Mojo Networks vs Ruckus Wireless comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Arista and Ruckus are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Arista is ranked #24, while Ruckus is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. Arista holds a 1.5% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Ruckus’s 9.9% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ruckus users who would recommend it.

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

2,341 Views
2,294 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Ruckus Wireless

Read 105 Ruckus Wireless reviews

16,483 Views
15,989 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Ruckus Wireless

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Ruckus Wireless and Mojo Networks compete in the wireless connectivity sector, each with unique features tailored to various user needs. Ruckus Wireless appears to hold an edge with its BeamFlex technology for stable coverage, while Mojo Networks stands out with its advanced security capabilities.

Features: Ruckus Wireless is characterized by its BeamFlex technology, providing dependable Wi-Fi coverage and connectivity. Users note its ease of setup, along with robust scalability that facilitates efficient management. Mojo Networks excels with cloud-based solutions, offering strong analytics and monitoring. The wireless intrusion prevention system adds a layer of security that distinguishes it in security-focused environments.

Room for Improvement: Ruckus Wireless could benefit from improved support response times and more advanced analytics features. Users suggest integrating more cloud capabilities. Mojo Networks users desire a unified management interface and enhancements in technical support and security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ruckus Wireless performs well in on-premises deployments with reliable support, though some users experience slow response times due to transitions. Mojo Networks thrives in hybrid and cloud deployments, with a seamless setup and good technical support, although premium support can be costly. Ruckus offers extensive international support, whereas Mojo provides user-friendly deployment and support structures.

Pricing and ROI: Ruckus Wireless is considered expensive, which may be a barrier for smaller organizations, but offers good ROI thanks to technology reliability and reduced operational costs. Mojo Networks offers cost-effective pricing compared to competitors like Meraki, providing essential features at a lower cost. Both solutions ensure long-term value, appealing to those valuing performance and security.

To learn more, read our detailed Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ruckus Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

105

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Wireless is 9.9%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ruckus Wireless	9.9%
Mojo Networks	1.5%
Other	88.6%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Pedro Soteras

CEO at ajuntament del Prat

Reliable wireless coverage has supported busy operations and has improved daily connectivity

We have areas that are interference-prone. I am not using BeamFlex technology with Ruckus Wireless. We are satisfied, but there are some problems in the current Ruckus Wireless solution that we could not solve two years ago, and we are still waiting for a solution. These are lateral management problems, and we solved them with another type of tools. However, I do not know if the new versions of the product have resolved that issue. We had approximately 150 access points at that time, so we had many points to change. We had another solution five years ago, and we changed all the access points to Ruckus Wireless solution as well as the Ruckus Wireless platform to manage all the access points.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of the solution has been good. We haven't had any issues."

"The Mojo has proved to handle these high-density requirements and perform better than many competitive devices."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

"We can see what the network is being used for or where problems may be."

"Arista Wifi (Mojo) is highly scalable with a single pane of glass for management, and its troubleshooting capabilities and deep insights are praiseworthy, which together reduce management efforts and help you achieve a great ROI."

"The technical support is pretty good."

"The initial setup was easy."

"It does everything we need it to do, and it scales well, it's stable and offers good security."

More Mojo Networks pros

"We belong to the hotel industry, and in the hotel itself we have deployed WiFi fully throughout the establishment and so far it is working perfectly."

"Its roaming capabilities and the fact that we can have redundant backup controllers are the most valuable. There is a backup controller that is heart beated to the primary. It is also fairly easy to install."

"It ensured our Internet service was always up, allowing us to serve our customers 24/7."

"Zero-handoff is one of the top features. The client balancing between the access points is good. Its security is also fine."

"The most valuable feature is simplicity."

"The product does a very good job of covering specific areas using less equipment than other providers."

"The most valuable feature is the performance. It works great."

"The product has good technical support and offers excellent documentation."

More Ruckus Wireless pros

Cons

"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."

"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."

"The price should be lowered. It is too high for our country."

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."

"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."

"Both further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."

"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."

More Mojo Networks cons

"The captive portal for guest access on the controller is an additional detail that could be enhanced."

"The response time of the support team needs to improve"

"The solution's pricing could be cheaper."

"The biggest adjustment improvement will come from a price adjustment because the price is quite high; it feels like premium pricing. I suggest shaving off 10 percent to 20 percent. That would help grow users and increase the number of clients."

"From the user point of view, sometimes we face a little bit of a challenge in terms of the channels selection for Ruckus. When we have installed all of the APs outdoors, those channels are actually empty in different numbers, so sometimes we found this challenging for getting paired between these point to point communications. If there is any way we can get some proprietary channels or some IT this interruption will not be there. That would be really fantastic for more reliable connectivity."

