Mojo Networks vs Ruckus Wireless comparison

Arista and Ruckus are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Arista is ranked #24, while Ruckus is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7. Arista holds a 1.5% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Ruckus’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ruckus users who would recommend it.

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

1,559 Views
1,528 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Ruckus Wireless

Read 106 Ruckus Wireless reviews

14,403 Views
13,971 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Ruckus Wireless

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Ruckus Wireless and Mojo Networks compete in the wireless connectivity sector, each with unique features tailored to various user needs. Ruckus Wireless appears to hold an edge with its BeamFlex technology for stable coverage, while Mojo Networks stands out with its advanced security capabilities.

Features: Ruckus Wireless is characterized by its BeamFlex technology, providing dependable Wi-Fi coverage and connectivity. Users note its ease of setup, along with robust scalability that facilitates efficient management. Mojo Networks excels with cloud-based solutions, offering strong analytics and monitoring. The wireless intrusion prevention system adds a layer of security that distinguishes it in security-focused environments.

Room for Improvement: Ruckus Wireless could benefit from improved support response times and more advanced analytics features. Users suggest integrating more cloud capabilities. Mojo Networks users desire a unified management interface and enhancements in technical support and security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ruckus Wireless performs well in on-premises deployments with reliable support, though some users experience slow response times due to transitions. Mojo Networks thrives in hybrid and cloud deployments, with a seamless setup and good technical support, although premium support can be costly. Ruckus offers extensive international support, whereas Mojo provides user-friendly deployment and support structures.

Pricing and ROI: Ruckus Wireless is considered expensive, which may be a barrier for smaller organizations, but offers good ROI thanks to technology reliability and reduced operational costs. Mojo Networks offers cost-effective pricing compared to competitors like Meraki, providing essential features at a lower cost. Both solutions ensure long-term value, appealing to those valuing performance and security.

To learn more, read our detailed Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ruckus Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

106

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Wireless is 10.5%, down from 14.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ruckus Wireless	10.5%
Mojo Networks	1.5%
Other	88.0%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Pedro Soteras

CEO at ajuntament del Prat

Reliable wireless coverage has supported busy operations and has improved daily connectivity

We have areas that are interference-prone. I am not using BeamFlex technology with Ruckus Wireless. We are satisfied, but there are some problems in the current Ruckus Wireless solution that we could not solve two years ago, and we are still waiting for a solution. These are lateral management problems, and we solved them with another type of tools. However, I do not know if the new versions of the product have resolved that issue. We had approximately 150 access points at that time, so we had many points to change. We had another solution five years ago, and we changed all the access points to Ruckus Wireless solution as well as the Ruckus Wireless platform to manage all the access points.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For support, we do not have to deal with a whole phone menu tree. You get to talk to an engineer right away."

"We can see what the network is being used for or where problems may be."

"At certain points, there are hardware updates and they send notifications before they do the updates."

"It has given us a huge leg-up when competing with other managed service providers who use different vendors because of the visibility it gives us to customers' traffic for troubleshooting purposes."

"The solution is very stable."

"In summary, there is very little that can be improved with this product."

"If you go with Mojo, you're not going to be sorry."

"The most important feature is ease of use. We can simply take an access point and plug it in, then it is automatically configured for us."

More Mojo Networks pros

"Unproblematic"

"All IPs can be managed and monitored by the customer from a single console."

"In head to head competition, Ruckus far outshines them 10 to one."

"With Ruckus, on the other hand, it is a really robust technology and the coverage it provides is helpful during deployment."

"The most valuable feature of Ruckus Wireless is its AI capability, which automatically scales up and down the coverage areas."

"Technical support has been very good; in any situation where I have had to reach out, they have been quick to respond and my issues were resolved in a timely manner."

"My customers use Ruckus Wireless for computing, data transfer, and internet access."

"The Ruckus Location-Based Services (LBS) Solution is the highlight that enables businesses to enhance the way of interaction with their customers on the basis of precise location."

More Ruckus Wireless pros

Cons

"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."

"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."

"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."

"The user interface needs improvement to make navigation even more simplistic."

"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"The price should be lowered. It is too high for our country."

"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."

More Mojo Networks cons

"They could add more flexibility for switching over to another radio if a radio is poor. I am not able to change the radios from 2.4 GHz to 5 GHz."

"Their support has been lacking a little bit and needs to be improved. I have had a ticket open for a month, and it is really hard to get a resolution out of them. They haven't really come out with anything that is much of an improvement in a long time. It has mostly just been fixes and things like that. We used to have a ZoneDirector or a physical controller for the wireless network, and that was kind of end of life. It was very old, and at the time, we were expanding the wireless network, and we didn't want to rely on one piece of hardware that was pretty old. So, we went to SmartZone Cluster, which has two VMs in a cluster. Unfortunately, we lost the feature ability for guest networks and other things that we were using before, and Ruckus just kind of told us that they weren't supporting that feature in the newer product, which is not really great. I was told initially that SmartZone was an upgrade to ZoneDirector. It is the logical thing to think that it is going to have all the same features, but it didn't. The issue that we have right now is onboarding BYOD devices. It is not really great for us, and we're looking for a new product to make that easier. We did have Cloudpath, which was a product that Ruckus purchased from another company that was an onboarding solution, but it just didn't really work very well for us. So, we discontinued using it, and it actually created more confusion for people. They should make BYOD or guest network portals a lot easier and better. In some areas, we have been having issues because there are just so many WAPs that are so close that we had to manually turn down the radio of power because the automatic feature of the AP wasn't really doing it right. It should also have a little bit better RF analysis capability to be able to see on the controller side. The front end for our staff, students, and guests has also not been quite as good as we had hoped."

