Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Pulseway based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, Microsoft Configuration Manager, and SolarWinds NPM.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Pulseway Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Pulseway, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Zabbix offers extensive customization and flexibility, making it suitable for large enterprises requiring deep configurability. In comparison, Pulseway provides real-time monitoring and a user-friendly mobile app, ideal for on-the-go management. Tech buyers might choose Pulseway for ease of use and Zabbix for scalability.
Comparing setup costs, Zabbix offers a lower upfront setup fee while Pulseway includes higher setup expenses. Zabbix may suit those looking for more budget-friendly options, whereas Pulseway accommodates broader setups with the associated cost.
Comparing setup costs, Zabbix offers a lower upfront setup fee while Pulseway includes higher setup expenses. Zabbix may suit those looking for more budget-friendly options, whereas Pulseway accommodates broader setups with the associated cost.
Microsoft Configuration Manager excels in comprehensive application deployment and patch management, ideal for large enterprises needing robust reporting and inventory management. In comparison, Pulseway offers lightweight remote monitoring and alerting, appealing for SMBs seeking flexible, straightforward RMM solutions with competitive pricing.
Microsoft Configuration Manager has a higher setup cost compared to Pulseway, which offers a more budget-friendly option for small to medium businesses.
Microsoft Configuration Manager has a higher setup cost compared to Pulseway, which offers a more budget-friendly option for small to medium businesses.
SolarWinds NPM provides SNMP-based monitoring and multi-vendor support, ideal for diverse IT environments. In comparison, Pulseway offers mobile control with remote access, beneficial for flexible server management. SolarWinds' costs suit larger deployments, whereas Pulseway's subscription model caters well to budget-conscious businesses.
SolarWinds NPM has a higher setup cost, whereas Pulseway offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making them distinct options based on financial considerations.
SolarWinds NPM has a higher setup cost, whereas Pulseway offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making them distinct options based on financial considerations.
PRTG Network Monitor excels in rapid deployment and monitoring flexibility with extensive sensors and detailed alerts. In comparison, Pulseway offers robust RMM capabilities and mobile access, appealing for its competitive pricing and straightforward setup, suitable for remote management and smaller budgets.
Pulseway excels in ease of deployment and customer service, while NinjaOne offers stronger features and a robust ROI. In comparison, Pulseway benefits from real-time monitoring and strong scripting, and NinjaOne is preferred for automated workflows and comprehensive reporting.
Pulseway offers a lower setup cost, making it economical, while NinjaOne has a higher setup cost, reflecting advanced feature investments. The pricing clearly sets NinjaOne apart as a premium option compared to the more budget-friendly Pulseway.
Pulseway offers a lower setup cost, making it economical, while NinjaOne has a higher setup cost, reflecting advanced feature investments. The pricing clearly sets NinjaOne apart as a premium option compared to the more budget-friendly Pulseway.
Pulseway's affordable pricing and simpler deployment attract businesses needing effective IT management with limited resources. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center appeals to enterprises demanding sophisticated network automation and policy-based security, requiring greater investment but offering extensive control and comprehensive solutions for complex infrastructure.
Pulseway offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cisco DNA Center entails a more significant initial investment due to its extensive infrastructure requirements.
Pulseway offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cisco DNA Center entails a more significant initial investment due to its extensive infrastructure requirements.
Nagios XI is favored for its extensive plugin ecosystem and cost-effective pricing, attracting those prioritizing budget and support. In comparison, Pulseway stands out with real-time monitoring, mobile management, and quick deployment, making it ideal for users seeking advanced features and ease of use.
Nagios XI has a higher setup cost compared to Pulseway, offering more extensive initial features. Pulseway presents a budget-friendly alternative with lower setup costs but fewer built-in functionalities.
Nagios XI has a higher setup cost compared to Pulseway, offering more extensive initial features. Pulseway presents a budget-friendly alternative with lower setup costs but fewer built-in functionalities.
Pulseway excels in real-time remote management with intuitive mobility. In comparison, Checkmk offers robust scalability suited for larger infrastructures. Pulseway's pricing appeals to budget-conscious buyers, whereas Checkmk's comprehensive features justify its higher investment. Pulseway's ease of deployment contrasts with Checkmk's extensive documentation for complex configurations.
Pulseway's setup cost is minimal with easy configuration, while Checkmk requires a higher initial investment with a complex setup process. Pulseway is budget-friendly for small teams, whereas Checkmk targets larger enterprises seeking advanced features.
