Microsoft Exchange vs ProtonMail comparison

"One of the most valuable features of Microsoft Exchange is its security."

"The initial setup is very simple."

"I find the Outlook client very valuable. It allows me to connect to the Exchange Server and send and receive emails easily. The graphical interface is user-friendly and has a good look and feel."

"The most used feature of Microsoft Exchange is the email capability, especially since it integrates with the calendar."

"The exchange functionalities are good."

"Microsoft Exchange is stable."

"We have found it to be a stable solution. It is scalable and easy to install."

"It has a feature that allows you to retain an email and recover it as an administrator. When you activate this feature, even if a user deletes an email, the email is still in the system, and we can retrieve it as an administrator. It is a very useful function. We turn this feature on for some of the mailboxes because we need to keep all the records. I like the way emails are classified in this solution. It makes it really easy to take a look at the most important messages. This is a really good functionality. Some of the emails directly exchanged with you are marked as important and shown in one tab, and everything else is in another tab. We usually don't have any issue with Exchange. It can be integrated with different solutions."

"What I appreciate most about ProtonMail is that they are trusted, which is why I choose them."

"The auto encryption of attachments is valuable."

"Some users encounter stability issues. I connect with the support team through my local partner, which takes time."

"Currently, its administration is too cumbersome. It's unwieldy. It's slow. It consumes too many resources. Configuration needs to be much more streamlined and administratively automated."

"More AI features would be good."

"Exchange took time to be deployed. It requires extensive configuration and setting up servers and managing internal network access."

"In our current situation, the disappearance of sanctions would be a tangible improvement. We are basically cut off from technical support and it's very difficult to obtain any updates."

"Exchange can be a little finicky, sometimes, or flakey. Last week, for example, I had gone into my calendar to check on some briefings that I had established, and then went back into my inbox, and suddenly the view had changed. I had no idea what it was that I had done, and I couldn't figure out how to get that view back. I took a productivity hit as a result of that, trying to fix it, due to the fact that it just wasn't what I wanted. It wasn't what I was used to working with. Two different tech support people had to work with me in order to get the view back to what I wanted just so I could be productive."

"Microsoft Exchange could improve the price."

"The default storage capacity is too small."

"I think it is good but I feel that only tech-savvy people use ProtonMail. It is not that popular among other people."

"One improvement could be the integration between ProtonMail and Proton Pass, allowing sharing of specific secrets via email."

"Microsoft doesn't have a unit price, it's based on the quantity, and they offer great discounts."

"The pricing is expensive."

"I rate Microsoft Exchange's pricing a six out of ten."

"The solution is expensive to maintain because it requires frequent updates and ongoing server maintenance."

"Microsoft's licensing structure is too complex, but its prices are affordable, though not cheap."

"Microsoft Exchange is a very well-priced solution."

"Its price is fair."

"The solution's pricing is fine...I do think the tool offers value for money."