N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

Why PeerSpot?

N-able and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. N-able is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0, while TeamViewer is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. N-able holds a 4.8% mindshare in RMM, compared to TeamViewer’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

N-able N-sight Remote Monit...

Read 16 N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management reviews

2,371 Views
1,968 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

TeamViewer ONE

Read 34 TeamViewer ONE reviews

3,117 Views
1,870 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

N-able N-sight Remote Monit...

TeamViewer ONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 24, 2026

N-able N-sight and TeamViewer ONE are two leading remote management solutions. N-able N-sight is favored for pricing and support, while TeamViewer ONE is recognized for its superior features, as noted by users.

Features: N-able N-sight offers comprehensive reporting, script deployment in cloud environments, and remote monitoring across multiple platforms. TeamViewer ONE stands out for its ease of use, stable remote access, and support features that enhance IT maintenance and collaboration tasks.

Room for Improvement: N-able N-sight users seek improved pricing models, reporting customization, and advanced AI integration. TeamViewer ONE could enhance its flexibility with better licensing options, increased security, and reduced connectivity issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: N-able N-sight provides flexible deployment across private, public clouds, and on-premises, offering control and responsive customer service. TeamViewer ONE, while flexible in deployment, occasionally faces challenges with licensing and connectivity issues affecting customer service consistency.

Pricing and ROI: N-able N-sight offers a cost-effective per-node pricing model with strong ROI through efficient management. TeamViewer ONE's higher pricing is offset by its free version and flexibility in paid versions, but users find it generally more expensive compared to competitors.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able N-sight Remote Monit...

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamViewer ONE

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (21st), Patch Management (18th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is 4.8%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer ONE is 4.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management	4.8%
TeamViewer ONE	4.5%
Other	90.7%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Daniel Gombe

Chief Executive Officer at SOIT Business Solutions

Remote management and incident handling have improved with customizable alerts and efficient patch management

The best feature in N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is the ease of use because I can remote into any machine that's under management without having to drive out to the customer all the time. It helps to reduce workflows because I can create scripts that I can automate, so I don't have to have many people working for me. It helps to reduce incident response times because it's a combination of tools that logs incidents to the PSA, creates tickets, and allows us to manage incidents all in one for an MSP. It does improve service delivery because we can see what's wrong with certain devices before even the customer has a problem, allowing us to remedy it with the necessary tools.

Read full review

Nitesh Ranjan

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably

One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are getting value for the money in that regard."

"If you want to understand what is happening on your network, this is a good tool."

"It is a pretty good all-around solution, especially for a small business like us who need to look after a limited number of clients."

"I'm really happy with the background remote access, which allows me to easily change system internals such as registry keys and silently execute commands using the command prompt in the background. This kind of remote access makes it easy for us to do our jobs without getting in the customer's way."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"If you don't have anybody on site but your business runs 24/7, this type of RMM tool will definitely help you out because it gives you 24/7 monitoring."

"The integrated backup and the scripting are good, and we use them the most."

"It provides quite a bit of real-time visibility; I can go in and see in real-time the processor use and memory use, it displays a list of the processes running currently and the installed software, and it also gives me warranty information so I know when things are reaching the end of life."

More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management pros

"The most valuable feature is the ease of use, and using this solution enables us to get support easily."

"What I like about TeamViewer Remote Management is the chat feature on the dashboard, which is very useful. The solution also has a meeting feature, but I don't use that. The remote feature and other features of TeamViewer Remote Management also work fine, so it's a good solution."

"It's considered a trusted application."

"If I want to access software or a PC in my office when I am in another location using my notebook, then I use TeamViewer Remote Management to do it remotely."

"There are some great features."

"One of the most valuable features has been that it's a remote tool. I think this is a particularly good tool, and it's user-friendly."

"We are able to connect to clients who are currently not connected to the VPN, and we are also able to do direct file transfers between the technician and the client."

"The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management is very simple."

