Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
N-able EDR Logo

Top 10 N-able EDR Alternatives

Vendor: N-able
3.5 out of 5
Start review

Top N-able EDR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to N-able EDR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. N-able EDR surpasses its competitors by offering robust threat detection, automatic remediation, and real-time analysis, ensuring comprehensive endpoint protection, streamlined incident response, and enhanced security posture with minimal user intervention.

N-able Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with N-able, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
N-able EDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon is preferred for its superior threat prevention and scalability, ideal for enterprises seeking robust security. In comparison, N-able EDR attracts buyers with its affordable pricing and excellent customer support, suiting those prioritizing cost-efficiency and integration in endpoint protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. N-able EDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers competitive pricing and straightforward installation processes with robust threat detection. In comparison, N-able EDR provides advanced threat-hunting and customizable policies, though it may have a complex deployment. Both offer comprehensive customer support, with N-able EDR valued for its extensive feature set.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. N-able EDR Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more affordable initial investment. The key difference lies in the initial expenditure, favoring N-able EDR for cost-sensitive implementations.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more affordable initial investment. The key difference lies in the initial expenditure, favoring N-able EDR for cost-sensitive implementations.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in automated threat detection and rapid remediation, making it ideal for users prioritizing automation. In comparison, N-able EDR stands out for its flexible integration and detailed threat insights, appealing to those needing seamless compatibility with other tools.
Download N-able EDR vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a straightforward setup cost, while N-able EDR presents a more complex pricing structure. SentinelOne offers a simpler cost model compared to N-able EDR's varied pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a straightforward setup cost, while N-able EDR presents a more complex pricing structure. SentinelOne offers a simpler cost model compared to N-able EDR's varied pricing.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender XDR excels in seamless integration with Microsoft 365 and automated threat detection. In comparison, N-able EDR offers comprehensive threat identification and superior customization. Microsoft Defender XDR provides competitive pricing, while N-able EDR delivers detailed security with higher ROI through extensive features.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. N-able EDR Report
Microsoft Defender XDR has a lower initial setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution, while N-able EDR requires a higher initial investment. N-able EDR's additional upfront expense might reflect enhanced capabilities or features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender XDR has a lower initial setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution, while N-able EDR requires a higher initial investment. N-able EDR's additional upfront expense might reflect enhanced capabilities or features.
N-able EDR Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Security excels in flexible features and active threat detection, while N-able EDR offers a comprehensive suite and ease of integration. In comparison, Elastic Security's customizable policies are a highlight, but N-able EDR's detailed reporting and extensive endpoint coverage appeal to tech buyers seeking seamless, automated responses.
Download Elastic Security vs. N-able EDR Report
Elastic Security has a lower initial setup cost, while N-able EDR incurs higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security has a lower initial setup cost, while N-able EDR incurs higher setup expenses.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
N-able EDR's affordability and system integration make it attractive for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR offers unmatched threat intelligence and a managed service team, appealing to organizations seeking comprehensive security and operational efficiency despite higher initial costs.
Download Huntress Managed EDR vs. N-able EDR Report
N-able EDR has a setup cost focusing on scalable deployment, while Huntress Managed EDR offers an uncomplicated cost structure for small businesses. Each solution targets different segments through their unique pricing and onboarding strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
N-able EDR has a setup cost focusing on scalable deployment, while Huntress Managed EDR offers an uncomplicated cost structure for small businesses. Each solution targets different segments through their unique pricing and onboarding strategies.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is known for its comprehensive threat prevention and user-friendly management console, making it a suitable choice for those seeking ease of deployment and customer service. In comparison, N-able EDR stands out for its robust features, advanced threat detection, and automated response workflows.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. N-able EDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR is more affordable upfront. Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers more comprehensive features, though its higher setup cost may be a consideration.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR is more affordable upfront. Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers more comprehensive features, though its higher setup cost may be a consideration.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is recognized for its cost-effectiveness, ease of deployment, and robust threat detection. In comparison, N-able EDR, despite being pricier, offers comprehensive features such as extensive threat hunting and automatic remediation, making it a strong choice for those needing advanced capabilities and favorable ROI.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. N-able EDR Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a moderate setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a lower initial setup cost. N-able EDR attracts budget-conscious users, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone EDR fits larger budgets with more extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a moderate setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a lower initial setup cost. N-able EDR attracts budget-conscious users, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone EDR fits larger budgets with more extensive features.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint is favored for its cost-effectiveness and smooth deployment. In comparison, N-able EDR's real-time monitoring and advanced features justify its higher cost. Cisco stands out in pricing and support, while N-able excels in sophisticated features and scalability.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. N-able EDR Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
N-able EDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in detailed reporting and advanced threat detection, making it ideal for users needing comprehensive visibility. In comparison, N-able EDR streamlines integration and real-time monitoring for those prioritizing ease of deployment and efficient customer service over extensive threat analysis.
Download ESET Inspect vs. N-able EDR Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers extensive features.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)