Atera vs Pulseway comparison

Atera and Pulseway are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. Atera is ranked #5 with an average rating of 10.0, while Pulseway is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. Atera holds a 6.9% mindshare in RMM, compared to Pulseway’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pulseway users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 15 Atera reviews

5,154 Views
1,649 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Pulseway

Read 6 Pulseway reviews

2,465 Views
493 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atera

Pulseway

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Pulseway and Atera are competing products in the remote monitoring and management space. Pulseway leads in user satisfaction regarding pricing and support, yet Atera's comprehensive features make it a preferred choice in functionality assessments.

Features: Pulseway provides real-time monitoring, mobile management capabilities, and a user-friendly interface. Atera combines RMM, PSA, and remote access within its integrated solution, offers robust automation tools, and features comprehensive monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Pulseway could enhance its feature set diversity and integrations to match its competitors. Expanding on automation and providing more advanced analytics options would be beneficial. Meanwhile, Atera could refine its mobile app functionalities and user experiences for more intuitive navigation. Improving system response times during high demand and offering more flexible customization options are also areas worth considering.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pulseway is lauded for its straightforward setup and rapid deployment, allowing users to swiftly integrate it into their workflow. It offers responsive customer service, which is especially valued. Atera provides an easy setup process as well, coupled with a focus on detailed customer support, making it a fit for businesses requiring extended service interactions.

Pricing and ROI: Pulseway is viewed as cost-effective, with its pricing structure allowing for quick ROI thanks to its efficiency and ease of use. Atera’s pricing is on the higher side, justified by its all-in-one comprehensive feature set, which aligns with a longer-term value and ROI for businesses needing integrated solutions. While Pulseway offers an immediate cost advantage, Atera's sustained value can justify its higher initial outlay.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. Pulseway Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Pulseway

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

34th

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

5th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (11th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (38th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (11th), Patch Management (11th), AIOps (18th), Agentic Automation (8th)

Pulseway

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

48th

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of Atera is 6.9%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pulseway is 2.3%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Atera	6.9%
Pulseway	2.3%
Other	90.8%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Avi Vaserman

Owner at Sytex Ltd.

Quick setup and efficient automation boost IT consulting services

It would be beneficial if Atera implemented telephone support for general questions. When onboarding new clients and creating their portal, it would be helpful if presidents or company owners could see the current configuration progress step-by-step, rather than relying solely on email and ticket systems. The task system for technicians could be improved by adding recurring task capabilities. This would allow technicians to have checkmarks and task lists they can mark off as completed. While scalability meets growing needs, there haven't been many additions in the last two years. They are adding new features gradually, but there is always room for improvement.

Read full review

Pieter Plas

Owner at Beerepoot Automatisering B.V.

A solution with a great monitoring system and ability to control access remotely

The initial setup was straightforward. Deployment depends on the size of a customer. We make the customer in the enterprise server, and there is a download per customer for the installation package. We can also roll it out very easily, and when we install it on one or two systems, it explores the network for more systems. We can then fire a deployment package on the other systems. So in one hour, we can do a lot. Most of the time, 90% of the work is very easy, and the last 10% are the business-critical systems from a customer. Also, we manually install important customer systems, like special applications where we like to monitor specific services in the server itself.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One thing that I'm most impressed by with Atera is how much they listen to their community to focus on more integrations."

"All of the features of Atera are valuable because they allow the customers to achieve their goals. It is easy to use, has good collaboration, and has zero maintenance."

"We value the alerts that come with the product which allow me to reach out to my clients. Overall, Atera generates additional revenue streams for work done on their machines."

"Atera has saved our organization money. We look at Atera as an extra employee that we only pay about $300 a month. This is incredible savings over having to hire somebody to do all the tasks that Atera performs for us."

"Atera has helped me to provide more accurate solutions based on a given problem. For example, we base our solutions on event scenarios, like the alerts. We identify that there's a series of problems occurring in a particular area from the information provided by the alerts."

"Atera's automation capabilities are excellent because we can create new users and customers, and when a company wants to integrate us as IT consultants to their network, it can be very simple, such as installing to Active Directory or Azure."

"Pricing is definitely my favorite part of it. It is also extremely easy to use."

"It is reliable, and when it is working, it works without issues."

More Atera pros

"They provide a lot of features; it's good and easy software."

"It has been very helpful to get notifications about various issues with my servers and network to help me take action to resolve problems before they become major issues."

"The setup is simple."

"It gives you remote control and has a mobile app."

"So this solution allows for 24/7 support and is very handy."

"One of the applications I have used the most was to troubleshoot users and I've never faced difficulties or issues with the application itself."

"The solution has great workflow and server modules."

"Using this platform has allowed us to reach and assist our remotely based clients, regardless of their location provided they have an internet connection."

More Pulseway pros

Cons

"Customization could be improved."

"They are working on an update, and I would like to see more stuff outside of just computers and servers."

"The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting."

"I would like to see more mobile device management. iPad is a big one."

"Customization could be improved."

"Atera could be improved by adding more granular control over technician roles. We need more specific controls on what technicians can access, like limiting their ability to view certain sections or access devices and share files. This feature request has already been made. The IP asset management capabilities need improvement to better manage assets beyond just devices."

"The billing module has a standard layout which is too limited for my needs."

"The chat solutions need improvement because we first need to connect to the customer."

More Atera cons

"Support needs to be improved because we've sometimes had to wait 24 hours to get a response."

"It would be nice if it also had a desktop application, similar to the phone app, which would allow me to monitor and control computers from my desktop."

"They have good technical support but it's not excellent."

"The solution does not allow you to make a script for just one customer."

"They have good technical support but it's not excellent."

"There are some bugs or glitches."