Pulseway's setup cost is minimal with easy configuration, while Checkmk requires a higher initial investment with a complex setup process. Pulseway is budget-friendly for small teams, whereas Checkmk targets larger enterprises seeking advanced features.
SCOM's integration with Microsoft products benefits Windows environments. In comparison, Pulseway's versatility across platforms, along with remote access and mobile features, appeals to diverse needs. SCOM's complexity contrasts with Pulseway's user-friendly deployment, making each appealing based on specific organizational needs.
SCOM requires a higher initial setup cost, ideal for larger enterprises, while Pulseway offers a more affordable setup cost, making it suitable for small to medium businesses.
SCOM requires a higher initial setup cost, ideal for larger enterprises, while Pulseway offers a more affordable setup cost, making it suitable for small to medium businesses.
WhatsUp Gold excels with intuitive mapping tools and lower pricing. In comparison, Pulseway offers superior real-time monitoring and mobile app capabilities. WhatsUp Gold's on-premise deployment is simple, while Pulseway's cloud setup is easy. WhatsUp Gold is cost-effective; Pulseway ensures high ROI with advanced features.
The setup cost for WhatsUp Gold is considerably higher compared to Pulseway, offering a detailed monitoring tool, whereas Pulseway provides a more affordable option with flexible and scalable monitoring solutions for various environments.
The setup cost for WhatsUp Gold is considerably higher compared to Pulseway, offering a detailed monitoring tool, whereas Pulseway provides a more affordable option with flexible and scalable monitoring solutions for various environments.
Icinga's robust support and Pulseway's comprehensive features cater to diverse needs. In comparison, Pulseway offers real-time remote monitoring and task automation, while Icinga provides customizable monitoring options. Both have different deployment models, with Pulseway offering quicker installation and Icinga requiring detailed configuration.
Icinga has higher setup costs compared to Pulseway, making Pulseway the more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. However, Icinga's robust enterprise features might justify the extra upfront investment for larger organizations with complex needs.
Icinga has higher setup costs compared to Pulseway, making Pulseway the more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. However, Icinga's robust enterprise features might justify the extra upfront investment for larger organizations with complex needs.
ScienceLogic excels in advanced monitoring and comprehensive system integrations. In comparison, Pulseway emphasizes user-friendly features like mobile accessibility and real-time monitoring. ScienceLogic offers in-depth reporting and analytics, whereas Pulseway is praised for ease of use and straightforward deployment.
ScienceLogic's setup cost is typically higher compared to Pulseway's more affordable setup options. This significant cost difference can impact budget-sensitive organizations.
ScienceLogic's setup cost is typically higher compared to Pulseway's more affordable setup options. This significant cost difference can impact budget-sensitive organizations.
Kaseya VSA excels in automation and remote management, offering efficient patching and inventory modules. In comparison, Pulseway's robust remote access and mobile features allow quick user responses. Tech buyers might choose Kaseya for its seamless remote support or Pulseway for cost-effectiveness and ease of setup.
Pulseway offers superior customer service and intuitive design, ideal for IT administrators focused on real-time monitoring. In comparison, Atera's comprehensive feature set supports managed service providers with integrated billing and CRM, providing a cost-effective, scalable solution through an all-in-one platform.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management excels in monitoring and reporting capabilities, suitable for detailed system management. In comparison, Pulseway offers advanced real-time management and mobile integration. DX Unified Infrastructure Management could enhance integration options, while Pulseway could improve its alert system. Deployment is quicker with Pulseway, and it offers faster ROI.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a lower setup cost compared to Pulseway, making it more cost-effective initially. In contrast, Pulseway, while having a higher setup cost, offers robust capabilities that justify the investment.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a lower setup cost compared to Pulseway, making it more cost-effective initially. In contrast, Pulseway, while having a higher setup cost, offers robust capabilities that justify the investment.
Pulseway offers real-time monitoring and affordability, appealing to SMBs needing flexible IT management. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance provides advanced network diagnostics, making it suitable for enterprises requiring comprehensive network assurance despite higher costs and complex deployment.
Zenoss Cloud excels in scalability and integration. In comparison, Pulseway offers strong real-time monitoring and automation. Zenoss Cloud users note performance issues, while Pulseway users suggest improved reporting. Zenoss Cloud's complex deployment is offset by robust customer service, whereas Pulseway is praised for easy setup and responsive support.
Pulseway attracts IT professionals with intuitive control and scalability for efficient solutions. In comparison, Meraki Dashboard is favored for comprehensive features and reliability in network management. Pulseway is budget-friendly, while Meraki Dashboard offers advanced insights and extensive capabilities.
