Atera vs Pulseway comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Atera and Pulseway are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. Atera is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.7, while Pulseway is ranked #17. Atera holds a 7.2% mindshare in RMM, compared to Pulseway’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pulseway users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 16 Atera reviews

8,934 Views
2,412 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Pulseway

Read 6 Pulseway reviews

4,322 Views
821 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atera

Pulseway

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Pulseway and Atera are competing products in the remote monitoring and management space. Pulseway leads in user satisfaction regarding pricing and support, yet Atera's comprehensive features make it a preferred choice in functionality assessments.

Features: Pulseway provides real-time monitoring, mobile management capabilities, and a user-friendly interface. Atera combines RMM, PSA, and remote access within its integrated solution, offers robust automation tools, and features comprehensive monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Pulseway could enhance its feature set diversity and integrations to match its competitors. Expanding on automation and providing more advanced analytics options would be beneficial. Meanwhile, Atera could refine its mobile app functionalities and user experiences for more intuitive navigation. Improving system response times during high demand and offering more flexible customization options are also areas worth considering.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pulseway is lauded for its straightforward setup and rapid deployment, allowing users to swiftly integrate it into their workflow. It offers responsive customer service, which is especially valued. Atera provides an easy setup process as well, coupled with a focus on detailed customer support, making it a fit for businesses requiring extended service interactions.

Pricing and ROI: Pulseway is viewed as cost-effective, with its pricing structure allowing for quick ROI thanks to its efficiency and ease of use. Atera’s pricing is on the higher side, justified by its all-in-one comprehensive feature set, which aligns with a longer-term value and ROI for businesses needing integrated solutions. While Pulseway offers an immediate cost advantage, Atera's sustained value can justify its higher initial outlay.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. Pulseway Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Pulseway

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

39th

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

6th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (15th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (45th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (13th), Patch Management (13th), AIOps (24th), Agentic Automation (13th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (5th)

Pulseway

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

74th

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of Atera is 7.2%, up from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pulseway is 3.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Atera	7.2%
Pulseway	3.0%
Other	89.8%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Ning Chane

IT Manager at Telstra

Remote monitoring has streamlined endpoint management and consistently reduced ticket resolution time

The best features Atera offers include the per-technician pricing, which is honestly one of the biggest things. Unlimited endpoints for a flat monthly fee per tech is a model that makes sense for us, since we are not paying more every time we add a new endpoint. The AI Copilot feature has been a nice addition that helps our techs summarize tickets and suggest fixes faster, which has cut our resolution times noticeably. The AI Copilot feature has specifically helped my team because the automation handles a lot of the routine work, such as patch deployments, maintenance tasks, and monitoring alerts. Atera has positively impacted my organization by transforming how our team operates day-to-day, and the pricing model is hard to beat. The outcomes or metrics showing how Atera has made a positive impact include the 30% reduction in ticket resolution time I mentioned earlier.

Read full review

reviewer2132892

Owner at Hogan's Systems Consulting, LLC

Great notifications, a wide variety of features, and excellent monitoring capabilities

It would be nice if it also had a desktop application, similar to the phone app, which would allow me to monitor and control computers from my desktop. It's nice to be able to do things remotely using my phone; however, in many cases, it would be very helpful to be able to do things from a desktop or laptop computer. This would be especially useful for things like remote access to computers. It's too hard to do much on a Windows computer using a tiny phone screen. Being able to do things from a desktop or laptop computer would be much more productive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Atera saves money. A trip to the customer costs between $20 to $30. Then, you need to charge the customer $20 to $30 for the travel. However, if you are doing this work remotely, then you are not driving. This makes the process easier and saves money for you and the customer. For example, if it is just one machine, then the savings comes out to $50 to $60. If we are talking about a huge client, who has hundreds of machines and is changing their infrastructure, that is a lot of money."

"Just because it is low cost doesn't mean it is low quality."

"I have better access when I go to look for something regarding either a specific user or software. It is easier to locate. When I am troubleshooting with my clients on the phone, I am not fiddling around looking through a bunch of ticket notes trying to locate something. It makes me a lot more efficient."

"One thing that I'm most impressed by with Atera is how much they listen to their community to focus on more integrations."

"Atera has positively impacted my organization by transforming how our team operates day-to-day, and the pricing model is hard to beat."

