Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Read 6 Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 114 Tricentis Tosca reviews

24,768 Views
15,356 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Micro Focus Service Test and Tricentis Tosca compete in the software testing market. Tricentis Tosca has the upper hand due to its advanced features, offering a worthwhile investment.

Features: Micro Focus Service Test offers robust API testing, ease of use, and flexibility in handling diverse data sources. It supports multiple technologies like REST, Java, and .NET. Tricentis Tosca includes model-based testing, extensive automation capabilities, and integration with multiple UI and non-UI technologies. It allows for scriptless automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.

Room for Improvement: Micro Focus Service Test could improve by offering cloud-based deployment and enhancing its customer support. Updates to support modern agile methodologies would be beneficial. Tricentis Tosca could enhance its SAP application performance and provide more competitive pricing. Improved reporting and support for niche technologies might also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers cloud-based deployment, which provides flexibility and agility, along with extensive customer support. Micro Focus Service Test follows a traditional deployment model requiring more setup, potentially affecting resource allocation and customer service effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Micro Focus Service Test involves lower setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. However, Tricentis Tosca's higher initial investment delivers greater ROI through advanced features and automation efficiency, justifying long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

1.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

114

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Featured Reviews

it_user375834

VRM - Venue Results Manager at a sports company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution.

The most valuable features for us are Performance on execution Usage, once most of tasks are drag and drop, so you just need to drag the features during script preparation Integration with other ALM tools My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool.…

Read full review

AKSHAYRATHI

Senior engineer at Nagarro

End-to-end regression automation has accelerated delivery and now secures complex test data

I think Tosca can be improved, particularly in AI capabilities because right now Tosca does not have any strong API capabilities. It has some AI features in the newer version, but many organizations have not adopted these due to version-specific problems, as some are still using older versions. From an AI point of view, they can enhance reliability since the world is moving towards AI, and every tool must be integrated. While Tosca has made attempts, I have not used them and they are not widely adopted, so they are stuck in the testing phase in my organization. I would also mention that while I am currently using Tosca Mobile, the loading part and connectivity issues need improvement. They should better integrate AI features that are already present but not widely used across many organizations. Reliability on the AI aspect needs enhancement for practical application. From the perspective of governance and security, I believe Tosca can develop its own LLM or leverage third-party LLMs while maintaining security and risk management regarding client data. Many companies prefer using Tosca due to data security, which is crucial. An in-house LLM could significantly enhance its debugging power and provide helpful solutions upon test case failure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The data validation used to take a lot of time, and now through Service Test it is done within minutes."

"The most valuable feature is the graphical workflow."

"Service Test is user friendly and requires QTP developers a relatively minimal learning curve to catch up with any changes in features that may get introduced by newer versions."

"My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool, which made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution."

"Service Test provides different opportunities in SOA testing, which helps us to provide better SOA solutions to clients."

"It has helped a lot in reducing the time that would be put in for a particular module."

"We have, within the first six months, been able to automate 85% of our critical business processes and we have been able to maintain that while keeping our BCR ratio down, and we have also seen about 234 defects per month in production drop to less than 8."

"The scriptless automation tool is one of the important features."

"Overall, by next year, we will be looking at a total reduction in testing costs of about $14 million, across the span of three years."

"Tosca can go through platforms to make end-to-end testing across CRM, billing, provisioning, order management flow, and databases to check for errors."

"I liked the "no required scripting" part as most of the people in my team are not skilled QAs and half of the team reside offshore, thus it suited to most of our requirements."

"Scriptless SW QA automation provides a very quick on ramp to test automation with little maintenance."

"It can provide all levels of testing from design to execution to reporting."

"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"When an entire script is ready in the tool and there is a modification of WSDL at the final point, you need to form the code from scratch and there will be a lot of objects in the tool that wouldn't work after the inclusion of the new WSDL, which requires significant manual effort to fix."

"They should come up with something like Fiddler to see the service status."

"Its pricing is a bit high when compared to other SOA testing tools."

"If the license server went down, all the HPST nodes would fail their automation tests, which would bring down the entire automated test infrastructure and people would think the current build was bad."

"Service Test technology is primarily meant to test applications without user interface therefore falling short of helping in the test of UI applications unlike QTP."

"The product, at times, does not recognize objects, especially in web applications."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive solution and there is an annual license required. The whole licensing process is confusing and it could be made easier."

"There have been some setbacks because of upgrades. While Tosca has been around for a while, Tricentis has catered to smaller clients and I don't think they have done such a large, at-scale transition or transformation before or worked with a company like ours, which is doing an enterprise-wide transformation. When we go to their customer advisory-board meetings, upgrades have been an issue. They have been working a lot to make upgrades seamless."

"I would say the reporting part of the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Tricentis Tosca's performance could be better. Sometimes when we are remapping or when it is loading it can take a lot of time. There are free solutions that have better performance in this area."

"Sometimes new features do not work as shown on slides, in the first release."

"There should be ease of data manipulation within automation test cases."

"Because of expensive licenses, if your company is new to the market, do not start a business using Tosca if you expect slow growth - use cheaper solutions instead, and switch to Tosca once you are overwhelmed with projects and work."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."

"I rate the price of Tricentis Tosca a two out of five."

"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."

"The price of the tool is a problem for a lot of Brazilian clients or Latino clients, as it is expensive. Where I work, if one is low price and ten is high price, I rate the tool's price as a ten out of ten."

"The tool's pricing is lower than that of other automation tools."

"I'm not sure if I'm at liberty to talk about the pricing, but it has some significant costs. For example, you have to pay a license and maintenance fee. Then the rest of the terms are negotiable. We have to consider what we need and what benefit we get from it."

"My understanding is that it's an expensive product, although I don't know the specifics with regards to pricing."

"There are two licenses: single user and multiple user. A multiple-user license means that several people can work together on one project and collaborate on code stored in a central location. A single-user license is for people working alone on a one particular application. It's much cheaper than a multi-user workspace. If you are getting a large volume of licenses for an enterprise, you can probably negotiate a discount, but I'm not sure about that."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	75

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis Tosca?

The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or me...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Visual Studio Test Professional vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 16% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

October 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Service Test, HPE Service Test

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

OpenText

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.