Pulseway has an affordable setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Meraki Dashboard typically involves higher initial expenses due to its enterprise-grade offerings.
Pulseway has an affordable setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Meraki Dashboard typically involves higher initial expenses due to its enterprise-grade offerings.
Pulseway excels in intuitive remote monitoring and mobile management, ideal for small to medium-sized businesses. In comparison, Pandora FMS stands out with robust features and extensive integration options, better catering to larger enterprises. Pulseway emphasizes ease of use, while Pandora FMS offers broader customization and scalability.
Pulseway requires minimal setup costs, making it affordable for small to medium-sized businesses, while Pandora FMS involves higher setup costs, suitable for larger enterprises needing extensive configuration.
Pulseway requires minimal setup costs, making it affordable for small to medium-sized businesses, while Pandora FMS involves higher setup costs, suitable for larger enterprises needing extensive configuration.
Pulseway excels in ease of deployment and customer satisfaction with real-time monitoring and intuitive features. In comparison, ConnectWise RMM stands out with robust features, offering extensive automation and integration, appealing to organizations seeking versatility, scalability, and comprehensive IT management solutions.
Netdata offers real-time monitoring with features like interactive graphs and simple installations. It excels in detailed metric tracking, aiding quick diagnostics. Valuable for DevOps teams, it allows extensive integration. Users note room for improvement in documentation and customization options to meet diverse needs.
Pulseway excels with mobile-first monitoring and automation, ideal for dynamic environments. In comparison, Datto RMM's advanced networking and integration appeal to larger enterprises. Pulseway's competitive pricing benefits small businesses, while Datto RMM's extensive features offer long-term ROI for complex operations.
Pulseway has no setup cost, making it more cost-effective initially, while Datto Remote Monitoring and Management includes a setup fee, which may reflect its comprehensive service features.
Pulseway has no setup cost, making it more cost-effective initially, while Datto Remote Monitoring and Management includes a setup fee, which may reflect its comprehensive service features.
Pulseway excels in pricing and customer support with features like remote monitoring ideal for small businesses. In comparison, N-able N-central offers advanced security and patch management suitable for large enterprises, appealing to tech buyers seeking comprehensive capabilities despite a higher cost setup.
Pulseway offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while N-able N-central requires a higher investment due to its more extensive setup process and features.
Pulseway offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while N-able N-central requires a higher investment due to its more extensive setup process and features.
NetCrunch offers robust monitoring capabilities and real-time network visualization. In comparison, Pulseway excels with mobile access and extensive remote management features. NetCrunch's straightforward pricing appeals to buyers, while Pulseway's comprehensive features justify its higher cost. NetCrunch provides reliable support; Pulseway ensures ease of use.
ConnectWise Automate excels with its extensive automation and integration, ideal for those valuing powerful remote management. In comparison, Pulseway’s mobile accessibility and intuitive design make it appealing for businesses prioritizing real-time monitoring and quick deployment despite higher pricing.
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor excels in cost-effectiveness and support, catering to firms seeking basic network oversight. In comparison, Pulseway's cross-platform compatibility and automation features attract enterprises requiring integrated IT management solutions despite a potentially higher initial investment.
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor has a straightforward setup with clear upfront costs, while Pulseway offers flexibility in setup but may incur additional expenses. These differences impact the initial implementation and potential long-term financial commitments.
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor has a straightforward setup with clear upfront costs, while Pulseway offers flexibility in setup but may incur additional expenses. These differences impact the initial implementation and potential long-term financial commitments.
Pulseway stands out for cost-effectiveness and customer support, offering remote monitoring, mobile access, and automation features. In comparison, Lenovo XClarity Controller excels with hardware integration, scalability, and robust management tools, justifying its higher price. Pulseway is ideal for quick deployment, while Lenovo XClarity offers long-term reliability.
Pulseway has a straightforward setup cost, making it accessible for smaller teams, while Lenovo XClarity Controller requires a more substantial initial investment, better suited for enterprises. Lenovo XClarity Controller offers advanced features reflecting its higher setup costs.
Pulseway has a straightforward setup cost, making it accessible for smaller teams, while Lenovo XClarity Controller requires a more substantial initial investment, better suited for enterprises. Lenovo XClarity Controller offers advanced features reflecting its higher setup costs.
ManageEngine RMM Central automates IT management tasks offering features like remote monitoring, patch management, and asset tracking. It excels in simplifying IT workflows. Some users feel that integration with other software can be improved. Its detailed reports and efficient functionality enhance IT operations.