More TeamViewer ONE pros

Cons

"The reporting could be more customizable. RMM pulls a vast amount of data, but you need to filter through it to get a decent executive report each month. I'm pulling reports all day through the XML file and such to get the information our executive needs. They don't want a 34-megabyte Excel spreadsheet, but the overview only provides limited information, like a basic breakdown."

"There is quite a bit of delay on the portal where we receive monitoring information from the endpoint agent on the remote device. Sometimes it gets stuck with no live response from the device, and you have to refresh the portal just to make sure that it's projecting the right information."

"After testing, we decided not to proceed with this product. It is very good and has many features, but the cost is very expensive so it is beyond our budget."

"The reporting could be more customizable."

"The alerts and reporting could be done a little more clearly. They are quite cryptic, and quite often, we seem to get a lot of reports just for a computer rebooting or going offline for a couple of minutes, which doesn't seem like it's that big of a deal. Reporting could be refined and improved, and they can make it easy to decipher the reports."

"Sometimes, it says it requires a reboot, and you reboot it, but the same message still shows up."

"We haven't had it for very long, and we're finally getting comfortable with it. The biggest improvement probably would be a little more clarification. It has few exclamation points or attention-getters when there is a computer that doesn't have the up-to-date patches, etc. However, it's not specific in terms of what you need to do. Sometimes, it says it requires a reboot, and you reboot it, but the same message still shows up. Sometimes, the messages that it gives you about how to resolve an issue are not very easy to understand."

"I would like to see notifications sent with SMS."

More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management cons

"I have contacted customer service and support a couple of times, but it was not good."

"VPN connection is an area with shortcomings that need improvement in the solution."

"There could be stable connectivity for the product’s current technology."

"My team needs full remote support plus more security when transferring data, so TeamViewer Remote Management isn't the best solution for the company."

"If you have one version, like if you have version 14, and the client has version 15, you can't access his computer. If the client is on 14 and the technician is on 15, he can't access the end user who's at home. So there's a disparity in versioning."

"One of the defects that I have noticed with TeamViewer Remote Management is that if I am on a certain version and the person to whom I am connected is not on the same version, then it does not connect at times until I update the solution."

"I would rate the stability a seven out of ten because every application gets bugs. So, there are some instances where it might be buggy and hanging."

"AnyDesk is easier compared to TeamViewer Remote Management since there is no password. We use AnyDesk more."

More TeamViewer ONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a license required for this solution."

"I haven't paid a whole lot of attention to that since I set it up. It has per-user licensing. If I remember it correctly, it worked out to about $10 a month per user. There were no additional costs. It was pretty straightforward and simple."

"As I'm not part of the procurement team and because I'm 100% technical, I'm not that familiar with the costs associated with N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management, but I can say that in my location, particularly here in Sri Lanka, it's more expensive than other RMM solutions. I'm working for an Australian IT MSP, and over there, the solution isn't as expensive, but where I'm located, it is, so this is the reason why sometimes, clients don't go with N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. Licensing cost is also the reason why my organization is looking into Kaseya RMM. My current organization merged with another organization that's using both Kaseya RMM and Connectwise."

"The solution is not very expensive."

"We use SolarWinds RMM on a pay-as-you-go monthly basis, so the cost can be highly variable because it depends on a few factors such as how many devices you need to support and what extra features you want to use. The more devices you have, the more you'll pay, and the same goes for extras."

"Out clients pay monthly for the license of N-able Remote Monitoring & Management."

"The product is fairly priced."

"It's expensive and out of our budget."

"The solution relies on cloud-based infrastructure so the price is tailored to each individual model used"

"Users need to pay a yearly license for TeamViewer Remote Management."

"Our licenses for TeamViewer Remote Management are being managed directly by our procurement team. If we need more licenses they handle it."

"My company needs to pay towards the solution's annual licensing subscription costs. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard license fees of the product."

"The solution's license is expensive."

"The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive. The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee."

"We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."

More TeamViewer ONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for N-able Remote Monitoring & Management?

The typical use case for my clients is that there is no atypical case. I use N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management to have a warning about the state of endpoint and server and also to p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able Remote Monitoring & Management?

