N-able N-central vs Pulseway comparison

N-able and Pulseway are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. N-able is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Pulseway is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. N-able holds a 5.5% mindshare in RMM, compared to Pulseway’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pulseway users who would recommend it.

N-able N-central

Read 10 N-able N-central reviews

2,757 Views
2,316 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pulseway

Read 6 Pulseway reviews

3,328 Views
699 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N-able N-central

Pulseway

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Pulseway and N-able N-central are competitive products in IT management software, each with distinct advantages for various organizational needs. Pulseway may appeal more to those valuing affordability and simplicity, while N-able N-central is attractive due to its extensive feature set and potential for long-term ROI.

Features: Pulseway offers strong real-time monitoring capabilities, remote access via an intuitive mobile app, and system control for effective management. N-able N-central features robust automation capabilities, comprehensive network management, and extensive integration options for enhanced control and security.

Room for Improvement: Pulseway could enhance its patch management customization and reporting features, while expanding third-party integrations. It may also benefit from improved workflow automation. N-able N-central might improve its initial setup simplicity and offer more intuitive training resources. It can further streamline its interface for users who prefer less complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pulseway enables straightforward deployment, which is ideal for smaller teams or businesses requiring quick setup. Customer service is efficient, focusing on resolving user issues. N-able N-central requires more effort in deployment but compensates with detailed customer support, aiding in complex configurations for larger infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Pulseway is budget-friendly, appealing to smaller businesses with its lower upfront costs and faster ROI. N-able N-central, while more expensive, supports larger enterprises with its feature-rich offerings and promises better long-term ROI through its advanced technological capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able N-central vs. Pulseway Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-central vs. Pulseway

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able N-central

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pulseway

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (51st), Server Monitoring (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of N-able N-central is 5.5%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pulseway is 3.0%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
N-able N-central	5.5%
Pulseway	3.0%
Other	91.5%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Nyiko Malapane

Senior Operations Specialist at Tagit cc

Transition has been smooth and integration supports compliance with ease

The transition to N-able N-central was very smooth. We were confident that our migration would not affect any operations. It was easy to migrate our clients into the new solutions. What we have experienced is that only branding has changed along with the way reports are structured. The solution is more advanced and the transition was well thought out. The process is managed properly. Regarding the integration capabilities of N-able N-central, my colleagues who work with this solution recently completed an ISO quality audit. The auditor could understand and manage how we handle our assets and environment because it's quite simple, even for someone who doesn't use the platform daily. This demonstrates that we are using a solution that meets our compliance requirements. N-able N-central is easy to use. Once licenses are provisioned, it's simple for my team to deploy the solution from anywhere remotely, provided there is internet access or remote access to the device.

Read full review

Pieter Plas

Owner at Beerepoot Automatisering B.V.

A solution with a great monitoring system and ability to control access remotely

The initial setup was straightforward. Deployment depends on the size of a customer. We make the customer in the enterprise server, and there is a download per customer for the installation package. We can also roll it out very easily, and when we install it on one or two systems, it explores the network for more systems. We can then fire a deployment package on the other systems. So in one hour, we can do a lot. Most of the time, 90% of the work is very easy, and the last 10% are the business-critical systems from a customer. Also, we manually install important customer systems, like special applications where we like to monitor specific services in the server itself.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's service is good."

"The most valuable features of N-central are its ease of deployment and ease of use."

"I like the remote connectivity, reporting suite, and patch management module."

"N-able N-central is an easy tool to implement with customers."

"N-able N-central has numerous good features. The asset tracking capability is powerful, allowing you to track hardware and software on devices connected to your network. The remote control is smooth, securely enabling remote access to servers and routers. It can be integrated with ticketing systems and other tools like CrowdStrike and N-able EDR for comprehensive network monitoring and security. The automation feature is handy, allowing you to schedule tasks, respond to system triggers, and automate problem resolution, such as handling disk space issues automatically."

"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."

"The support is at a good level. So normally, we can always get to a solution when we are stuck with some monitoring problems that we encounter."

"The transition to N-able N-central was very smooth; we were confident that our migration would not affect any operations, and it was easy to migrate our clients into the new solutions."

More N-able N-central pros

"We like the patching of the window updates in the client's systems. You can automatically do updates with a single click."

"Using this platform has allowed us to reach and assist our remotely based clients, regardless of their location provided they have an internet connection."

"It has made life a lot easier for the administrators."

"One of the applications I have used the most was to troubleshoot users and I've never faced difficulties or issues with the application itself."

"So this solution allows for 24/7 support and is very handy."

"It gives you remote control and has a mobile app."

"They provide a lot of features; it's good and easy software."

"It has been very helpful to get notifications about various issues with my servers and network to help me take action to resolve problems before they become major issues."

More Pulseway pros

Cons

"The integration with other applications could be better."

"The industry has moved towards Redfish for out-of-band and in-band monitoring, yet N-able N-central still relies on older protocols like SNMP."

"We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product."

"N-able N-central could improve the remote access, my technicians have complained about it. They have used other free tools instead to compensate, such as TeamViewer. Additionally, when using remote access on the web, it is lacking reports."

"At this moment, we encounter stability issues with N-able N-central from time to time."

"It was previously expensive and tedious to manage different licenses."

"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."

"The solution's overall integration should be improved."

