Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs TestingWhiz comparison

OpenText and Cygnet.One are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cygnet.One users who would recommend it.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Read 6 Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

TestingWhiz

Read 1 TestingWhiz review

403 Views
318 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

TestingWhiz

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and TestingWhiz based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, BrowserStack, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

1.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TestingWhiz

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (23rd), Regression Testing Tools (10th)

Featured Reviews

it_user375834

VRM - Venue Results Manager at a sports company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution.

The most valuable features for us are Performance on execution Usage, once most of tasks are drag and drop, so you just need to drag the features during script preparation Integration with other ALM tools My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool.…

Read full review

Vijay-Sawale

Test Associate & Manager at Opus Technologies

Low code features and good customization but needs more customer-requested features

We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation The organization was able to provide customers with business solutions by giving demos of various tools, assisting in securing…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool, which made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution."

"The most valuable feature is the graphical workflow."

"The data validation used to take a lot of time, and now through Service Test it is done within minutes."

"Service Test provides different opportunities in SOA testing, which helps us to provide better SOA solutions to clients."

"Service Test is user friendly and requires QTP developers a relatively minimal learning curve to catch up with any changes in features that may get introduced by newer versions."

"It has helped a lot in reducing the time that would be put in for a particular module."

"TestingWhiz is a low code, no code tool with integration facilities, such as with Jira, and can be used over the cloud."

Cons

"They should come up with something like Fiddler to see the service status."

"Its pricing is a bit high when compared to other SOA testing tools."

"If the license server went down, all the HPST nodes would fail their automation tests, which would bring down the entire automated test infrastructure and people would think the current build was bad."

"When an entire script is ready in the tool and there is a modification of WSDL at the final point, you need to form the code from scratch and there will be a lot of objects in the tool that wouldn't work after the inclusion of the new WSDL, which requires significant manual effort to fix."

"Service Test technology is primarily meant to test applications without user interface therefore falling short of helping in the test of UI applications unlike QTP."

"Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestingWhiz?

It is cheaper compared to other tools. The tool is web-based with various licenses, including professional and enterprise editions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestingWhiz?

Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available. Additionally, there is a need to improve the handling of less critical issues which...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TestingWhiz?

We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Compared 43% of the time

More Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Competitors

Selenium HQ vs TestingWhiz

Compared 35% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs TestingWhiz

Compared 28% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs TestingWhiz

Compared 23% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs TestingWhiz

Compared 15% of the time

More TestingWhiz Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2026

Download Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2026

Download TestingWhiz product report

Also Known As

Service Test, HPE Service Test

No data available

Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

OpenText

TestingWhiz is a Codeless Automation Testing Tool for Software, Web, Mobile, Database, Cloud, Web Services and API testing. It is pillared on a strong architecture combined with intuitive Automation Engine and short learning curve that promises to take your test automation to the next level.

Cygnet.One

Sample Customers

John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank

Verizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, BrowserStack, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.