"The initial setup is complex."

"The cloud system from Ruckus is not mature enough just yet."

"An area for improvement in Ruckus Wireless is automating its guest WiFi access function. Currently, the product requires token generation, so it would be better if there's a portal for the guest to log in and get the password rather than the IT team needing to give passwords to guests."

More Ruckus Wireless cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"There are other solutions, like Ubiquiti, that have lowered their prices, which sometimes makes the argument to go with them. However, we do not bake in the WiFi for other vendors into our managed services, because they do not meet our standard offering."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"The license is provided per access point, so you buy an access point and you use it."

"Of every solution we looked at, every wireless solution, Mojo was a minimum of six figures cheaper. Minimum. Most of them were double, which again is unheard of. Not only do you get all the feature benefits, like everything is there, everything just works, but at the same time, it was a no-brainer, because of the cost. It's almost like you hit the lottery."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

"If you walk into any restaurant or hotel you will find Ruckus Wireless solutions because it is economical when it comes to pricing. There is a basic subscription for the license and support."

"The only complaint I have about Ruckus is the price, but considering other enterprise WiFi products are similarly priced, I feel Ruckus is a superior product."

"It is a good product, but it is pricey. In terms of the pricing, it is a bit expensive."

"Ubiquiti and Aruba Instant On are good for small businesses in terms of cost than Ruckus Wireless."

"Ruckus is an expensive solution."

"The price is high and I give the price a four out of ten."

"The price of Ruckus Wireless is less expensive than other solutions, such as Cisco."

"With Ubiquiti, there's no annual cost to keep the software upgraded, whereas with Ruckus, you have to pay an annual fee or three-year fee. That makes it a little more pricey."

More Ruckus Wireless pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

16%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Aruba Wireless or Ruckus Wireless?

At my organization, we researched Ruckus Wireless among other solutions but ultimately chose Aruba wireless. What did we like about Ruckus? First, it was very easy to use, and anybody with minimal...

See all answers

Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?

Ruckus Wireless offers users the benefit of being both easy to set up and get running as well as being very user friendly. This user-friendly quality also renders it easy to learn how to use and ma...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 10% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 35% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 6% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 4% of the time

ExtremeWireless vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 4% of the time

More Ruckus Wireless Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

October 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Wireless

October 2026

Download Ruckus Wireless product report

Also Known As

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

No data available

Overview

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Ruckus Wireless is renowned for its BeamFlex technology, delivering strong connectivity and ease of use. With integration for existing networks and support for Wi-Fi 6, it provides robust performance in high-density environments such as offices and educational institutions.

Known for reliability and seamless integration, Ruckus Wireless offers scalable wireless solutions ideal for demanding environments. Utilizing SmartRoam and mesh networking, it ensures connectivity and enhanced user experience. Compatibility with Wi-Fi 6 technology and intelligent analytics features cater to the needs of enterprise environments, hospitality, and educational sectors. However, pricing competitiveness and cloud solutions require enhancement alongside improvements in security features to align with industry expectations, addressing concerns about delivery times and feature innovation.

What are the standout features of Ruckus Wireless?

BeamFlex Technology: Improves signal reach and reliability.
Scalability: Easily expands to meet company growth.
SmartRoam: Ensures seamless connectivity transitions.
Mesh Networking: Provides flexible, expansive network coverage.
Wi-Fi 6 Support: Delivers high-efficiency wireless in dense environments.
Intelligent Analytics: Offers valuable network insights and data.

What are the benefits businesses should expect from Ruckus Wireless?

Reliable Performance: Consistent connectivity, reducing downtime.
Cost-efficiency: Competitive pricing for efficient network solutions.
User-friendly Integration: Seamless with existing network infrastructures.
Robust Technical Support: Responsive assistance for troubleshooting and setup.

Across sectors like hospitality, education, and entertainment, Ruckus Wireless is deployed to enhance wireless connectivity. It supports environments needing resilient wireless performance from college campuses to theaters, utilizing access points and sophisticated network management capabilities to improve user connectivity experiences.

Ruckus

Sample Customers

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

American University of Sharjah, Baruch College, Centro Escolar Liceo Santo Tomšs, Chevalier College, Chico Unified School District, Colegio de Fomento El Prado, Columbia Public Schools, Delta School District, Dordt College, Douglas County School District, Drew University, Armonea, Central Utah Clinic, Grove Hill Medical Center, Inner South Community Health Service, Midwest Surgical, Satilla Regional Medical Center, Lyndoch Living, Polonus, Roaring Fork School District, Sonora State, Vivid, Sydney, Players Club, Sandals, Scandic Hotels, Sheraton LAX, Sunbird

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless

September 2026

Free Report: Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless

Find out what your peers are saying about Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.