Microsoft Project vs Procore Project Management comparison

"I like that I can change the task and include different resources related to the task."

"Microsoft offers good support."

"The most valuable features of this solution are dependency management, milestone progress, multiple resource rates, and RAG views."

"Being able to get a milestone schedule or a breakdown out of it is valuable. It can integrate into Visio, which is helpful."

"Microsoft Project provides ROI in terms of return on investment, including time savings and money savings."

"The reporting and national resource capacity planning are the most valuable features."

"They have begun to improve with the new cloud integration."

"Microsoft Project is one of the only solutions you can use in just about any industry. It's difficult to do that with most other project management tools. There is a lot of flexibility within the product assets. Most sectors can utilize Microsoft Project successfully because it doesn't have any generic adapters."

"Other companies have been using it for years, and it is a very stable platform."

"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."

"The coordination between the field and the office without the need to print or physically transport drawings is very valuable."

"What I appreciate about using Procore Project Management is the convenience of putting everything in one location, where pictures, schedules, blueprints, drawings, change orders, and all documents are accessible in one platform."

"There have been some drawbacks with customization. Some users want it to be an automation tool."

"The licensing cost is expensive and has room for improvement."

"The solution could offer waterfall options for agile and sprint planning."

"Could be more user-friendly, and forecasting could be better."

"The Gantt set needs to be improved. The grid lines needs to be more interactive."

"The only suggestion for improvement is the generative AI feature for task suggestions; this is the main concern so far, something nice to have."

"The setup and scalability can be somewhat difficult for new users until they gain knowledge."

"Its user interface could be a little bit more intuitive. Not everybody has the luxury of going to training and understanding which button does what and the functionality. The user interface should be improved to make it a little bit more intuitive. It is not user-friendly. I've dealt with it for a number of years, so it is not hard for me to figure it out, but you would need a quick reference guide or something to say, "Here are the basics. This is how you do X.""

"It takes time to use it. It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"I did not care for the platform from a user-friendly perspective because I am more of a construction professional than a computer professional."

"It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."

"I am not involved with this."

"It was a three-year license deal that was reconciled on a quarterly basis. It is a reasonably priced product, and I consider that we got good value for money."

"The pricing is based on a licensing model and is reasonable."

"Its price could be reduced a little."

"The license fees for the professional version, which is estimated to be approximately $1,600, and the standard version, which is approximately $1,200, may be considered expensive by some users. This is something that could be improved to make the platform more accessible to a wider audience."

"The cost for an on-premises-based license is a one-time fee, and the cloud-based is an annual payment plan."

"The product is not expensive. My company has opted for an annual subscription."

"Microsoft Project is an expensive solution."

"The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."