"Its pricing and licensing can be improved. Its UI can also be more user-friendly. Currently, in the Unleashed mode, the information that you have about the switches that you add to the controller is quite limited. I would like more information regarding switches. In this mode, an access point acts as a controller, so you don't need a controller. It is for deployments with less than 125 access points, and you can use an access point as a controller."

"I feel that the vendor needs to have better control of who is selling the product online, especially when the reseller doesn't know anything about the product."

"My suggestion would be for them to return to more innovative thinking or innovative ideas."

"Sometimes when there's a load of work, even within the range of the concurrent users, we feel that the system is burdened and slows down."

"o make it a ten I would like the ability to replace it if we do have a faulty device. Getting one faster might be helpful. I would like to have autoconfiguration where instead of having to configure a new network, we would be able to push all configuration out a little easier with the interface."

"The price is on the higher end. It's quite expensive, but that is what you get with these types of solutions."

More Ruckus Wireless cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Of every solution we looked at, every wireless solution, Mojo was a minimum of six figures cheaper. Minimum. Most of them were double, which again is unheard of. Not only do you get all the feature benefits, like everything is there, everything just works, but at the same time, it was a no-brainer, because of the cost. It's almost like you hit the lottery."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"We have a term that is renewed every three years."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

"Ruckus Wireless pricing is reasonable. On a scale from one to five, I would give Ruckus Wireless pricing a four."

"It's quite expensive, but that is what you get with these types of solutions."

"It's definitely a good value. It's more expensive than some of the other offerings out there, but when you compare it to other enterprise-class gear, it's very well priced. And the beauty of it is, because it has better range because of their patented BeamFlex - which is the way they can send and receive and listen to signals - you can actually use fewer access points. That means that it's a cheaper overall project."

"Cost-wise, the product is priced above average, considering its competitors in the market."

"Ruckus Wireless is a cheaper solution than Cisco."

"Its price is reasonable for me."

"If you walk into any restaurant or hotel you will find Ruckus Wireless solutions because it is economical when it comes to pricing. There is a basic subscription for the license and support."

"It is a pricey solution."

More Ruckus Wireless pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Aruba Wireless or Ruckus Wireless?

At my organization, we researched Ruckus Wireless among other solutions but ultimately chose Aruba wireless. What did we like about Ruckus? First, it was very easy to use, and anybody with minimal...

See all answers

Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?

Ruckus Wireless offers users the benefit of being both easy to set up and get running as well as being very user friendly. This user-friendly quality also renders it easy to learn how to use and ma...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

SonicWall SonicWave Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 27% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 8% of the time

ExtremeWireless vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Ruckus Wireless

Compared 5% of the time

More Ruckus Wireless Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

June 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Wireless

June 2026

Download Ruckus Wireless product report

Also Known As

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

No data available

Overview

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Ruckus Wireless is renowned for its BeamFlex technology, delivering strong connectivity and ease of use. With integration for existing networks and support for Wi-Fi 6, it provides robust performance in high-density environments such as offices and educational institutions.

Known for reliability and seamless integration, Ruckus Wireless offers scalable wireless solutions ideal for demanding environments. Utilizing SmartRoam and mesh networking, it ensures connectivity and enhanced user experience. Compatibility with Wi-Fi 6 technology and intelligent analytics features cater to the needs of enterprise environments, hospitality, and educational sectors. However, pricing competitiveness and cloud solutions require enhancement alongside improvements in security features to align with industry expectations, addressing concerns about delivery times and feature innovation.

What are the standout features of Ruckus Wireless?

BeamFlex Technology: Improves signal reach and reliability.
Scalability: Easily expands to meet company growth.
SmartRoam: Ensures seamless connectivity transitions.
Mesh Networking: Provides flexible, expansive network coverage.
Wi-Fi 6 Support: Delivers high-efficiency wireless in dense environments.
Intelligent Analytics: Offers valuable network insights and data.

What are the benefits businesses should expect from Ruckus Wireless?

Reliable Performance: Consistent connectivity, reducing downtime.
Cost-efficiency: Competitive pricing for efficient network solutions.
User-friendly Integration: Seamless with existing network infrastructures.
Robust Technical Support: Responsive assistance for troubleshooting and setup.

Across sectors like hospitality, education, and entertainment, Ruckus Wireless is deployed to enhance wireless connectivity. It supports environments needing resilient wireless performance from college campuses to theaters, utilizing access points and sophisticated network management capabilities to improve user connectivity experiences.

Ruckus

Sample Customers

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

American University of Sharjah, Baruch College, Centro Escolar Liceo Santo Tomšs, Chevalier College, Chico Unified School District, Colegio de Fomento El Prado, Columbia Public Schools, Delta School District, Dordt College, Douglas County School District, Drew University, Armonea, Central Utah Clinic, Grove Hill Medical Center, Inner South Community Health Service, Midwest Surgical, Satilla Regional Medical Center, Lyndoch Living, Polonus, Roaring Fork School District, Sonora State, Vivid, Sydney, Players Club, Sandals, Scandic Hotels, Sheraton LAX, Sunbird

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless

June 2026

Free Report: Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless

Find out what your peers are saying about Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.