Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

OpenText and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Read 6 Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

3,016 Views
1,749 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

1.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (12th), Test Management Tools (6th)

Featured Reviews

it_user375834

VRM - Venue Results Manager at a sports company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution.

The most valuable features for us are Performance on execution Usage, once most of tasks are drag and drop, so you just need to drag the features during script preparation Integration with other ALM tools My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool.…

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has helped a lot in reducing the time that would be put in for a particular module."

"The most valuable feature is the graphical workflow."

"My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool, which made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution."

"Service Test is user friendly and requires QTP developers a relatively minimal learning curve to catch up with any changes in features that may get introduced by newer versions."

"Service Test provides different opportunities in SOA testing, which helps us to provide better SOA solutions to clients."

"The data validation used to take a lot of time, and now through Service Test it is done within minutes."

"It is very easy to use, and you can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."

"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a user-friendly solution."

"The most valuable features are integration, support, and ease of use."

"The interface is easy to use."

"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."

"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."

"At the start, many years ago, it was not the best solution, but now it is the best in a technical development environment."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"Service Test technology is primarily meant to test applications without user interface therefore falling short of helping in the test of UI applications unlike QTP."

"They should come up with something like Fiddler to see the service status."

"Its pricing is a bit high when compared to other SOA testing tools."

"If the license server went down, all the HPST nodes would fail their automation tests, which would bring down the entire automated test infrastructure and people would think the current build was bad."

"When an entire script is ready in the tool and there is a modification of WSDL at the final point, you need to form the code from scratch and there will be a lot of objects in the tool that wouldn't work after the inclusion of the new WSDL, which requires significant manual effort to fix."

"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."

"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."

"The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface. Currently, I need to search online to find out how to use certain functions."

"The database administration could be better; it would be nice if we could do every design related task also in Visual Studio what is possible in SQL Server Management Studio."

"I would like to see more integration in the solution."

"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."

"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."

"The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is a price-effective solution"

"We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."

"We use the solution’s community version, and the solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

"Users have to pay a licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

"I think that the pricing is quite good."

"The pricing is expensive."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very expensive solution."

"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional?

We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for automation testing, specifically using C# Selenium.Visual Studio Test Case Management, which is embedded in Azure DevOps itself, is part of our process. We ...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

More Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

April 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Also Known As

Service Test, HPE Service Test

No data available

Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

OpenText

Visual Studio Test Professional offers sophisticated testing capabilities with a focus on integration with Azure DevOps. Supporting software development, it aids in application creation, lifecycle management, and testing, accommodating a wide array of programming languages.

Visual Studio Test Professional delivers robust features essential for software developers, including seamless integration with C# and .NET projects and extensive customization options. The platform's robust debugging, unit testing, and memory analysis help streamline the development process. Its intuitive interface and integration with tools like IntelliSense and NuGet package manager enhance productivity, alongside its collaboration capabilities with Azure DevOps. While beneficial, it faces challenges such as integration issues with CI tools, high technical skill requirements, and concerns about pricing and stability. Refinements in user interface design, platform compatibility, and support for AI and machine learning technologies remain necessary.

What are the most important features of Visual Studio Test Professional?

Seamless Integration: Works efficiently with C# and .NET, reducing setup complexities.
Intelligent Tools: Includes IntelliSense for coding, simplifying complex tasks.
Robust Debugging: Offers advanced debugging features for troubleshooting.
Extensive Customization: Adaptable to meet development needs effectively.
Azure DevOps Collaboration: Enhances project collaboration and tracking.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines development workflow, saving time.
Enhanced Collaboration: Team integrations facilitate smoother project execution.
Expanded Capabilities: Supports automation, leading to increased productivity.
Comprehensive Documentation: Extensive resources aid in navigating platform complexities.

Visual Studio Test Professional finds its application in software development and automation testing industries, where technical teams use it to create and manage applications across multiple environments. It supports test-driven development, ensuring secure and functional project outputs, and aids in the integration of DevOps practices, enhancing collaborative efforts in software solutions creation.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.