

Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
NinjaOne enables significant time savings, reducing my workload by 40% to 50%, primarily due to remote management capabilities.
I have seen a return on investment with NinjaOne, specifically with fewer employees and less time spent on troubleshooting.
Our experience with escalation supports, including auto escalation to third-level or engineering support, has been very positive.
The customer support at NinjaOne is excellent, rated ten out of ten.
Customer support from NinjaOne is excellent.
It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly.
The technical support of Tenable Vulnerability Management is available 24/7, and whenever we require support, we can get it within five minutes.
We had used Tenable's expert support services in order to make sure that we run Tenable Vulnerability Management on a continuous basis and are able to utilize their services.
I would rate the scalability of NinjaOne as ten out of ten.
We easily install the agent on new servers and can create scripts to automate agent installation.
The scalability of NinjaOne is good; we can add more as we grow.
They can seamlessly scale the number of endpoints from 100 to 1,000,000 in a day.
Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly scalable.
With the growing needs of our company, Tenable Vulnerability Management is able to safely adapt.
I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
In the two years I have used it, I have never experienced any downtime or reliability issues.
I have faced no stability issues with Tenable.
The stability is commendable, and I would rate Tenable ten out of ten.
The stability of Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly reliable.
Security and reporting, including business intelligence tools, are adequate.
NinjaOne should consider adding notifications about script executions to email, Teams, or Slack channels.
The ability to have more than one NinjaOne agent on a device at a time, as this is a significant issue in our current state.
They should also accelerate the process of implementing new features upon request.
I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io.
Tenable Vulnerability Management is not very effective for real-time risk prioritization for our organization's security strategy.
The pricing for NinjaOne is appropriate for small companies.
NinjaOne is reasonably priced, particularly with the inclusion of TeamViewer, SentinelOne, and Bitdefender.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for NinjaOne is fairly cheap and easy.
Tenable charges around $40 per device, while Rapid7 costs $10 to $15 per device.
I would not say very expensive for Tenable Vulnerability Management; it is not prohibitive, but at the same time, there are some other tools in the marketplace which are offering the same kind of services that Tenable offers, the same kind of features that Tenable has offered at a lesser cost.
The software's automation tools have solved critical deployment problems for small businesses.
A significant feature of NinjaOne is its remote access capability, which is essential for my clients’ home office usage.
Every month, every quarter, I see new features, and it is always evolving.
Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.
The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment.
The best features of Tenable Vulnerability Management are flexibility, breadth and scope, and the fact that their current vulnerabilities come out, and they have tests for them within a day or two.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Tenable Vulnerability Management | 3.2% |
| NinjaOne | 0.8% |
| Other | 96.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
NinjaOne provides comprehensive remote monitoring, troubleshooting, and automation via a user-friendly web interface. With a robust mobile app and integration capabilities, it appeals to small businesses seeking cost-effective management solutions.
NinjaOne is designed to streamline IT operations through its remote monitoring, patch management, and automation capabilities. Its integration with Bitdefender and ongoing feature enhancements are valuable, although users express a desire for more third-party compatibility and smoother deployment processes. The platform's SLA system enhances performance tracking, while its continual development is a key attraction. Despite some calls for a more intuitive graphical interface and advanced reporting features, it remains an asset for managed service providers and businesses adapting to cloud-based environments.
What are the most important features?NinjaOne is widely employed across different sectors for server and workstation management, network infrastructure oversight, and client computer support. With its cloud-based framework, it supports managed service providers and businesses shifting to the cloud, ensuring seamless software deployment and improved asset management, making it integral to modern IT environments.
Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.