"Remote Desktop Assistance for Mac endpoints - not having this functionality is a major inconvenience in having to have two systems for clients using this platform."

"However, the solution does not allow you to make a script for just one customer, so it would be great if that is improved."

More Pulseway cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One of the biggest issues I face is the need to pay per technician. I've dealt with other platforms that you need to have 250-500 devices. Even though the cost declines as the number of devices a person has increases, they still require you to pay for 250 or 500, respectively. With Atera, the number doesn't matter as you always pay the same amount. I approximate that Atera saves me $100 per week."

"The value of the product is perfect, neither cheap nor expensive. I think it is the right rate. It would be awesome if it continued to be the same price because it is a great solution that I like. I like it because I'm not paying per device. I have some customers on monthly contracts and some of them are on break'n fix. If I have a client who is on break'n fix, and they need to pay per agent, then I am losing money. If they were ever to change structures, going to pay-per-device model, then I would need to think about changing to something else."

"We pay per user. I am the only user. It is $150 per user. If I need to add one, it is not as costly as expanding with other providers."

"With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be."

"Pricing is my favorite part of it. It was per user, not per client."

"Our company is a startup. The initial reason I looked into Atera was the fact that you pay by the technician, not per-device. That means you are able to jump right in with a service without having a large overhead."

"As an internal IT, it's gold right there. It is money in the bank."

"Atera happened to have the best pricing model."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

The prices have increased over time. After expressing concerns about pricing to account managers, they offered a 30% discount option for annual commitments. The main benefit we see with this produc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

We use it for maintenance support, patch management, the ticket system, ticketing, and automation in general. Atera enables us to take control quickly with different options. We can perform registr...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 8% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

Sendbird vs Atera

Compared 6% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Atera

Compared 5% of the time

More Atera Competitors

Zabbix vs Pulseway

Compared 7% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Pulseway

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pulseway

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Pulseway

Compared 4% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Pulseway

Compared 2% of the time

More Pulseway Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

May 2026

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

Pulseway

April 2026

Download Pulseway product report

Overview

Atera provides advanced tools for remote monitoring, automation, and ticketing, offering an intuitive design and competitive pricing that supports managed service providers with monitoring, alerts, and system management.

Atera stands out with its automation, remote access, and smooth integration capabilities like PowerShell commands, TeamViewer, and Splashtop. Its monitoring and alert systems allow IT professionals to preemptively address issues, enhancing productivity with features such as a robust ticketing system, patch management, and scripting tools. Cross-platform compatibility and collaboration tools streamline IT operations. Despite its strengths, Atera requires enhancements in identity access management, chat features, mobile device management, third-party integrations, customizable reports, and more detailed role management for technicians. A renewed interface and improved network and cloud service monitoring are desired. Users also look for seamless management across diverse platforms, particularly under connectivity issues.

What are Atera's key features?

Automation: Streamlines processes with powerful automation capabilities.
Remote Access: Facilitates easy access to client machines for issue resolution.
Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design enhances efficiency.
Integration: Seamless TeamViewer and Splashtop integration.
Monitoring: Effective monitoring and alert systems preempt issues.
Ticketing System: Boosts productivity with efficient workflow management.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are always up-to-date.
Scripting: Powerful tools for automation and task execution.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Efficiency: Automation and scripting enhance task management.
Cost-effective: Combines robust features with competitive pricing.
Scalability: Cross-platform compatibility supports business growth.
Productivity: Monitoring and alerts optimize resource allocation.

Atera is widely used by managed service providers and IT support companies to enhance efficiency in industries such as manufacturing and construction. It provides remote monitoring, automation, and comprehensive IT management, ensuring seamless integration with different products and systems for broad site coverage. Businesses leverage Atera's RMM, PSA, ticketing, and IT automation features to improve operational efficiency and responsiveness.

Atera

Pulseway is a comprehensive IT management tool offering critical functionalities such as integrated dashboards, automation, and remote support. It supports seamless IT operations across multiple platforms, providing ease in monitoring and management.

Pulseway provides a robust platform for IT teams seeking to efficiently manage their infrastructure. With its capabilities in system monitoring, remote control, and mobile app accessibility, users can effectively oversee endpoint performance and receive timely alerts. It simplifies the management of server workflows, software deployment, and updates, catering to diverse IT environments. Its compatibility with multiple platforms ensures convenience in network monitoring, password updates, and administration access, allowing IT support to function across locations. There's room for improvement, particularly in enhancing remote session performance, graphical interface, and adding features like Remote Desktop Assistance for Mac.

What features does Pulseway offer?

Integrated Dashboard: Centralizes monitoring for better visibility.
Automatic Windows Updates: Ensures systems are up-to-date automatically.
Remote Script Execution: Facilitates task automation remotely.
Advanced Reporting: Provides detailed analysis for informed decision-making.
Mobile App: Offers 24/7 accessibility and support capabilities.

What benefits do Pulseway users experience?

Enhanced IT Efficiency: Streamlines operations and reduces manual tasks.
Cross-Platform Support: Adapts to diverse IT environments and needs.
Improved Remote Support: Facilitates responsive and effective help desk capabilities.
Scalable Management: Supports expanding IT infrastructures seamlessly.

Pulseway is utilized across industries like healthcare, finance, and education, providing essential IT support. It enables organizations to monitor critical systems, ensuring minimal downtime and optimal resource usage. Cybersecurity teams benefit from its deployment for tracking disk space, memory, CPU usage, and installed applications, enhancing overall network security and operational reliability.

Pulseway

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

Dell, Canon, Siemens, Harvard University, Northwestern University

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Pulseway

April 2026

Free Report: Atera vs. Pulseway

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. Pulseway and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. Pulseway report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.