No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
N-able EDR Logo

Top 10 N-able EDR Alternatives

Vendor: N-able
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top N-able EDR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to N-able EDR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

N-able Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with N-able, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
N-able EDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with its cloud-native architecture and real-time threat intelligence, appealing to those seeking cutting-edge security capabilities. In comparison, N-able EDR offers competitive pricing and easy integration, attracting organizations prioritizing affordability and straightforward deployment.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. N-able EDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon generally has a higher setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. This price distinction reflects their approach towards different market segments.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon generally has a higher setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. This price distinction reflects their approach towards different market segments.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides endpoint protection by detecting and blocking malware. It integrates with firewalls, enhances security with AI-driven threat detection, and offers behavior-based analysis. Praised for its user-friendly interface, it ensures endpoint safety but faces challenges like integration issues, high memory usage, and compatibility differences.

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. N-able EDR Report
I feel it is fairly priced.
The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic.
View comparison
Pricing
I feel it is fairly priced.
The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers competitive pricing and straightforward installation processes with robust threat detection. In comparison, N-able EDR provides advanced threat-hunting and customizable policies, though it may have a complex deployment. Both offer comprehensive customer support, with N-able EDR valued for its extensive feature set.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. N-able EDR Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more affordable initial investment. The key difference lies in the initial expenditure, favoring N-able EDR for cost-sensitive implementations.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more affordable initial investment. The key difference lies in the initial expenditure, favoring N-able EDR for cost-sensitive implementations.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers advanced AI-driven threat detection and autonomous response, appealing to those prioritizing superior protection. In comparison, N-able EDR excels with seamless IT management integration and cost-effectiveness, ideal for those seeking simplicity and budget-friendly solutions.
Download N-able EDR vs. SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a straightforward setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more competitive initial pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a straightforward setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more competitive initial pricing model.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
N-able EDR attracts tech buyers with competitive pricing, real-time threat detection, and robust support. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR's advanced threat intelligence and proactive hunting appeal to those seeking superior security insights despite higher initial costs. Both offer cloud-based deployment and strong customer service.
Download Huntress Managed EDR vs. N-able EDR Report
N-able EDR reviews highlight its affordable setup costs, while Huntress Managed EDR is noted for having more expensive setup fees.
View comparison
Pricing
N-able EDR reviews highlight its affordable setup costs, while Huntress Managed EDR is noted for having more expensive setup fees.
N-able EDR Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Security excels in flexible features and active threat detection, while N-able EDR offers a comprehensive suite and ease of integration. In comparison, Elastic Security's customizable policies are a highlight, but N-able EDR's detailed reporting and extensive endpoint coverage appeal to tech buyers seeking seamless, automated responses.
Download Elastic Security vs. N-able EDR Report
Elastic Security has a lower initial setup cost, while N-able EDR incurs higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security has a lower initial setup cost, while N-able EDR incurs higher setup expenses.
N-able EDR Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Tanium excels in threat detection with detailed endpoint visibility, ideal for those needing comprehensive security. In comparison, N-able EDR offers advanced automation and easier deployment, making it attractive for buyers seeking robust, cost-effective solutions with simplified integration, enhancing its value-driven appeal.
Download N-able EDR vs. Tanium Report
Tanium offers a lower initial setup cost compared to N-able EDR, making it more budget-friendly for organizations with limited resources, while N-able EDR may justify its higher cost with advanced features and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium offers a lower initial setup cost compared to N-able EDR, making it more budget-friendly for organizations with limited resources, while N-able EDR may justify its higher cost with advanced features and scalability.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers robust threat detection and incident response, ideal for budget-conscious companies. In comparison, N-able EDR features advanced malware protection and a cloud-native architecture, appealing to firms prioritizing scalability and advanced security features.
Download N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security offers a simpler setup process without significant initial costs, while N-able EDR may involve higher setup expenses but provides an advanced feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security offers a simpler setup process without significant initial costs, while N-able EDR may involve higher setup expenses but provides an advanced feature set.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender XDR excels in seamless integration with Microsoft 365 and automated threat detection. In comparison, N-able EDR offers comprehensive threat identification and superior customization. Microsoft Defender XDR provides competitive pricing, while N-able EDR delivers detailed security with higher ROI through extensive features.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. N-able EDR Report
Microsoft Defender XDR has a lower initial setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution, while N-able EDR requires a higher initial investment. N-able EDR's additional upfront expense might reflect enhanced capabilities or features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender XDR has a lower initial setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution, while N-able EDR requires a higher initial investment. N-able EDR's additional upfront expense might reflect enhanced capabilities or features.
N-able EDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR provides detailed threat detection and advanced security features. In comparison, N-able EDR excels in ease of use and seamless integration with existing systems. Fortinet FortiEDR is ideal for those prioritizing security, while N-able EDR suits users seeking operational simplicity.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. N-able EDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, making Fortinet's initial investment steeper.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, making Fortinet's initial investment steeper.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in pricing and offers robust threat detection with zero-trust network access. In comparison, N-able EDR provides extensive threat intelligence and customizable security policies, appealing to those seeking advanced security features and significant long-term ROI.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. N-able EDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has lower setup costs, while N-able EDR involves a higher initial expenditure, highlighting the cost difference in onboarding these cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has lower setup costs, while N-able EDR involves a higher initial expenditure, highlighting the cost difference in onboarding these cybersecurity solutions.
