Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
NinjaOne Logo

Top 10 NinjaOne Alternatives

Vendor: NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

Top NinjaOne Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to NinjaOne based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Intune, ServiceNow, and Zabbix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

NinjaOne surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive remote monitoring, robust automation tools, and seamless integration capabilities, empowering IT professionals with enhanced efficiency, proactive problem-solving, and superior support for managing IT operations effectively.

NinjaOne Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with NinjaOne, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
NinjaOne Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in integration with Office 365 and Azure, appealing to those in the Microsoft ecosystem. In comparison, NinjaOne stands out with its remote management and ease of use, fitting small businesses seeking quick implementation and scalable pricing for IT solutions.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. NinjaOne Report
Microsoft Intune offers competitive setup costs, focusing on scalability and integration, while NinjaOne provides a straightforward setup with a simplified cost structure, highlighting its user-friendly approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers competitive setup costs, focusing on scalability and integration, while NinjaOne provides a straightforward setup with a simplified cost structure, highlighting its user-friendly approach.
NinjaOne Logo
ServiceNow
4.2 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
ServiceNow
4.2 out of 5
ServiceNow allows extensive customization for diverse business processes, using ITIL methodologies. In comparison, NinjaOne emphasizes ease of use and effective remote management for device maintenance. ServiceNow's advanced features suit complex needs, whereas NinjaOne's simplicity appeals to those seeking cost-effective device management.
Download NinjaOne vs. ServiceNow Report
ServiceNow incurs a substantial setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting distinct differences in their pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow incurs a substantial setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting distinct differences in their pricing strategies.
NinjaOne Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix is appreciated for its flexibility and a robust free version. In comparison, NinjaOne is favored for its comprehensive integrations and smoother deployment. Zabbix's steep learning curve and complex deployment contrast with NinjaOne's higher pricing but superior customer support and advanced features.
Download NinjaOne vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix has a lower setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which is known for its higher initial setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix has a lower setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which is known for its higher initial setup fee.
NinjaOne Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
New Relic excels in dev-ops integration and application performance monitoring, offering deep insights and real-time analytics. In comparison, NinjaOne focuses on device management with strong remote monitoring. New Relic faces pricing issues, while NinjaOne is praised for competitive pricing and user-friendly automation.
Download New Relic vs. NinjaOne Report
New Relic involves moderate initial setup costs, while NinjaOne offers a more budget-friendly setup. These distinct pricing strategies may influence preference based on financial priorities.
View comparison
Pricing
New Relic involves moderate initial setup costs, while NinjaOne offers a more budget-friendly setup. These distinct pricing strategies may influence preference based on financial priorities.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager excels in managing complex enterprise environments with its robust application deployment and Intune integration. In comparison, NinjaOne caters to small to medium-sized businesses with its user-friendly remote management and efficient cloud-based deployment, offering flexible pricing for cost-conscious tech buyers.
Download Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. NinjaOne Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager requires a substantial setup investment, whereas NinjaOne offers a more cost-effective implementation with lower initial costs, highlighting significant disparities in setup pricing between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager requires a substantial setup investment, whereas NinjaOne offers a more cost-effective implementation with lower initial costs, highlighting significant disparities in setup pricing between the two solutions.
NinjaOne Logo
Workspace ONE UEM
4.1 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Workspace ONE UEM
4.1 out of 5
VMware Workspace ONE excels in integration and advanced features, making it suitable for complex IT environments. In comparison, NinjaOne is user-friendly and cost-effective, ideal for rapid deployment and ease of use. Choosing depends on the need for sophisticated functionality versus straightforward simplicity.
Download NinjaOne vs. Workspace ONE UEM Report
VMware Workspace ONE has a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne. NinjaOne's setup cost is more affordable, making it a cost-effective choice.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Workspace ONE has a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne. NinjaOne's setup cost is more affordable, making it a cost-effective choice.
NinjaOne Logo
Tanium
3.8 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Tanium
3.8 out of 5
Tanium excels in comprehensive endpoint management and real-time analytics, ideal for large businesses seeking advanced features. In comparison, NinjaOne provides simple navigation and effective remote management, making it suitable for organizations valuing ease of use and quicker deployment.