There is room for improvement in the functional aspects of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. For example, it should evaluate the penetration of assets and enhance asset management ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able Remote Monitoring & Management?

My relationship with N-able is as an end-user; I work as an MSP and use this solution to manage my customer endpoints. Regarding the pricing of this tool, I don't have any suggestions. I think the ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?

Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. However, the setup is easy and friendly to use. My overall rating for this product is...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?

I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.

See all answers

Comparisons

ConnectWise Automate vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

Compared 12% of the time

N-able N-central vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

Compared 11% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

Compared 10% of the time

Comodo RMM vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine RMM Central vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

Compared 6% of the time

More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Competitors

NinjaOne vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 13% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Bastion vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 10% of the time

GoTo Resolve vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 8% of the time

Atera vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 5% of the time

More TeamViewer ONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

September 2026

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management report

Download N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer ONE

August 2026

Download TeamViewer ONE product report

Also Known As

N-able Remote Monitoring & Management, SolarWinds MSP Remote Monitoring & Management, MSP RMM, SolarWinds RMM, SolarWinds Remote Monitoring and Management

TeamViewer IoT

Overview

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management provides robust script deployment, comprehensive monitoring, and real-time alerts. It supports multiple platforms for effective asset management and web protection while simplifying IT environments with automation and custom scripting.

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management integrates automation and security, offering multi-platform support that enhances asset management, web protection, and remote connectivity. Its dashboard facilitates patch management and incident response. While users value its background remote access and reporting features, they seek improvements in reporting customization, customer support, and portal communication. Pricing models and mobile compatibility, especially for Android devices, require attention, with a need for a more intuitive interface and better asset management. Enhancements in backup responsiveness and compatibility with direct VMware monitoring are necessary, alongside updates to its appearance and the inclusion of AI capabilities.

What are the key features of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management?

Script Deployment: Enables efficient mass deployment of scripts across devices.
Real-time Alerts: Offers immediate notifications for quick problem resolution.
Background Remote Access: Allows discreet system control without user disruption.
Integrated Reporting: Provides detailed analytics for better decision-making.
Multi-platform Support: Enhances management across different operating systems.
Automation and Custom Scripting: Reduces manual tasks and increases visibility.

What benefits or ROI can users find in reviews?

Streamlined Management: Centralizes control for efficient IT operations.
Improved Visibility: Enhances oversight of IT environments.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational expenses through automation.
Increased Security: Bolsters network protection and endpoint security.

Industries implementing N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management leverage it for network management, remote support, and monitoring of IT infrastructure like network devices. It aids in phasing out Active Directory and managing IT tasks for clients, providing antivirus deployment and backup management across multiple locations.

N-able

TeamViewer ONE offers remote access and cross-platform functionality, enhancing IT operations across various systems and clouds like AWS and Azure while streamlining setup and secure connections.

Providing a robust platform for IT professionals, TeamViewer ONE enables efficient remote management with features like interactive chat, file transfers, and seamless session management. Despite its strengths, users highlight the need for improved pricing models, security measures, and enhanced stability. Regular updates are requested to tackle connectivity and lag challenges, and improvements in reporting, integration, and mobile remote functionalities are desired.

What are the standout features of TeamViewer ONE?

Remote Access: Facilitates secure control across multiple devices.
Cross-Platform Functionality: Operates on different OS and cloud environments.
File Transfers: Enables smooth and efficient data exchange.
Interactive Chat: Supports real-time communication during sessions.
Remote Management: Provides a comprehensive view of system resources.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Simplifies teamwork with easy connectivity.
IT Support Efficiency: Streamlines troubleshooting and support tasks.
Resource Management: Offers tools for managing system performance.
Security Assurance: Delivers trusted connections for data protection.

TeamViewer ONE is implemented in industries requiring remote support and server management, offering solutions for IT support, remote client connections, and seamless meeting management. It assists in monitoring, troubleshooting, and resolving software and hardware issues for service providers and companies.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

NetSys Network Systems

Carey Paul Honda

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE

September 2026

Free Report: N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.