"We value the alerts that come with the product which allow me to reach out to my clients. Overall, Atera generates additional revenue streams for work done on their machines."

"The savings have been astronomical."

"I really like the Shared Script Library and automation tasks which they have implemented... because all the Atera users in the community can share their scripts and their automation tasks knowledge. The same goes for the Shared SNMP Template Library."

More Atera pros

"The solution has great workflow and server modules."

"One of the applications I have used the most was to troubleshoot users and I've never faced difficulties or issues with the application itself."

"It has been very helpful to get notifications about various issues with my servers and network to help me take action to resolve problems before they become major issues."

"The setup is simple."

"Using this platform has allowed us to reach and assist our remotely based clients, regardless of their location provided they have an internet connection."

"They provide a lot of features; it's good and easy software."

"It has made life a lot easier for the administrators."

"It gives you remote control and has a mobile app."

More Pulseway pros

Cons

"Atera could be improved by adding more granular control over technician roles. We need more specific controls on what technicians can access, like limiting their ability to view certain sections or access devices and share files. This feature request has already been made. The IP asset management capabilities need improvement to better manage assets beyond just devices."

"The solution is scalable. However, in the past, we did have some issues."

"I would like to see more mobile device management. iPad is a big one. I know they've been working on some of that. For me, it would be amazing if I could do tablet devices and even expand it to POS systems or the like. I know that a lot goes into that but I've seen it is an area they're looking at."

"It will be interesting if Atera can integrate all kinds of products. In North America, there are a lot of resellers, like Ingram Micro, Tech Data, Arrow Electronics, etc. It would be amazing if Atera could integrate with these products. If they could integrate with these products for MSPs, it would be much easier. Then, if you are buying something, and need to add something, you don't need to jump from place to place because this is a very quick sales instrument for use on a daily basis."

"Reporting is probably the main frustration."

"It will be interesting if Atera can integrate all kinds of products."

"I would like to see more mobile device management. iPad is a big one."

"The mobility of Atera is also a feature which needs to be addressed so that it can be used on iPads, iPhones and things of this nature. I would also like to see an agent included on these devices so that I can monitor, maintain and manage them."

More Atera cons

"It would be nice if it also had a desktop application, similar to the phone app, which would allow me to monitor and control computers from my desktop."

"However, the solution does not allow you to make a script for just one customer, so it would be great if that is improved."

"GUI needs to be improved and the solution lacks a process for monitoring VOIP calls."

"Remote Desktop Assistance for Mac endpoints - not having this functionality is a major inconvenience in having to have two systems for clients using this platform."

"Support needs to be improved because we've sometimes had to wait 24 hours to get a response."

"There are some bugs or glitches."

"They have good technical support but it's not excellent."

"Sometimes the speed is a problem. When I've been remote controlling people, from time to time, there were some issues with people in Hong Kong."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As an internal IT, it's gold right there. It is money in the bank."

"The value of the product is perfect, neither cheap nor expensive. I think it is the right rate. It would be awesome if it continued to be the same price because it is a great solution that I like. I like it because I'm not paying per device. I have some customers on monthly contracts and some of them are on break'n fix. If I have a client who is on break'n fix, and they need to pay per agent, then I am losing money. If they were ever to change structures, going to pay-per-device model, then I would need to think about changing to something else."

"Pricing is my favorite part of it. It was per user, not per client."

"With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be."

"We pay per user. I am the only user. It is $150 per user. If I need to add one, it is not as costly as expanding with other providers."

"Our company is a startup. The initial reason I looked into Atera was the fact that you pay by the technician, not per-device. That means you are able to jump right in with a service without having a large overhead."

"One of the biggest issues I face is the need to pay per technician. I've dealt with other platforms that you need to have 250-500 devices. Even though the cost declines as the number of devices a person has increases, they still require you to pay for 250 or 500, respectively. With Atera, the number doesn't matter as you always pay the same amount. I approximate that Atera saves me $100 per week."