N-able EDR Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 InsightIDR excels in threat detection and response, offering advanced incident response tools and seamless cloud integration. In comparison, N-able EDR is noted for strong malware detection and automated threat response. Tech buyers may choose Rapid7 InsightIDR for its user-friendly interface or N-able EDR for robust security.
Download N-able EDR vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report
Rapid7 InsightIDR typically requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas N-able EDR offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightIDR typically requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas N-able EDR offers a more cost-effective setup.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum prioritizes pricing and support with automated threat detection. In comparison, N-able EDR focuses on advanced endpoint protection and threat mitigation. Kaspersky's ease of deployment suits smaller firms, while N-able EDR's comprehensive security appeals to enterprises seeking robust defense.
Download Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs. N-able EDR Report
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers competitive setup costs compared to the often higher setup expenses of N-able EDR.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers competitive setup costs compared to the often higher setup expenses of N-able EDR.
N-able EDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
N-able EDR excels in support and deployment features, making it suitable for those prioritizing user assistance and initial setup ease. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR's extensive feature set, including advanced threat hunting, makes it ideal for users seeking comprehensive security solutions.
Download N-able EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
N-able EDR has a lower setup cost, offering an affordable entry compared to WatchGuard EPDR, which has a higher initial expenditure. WatchGuard EPDR justifies this with more extensive features and integration options.
View comparison
Pricing
N-able EDR has a lower setup cost, offering an affordable entry compared to WatchGuard EPDR, which has a higher initial expenditure. WatchGuard EPDR justifies this with more extensive features and integration options.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is recognized for its cost-effectiveness, ease of deployment, and robust threat detection. In comparison, N-able EDR, despite being pricier, offers comprehensive features such as extensive threat hunting and automatic remediation, making it a strong choice for those needing advanced capabilities and favorable ROI.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. N-able EDR Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a moderate setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a lower initial setup cost. N-able EDR attracts budget-conscious users, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone EDR fits larger budgets with more extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a moderate setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a lower initial setup cost. N-able EDR attracts budget-conscious users, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone EDR fits larger budgets with more extensive features.
N-able EDR Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
USM Anywhere excels in pricing and support, offering better value overall. In comparison, N-able EDR's feature set is more comprehensive, particularly in advanced endpoint response capabilities. USM Anywhere's quick deployment and customer support contrast with N-able EDR's robust documentation and higher cost with significant ROI.
Download N-able EDR vs. USM Anywhere Report
USM Anywhere has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, making it a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
USM Anywhere has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, making it a more budget-friendly option.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint is favored for its cost-effectiveness and smooth deployment. In comparison, N-able EDR's real-time monitoring and advanced features justify its higher cost. Cisco stands out in pricing and support, while N-able excels in sophisticated features and scalability.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. N-able EDR Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
N-able EDR Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Lookout is praised for advanced mobile threat protection and data encryption, making it ideal for mobile-centric security needs. In comparison, N-able EDR excels with automated threat detection and in-depth analytics, appealing to those who prioritize comprehensive threat intelligence and a versatile deployment model.
Download Lookout vs. N-able EDR Report
Lookout has lower setup costs, making it more affordable, while N-able EDR's setup is higher but might offer more comprehensive support.
View comparison
Pricing
Lookout has lower setup costs, making it more affordable, while N-able EDR's setup is higher but might offer more comprehensive support.
N-able EDR Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Logpoint is praised for its customer support and ease of use. In comparison, N-able EDR offers comprehensive features with automated threat detection, justifying its higher price. Logpoint excels in customizability and log management, while N-able EDR provides broader security coverage and advanced threat response.
Download Logpoint vs. N-able EDR Report
Logpoint has low initial setup costs, while N-able EDR requires higher investment upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint has low initial setup costs, while N-able EDR requires higher investment upfront.
N-able EDR Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
ConnectWise SIEM offers robust threat detection and comprehensive log management. In comparison, N-able EDR excels in real-time endpoint protection and automated threat response. ConnectWise SIEM is cost-effective with strong support, while N-able EDR's advanced features justify its higher price.
Download ConnectWise SIEM vs. N-able EDR Report
ConnectWise SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, making it a pricier option for initial deployment. N-able EDR's lower setup cost offers a more budget-friendly alternative for businesses seeking economical security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ConnectWise SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, making it a pricier option for initial deployment. N-able EDR's lower setup cost offers a more budget-friendly alternative for businesses seeking economical security solutions.
N-able EDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in detailed reporting and advanced threat detection, making it ideal for users needing comprehensive visibility. In comparison, N-able EDR streamlines integration and real-time monitoring for those prioritizing ease of deployment and efficient customer service over extensive threat analysis.
Download ESET Inspect vs. N-able EDR Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers extensive features.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
Trellix EDR excels in advanced threat detection and automation, making it ideal for addressing complex threats. In comparison, N-able EDR offers superior ease of use and customer support, suitable for those prioritizing straightforward deployment and management. Trellix focuses on automation, while N-able emphasizes user-friendliness.
Download N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Trellix EDR incurs a significant setup cost, whereas N-able EDR offers lower initial setup expenses, highlighting an important financial consideration for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix EDR incurs a significant setup cost, whereas N-able EDR offers lower initial setup expenses, highlighting an important financial consideration for businesses.
N-able EDR Logo
Halcyon
1 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
Halcyon
1 out of 5

Halcyon enhances business processes through automation and data analysis. Users appreciate its workflow streamlining, productivity increase, and insightful analytics. Its integration and ease of deployment are frequently highlighted. Robust data handling, real-time processing, and scalability are notable. Improvements are needed in customer service, bug resolution, and system compatibility.

View comparison
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response offers comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities. In comparison, N-able EDR stands out for its seamless integration and advanced automation features. Symantec's straightforward deployment is praised, while N-able EDR's competitive pricing and robust performance attract tech buyers.
Download N-able EDR vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more affordable setup.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)