Download NinjaOne vs. Tanium Report
Tanium's setup cost is higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set, while NinjaOne offers a more affordable setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium's setup cost is higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set, while NinjaOne offers a more affordable setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for complex infrastructures with its scalability and proactive alerting features. In comparison, NinjaOne suits small to medium businesses, offering strong automation and integration capabilities. PRTG excels in sensor variety, while NinjaOne emphasizes device management and automation.
Download NinjaOne vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a seamless setup with minimal upfront costs, while NinjaOne provides a structured setup with transparent pricing. These differences highlight the distinct approaches each solution takes towards initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a seamless setup with minimal upfront costs, while NinjaOne provides a structured setup with transparent pricing. These differences highlight the distinct approaches each solution takes towards initial implementation.
NinjaOne Logo
Jamf Pro
4.8 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Jamf Pro
4.8 out of 5
Jamf Pro excels in Apple device management with seamless integration and robust security. In comparison, NinjaOne provides comprehensive IT tools with greater flexibility across platforms. Tech buyers may choose Jamf Pro for Apple-specific environments or NinjaOne for its broader IT management capabilities.
Download Jamf Pro vs. NinjaOne Report
Jamf Pro has a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more cost-effective initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Jamf Pro has a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more cost-effective initial investment.
NinjaOne Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix offers extensive patch management and endpoint security with a higher setup cost, providing robust ROI. In comparison, NinjaOne excels in remote monitoring with straightforward deployment and affordable pricing. Users may choose BigFix for comprehensive features, whereas NinjaOne's user-friendly design attracts those prioritizing ease of use.
Download BigFix vs. NinjaOne Report
BigFix offers a high setup cost, while NinjaOne provides a budget-friendly option, making the two solutions distinctly different in pricing, appealing to diverse budgetary preferences.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix offers a high setup cost, while NinjaOne provides a budget-friendly option, making the two solutions distinctly different in pricing, appealing to diverse budgetary preferences.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management
4.0 out of 5

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Download NinjaOne vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report
There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost.
The solution is not too expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost.
The solution is not too expensive.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
TeamViewer Business
4.3 out of 5
TeamViewer Business excels with features like bypassing firewalls and cross-platform support, ideal for remote support needs. In comparison, NinjaOne provides robust device management and integrates well with third-party apps, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive monitoring and script customization.
Download NinjaOne vs. TeamViewer Business Report
TeamViewer Business typically has no setup cost, while NinjaOne is known for a straightforward and quick installation process that involves minimal implementation expenses. Choose based on whether you prioritize immediate usage or simplicity in deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamViewer Business typically has no setup cost, while NinjaOne is known for a straightforward and quick installation process that involves minimal implementation expenses. Choose based on whether you prioritize immediate usage or simplicity in deployment.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
4.1 out of 5
ManageEngine Endpoint Central offers broad IT management tools perfect for diverse OS asset management. In comparison, NinjaOne provides robust automation and remote access. ManageEngine suits budget-focused teams, while NinjaOne benefits those prioritizing ease-of-use and expanded cloud capabilities despite higher costs.
Download ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs. NinjaOne Report
ManageEngine Endpoint Central involves a more complex setup while NinjaOne offers a straightforward, low-cost implementation, highlighting their differences in initial deployment costs and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Endpoint Central involves a more complex setup while NinjaOne offers a straightforward, low-cost implementation, highlighting their differences in initial deployment costs and complexity.
NinjaOne Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI offers advanced monitoring and customizable alerts with strong integration options, favored for its pricing and customer support. In comparison, NinjaOne excels in streamlined IT management and automation, preferred for its ease of deployment and high ROI despite higher costs.
Download Nagios XI vs. NinjaOne Report
Nagios XI has a higher setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI has a higher setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
JIRA Service Management
4.1 out of 5
JIRA Service Management excels in customizable workflows and integration with Atlassian tools. In comparison, NinjaOne emphasizes simplicity and robust remote monitoring for device management. JIRA suits larger teams, while NinjaOne is ideal for straightforward IT service management tasks.