"In terms of cost, it's not very expensive. I’d rate it around three or four out of ten, considering its value for money."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Construction Company

10%

Educational Organization

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Large Enterprise	1

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

The prices have increased over time. After expressing concerns about pricing to account managers, they offered a 30% discount option for annual commitments. The main benefit we see with this produc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

Reporting is probably the main frustration. Some of the more advanced reports are locked behind higher pricing tiers, which feels restrictive. Atera can be improved in that the remote access can al...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

My main use case for Atera is remote monitoring and management across all our endpoints. We have devices spread across multiple sites, so having one platform where we can see everything, push patch...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Atera

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Atera

Compared 5% of the time

Sendbird vs Atera

Compared 4% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs Atera

Compared 3% of the time

More Atera Competitors

Zabbix vs Pulseway

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pulseway

Compared 4% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Pulseway

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Pulseway

Compared 4% of the time

Robusta vs Pulseway

Compared 3% of the time

More Pulseway Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

October 2026

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

Pulseway

October 2026

Download Pulseway product report

Overview

Atera provides advanced tools for remote monitoring, automation, and ticketing, offering an intuitive design and competitive pricing that supports managed service providers with monitoring, alerts, and system management.

Atera stands out with its automation, remote access, and smooth integration capabilities like PowerShell commands, TeamViewer, and Splashtop. Its monitoring and alert systems allow IT professionals to preemptively address issues, enhancing productivity with features such as a robust ticketing system, patch management, and scripting tools. Cross-platform compatibility and collaboration tools streamline IT operations. Despite its strengths, Atera requires enhancements in identity access management, chat features, mobile device management, third-party integrations, customizable reports, and more detailed role management for technicians. A renewed interface and improved network and cloud service monitoring are desired. Users also look for seamless management across diverse platforms, particularly under connectivity issues.

What are Atera's key features?

Automation: Streamlines processes with powerful automation capabilities.
Remote Access: Facilitates easy access to client machines for issue resolution.
Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design enhances efficiency.
Integration: Seamless TeamViewer and Splashtop integration.
Monitoring: Effective monitoring and alert systems preempt issues.
Ticketing System: Boosts productivity with efficient workflow management.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are always up-to-date.
Scripting: Powerful tools for automation and task execution.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Efficiency: Automation and scripting enhance task management.
Cost-effective: Combines robust features with competitive pricing.
Scalability: Cross-platform compatibility supports business growth.
Productivity: Monitoring and alerts optimize resource allocation.

Atera is widely used by managed service providers and IT support companies to enhance efficiency in industries such as manufacturing and construction. It provides remote monitoring, automation, and comprehensive IT management, ensuring seamless integration with different products and systems for broad site coverage. Businesses leverage Atera's RMM, PSA, ticketing, and IT automation features to improve operational efficiency and responsiveness.

Atera

Pulseway is a comprehensive IT management tool offering critical functionalities such as integrated dashboards, automation, and remote support. It supports seamless IT operations across multiple platforms, providing ease in monitoring and management.

Pulseway provides a robust platform for IT teams seeking to efficiently manage their infrastructure. With its capabilities in system monitoring, remote control, and mobile app accessibility, users can effectively oversee endpoint performance and receive timely alerts. It simplifies the management of server workflows, software deployment, and updates, catering to diverse IT environments. Its compatibility with multiple platforms ensures convenience in network monitoring, password updates, and administration access, allowing IT support to function across locations. There's room for improvement, particularly in enhancing remote session performance, graphical interface, and adding features like Remote Desktop Assistance for Mac.

What features does Pulseway offer?

Integrated Dashboard: Centralizes monitoring for better visibility.
Automatic Windows Updates: Ensures systems are up-to-date automatically.
Remote Script Execution: Facilitates task automation remotely.
Advanced Reporting: Provides detailed analysis for informed decision-making.
Mobile App: Offers 24/7 accessibility and support capabilities.

What benefits do Pulseway users experience?

Enhanced IT Efficiency: Streamlines operations and reduces manual tasks.
Cross-Platform Support: Adapts to diverse IT environments and needs.
Improved Remote Support: Facilitates responsive and effective help desk capabilities.
Scalable Management: Supports expanding IT infrastructures seamlessly.

Pulseway is utilized across industries like healthcare, finance, and education, providing essential IT support. It enables organizations to monitor critical systems, ensuring minimal downtime and optimal resource usage. Cybersecurity teams benefit from its deployment for tracking disk space, memory, CPU usage, and installed applications, enhancing overall network security and operational reliability.

Pulseway

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

Dell, Canon, Siemens, Harvard University, Northwestern University

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Pulseway

October 2026

Free Report: Atera vs. Pulseway

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. Pulseway and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. Pulseway report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.