Microsoft Exchange vs ProtonMail comparison

"Exchange's interface is good. All of our engineers like it and are accustomed to using it."

"The search tools are good."

"We have found it to be a stable solution. It is scalable and easy to install."

"We've been using Exchange as an email platform. Our clients require multi-country, multi-regional email collaboration with controlled mail flow. The most valuable feature is the capability of message tracking and the protection of user data."

"Our customers are satisfied with the features included in Microsoft Exchange."

"Exchange is a robust system that is well suited for an enterprise environment. It's always up, and we hardly face any technical issues. Exchange has a web interface and integrates perfectly with Microsoft Outlook. This web interface can be easily used to change the passwords from the domain controllers."

"The best features are that Exchange is very customer-friendly, its interface is self-explanatory, it doesn't hang, and it keeps evolving."

"It is a product that is simple to manage, and easy to use."

"The auto encryption of attachments is valuable."

"What I appreciate most about ProtonMail is that they are trusted, which is why I choose them."

"In the version we have, I would like to see better communication between the end device and the Exchange server."

"The cost could be cheaper."

"Microsoft could improve on Exchange's hybrid deployment or HCW. They need to improve on that because I was having many issues with HCW in our environment at times."

"The only thing that could be improved is the pricing."

"An improvement would be to combine Exchange and Teams so that emails, calls, and chats can be integrated into one window."

"After 2022, users of Microsoft Exchange have to migrate mailboxes to Microsoft Exchange Online, and what I'd like to improve is for Microsoft to publish more on-premise versions for customers using Microsoft Exchange. Having more security is another room for improvement in the solution, particularly for mailboxes that develop the Exchange Edge rule to protect internal mailboxes. What I'd like to see from Microsoft Exchange in the future is for Microsoft to still update the latest, existing version which is 2022. I'd like Microsoft to still push more cumulative updates for Microsoft Exchange 2022."

"The product or service could be improved in terms of Microsoft Outlook client compatibility."

"The solution should be easier to deploy."

"One improvement could be the integration between ProtonMail and Proton Pass, allowing sharing of specific secrets via email."

"I think it is good but I feel that only tech-savvy people use ProtonMail. It is not that popular among other people."

"We can get Exchange in the cloud along with the Microsoft 365 license."

"I have Outlook 365 Professional, and Exchange comes in the bundle with other solutions, such as Word and OneDrive. I pay for the use of the bundle monthly and I can imagine if you are a company with many licenses the pricing model would be a lot different."

"It would be nice if it used less resources to run on-premise."

"I don't have enough information about the licensing costs of Microsoft Exchange, but I do know that you need two types of licenses to run it. You need the product key and the client access key to activate Microsoft Exchange. This means that apart from the standard Microsoft Exchange licensing fees, you have to pay additional costs."

"The price of Microsoft Exchange is reasonable."

"Microsoft Exchange is a very well-priced solution."

"Microsoft's licensing structure is too complex, but its prices are affordable, though not cheap."

"This solution is expensive."