Download JIRA Service Management vs. NinjaOne Report
JIRA Service Management involves a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
JIRA Service Management involves a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.
NinjaOne Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
NinjaOne attracts tech buyers with its intuitive design and responsive customer service. In comparison, Checkmk appeals to those needing feature depth and granular control. NinjaOne's ease of use contrasts with Checkmk's flexibility, making each a strong choice for different organizational needs.
Download Checkmk vs. NinjaOne Report
NinjaOne has a minimal setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Checkmk involves a more significant setup cost. NinjaOne's affordability in initial setup contrasts with Checkmk's higher setup expense, reflecting distinct financial commitments for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne has a minimal setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Checkmk involves a more significant setup cost. NinjaOne's affordability in initial setup contrasts with Checkmk's higher setup expense, reflecting distinct financial commitments for businesses.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
NinjaOne offers a cost-effective, user-centric solution with robust integration and automation for enhanced efficiency. In comparison, Auvik Network Management provides advanced network visibility and diagnostics, appealing to tech buyers seeking comprehensive tools with long-term value despite a higher initial investment.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NinjaOne Report
NinjaOne has a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, while Auvik Network Management (ANM) involves a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne has a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, while Auvik Network Management (ANM) involves a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
NinjaOne Logo
Zendesk
4.1 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Zendesk
4.1 out of 5
NinjaOne offers strong IT management tools, focusing on cost-efficiency and ease of deployment. In comparison, Zendesk excels in customer interaction features like ticketing and CRM, appealing to those valuing integration and a broad feature set, despite potentially higher initial costs.
Download NinjaOne vs. Zendesk Report
NinjaOne has a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Zendesk offers a more complex setup with potentially higher initial expenses. NinjaOne's simplicity contrasts with Zendesk's detailed configuration requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne has a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Zendesk offers a more complex setup with potentially higher initial expenses. NinjaOne's simplicity contrasts with Zendesk's detailed configuration requirements.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
N-able Cove Data Protection
4.5 out of 5
N-able Cove offers robust cloud-based backup and disaster recovery with flexible pricing and scalability, ideal for MSPs. In comparison, NinjaOne focuses on device management and integration, suiting smaller businesses seeking comprehensive solutions with competitive pricing, making each appealing to different tech buyers' priorities.
Download N-able Cove Data Protection vs. NinjaOne Report
N-able Cove Data Protection typically has a lower setup cost, while NinjaOne may require more investment upfront. This difference can influence initial adoption based on budget constraints, highlighting a key consideration between these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
N-able Cove Data Protection typically has a lower setup cost, while NinjaOne may require more investment upfront. This difference can influence initial adoption based on budget constraints, highlighting a key consideration between these solutions.
NinjaOne Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
Kaseya VSA offers a wide range of functionalities like automation and patch management, which can attract those needing extensive features. In comparison, NinjaOne provides an intuitive and efficient remote management experience, appealing to users who prioritize ease of use and reliability.
Download Kaseya VSA vs. NinjaOne Report
Kaseya VSA has higher setup costs compared to NinjaOne, making NinjaOne a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya VSA has higher setup costs compared to NinjaOne, making NinjaOne a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.
NinjaOne Logo
TeamViewer Tensor
4.3 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
TeamViewer Tensor
4.3 out of 5
NinjaOne excels in automation and patch management while TeamViewer Tensor offers superior remote access and control, especially in enterprise contexts. In comparison, NinjaOne's ease of deployment and customer service are highlights, whereas TeamViewer Tensor provides powerful features that justify its higher price for advanced capabilities.
Download NinjaOne vs. TeamViewer Tensor Report
NinjaOne has no setup cost, whereas TeamViewer Tensor requires an initial investment. NinjaOne's pricing model is straightforward, while TeamViewer Tensor's setup fee highlights a more complex cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne has no setup cost, whereas TeamViewer Tensor requires an initial investment. NinjaOne's pricing model is straightforward, while TeamViewer Tensor's setup fee highlights a more complex cost structure.
