Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs Sauce Labs comparison

OpenText and Sauce Labs are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Sauce Labs users who would recommend it.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Read 6 Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Sauce Labs

Read 113 Sauce Labs reviews

6,349 Views
5,397 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Sauce Labs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and Sauce Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

1.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sauce Labs

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (12th), Test Automation Tools (19th)

Featured Reviews

it_user375834

VRM - Venue Results Manager at a sports company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution.

The most valuable features for us are Performance on execution Usage, once most of tasks are drag and drop, so you just need to drag the features during script preparation Integration with other ALM tools My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool.…

Read full review

Mohit Rathi

Lead Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Provides multiple test environments and saves time, but should have something for inspecting mobile apps screens

With the desktop browser, we can inspect any screen with the web developer option, but they should provide something for mobiles so that we can quickly inspect elements on the device. To write the Selenium scripts, we require web locators. We have to capture them from the local and execute the script on Sauce Labs. If Sauce Labs can provide a solution where we can inspect any of the mobile devices online, it will be very helpful for us. I also faced an issue where during the execution time, the iCloud password used to expire within a certain period, which used to create pop-ups on the screen making our tests fail. That was one thing that we faced many times. If that can be improved, it will be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the graphical workflow."

"My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool, which made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution."

"Service Test provides different opportunities in SOA testing, which helps us to provide better SOA solutions to clients."

"Service Test is user friendly and requires QTP developers a relatively minimal learning curve to catch up with any changes in features that may get introduced by newer versions."

"It has helped a lot in reducing the time that would be put in for a particular module."

"The data validation used to take a lot of time, and now through Service Test it is done within minutes."

"I never faced any issues with the stability."

"The insights section provides a great overall state of the automation suite and can identify trends relatively quickly. If we see a dip in our passing rate over time, we can look at what changed when the test started failing to find the root cause rather than doing a quick fix to find that the test fails a short time later."

"Sauce Labs helps us identify the root causes of bugs. The solution offers a lot of flexibility by providing the latest iOS and Android emulator versions, and even the Appium updates when it comes out in the market."

"Having the ability to test our application on additional browser/OS/mobile device combinations opens up additional revenue streams for us because we have a larger user base."

"Testing my app on cloud has really helped us with save time and resources to procure various hardware and software, and set those up."

"With only a few clicks, it gives us the availability to use any browser and OS combination whenever we want."

"No need to purchase more real devices."

"The configuration and options within Sauce Labs are endless, which makes it an excellent product."

More Sauce Labs pros

Cons

"When an entire script is ready in the tool and there is a modification of WSDL at the final point, you need to form the code from scratch and there will be a lot of objects in the tool that wouldn't work after the inclusion of the new WSDL, which requires significant manual effort to fix."

"Its pricing is a bit high when compared to other SOA testing tools."

"They should come up with something like Fiddler to see the service status."

"If the license server went down, all the HPST nodes would fail their automation tests, which would bring down the entire automated test infrastructure and people would think the current build was bad."

"Service Test technology is primarily meant to test applications without user interface therefore falling short of helping in the test of UI applications unlike QTP."

"Back in 2018 or 2019, I would have said that Sauce Labs' stability is horrible."

"I can't remove team members that have left the organization. I can only set them as inactive. It would be really nice to clean up my data and delete them from the team management."

"Lacks the ability to start multiple tests simultaneously."

"Sometimes pasting text while using "text object" does not seem to work, and it slows down testing times quite a bit."

"Speed."

"Unable to segregate reports for tests that are currently being developed, and might not be returning useful results."

"Playback needs improvement."

"Using Sauce Connect was very confusing."

More Sauce Labs cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Compared with other services, Sauce Labs is a bit expensive."

"Go ahead please. Try it at a smaller scale."

"They could improve on the pricing because it seems pretty expensive. I'm sure it's justified, but it's expensive."

"Their pricing is incredibly competitive."

"Now that we have an enterprise license, we no longer have to worry about minutes each month!"

"The pricing is reasonable due to the amount of diversity that they provide. However, I feel they might be more flexible to bargain based on their relationship with our organization."

"We pay for a specific number of VMs."

"Try the free trial and work with a Sauce Labs representative to see what package works best for your application(s)."

More Sauce Labs pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	73

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Visual Studio Test Professional vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

More Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Competitors

BrowserStack vs Sauce Labs

Compared 11% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs Sauce Labs

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs Sauce Labs

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Sauce Labs

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Sauce Labs

Compared 3% of the time

More Sauce Labs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

June 2026

Download Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Sauce Labs

May 2026

Download Sauce Labs product report

Also Known As

Service Test, HPE Service Test

No data available

Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

OpenText

Sauce Labs delivers a versatile platform for enhancing testing accuracy and efficiency. It supports parallel testing and provides access to numerous browser versions without infrastructure worries, making it ideal for comprehensive compatibility checks.

Sauce Labs integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, offering parallel testing, cross-browser and OS testing, and extensive mobile device support. Users can quickly deploy virtual machines and utilize a variety of browsers. Features like video recording, screenshots, and real-time reports facilitate effective debugging. With secure cloud execution and a wide range of real and virtual devices, Sauce Labs significantly enhances development processes. However, there are areas needing improvement, such as speed and connectivity, device availability, documentation quality, and integration with platforms like Azure and GitHub.

What are the core features of Sauce Labs?

Parallel Testing: Run multiple tests concurrently to save time.
Cross-Browser and OS Testing: Test on numerous browser versions and operating systems effortlessly.
Mobile Device Support: Access various mobile platforms for testing.
Integration with CI/CD: Enhance development workflows with seamless integration.
Real and Virtual Device Availability: Use a mix of devices for comprehensive testing.

What benefits should users look for in Sauce Labs?

Infrastructure Efficiency: Avoid the burden of maintaining testing infrastructure.
Debugging Tools: Benefit from video recording and real-time reports for swift issue resolution.
Resource Management: Improve test and resource management through scalability.
Comprehensive Compatibility: Validate applications across a multitude of device and browser configurations.

Sauce Labs is implemented across various industries, particularly where robust testing is crucial. In sectors like finance and healthcare, where application reliability and security are paramount, companies leverage Sauce Labs to ensure their applications function flawlessly across devices. The ability to execute thousands of daily tests and comprehensive integration capabilities makes it a preferred choice for industries focusing on delivering high-quality applications.

Sauce Labs

Sample Customers

John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank

Salesforce.com, Mozilla, Zendesk, Puppet Labs, Twitter, Bank of America, Eventbrite, Bleacher Report, Okta, Intuit, Travelocity, Sharecare, CapitalOne.

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.