the analysis is not contingent upon an on-demand pull request; it happens live. Tighter integration, and tighter real-time integration with the ERP ledgers, could help enhance the capabilities further. Tighter integration certainly is the core area for improvement with Kyriba. In addition to that, I would say that the adoption of AI could be another enhancement in the UI. The context I would suggest for its implementation is within the analysis of discrepancies. Obviously, not everything reconciles perfectly anytime cash pooling is done, so identifying postings where the match cannot be performed, leading to necessary settlements, would be good areas for Kyriba to develop further capabilities.
DA
Consultant at Avvale
The use of data forms simplifies financial data management and input processes
The best feature of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is the possibility to use data forms to input data and allow users to have a template with the data form. For users, it is not necessary to go with a free form to take data or input data. My automotive customer transitioned from Essbase on-premise to Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud specifically for the data forms functionality. This is the main feature that Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud offers compared to the Essbase on-premise solution. Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud offers the possibility to use data forms for viewing and inputting data. This is the easiest way to perform these actions without using free forms.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to do transfers directly from Kyriba has saved time and reduced the effort of taking approvals from an external party, creating a memo, creating the template in Citibank or any other bank, and obtaining additional levels of approval, since in Kyriba, I can create the payment and only one person can approve it."
"Kyriba has positively impacted my organization by making our work easier compared to the first software we were using."
"Treasury managers have better visibility to their idle cash, and a glance overview of all accounts at one place is available without logging into each bank portal, which definitely provides better visibility and hence better use of the idle cash."
"Kyriba is the best software available, and I have seen a return on investment where the initial yearly fee is superseded by the transaction fees and tax savings we have on bulk transactions and cross-border connectivity, making it a very profitable proposition when pricing is done correctly and implemented on a large level."
"My advice to others looking into using Kyriba is that it is a great product and very cost-effective, especially compared to other competitors in the market, and I have been very happy with Kyriba over the past nine years."
"Kyriba offers the best TMS on the market for cash liquidity, cash forecasting, net debt, and GL reconciliation."
"But once you start using it, it is one of the best treasury products I have come across in my career."
"Kyriba offers excellent features, including its user-friendly UI as a payment provider."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is ad hoc reporting."
"We have labor queues and workforce planning as well as our complete budget and focus for different business areas in the company, and it is adding so much value."
"The product has a direct plugin to Microsoft Excel, and the ease of pulling in data and reporting and ease of getting quickly at data at different levels is great."
"The customization level is excellent."
"Beneficial analysis and easy to do management adjustments."
"The most valuable feature is the data integration in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud."
"They provide tools certified to work on-site, in the cloud, or in a hybrid scenario, and this flexibility is valuable for various business sizes."
"We previously used Oracle EDS, and when comparing it to this solution, this solution has a much better interface. There are lots of advantages of the new solutions. Having it on the cloud, we are able to forget about keeping them updated or taking care of the database. We have minimal maintenance."
 

Cons

"Kyriba could improve their support, as the production support may sometimes be a bit delayed."
"Money-wise, I think it takes two to three years to generate the full ROI on that investment, given the initial setup of implementation is a bit higher."
"There are a bit of glitches sometimes."
"I give it a seven because of its limitation to handle complex requirements of financial transactions, such as complex derivatives, structured derivatives, and hedge accounting, which the product is not well-built for."
"I chose a seven because of the interface and the support services we have with Kyriba, as sometimes payments get stuck during production or working hours, resulting in delays for vendors."
"The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very expensive, as the licenses are quite expensive."
"Tighter integration certainly is the core area for improvement with Kyriba."
"Kyriba could be improved in the areas of connecting with multiple banks and managing various statuses."
"Oracle response time for customer SRs is horrible."
"The business rules behind the forms need improvement, and the total processing time should be enhanced with the help of proper commands, specifically regarding the execution time of existing rules."
"I don’t like this version, but it might get better."
"Oracle initially forced HFM users to migrate to FCCS, which was difficult because moving applications wasn't easy."
"But there are some limitations. For example, the Attributes feature doesn't do cross-tab reporting based on KPI."
"It could be more friendly with Excel."
"For HR, the workforce planning out of the box is complicated. For most users, it's not easy, and it requires a learning curve. It's not very user-friendly. It can be improved."
"It would be nice to have better performance."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is expensive."
"There is an annual subscription for this solution and it is priced high."
"The price of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is expensive. However, it solves a lot of issues at the company. Having a better price could make us think about using more cloud products for Oracle and increase usage."
"The solution is free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Financial Performance and Strategy Management solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Transportation Company
11%
Construction Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Large Enterprise20
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise17
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kyriba?
We did not purchase Kyriba through AWS Marketplace; it was embedded in the licensing. We bought this from Kyriba, and they charged us the final amount, so I do not know what they pay to AWS.
What needs improvement with Kyriba?
Kyriba should improve its liquidity planning module to allow for longer-term budgetary planning. Secondly, they need to enhance their support system, as the support provided to customers is quite s...
What is your primary use case for Kyriba?
My main use case for Kyriba is implementing Kyriba in systems across different companies. I have implemented cash management, payments, and accounting modules for one of the government entities in ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
While cloud pricing may initially appear more expensive due to the absence of infrastructure expenses, it is fair. There's no need for physical servers or infrastructure management. The licensing i...
What needs improvement with Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
The Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud can be improved in various ways.
What is your primary use case for Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
I am not currently using the Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud with any of my clients recently. There are no specific use cases that I have for this product.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Oracle PBCS, Oracle Enterprise Business Planning
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Australian Finance Group Ltd., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., TBS Group, Delaware Life Insurance, Shelf Drilling Ltd., Abu Dhabi Department of Finance, Fugro Norway AS, Drake & Scull International PJSC (DSI), Racepoint Global, Edgewater Technology Inc., King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Communications Test Design Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about Kyriba vs. Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.