Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

Microsoft and Salesforce are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Salesforce is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 15.7% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Salesforce’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Read 39 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reviews

3,944 Views
2,212 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 6 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,010 Views
781 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and MuleSoft Composer are leading integration platforms. User reviews indicate that Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in cost-effectiveness, while MuleSoft Composer is favored for its rich feature set.

Features: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is praised for its pre-built connectors, robust workflow automation, and seamless integration with other Microsoft services. MuleSoft Composer stands out with its extensive range of integration capabilities, advanced features like API management and data transformation, and comprehensive tools for complex integrations.

Room for Improvement: Users of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps suggest enhancements in documentation, debugging tools, and interface intuitiveness. MuleSoft Composer could improve performance, initial setup processes, and user onboarding. Both platforms have areas to refine, but user feedback is slightly more critical for MuleSoft Composer regarding performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is noted for its easy deployment, reliable customer support, and integration with Azure support channels. MuleSoft Composer, while offering detailed deployment options, faces criticism for its complexity; nevertheless, its customer service is highly rated for responsiveness and effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is often highlighted for its budget-friendly pricing and strong ROI, with pay-as-you-go options and potential cost savings within the Azure ecosystem. MuleSoft Composer, albeit more expensive, is seen as yielding high returns due to its advanced capabilities, with users acknowledging the higher cost but justifying it with superior features and resultant business value.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (27th), Cloud Data Integration (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 15.7%, up from 13.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 3.3%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

Influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent

I have worked on multiple platforms in this space, like MuleSoft, Oracle, Intel, Microsoft, and Dell Boomi. However, Azure Logic Apps is the easiest and most transparent in terms of its operations, licensing cost, and scaling. Being in Azure, the use of the Azure ecosystem becomes quite native with Logic Apps.

Read full review

Prince Barai

Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.

The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved

Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very easy to use, and it's blazing fast. The best thing about Logic Apps is actually its ability to create a solution in a matter of hours. It doesn't need any kind of provisioning, and you don't need any kind of hardware. You can create very small elements like these Logic Apps, and you can build a whole solution from those very simple and small elements. I also like that they are completely incorporated with your existing active directory. You can use user groups directly from the active directory inside Azure and access it from the Logic Apps. You don't need to do anything special, and you just have access. You can just check if the user is, for example, allowed to do some action. Normally it would take you some additional steps and some additional calls to check it. You have to come back to the active directory to make this possible. In Logic Apps, you just have it, and you can use it. I think that there's this concept of logging and recall to the Logic App. It shows you every single step, every single product, and the result it's returning to the next step. It also has an amazing debugging feature. You can rerun some calls and see if, after a correction of the Logic App, for example, you get the correct results. So, it's almost like it's alive. It's like you make a change, poof it, and it's in production, and it's working. The speed of the composition of the problem and creating a real solution for it is extremely fast with this solution. It's extremely fast in creation."

"I like the ability within Logic Apps to design the workbooks through the portal with minimal code."

"The product integration with Active Directory and detailed execution tracking for debugging are the most valuable features."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a nine out of ten, with ten being easy to set up."

"The product's initial setup phase is something that I don't think is complex because once we start using it, it becomes simple."

"Azure Logic Apps has influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent in many cases and is generally 30% to 40% cheaper than any comparable services in this space."

"The product has efficient connectors."

"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pros

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

Cons

"The solution could add an AI version to make it easier for people."

"Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it."

"An area for improvement for Azure Logic Apps could be enhancing its ability to handle large datasets. When dealing with extensive data, we often have to use Azure Data Factory, which is mostly limited to scheduled jobs."

"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."

"The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services."

"Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement."

"There could be custom code for the product's components."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is good for certain types of workloads, but it doesn't offer many customization options."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps cons

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to the prices of Mulesoft, the price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is low."

"The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."

"It is a cost-efficient platform."

"I rate Microsoft Azure Logic Apps's pricing a seven out of ten."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is a little bit expensive, and that is why you use it only for certain types of scenarios."

"It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten"

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pricing and cost advice

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

35%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others. Pricing is dynamic, based on scalability and usage. It is comparable to IBM MQ in cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB. Additionally, I have concerns about disaster recovery ...

See all answers

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

See all answers

Comparisons

Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 30% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 16% of the time

Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 11% of the time

Talend Data Integration vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 1% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 41% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 14% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 14% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 10% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 9% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

March 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

March 2025

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Overview

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

Microsoft

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

March 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.