NinjaOne Logo
Freshservice
4.0 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Freshservice
4.0 out of 5
Freshservice excels in incident and change management with strong mobile support and intuitive automation. In comparison, NinjaOne's strength lies in remote management and device monitoring. Freshservice offers flexible deployment, while NinjaOne is valued for scalability and effective policy and patch management.
Download Freshservice vs. NinjaOne Report
Freshservice has a straightforward setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more cost-effective initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Freshservice has a straightforward setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more cost-effective initial configuration.
NinjaOne Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
Meraki Dashboard excels in network management with features like presence analytics and SD-WAN, offering seamless cloud management. In comparison, NinjaOne specializes in script automation and device management with strong remote tools, prioritizing integration and flexible pricing appealing to tech buyers seeking efficiency.
Download Meraki Dashboard vs. NinjaOne Report
Meraki Dashboard requires a moderate initial setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more budget-friendly installation. The key difference lies in the cost structure: Meraki is priced higher, making NinjaOne a more economical choice upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Meraki Dashboard requires a moderate initial setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more budget-friendly installation. The key difference lies in the cost structure: Meraki is priced higher, making NinjaOne a more economical choice upfront.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
4.4 out of 5
KACE excels in endpoint management, offering mass deployment and asset management, suitable for large environments. In comparison, NinjaOne provides robust monitoring and remote access, ideal for small to medium-sized businesses. KACE fits enterprises needing comprehensive IT management, while NinjaOne offers agile solutions for smaller teams.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. NinjaOne Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
NinjaOne Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
NinjaOne excels in device management efficiency with robust mobile app features and automated management options, appealing to enterprises seeking integration. In comparison, Atera's strengths lie in pricing and automation, making it ideal for startups or businesses with fluctuating IT demands.
Download Atera vs. NinjaOne Report
NinjaOne offers a higher setup cost focused on advanced features, while Atera provides a more affordable option with essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne offers a higher setup cost focused on advanced features, while Atera provides a more affordable option with essential functionalities.
NinjaOne Logo
Automox
4.5 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Automox
4.5 out of 5
NinjaOne excels with an intuitive design and efficient monitoring, appealing to smaller teams. In comparison, Automox offers advanced patch management and automation for larger operations. NinjaOne’s straightforward deployment suits immediate needs, while Automox’s detailed documentation supports complex setups and scalability.
Download Automox vs. NinjaOne Report
NinjaOne offers a transparent setup cost model, while Automox provides a customizable pricing structure. NinjaOne's fixed setup cost contrasts with Automox's flexibility in setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne offers a transparent setup cost model, while Automox provides a customizable pricing structure. NinjaOne's fixed setup cost contrasts with Automox's flexibility in setup expenses.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management
4.6 out of 5
NinjaOne excels in remote monitoring with script deployment and patch management, suitable for SMBs. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity focuses on asset discovery and vulnerability management, appealing to larger enterprises seeking advanced security. Both offer different strengths, catering to diverse business needs.
Download NinjaOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
NinjaOne offers a competitive setup cost with immediate deployment benefits, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides a comprehensive security-focused setup.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne offers a competitive setup cost with immediate deployment benefits, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides a comprehensive security-focused setup.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft WSUS is ideal for centralized update management in Windows environments. In comparison, NinjaOne provides extensive remote monitoring, asset tracking, and multi-OS support. WSUS excels at targeted updates, while NinjaOne's broader feature set aids multifaceted IT management. WSUS offers cost-effectiveness within the Microsoft ecosystem, whereas NinjaOne delivers better ROI through comprehensive IT tools.
Download Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs. NinjaOne Report
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services has a low setup cost, whereas NinjaOne incurs a higher setup cost due to its advanced features and comprehensive functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services has a low setup cost, whereas NinjaOne incurs a higher setup cost due to its advanced features and comprehensive functionality.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
ConnectWise Automate
3.7 out of 5
ConnectWise Automate draws tech buyers with its comprehensive automation and extensive scripting, ideal for complex IT needs. In comparison, NinjaOne appeals through cost-effective pricing and a streamlined, user-friendly experience, ensuring swift deployment and proactive customer interaction for efficient IT management.
