N-able EDR vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

N-able and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #46 with an average rating of 7.5, while WatchGuard is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8. N-able holds a 0.6% mindshare in EDR, compared to WatchGuard’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

N-able EDR

Read 4 N-able EDR reviews

793 Views
777 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WatchGuard EPDR

Read 37 WatchGuard EPDR reviews

5,078 Views
3,250 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

WatchGuard EPDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

N-able EDR and WatchGuard EPDR are popular endpoint protection solutions. WatchGuard EPDR is considered superior due to its features and users feel it is worth the price.

Features: N-able EDR offers comprehensive threat intelligence, seamless integration, and easy-to-use dashboards. WatchGuard EPDR provides advanced machine learning capabilities, real-time threat detection, and granular policy setup.

Room for Improvement: N-able EDR users suggest enhancements in reporting capabilities, a more granular policy configuration, and offline threat protection. WatchGuard EPDR users recommend improvements in performance impact, offline protection, and a more user-friendly interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: N-able EDR is favored for its straightforward deployment and excellent customer service. WatchGuard EPDR is noted for its complex setup process but reliable customer support.

Pricing and ROI: N-able EDR users find it cost-effective with a satisfactory return on investment. WatchGuard EPDR users feel it provides good value despite higher setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

46th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WatchGuard EPDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WatchGuard EPDR	1.9%
N-able EDR	0.6%
Other	97.5%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Nyiko Malapane

Senior Operations Specialist at Tagit cc

Reporting effectiveness and advanced AI capabilities improve threat awareness while needing pricing simplification and licensing self-service

With pricing, they can improve by bundling their pricing because sometimes billing comes in a very long process. If they could bundle it as one solution and show the capabilities or features, they would be able to sell it more effectively, and as resellers, we could sell it to customers more easily. The technical support is responsive, but sometimes we experience limitations regarding the ability to add licensing. They could implement a self-service platform for assigning new licenses or ordering more. Currently, we depend on contacting someone who sends a new contract to sign through the process. They could change their licensing model, though I am not the right person to comment on functionality. On the reporting side, everything is covered.

Read full review

Norlia Jalani

Section Head, Information Technology at a transportation company with 201-500 employees

Using cloud-based console for software inventory management and email alerts

I have no idea if I use some automation functions. I can't find any disadvantages; maybe that is because many companies haven't used it. I would prefer to see some features such as AI in antivirus solutions. I appreciate reporting, but it could be better with monthly reporting or auto-generated monthly reports.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"We have been using this solution for quite some time, and the AI functionality is quite advanced; we are able to provide insights on different aspects and read the reports easily."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"Adaptive Defense is pretty easy to use, and Panda support is excellent."

"It is stable, and the performance is good."

"The most valuable part of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is its overall effectiveness as a good and decent security solution, providing comprehensive security which improves protection for devices significantly."

"Great technical support staff."

"What I appreciate the most about WatchGuard EPDR is that with the managed detection and response system, when there is an alert about the product running, the turnaround time for enabling it is less than two hours."

"It's very easy to deploy, we don't have any problem or issues. It's most full automatic. It basically takes the assumption that everything is supposed to be a suspect; files, processes, URL accesses, and so on."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily."

"The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective."

More WatchGuard EPDR pros

Cons

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"With pricing, they can improve by bundling their pricing because sometimes billing comes in a very long process."

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"The AV and scanning features could be a little bit better."

"The Linux installation is performed on the command line and they need a package installer for that operating system."

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense is stable. However, when updates are being done on the computers we can experience some troubles because the computers need to be restarted. When we start the computers they are not functioning correctly and we have not received proper feedback regarding this random issue."

"The only part I really don't use as much is their firewall. It's a bit superfluous. Most people have their own firewall in place, so they don't really need that part portion of the solution."

"For some urgent updates, I don't like the need for the tool to be frequently restarted."

"It needs improvements in its EDR and its ability to manage all the nodes. I'd like better communication between the console and the nodes, so I don't have to remote into each individual machine that's having an issue with the protection."

"The implementation was difficult."

"They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."

More WatchGuard EPDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"The product is available at a high price."

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."

"Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."

"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

"The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions."

"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."

More WatchGuard EPDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Healthcare Company

10%

Non Profit

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Hospitality Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

We are using N-able EDR, but I think Sophos makes sense because of the environment we operate in. The localization and different elements were important factors we were looking at. They have their ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

I am more focused on operations and procurement. The decision to use this solution was made before I joined the company. It started with patch management systems and progressed into EDR, backup mon...

See all answers

What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?

The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?

The price of the solution is okay. It's all right.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?

I would not be able to say what areas of WatchGuard EPDR have improved, as I do not work with the product myself so much anymore. I just used to assist with installation and deployment, especially ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 13% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Security vs N-able EDR

Compared 8% of the time

Lookout vs N-able EDR

Compared 5% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 3% of the time

More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard EPDR

January 2026

Download WatchGuard EPDR product report

Also Known As

No data available

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Overview

N-able EDR effectively safeguards against cybersecurity threats like malware and ransomware. With AI-driven capabilities and seamless integration with remote monitoring tools, it offers advanced protection and management for servers and workstations.

N-able EDR, known for its advanced defense mechanisms, utilizes AI and machine learning to enhance threat detection beyond traditional antivirus capabilities. It provides comprehensive visibility with its '360 vision,' integrating smoothly with remote management for unified performance monitoring. While it excels in protecting Windows environments, users seek improvements in mobile support and billing practices. A focus on enhancing licensing efficiency and reducing false positives could further enhance its usability. Ranked highly by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK, N-able EDR remains a favored choice among users for its effective threat management and detailed reporting functionalities.

What are the key features of N-able EDR?

Rollback feature: Helps revert devices to previous states after an attack.
AI models: Improve threat detection using sophisticated algorithms.
Exceptional detection and protection: Offers robust defense against multiple threat vectors.
Auto-response capability: Uses machine learning for efficient incident management.
'360 vision': Provides complete visibility of device inventories.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Comprehensive security: Enhanced detection surpassing traditional antivirus.
Efficient monitoring: Unified device management through RMM integration.
Insightful reporting: Advanced reports provide critical security insights.
Inventory management: Full device oversight with '360 vision'.

In sectors reliant on Windows-based systems, N-able EDR is deployed as a primary antivirus solution. Its advanced AI and reporting features allow businesses to efficiently manage threat landscapes. However, while it secures servers and workstations, industries requiring mobile device support may find its current capabilities insufficient, prompting requests for broader platform integration.

N-able

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR

December 2025

Free Report: N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.