ManageEngine DataSecurity vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention comparison

ManageEngine and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. ManageEngine is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8. ManageEngine holds a 0.5% mindshare in DLP, compared to Microsoft’s 8.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine DataSecurity

Read 2 ManageEngine DataSecurity reviews

368 Views
368 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Loss...

Read 31 Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention reviews

7,759 Views
6,518 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

ManageEngine DataSecurity

Microsoft Purview Data Loss...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and ManageEngine DataSecurity compete in providing data protection solutions for organizations. Microsoft Purview seems to have an edge in pricing and support, while ManageEngine stands out with its feature set.

Features: Microsoft Purview offers robust integration with Microsoft 365, advanced threat protection, and policy enforcement. ManageEngine provides comprehensive auditing capabilities, detailed file integrity monitoring, and multi-operating system support, offering deeper insights into potential threats.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview is known for seamless deployment within Microsoft ecosystems but faces some challenges in customer service responsiveness. ManageEngine, despite a more complex setup process, is recognized for strong customer service support, assisting with transitions.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview is seen as cost-effective with pricing aligned to Microsoft 365 subscriptions, offering efficient ROI for those with existing Microsoft infrastructure. ManageEngine, though initially more expensive, is valued for its extensive features and long-term benefits, promising substantial ROI for businesses focused on robust data security.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine DataSecurity

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Purview Data Loss...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of ManageEngine DataSecurity is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is 8.3%, down from 15.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	8.3%
ManageEngine DataSecurity	0.5%
Other	91.2%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Ganapathy Manoharan

IT Systems Administrator at Prokhas Sdn Bhd

Affordable and provides visibility into what the users are doing with the data

The file integrity monitoring feature is difficult to manage because some files are confidential while others are not. We use a different tool to classify the files as confidential and non-confidential. The sensitive data discovery and classification features are not of much help. It is a difficult process. The controlling features must be improved. The interface must be improved.

Read full review

ClayHampton

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Protects sensitive data across devices and helps address client compliance needs proactively

The reporting in Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is a little easier than most Microsoft portals. I understand the licensing cost, especially if you're a Business Premium or in the SMB world, and a lot of clients run with a Business Premium. That comes with data loss prevention in a manual process, whereas E5 gives automation. Microsoft has said, 'Okay, here's your Microsoft 365 E5 compliance add-on that can go on the Business Premium.' So Business Premium users can get the data loss prevention features of E5, which is fantastic. That was the big point that they were missing, and I'm glad that they actually have an add-on now that makes it possible. So truly, I don't think there's a downside. Maybe more reporting, but that's it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product’s strict policies are its best features."

"The detection and alert features are valuable."

"Microsoft Purview has helped improve my company's ability to discover sensitive data, as most companies would say that they improved in the whole posture on this field."

"Insider risk management and data retention are beneficial."

"It's secure and can be integrated with an existing Forcepoint DLP setup."

"If we can prevent information from going out, eventually, when a regulator is asking about our security measures, we can show what we've been doing."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention protects the organization from user data getting out that should not be out and works very well when assessing the ability to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's ability to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information is valuable."

"The auto-labeling feature is definitely the most valuable feature. It goes in and labels the documents for you in different repositories. It covers the Outlook and Exchange repositories along with SharePoint and OneDrive. It is really helpful in those areas."

"One of the valuable features of Purview is the ability to create a legal hold on a user's account within the compliance portal. That's pretty useful when it comes to any litigation or if you want to redeem the content within a mailbox, OneDrive, or a generic public SharePoint site."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"The vendor must provide a cloud solution."

"The interface must be improved."

"I would say the improvement of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention could be in the propagation of policies, as if you create a policy, it may take up to 48 hours to propagate to devices, and this might take a little bit longer than ideal."

"Endpoint Data Loss Prevention needs to be improved as it is not up to expectations."

"The AI advancements can improve the false positives."

"A major improvement is required in the solution's incident handling and alerting."

"The amount of false positives and the hash issue we had have brought down the score for me."

"The scalability, in terms of the portal, could be more user-friendly. Sometimes I have faced difficulties in identifying the options."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's licensing is expensive."

"There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a learning curve for setting up the labels. Some of the setup wizards could be more helpful from an AI perspective. They can streamline the setup through more AI technologies so that you don't have to jump through so many hoops and different menus and dropdowns. It would be useful to have a setup wizard that is more hands-off and engaging for setting up the information type labels. If you tell them this is what we're trying to protect, it should basically start to lead you down that path of best practices. Such a feature would be great."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Though I am not a specialist, the tool is quite expensive."

"It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have an E5 license, and a part of understanding the E5 license is to see what all you get with it. If you really look at it from that standpoint, you get a lot of value. You have Defender and all its security features in there as well. Their licensing is fairly flexible. They have different programs. We've seen ones where you could pay for up to three to five years in advance. There is also a monthly pay-as-you-go type of deal, but we're doing a yearly renewal and fixing the budget."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

"If one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the price as one out of ten."

"The cost works out to about $15 per user per month."

"I am satisfied with the tool's pricing."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"You get the solution in a bundle if you get the E5 suite."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine DataSecurity?

The detection and alert features are valuable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine DataSecurity?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine DataSecurity?

We use the product for real-time data visibility and analysis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

The pricing of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is acceptable for us.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

I think that a feature on the side where you could click on something with a question mark, and then if you click on it, it would open up a new window and give you more information on that, almost ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

My main use case is to upload mailboxes. We're using Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to upload mailboxes. The migration tool that's built into the Microsoft Hybrid isn't working on our domai...

See all answers

Comparisons

Trellix DLP vs ManageEngine DataSecurity

Compared 27% of the time

More ManageEngine DataSecurity Competitors

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon Macie vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Download ManageEngine DataSecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

January 2026

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention, MS Endpoint DLP, Microsoft Endpoint DLP

Overview

Information not available

ManageEngine

At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

February 2026

Free Report: ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.