LiveNX vs OpsRamp comparison

Read 13 OpsRamp reviews

5,844 Views
4,325 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

LiveNX and OpsRamp compete in network management, each offering unique strengths. LiveNX holds an edge in aesthetic design and customer service, while OpsRamp's strong feature set and value delivery make it standout.

Features: LiveNX offers real-time network monitoring with CLI scripting, extensive QoS modeling tools, and robust visualization of network traffic. OpsRamp provides a single pane of glass for multi-tenant architecture, predictive analytics for future issue identification, and seamless dashboard integration for a comprehensive monitoring experience.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX could enhance its user interface simplicity, expand third-party integrations, and improve automation capabilities. OpsRamp may benefit from refining event correlation, expanding NPM features to compete with traditional solutions, and enhancing visual appeal of its dashboards.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveNX offers a streamlined deployment process with significant support, focusing on smooth setup. OpsRamp allows agile deployment prioritizing remote monitoring and requires more initial configuration but benefits from scalability and comprehensive monitoring capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX provides a cost-effective initial investment with strong ROI through intuitive tools and excellent customer service. OpsRamp, potentially higher in setup costs, justifies its price through extensive features promising substantial long-term returns suitable for complex needs.

To learn more, read our detailed LiveNX vs. OpsRamp Report (Updated: September 2026).

LiveNX vs. OpsRamp

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LiveNX

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

36th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (29th)

OpsRamp

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (8th), AIOps (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of LiveNX is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpsRamp is 1.0%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpsRamp	1.0%
LiveNX	0.9%
Other	98.1%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Ashwani Bansal

Senior Solution Consultant at Orange

Network management and diagnostics improved through effective monitoring and reporting capabilities

The solution is handy. I have not used that particular feature. Maintenance is required for the system. If you want to use something on the endpoints or end-user devices, then using LiveAction LiveNX in place of other tools would be quite beneficial. The solution impacts operational costs and resources. On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine.

Read full review

reviewer2732427

System Integration Advisor at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Provides robust infrastructure monitoring with excellent integrations and alert predictions but needs improved AIOps capabilities

If we treat OpsRamp as an infrastructure monitoring tool, there are many positive aspects. However, when viewed as an AIOps tool, there are numerous potential additions. Currently, it performs infrastructure monitoring but has limited capability in application monitoring, which needs improvement. They are introducing observability as a feature where metrics, logs, and traces can be implemented, but this is currently in a primitive state that can grow over time. The platform is very stable, and the UI is excellent. However, regarding AIOps features, enhancements could be made to provide more value, such as dynamic thresholding and other capabilities that competitor tools have, such as LogicMonitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great, but it is far, far away from good and perfect."

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"It is very good if you are a Cisco shop; it gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

More LiveNX pros

"The feature we found most valuable in OpsRamp is alert generation because whenever there is any kind of spike on any virtual machine, the solution generates alerts based on the thresholds we implemented. We have integrated our ideas and tools with OpsRamp, so alerts are generated, then we notify the customers. That's the main feature we like about OpsRamp because we don't have to monitor each resource. Instead, OpsRamp does the monitoring for us, and it generates the alerts based on the thresholds."

"The most valuable feature of OpsRamp is the creation of the dashboards of the infrastructure for the CPU memory and SQL servers, and additionally URL monitoring through Selenium scripting and the availability dashboard is useful."

"The main differences between OpsRamp and other solutions are the artificial intelligence and the ease of implementation and scaling."

"It is a pretty stable solution."

"The technical support is fantastic, and they are fast to respond."

"This is what we have achieved, 90% alert reduction, 70% of manual, routine IT processes now automated, 50% increase in team efficiency and productivity."

"The multi-tenant architecture capability of OpsRamp has helped me streamline and improve the processes within my organization."

"Predictive analysis is a valued feature."

More OpsRamp pros

Cons

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"The only downside to this software is the price; it's a very pricey solution and very expensive, and it requires a good amount of resources in terms of server memory."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"Maintenance is required for the system."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"My advice to others would be to run away from it. This is a slight exaggeration but this is more because the application is horrible, the stability is horrible, the performance is horrible and the support is horrible."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions."

More LiveNX cons

"I would like to see two things. The first is a self-service portal for the cloud, any cloud deployments, and the second is maturity validation towards ITSM, internalizing OpsRamp TSM. As a result, instead of integrating with more mature tools similar to ServiceNow, people will use OpsRamp."

"We would like this solution to be developed into a full CMP tool, so that we are able to use a single product for all of our cloud management needs."

"OpsRamp could improve the critical alerts. We have been receiving some false alerts when monitoring. For example, the alert shows the site is down, but when we try to do manual access to the URL, it's accessible."

"OpsRamp cannot be scaled for big and large company deployments."

"We have 55 AVDs, and patches might roll out to 32-35 initially, with the rest taking a month or so. OpsRamp can't detect them all directly. Since clients want patches applied as soon as possible, we manually patch those remaining devices."

