Microsoft Project vs Procore Project Management comparison

"Dependencies (not typically effectively used in "Agile" techniques) allow understanding of actual project status and challenges."

"It is a complete and all-rounded enterprise product. From a portfolio management perspective and an individual project management perspective, it is a corporate-wide project management product. It can be used for resource planning, financial planning, task planning, etc."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable features of this solution are dependency management, milestone progress, multiple resource rates, and RAG views."

"It's a scalable product, especially the online version."

"They now have MS project Online and they have two levels, so it's easier to access what you need and to choose specifically what you'll use. You can start at a lower level, for example, and be more cost-effective and move up if it suits you."

"It served the purpose. It was pretty user-friendly."

"The daily tracker is valuable."

"The coordination between the field and the office without the need to print or physically transport drawings is very valuable."

"What I appreciate about using Procore Project Management is the convenience of putting everything in one location, where pictures, schedules, blueprints, drawings, change orders, and all documents are accessible in one platform."

"Other companies have been using it for years, and it is a very stable platform."

"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."

"In a future update, the system should be more inclusive and open to everyone, not just limited to one organization. For example, there may be instances where we want to bring in a guest from outside our organization and integrate them into our project. It would be beneficial if the system was more accessible and easy to integrate with other projects. Additionally, it would be great if there was a way to receive notifications, regardless of whether they come from a Gmail domain or another domain, to keep us informed of any incoming tasks."

"It needs to be more comprehensive."

"It has a bit of a learning curve since there are a lot of features in it, and we haven't really gotten a chance to train through the whole product."

"The solution could offer waterfall options for agile and sprint planning."

"What could have been better is the integration with Office 365 so that if you're discussing a project on Teams or there's an email related to the project, it can be tagged to the project in Microsoft Project. That functionality is currently not there."

"The Gantt set needs to be improved. The grid lines needs to be more interactive."

"The stability of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."

"We'd like to have more resource allocation and monitoring features."

"It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"It takes time to use it. It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."

"I did not care for the platform from a user-friendly perspective because I am more of a construction professional than a computer professional."

"The pricing is based on a licensing model and is reasonable."

"Licensing costs vary depending on the user volume. The pricing is good, I'd rate it four out of five."

"The solution has a decent annual license subscription cost, which is not high."

"It gets expensive when having to add all of the plugins and everything that you need."

"I believe the licensing for the solution is based on an annual fee."

"I am not involved with this."

"You do not have to invest much in terms of configuring this solution to suit your needs."

"The product is not expensive. My company has opted for an annual subscription."

"The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."