No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Teams vs TIBCO tibbr comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
181
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (3rd)
TIBCO tibbr
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
16th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 6.8%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO tibbr is 2.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Teams6.8%
TIBCO tibbr2.5%
Other90.7%
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Ayush Saxena - PeerSpot reviewer
Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Collaboration has transformed daily work and supports seamless global voice communication
Microsoft Teams could be improved, especially regarding contact center solutions which have a growing need for omnichannel capabilities, integrating with external platforms such as social media and email for a unified experience. Minor improvements might include reintroducing features such as GPU options available in classic Microsoft Teams to address issues in modern Microsoft Teams related to video meetings and content sharing. Furthermore, essential information such as who started or ended recordings should be more accessible in the Microsoft Teams admin center. I rate it a nine because Microsoft Teams occasionally experiences glitches in the client, leading to missing chat history or other transient issues. The performance issues with the desktop client and the support service complexities contribute to my rating being less than perfect. I have not identified any other improvements needed for Microsoft Teams.
it_user685332 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
The gaps in the API are filled by our own R+D and the publish mechanism is very reliable.
The API is awful. We needed to develop a batch load tool in order to send automated events to Tibber API. The current API version is not well documented, i.e. the current version of the API in the software doesn't correspond to the web-documented API. We had to imagine parameters and names. We had difficulty making it all work, as the login/SSO mechanism was not properly explained so that we could perform external logins to the API and use their features.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I think communication is the best feature overall. We use Microsoft Teams for chat, video, and audio communications, so communication is the most valuable feature. Video communication has improved our productivity. We often need to review the code of some developers, which means we need to see their shared screen. So, I think the screen-sharing feature is the best one for us."
"You can add Teams to a conversation; you can create reports, project plans, or many other things based on Microsoft solutions, and it has improved communication between teams and within each team."
"SharePoint is the most important thing of the solution where you can share your data. I am also impressed with the real-time transcript feature."
"In terms of administrating through Office 365, I like the administration panel, the configuration is easy and powerful, and its integration within Microsoft is very good."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its newest rolled-out feature, called the town hall meeting feature."
"We can share all files on Microsoft Teams directly. It is integrated with Outlook."
"The features of Microsoft Teams I find most useful for team productivity are mainly the screen sharing feature, along with recordings and automatically generated transcripts when we do recording."
"Typically the classical ROI is about seven months from full deployment, but there are a lot of benefits that we can't measure with this metric, like more dissemination of knowledge, fast internal expert finding, less internal emails, less waste of time, and better employee engagement."
"The gaps in the API are filled by our own R+D and the publish mechanism is very reliable."
 

Cons

"I would like to receive fewer updates from Microsoft Teams."
"Microsoft Teams has a limitation on the number of people, which could be increased."
"Signing up for a new device for the solution is challenging."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"We encountered occasional outages, which occurred a couple of times last year while using the product."
"The setup of Microsoft Teams is not very easy, with occasional issues in driver installation and browser compatibility."
"One time the product was basically freezing. I couldn't send a message to my colleague for some reason."
"I didn't know that Teams is part of Office 365, so I think that it should be better advertised with its features and capabilities."
"More customizable features, particularly in mobile app; better preview of document and images stored in other cloud services (like Google Drive, Dropbox and so on)."
"The API is awful."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is affordable because it also includes the licenses on Microsoft Word, Microsoft Office and SharePoint."
"The solution is affordable."
"The product's pro accounts are cheap."
"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The solution's cost is high."
"We get the solution on a corporate plan, where everything is included."
"The solution has a reasonable price in the market."
"We are satisfied with the price of this solution."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Construction Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business66
Midsize Enterprise46
Large Enterprise77
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
From an organizational point of view, the pricing and setup costs for Microsoft Teams are right, especially since it integrates all the new technologies coming to market, including AI and various A...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
One issue is that now it requires the presenter to initiate the meeting. Previously, anyone could quickly become a presenter, but now I have to ask or request for the presentation. This can cause p...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Teams?
My primary use case for Microsoft Teams is day-to-day communication and collaboration with colleagues across different teams and locations. I use it for chats, virtual meetings, sharing documents a...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

MS Teams
tibbr
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
InterPortPolice, Thomson Reuters, Wingstop
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Teams vs. TIBCO tibbr and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.