Download ConnectWise Automate vs. NinjaOne Report
ConnectWise Automate typically involves higher setup costs compared to NinjaOne, highlighting a financial consideration in their comparison.
View comparison
Pricing
ConnectWise Automate typically involves higher setup costs compared to NinjaOne, highlighting a financial consideration in their comparison.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
Datto Remote Monitoring and Management
4.0 out of 5
Datto RMM offers flexible pricing and strong security features, appealing to security-focused enterprises. In comparison, NinjaOne excels with advanced features and integration capabilities, providing streamlined management. Datto RMM is adaptable, while NinjaOne simplifies deployment with user-friendly setup and proactive customer service.
Download Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs. NinjaOne Report
Datto Remote Monitoring and Management presents a more affordable setup cost, while NinjaOne offers higher-priced setup options that reflect its premium feature set. The distinction highlights the differing pricing strategies employed by each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Datto Remote Monitoring and Management presents a more affordable setup cost, while NinjaOne offers higher-priced setup options that reflect its premium feature set. The distinction highlights the differing pricing strategies employed by each solution.
NinjaOne Logo
N-able N-central
4.3 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
N-able N-central
4.3 out of 5
N-able N-central appeals to those seeking robust monitoring and IT automation, with its deep customization and competitive pricing. In comparison, NinjaOne attracts tech buyers with its intuitive design and seamless integration, emphasizing rapid deployment and high perceived value in pricing.
Download N-able N-central vs. NinjaOne Report
N-able N-central offers a flexible setup cost structure, while NinjaOne provides a straightforward, more predictable setup fee; this makes N-able N-central potentially more adaptable to different organizational needs than NinjaOne.
View comparison
Pricing
N-able N-central offers a flexible setup cost structure, while NinjaOne provides a straightforward, more predictable setup fee; this makes N-able N-central potentially more adaptable to different organizational needs than NinjaOne.
NinjaOne Logo
VNC Connect
3.7 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
VNC Connect
3.7 out of 5
NinjaOne excels with strong customer support and ease of use, while VNC Connect is praised for robust features and scalability. NinjaOne's comprehensive monitoring streamlines IT operations. In comparison, VNC Connect provides high-performance remote access. NinjaOne is straightforward to deploy, whereas VNC Connect offers extensive support documentation.
Download NinjaOne vs. VNC Connect Report
NinjaOne's setup cost is relatively high, while VNC Connect offers a more affordable setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne's setup cost is relatively high, while VNC Connect offers a more affordable setup process.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM)
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) excels in device management, security, and Cisco product integration. In comparison, NinjaOne offers comprehensive endpoint management, automation, and remote monitoring. Tech buyers might choose Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) for pricing and support. NinjaOne is chosen for advanced features and ease of deployment.
Download Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs. NinjaOne Report
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) has a higher initial setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) has a higher initial setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
NinjaOne Logo
MSP360 Backup
4.0 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
MSP360 Backup
4.0 out of 5

MSP360 Backup is a comprehensive data protection solution designed for businesses of all sizes. It offers a wide range of features and capabilities to ensure the safety and security of critical data. 

Download MSP360 Backup vs. NinjaOne Report
It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup.
We have a very good return on investment.
View comparison
Pricing
It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup.
We have a very good return on investment.
NinjaOne Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
NinjaOne excels in IT asset management, patching, and remote monitoring, offering a user-friendly interface. In comparison, Vicarius vRx provides advanced vulnerability management and automated remediation, resulting in deeper security features. Tech buyers choose NinjaOne for ease of use, while Vicarius vRx is preferred for comprehensive security.
Download NinjaOne vs. Vicarius vRx Report
NinjaOne has a lower setup cost compared to Vicarius vRx, highlighting its cost efficiency. Vicarius vRx's higher setup cost is justified by its advanced features and robust security measures.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne has a lower setup cost compared to Vicarius vRx, highlighting its cost efficiency. Vicarius vRx's higher setup cost is justified by its advanced features and robust security measures.
NinjaOne Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
NinjaOne and Scalefusion offer robust IT management options but differ in strengths. NinjaOne is appreciated for affordability and support, enhancing its monitoring and automation capabilities. In comparison, Scalefusion impresses with comprehensive device management features, making it worth the additional cost for some tech buyers.
