Microsoft Exchange vs ProtonMail comparison

"The deployment is a plug-and-play process."

"The latest versions have gotten much better about balancing the load on the backend."

"It is a product that is simple to manage, and easy to use."

"The integration of Microsoft Exchange with other tools allows for seamless collaboration and increased productivity within teams."

"The backup and archiving features are valuable, it is user friendly too."

"We have found it to be a stable solution. It is scalable and easy to install."

"The most valuable features are that you can exchange information, tasks, attachments, and enhance the process in a short amount of time."

"The platform's most valuable feature is the mailbox roles."

"The auto encryption of attachments is valuable."

"What I appreciate most about ProtonMail is that they are trusted, which is why I choose them."

"At the end of the day, the biggest area for improvement is having better and more knowledgeable support technicians."

"The product or service could be improved in terms of Microsoft Outlook client compatibility."

"Nothing is perfect, that's why I am giving Microsoft Exchange a nine."

"The management of .pst files and archiving need improvement."

"It is costly, so it depends on how much you want to pay."

"They could offer simultaneous features for Exchange Online and on-premises versions. Specific features such as litigation hold and audit setups should be available on-premises."

"The solution could be more secure."

"The platform could be more user-friendly."

"One improvement could be the integration between ProtonMail and Proton Pass, allowing sharing of specific secrets via email."

"I think it is good but I feel that only tech-savvy people use ProtonMail. It is not that popular among other people."

"I rate Microsoft Exchange a four out of ten for pricing because it is quite cheap, and many companies use the solution."

"It would be nice if it used less resources to run on-premise."

"We renew the product license with Microsoft every three years. The cost is included within a bundle of services. It's an enterprise agreement with Microsoft."

"I don't have enough information about the licensing costs of Microsoft Exchange, but I do know that you need two types of licenses to run it. You need the product key and the client access key to activate Microsoft Exchange. This means that apart from the standard Microsoft Exchange licensing fees, you have to pay additional costs."

"The solution is expensive to maintain because it requires frequent updates and ongoing server maintenance."

"The price of Microsoft Exchange is reasonable."

"It's a little bit expensive."

"Its price is very affordable, and basically, it is the standard of the industry. We have the Exchange 365 subscription, which includes the usage of Exchange Online. I don't know the specific cost, but it is the retail price of Microsoft 365 E3 licenses. Microsoft's licensing is not very easy to understand. Microsoft changes rules every other day, which makes it difficult for us to understand the licensing not only for Exchange but also for other products. It can sometimes be really complex to understand what you need to have in order to comply with Microsoft licensing."