No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.
Tricentis Tosca
Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews
  • 21,385 Views
  • 12,831 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Micro Focus Service Test and Tricentis Tosca compete in the software testing market. Tricentis Tosca has the upper hand due to its advanced features, offering a worthwhile investment.

Features: Micro Focus Service Test offers robust API testing, ease of use, and flexibility in handling diverse data sources. It supports multiple technologies like REST, Java, and .NET. Tricentis Tosca includes model-based testing, extensive automation capabilities, and integration with multiple UI and non-UI technologies. It allows for scriptless automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.

Room for Improvement: Micro Focus Service Test could improve by offering cloud-based deployment and enhancing its customer support. Updates to support modern agile methodologies would be beneficial. Tricentis Tosca could enhance its SAP application performance and provide more competitive pricing. Improved reporting and support for niche technologies might also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers cloud-based deployment, which provides flexibility and agility, along with extensive customer support. Micro Focus Service Test follows a traditional deployment model requiring more setup, potentially affecting resource allocation and customer service effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Micro Focus Service Test involves lower setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. However, Tricentis Tosca's higher initial investment delivers greater ROI through advanced features and automation efficiency, justifying long-term investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
1.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tricentis Tosca
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Service Virtualization (2nd), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user375834 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user375834
VRM - Venue Results Manager at a sports company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution​.
The most valuable features for us are Performance on execution Usage, once most of tasks are drag and drop, so you just need to drag the features during script preparation Integration with other ALM tools My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool.…
Read full review
reviewer2740515 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2740515
Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers
Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Service Test is user friendly and requires QTP developers a relatively minimal learning curve to catch up with any changes in features that may get introduced by newer versions."
"It has helped a lot in reducing the time that would be put in for a particular module."
"My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool, which made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution."
"The most valuable feature is the graphical workflow."
"The data validation used to take a lot of time, and now through Service Test it is done within minutes."
"Service Test provides different opportunities in SOA testing, which helps us to provide better SOA solutions to clients."
"Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies."
"It is easy to maintain and easy to automate. No coding skills are required to automate. It is also easy in terms of transferring knowledge and skills. Many of my team members shifted over the past one and a half years, and there was no big issue with respect to knowledge sharing. It is a good tool that enables me to re-automate my scripts and update my scripts as quickly as possible. Looking at the amount of rework and maintenance activity that we had done for our scripts, it might have been a nightmare with some other scripting tool."
"The primary driver for us is that it puts automation into the hands of non-technical testers."
"We decided to go with Testsuite because you can integrate manual test cases and you can see the reports in a nice way and see how the test case is going in the requirement section."
"One notable feature is its ability to handle negative XPath healing processes. If one XPath fails, Tosca can utilize backup XPaths to ensure test cases do not fail due to locator issues, thereby focusing on identifying application-side issues, which is the ultimate goal."
"Testsuite accomplishes what a lot of different tools did before."
"The model-based scriptless automation is the most valuable feature because it needs less maintenance as compared to script-based automation."
"Risk-based testing, test optimization, and support for over one hundred technologies are some of the most important capabilities of the platform."
More Tricentis Tosca pros
 

Cons

"If the license server went down, all the HPST nodes would fail their automation tests, which would bring down the entire automated test infrastructure and people would think the current build was bad."
"Its pricing is a bit high when compared to other SOA testing tools."
"They should come up with something like Fiddler to see the service status."
"When an entire script is ready in the tool and there is a modification of WSDL at the final point, you need to form the code from scratch and there will be a lot of objects in the tool that wouldn't work after the inclusion of the new WSDL, which requires significant manual effort to fix."
"Service Test technology is primarily meant to test applications without user interface therefore falling short of helping in the test of UI applications unlike QTP."
"It would be of great help if they can fix the loading or performance issues. Sometimes, when I create the test case folder and test cases, it feels like it has loading or performance issues. When passing the objects, we can't sometimes find the exact element. We need to find out that exact location and just give the path for that, and then it works. In the pipeline, when creating Jenkins, we create the list execution for passing the execution list to the commander. I feel it is a bit late, by a fraction of seconds. I first thought it could be my mistake or a setting issue, but I worked on that, and it's not a mistake or a setting issue."
"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."
"Some issues with stability, but those are minor errors."
"It may be different for other companies, but for us, establishing a set of procedures to get people trained was important."
"Tricentis Tosca's performance could be better. Sometimes when we are remapping or when it is loading it can take a lot of time. There are free solutions that have better performance in this area."
"Browser compatibility (probably solved in the newest versions). Version 8 of Tosca had weak compatibility with automation via browsers."
"Getting support from their support team is very difficult; the overall competence of the support has declined, and it's taking a lot of time to get solutions."
"Exploratory testing engine needs improved element recognition (at lease in JAVA Swing)"
More Tricentis Tosca cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis."
"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive solution and there is an annual license required. The whole licensing process is confusing and it could be made easier."
"The pricing and licensing of Tricentis Tosca were alright. Many customers look for end-to-end enterprise solutions, there were not many challenges with the pricing. However, the customers who are coming from Selenium or similar, feel they're paying a premium for this Tricentis Tosca license. If the right person is there for the implementation of the Tricentis Tosca, then it is one of the best tools in the market."
"Pricing could be better."
"We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year."
"I rate the price of Tricentis Tosca a two out of five."
"The tool's pricing is lower than that of other automation tools."
"The price of the tool is a problem for a lot of Brazilian clients or Latino clients, as it is expensive. Where I work, if one is low price and ten is high price, I rate the tool's price as a ten out of ten."
More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise24
Large Enterprise74
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
See all answers
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis Tosca?
The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or me...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 23% of the time
TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 18% of the time
Sauce Labs vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
Sauce Labs vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 17% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 12% of the time
Visual Studio Test Professional vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
Visual Studio Test Professional vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 11% of the time
More Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Competitors
OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 11% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 7% of the time
Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 4% of the time
Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 4% of the time
Ranorex Studio vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Ranorex Studio vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 3% of the time
More Tricentis Tosca Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
June 2026
Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] reportDownload Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis Tosca
May 2026
Tricentis Tosca reportDownload Tricentis Tosca product report
 

Also Known As

Service Test, HPE Service Test
Orchestrated Service Virtualization
 

Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

OpenText

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?
  • User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
  • Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
  • Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
  • Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
  • Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.
What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?
  • Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
  • Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
  • Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
  • Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis
 

Sample Customers

John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
June 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.