Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Microsoft and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while Ping Identity is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2. Microsoft holds a 3.2% mindshare in CIaA, compared to Ping Identity’s 9.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Read 8 Microsoft Entra Verified ID reviews

1,138 Views
444 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 30 Ping Identity Platform reviews

5,618 Views
1,180 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Ping Identity Platform and Microsoft Entra Verified ID are competitors in the identity management sphere. Microsoft Entra Verified ID is often favored for its comprehensive features, especially its decentralized identity management, which provides enhanced user privacy and data control.

Features: Ping Identity Platform offers advanced access management, efficient single sign-on capabilities, and granular security measures. Microsoft Entra Verified ID excels with its decentralized identity management system, strong integration with Microsoft ecosystems, and multifactor authentication options that enhance security and usability for enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could benefit from improving its integration capabilities with non-standard structures, broadening its customization options, and enhancing mobile device usability. Microsoft Entra Verified ID may improve in expanding support for non-Microsoft systems, simplifying user interfaces for admin tasks, and enhancing customer-specific customization possibilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform offers streamlined deployment with strong support services, ensuring easy implementation and ongoing assistance. In contrast, Microsoft Entra Verified ID leverages its close integration with existing Microsoft products, providing seamless deployment and customer service attractive to those already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform typically involves higher upfront costs but offers substantial ROI with its extensive features and support, appealing to those seeking comprehensive security solutions. Microsoft Entra Verified ID is known for competitive pricing and, due to its decentralized approach, offers attractive ROI by being a cost-effective solution that harmonizes well with other Microsoft products, appealing to organizations needing scalable and affordable identity management.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Ping Identity Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (20th)

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (9th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Access Management (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra Verified ID is 3.2%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 9.4%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ping Identity Platform	9.4%
Microsoft Entra Verified ID	3.2%
Other	87.4%

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Featured Reviews

MuhammadWaqar

IT Director at Interwood Mobel Pvt Ltd

Supports user management and authentication but needs simpler hybrid integration for broader adoption

I believe there should be an easy provision for the on-premises and for the hybrid environment in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, as there seems to be some difficulty with hybrid implementations, especially in a country like Pakistan where most are transitioning to cloud but not fully migrating, instead opting for hybrid solutions. An ease for hybrid integration would greatly help the technical teams. I believe the policy implementation is a little bit complex on the Microsoft side; there should be a simpler way to implement policies, utilizing standardized templates for compliance, such as industry-specific templates for the service industry, which would be helpful for HIPAA and other compliances.

Read full review

Shruthi R Varikoti

Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo

Generative AI automates access reviews and provides workflow efficiencies

I work with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), IT Service Management (ITSM), and Customer Service Management (CSM) modules of ServiceNow. My project is related to cybersecurity. I have touched on generative AI and integrations like SOAP APIs. I have used the Ping Identity Platform for seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."

"The authentication features of Microsoft Entra Verified ID are valuable. As an infrastructure professional, I appreciate the exceptional integration between on-premises Active Directory features and Entra ID."

"The MFA number matching feature effectively prevents unauthorized access by phishing bad actors who might obtain email credentials. This feature requires users to verify a number on their screen, ensuring they only approve genuine requests."

"Microsoft Entra Verified ID has smoothed out our identity verification process and made it easier for us to authenticate users, making us more confident about our users being who they say they are so we can trust that we have secure logins for all our users."

"I find Microsoft Dynamics 365 very easy and useful because most of the users on our end are using Microsoft, thus they are very familiar with the Microsoft Office stack, and some of SharePoint and Teams."

"The most valuable features of the solution are mainly in the areas of security and auditing."

"Microsoft Entra Verified ID has helped reduce fraud or impersonation attacks because if you are using a government-sanctioned ID, what is more secure than that?"

"I would recommend this solution to others because it's simple enough to deploy."

"I like PingFederate."

"PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies."

"I like the self-service feature. The 502 and UBP systems are also excellent. PingID's ability to authenticate with SSH, RDP, and Windows login is pretty handy. It covers the entire spectrum of use."

"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."

"From a security perspective, I highly value the product's biometric authentication methods such as FIDO, FaceID, YubiKey, and the mobile app."

"It's convenient for users to log in through Ping using the Kerberos adapter because it doesn't require them to authenticate again."

"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"The tool's expensive nature is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"There are issues with the integration of Microsoft Entra Verified ID and MFA. Sometimes, the MFA process doesn't succeed, requiring users to sign out and log back in."

"I have not really seen return on investment with Microsoft Entra Verified ID."

"There is room for improvement in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, particularly in the integration with other platforms, as they could do better with the API, for example."

"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."

"While Microsoft continues to improve the solution, integrating the ID with biometric features could be enhanced, especially in terms of standard B2C flows for multi-factor authentication. Improvements in remembering devices and the timing of MFA triggers could also be beneficial."

"I believe there should be an easy provision for the on-premises and for the hybrid environment in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, as there seems to be some difficulty with hybrid implementations, especially in a country like Pakistan where most are transitioning to cloud but not fully migrating, instead opting for hybrid solutions."

"Microsoft products basically have no support other than the knowledge base, so I would give it a two out of 10."

"It requires some expertise to set up and manage."

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

"Ping Identity Platform must improve its UI since its management console is complicated."

"In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex."

"They could enhance the product's device tracking for better zero-trust security would be beneficial. Currently, it tracks IPs well but lacks detailed device information, which is crucial from a security standpoint."

"PingAccess can only have one token provider, and you cannot enable two different token providers simultaneously."

"In Ping Identity, we have had some issues. We've worked with logging and troubleshooting, including some firewall and security issues."

"There is room for improvement in the solution, particularly in security."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I still feel the pricing is on the higher side for larger customers. They don't pay anything for on-prem Active Directory. Although we receive additional features with Microsoft’s SSO, pricing is an area Microsoft can work on."

"If one is cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the product price as seven."

"The pricing and setup are standard. With Entra, you choose between P1 and P2 licenses. We recommend having at least one P2 license in a company for better alert management, even though P2 is more expensive."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"The product is costly."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

It is hard for me to say how Microsoft Entra Verified ID can be improved. I really do not know the extent of how that can benefit everything. I am trying to learn that here at the Ignite conference.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

My main use cases for Microsoft Entra Verified ID are verifying the end user saying who they are and being able to back that up with government-issued proof.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

My organization has not implemented the Face Check feature yet; we are using YubiKeys. My organization's trust in digital interactions really has not changed since implementing Microsoft Entra Veri...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 11% of the time

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra Verified ID Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

January 2026

Download Microsoft Entra Verified ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

January 2026

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Microsoft Entra Verified ID is a managed verifiable credential service that lets organizations build unique user-owned identity scenarios designed for trustworthy, secure, and efficient interactions between people and organizations. Transform the way you perform identity verification with verifiable credentials.

Face Check with Microsoft Entra Verified ID is a premium privacy-respecting facial matching feature powered by Azure AI services that unlocks high-assurance identity verification at scale. It matches a user's real-time selfie with a trusted identity document – such as a driver’s license or a passport – without ever passing or storing personal data, providing secure, trustworthy verifications for organizations and a quick, simple experience for users.

Learn more about Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Microsoft

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Ping Identity Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.