"OpsRamp had shortcomings associated with its network capabilities."

"The product also tends to release updates first and find out there is an issue later."

"This is an emerging tool and they have tried to consolidate everything not always with success."

More OpsRamp cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"It's very expensive."

"We use the free version."

"OpsRamp is a cost-effective solution."

"I don't have any idea about the licensing cost for OpsRamp, but I just know that its pricing is based on the resource count for each tenant."

"You pay it for a year and you'll have full access to the entire platform, not only for monitoring and alerting, you will have access to the entire platform, and whatever technology they develop will be made available to you."

"There is an annual licensing fee to use OpsRamp."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

What advice do you have for others considering LiveAction LiveNX?

I work as an integrator with LiveAction LiveNX. Most customers prefer deploying it on premises rather than in the cloud. The advanced diagnostics capabilities, including flow-based surveillance and...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpsRamp?

I share the impression that OpsRamp pricing is fair; it does not strike me as expensive, and the licensing model is clear enough.

What needs improvement with OpsRamp?

What is your primary use case for OpsRamp?

Currently, my use case for OpsRamp is using it as an infrastructure monitoring tool for customers, where we can provide infrastructure monitoring as a platform. We can have AI appended to those mon...

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs LiveNX

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveNX

Compared 6% of the time

Nmap vs LiveNX

Compared 5% of the time

ThousandEyes vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

LiveSP vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

Compared 3% of the time

More LiveNX Competitors

Datadog vs OpsRamp

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs OpsRamp

Compared 6% of the time

BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps vs OpsRamp

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpsRamp

Compared 5% of the time

ScienceLogic vs OpsRamp

Compared 4% of the time

More OpsRamp Competitors

Product Reports

LiveNX

Download LiveNX product report

Download OpsRamp product report

Also Known As

LiveNX

No data available

Overview

LiveNX enables real-time network monitoring with a graphical interface, offering detailed reports and advanced integration for comprehensive analysis and efficient network management.

LiveNX provides intuitive tools for real-time issue identification and resolution, leveraging advanced integration with platforms like Cisco SD-WAN to enhance network performance analysis. Through features such as visual analytics and QoS modeling, LiveNX supports capacity management planning and operational efficiency, although it requires improvements in pricing, resource efficiency, and web interface functionality. Users value its insights into traffic patterns, enabling optimization and proactive issue resolution.

What are the key features of LiveNX?

Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates immediate issue identification.
Graphical Interface: Enhances user experience with detailed visualization.
Integration Capabilities: Supports platforms like Cisco SD-WAN for comprehensive analysis.
Visual Analytics: Provides insights into traffic patterns.
QoS Modeling: Aids in planning and maintaining service quality.
Custom Templates: Offers personalized network management tools.

What benefits should users look for?

Proactive Issue Resolution: Enables early detection and solving of network problems.
Comprehensive Analysis: Assists in understanding and managing network performance.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances overall network management processes.
Traffic Optimization: Improves service quality and network utilization.

Industries use LiveNX to monitor and troubleshoot network performance, manage traffic, and ensure QoS across on-premises and cloud environments. It is particularly valued for its ability to visualize and optimize network traffic, which is crucial for maintaining service quality.

BlueCat

OpsRamp offers a comprehensive IT management platform that enhances business operations through monitoring automation, AIOps, and integration capabilities.

OpsRamp provides a single pane of glass for hybrid infrastructure management, integrating with tools like Zendesk to streamline operations. With predictive analytics and AIOps features such as root cause analysis, it significantly improves IT efficiency. The platform's machine learning, event correlation, and personalized dashboards improve user experience. However, users have noted scalability issues, interface limitations, and patch management inconsistencies, with room for enhancement in network capabilities and ITSM maturity.

What features define OpsRamp?

Single Pane of Glass: Enables seamless monitoring of all IT assets in one dashboard.
Event Correlation: Reduces noise by filtering events and highlighting critical incidents.
Integration Capability: Connects with tools like Zendesk to boost collaboration.
Predictive Analytics: Offers insights through machine learning to anticipate IT issues.
AIOps Automation: Facilitates root cause analysis and automated incident resolution.

What benefits should users consider from OpsRamp reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlined operations through integration and automation.
Improved Collaboration: Better coordination via multi-tenant architecture and shared dashboards.
Increased Accuracy: Machine learning features provide precise reporting and analysis.
Operational Cost Savings: Tools consolidation and predictive features reduce expenses.

OpsRamp is widely implemented for managing and automating IT infrastructure across sectors. Enterprises apply it for Azure infrastructure management, resource threshold setting, and generating alerts. It supports digital transformation through incident management, tools consolidation, and leveraging AI for IT operations, facilitating network and storage device onboarding for customer environments.

Sample Customers

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Epsilon, CloudBrix, GreenPages, NIIT Technologies

LiveNX vs. OpsRamp