More N-able N-central cons

"Remote Desktop Assistance for Mac endpoints - not having this functionality is a major inconvenience in having to have two systems for clients using this platform."

"There are some bugs or glitches."

"They have good technical support but it's not excellent."

"Sometimes the speed is a problem. When I've been remote controlling people, from time to time, there were some issues with people in Hong Kong."

"It would be nice if it also had a desktop application, similar to the phone app, which would allow me to monitor and control computers from my desktop."

"However, the solution does not allow you to make a script for just one customer, so it would be great if that is improved."

"Support needs to be improved because we've sometimes had to wait 24 hours to get a response."

"GUI needs to be improved and the solution lacks a process for monitoring VOIP calls."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are average, almost six out of ten."

"N-able N-central is not an expensive solution."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able N-central?

The MSP part of N-able N-central has evolved over the years. They have been trying to move from professional or network server and desktop licensing to make it more comprehensive. With professional...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able N-central?

We have been dealing with Enable EDR and N-able N-central, which is a management center. It's the NOC solution that we are currently running our asset management on. We are managing tasks in that e...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able N-central?

There's a new node for N-able N-central which they have addressed. Our outstanding items include reviewing our pricing and partnership level, which can provide additional benefits when we exceed 10...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs N-able N-central

Compared 23% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-central

Compared 10% of the time

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 9% of the time

Atera vs N-able N-central

Compared 9% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 6% of the time

More N-able N-central Competitors

Zabbix vs Pulseway

Compared 7% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Pulseway

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pulseway

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Pulseway

Compared 4% of the time

ConnectWise Automate vs Pulseway

Compared 4% of the time

More Pulseway Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-central

July 2026

Download N-able N-central product report

Buyer's Guide

Pulseway

July 2026

Download Pulseway product report

Also Known As

SolarWinds N-central, SolarWinds MSP N-central

No data available

Overview

N-able N-central is an all-encompassing IT management platform geared towards efficient network oversight. It offers comprehensive tools for monitoring and automation, which are crucial for managed services providers managing complex network environments.

N-able N-central provides solutions tailored to IT management, offering remote connectivity, asset tracking, and integration with systems like CrowdStrike. Its single-pane interface supports extensive device monitoring, script execution, and automation for task scheduling. The platform emphasizes robust patch management and reliable support, making it suitable for client integration and compliance audits. However, improvements are needed in remote access, application integration, and mobile device support. Users suggest investing in Redfish and REST API monitoring due to unreliable SNMP and an increased focus on AI to enhance maintenance recommendations.

What are the key features of N-able N-central?

Intuitive Remote Connectivity: Facilitates seamless access and management from anywhere.
Asset Tracking: Offers robust tracking of hardware and software assets within a network.
Automation: Streamlines task scheduling and resolution processes.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are updated and secure efficiently.
Integration Support: Seamlessly works with systems like CrowdStrike for enhanced security.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Helps manage diverse network environments with ease.
Scalability: Supports expansion in IT management capabilities as businesses grow.
Security Enhancement: Strengthens organizational security through integrated patch management and antivirus capabilities.
Efficient IT Management: Simplifies tasks through automation, reducing manual effort and increasing productivity.

N-able N-central is embraced in industries requiring robust IT management solutions, particularly managed services providers. It's widely used for monitoring systems, remote access, and asset tracking. Industries leverage its automation and integration capabilities to maintain system stability and security, addressing threats without heavy IT infrastructure on clients' premises.

N-able

Pulseway is a comprehensive IT management tool offering critical functionalities such as integrated dashboards, automation, and remote support. It supports seamless IT operations across multiple platforms, providing ease in monitoring and management.

Pulseway provides a robust platform for IT teams seeking to efficiently manage their infrastructure. With its capabilities in system monitoring, remote control, and mobile app accessibility, users can effectively oversee endpoint performance and receive timely alerts. It simplifies the management of server workflows, software deployment, and updates, catering to diverse IT environments. Its compatibility with multiple platforms ensures convenience in network monitoring, password updates, and administration access, allowing IT support to function across locations. There's room for improvement, particularly in enhancing remote session performance, graphical interface, and adding features like Remote Desktop Assistance for Mac.

What features does Pulseway offer?

Integrated Dashboard: Centralizes monitoring for better visibility.
Automatic Windows Updates: Ensures systems are up-to-date automatically.
Remote Script Execution: Facilitates task automation remotely.
Advanced Reporting: Provides detailed analysis for informed decision-making.
Mobile App: Offers 24/7 accessibility and support capabilities.

What benefits do Pulseway users experience?

Enhanced IT Efficiency: Streamlines operations and reduces manual tasks.
Cross-Platform Support: Adapts to diverse IT environments and needs.
Improved Remote Support: Facilitates responsive and effective help desk capabilities.
Scalable Management: Supports expanding IT infrastructures seamlessly.

Pulseway is utilized across industries like healthcare, finance, and education, providing essential IT support. It enables organizations to monitor critical systems, ensuring minimal downtime and optimal resource usage. Cybersecurity teams benefit from its deployment for tracking disk space, memory, CPU usage, and installed applications, enhancing overall network security and operational reliability.

Pulseway

Sample Customers

Premier Technology Solutions

Dell, Canon, Siemens, Harvard University, Northwestern University

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-central vs. Pulseway

June 2026

Free Report: N-able N-central vs. Pulseway

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able N-central vs. Pulseway and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able N-central vs. Pulseway report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.