Download NinjaOne vs. Scalefusion Report
NinjaOne has lower setup costs compared to Scalefusion, highlighting a cost-effective option for organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne has lower setup costs compared to Scalefusion, highlighting a cost-effective option for organizations.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
ConnectWise ScreenConnect
4.2 out of 5
ConnectWise ScreenConnect appeals to tech buyers seeking cost-effective remote control and stable performance. In comparison, NinjaOne attracts those needing comprehensive monitoring and integrated automation. ConnectWise ScreenConnect is favored for straightforward deployment, while NinjaOne is chosen for its advanced feature set and superior customer service.
Download ConnectWise ScreenConnect vs. NinjaOne Report
ConnectWise ScreenConnect has minimal setup costs, making it an economical option, while NinjaOne has higher setup costs, reflecting its extensive initial service offerings.
View comparison
Pricing
ConnectWise ScreenConnect has minimal setup costs, making it an economical option, while NinjaOne has higher setup costs, reflecting its extensive initial service offerings.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
Ivanti Neurons for ITSM
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Neurons for ITSM offers advanced automation and comprehensive asset management, attracting those seeking extensive ITSM functionalities. In comparison, NinjaOne is favored for its simplified deployment, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness, appealing to organizations focused on efficient and straightforward IT management.
Download Ivanti Neurons for ITSM vs. NinjaOne Report
Ivanti Neurons for ITSM requires a moderate setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Neurons for ITSM requires a moderate setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
NinjaOne Logo
TOPdesk
3.9 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
TOPdesk
3.9 out of 5
TOPdesk offers robust service automation and integration options suitable for customized IT management. In comparison, NinjaOne emphasizes streamlined remote monitoring and device management. A tech buyer might choose TOPdesk for customizable workflows, while NinjaOne appeals to those needing swift deployment and device security.
Download NinjaOne vs. TOPdesk Report
TOPdesk has a moderate setup cost, whereas NinjaOne offers a straightforward, lower setup fee, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
TOPdesk has a moderate setup cost, whereas NinjaOne offers a straightforward, lower setup fee, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
NinjaOne Logo
ConnectWise RMM
4.0 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
ConnectWise RMM
4.0 out of 5
ConnectWise RMM offers extensive integrations and automation, appealing to users needing comprehensive IT solutions. In comparison, NinjaOne attracts tech buyers with its user-friendly setup and efficient patch management. NinjaOne's pricing appeals for cost-effectiveness, while ConnectWise RMM suits those prioritizing scalability.
Download ConnectWise RMM vs. NinjaOne Report
ConnectWise RMM involves an initial setup cost, whereas NinjaOne may provide a more streamlined setup process with reduced costs.
View comparison
Pricing
ConnectWise RMM involves an initial setup cost, whereas NinjaOne may provide a more streamlined setup process with reduced costs.
NinjaOne Logo
HaloITSM
4.5 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
HaloITSM
4.5 out of 5
NinjaOne offers efficient remote monitoring and asset management with streamlined deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, HaloITSM provides comprehensive IT service management features, supporting complex deployments with thorough guidance, making it ideal for organizations needing extensive IT service functionality despite potential higher initial costs.
Download HaloITSM vs. NinjaOne Report
NinjaOne offers straightforward setup costs, while HaloITSM presents varying initial expenses that can impact smaller budgets. Key differences lie in the overall affordability and budget considerations between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne offers straightforward setup costs, while HaloITSM presents varying initial expenses that can impact smaller budgets. Key differences lie in the overall affordability and budget considerations between the two solutions.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management
4.2 out of 5
N-able N-sight offers cost-effectiveness and comprehensive customization for businesses seeking value-focused IT management. In comparison, NinjaOne provides a robust, cloud-based deployment with intuitive management functionalities and advanced capabilities, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing innovation and holistic IT solutions.
Download N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. NinjaOne Report
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management has a lower setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more comprehensive initial configuration. The cost difference highlights their distinct approaches towards implementation efficiency and flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management has a lower setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more comprehensive initial configuration. The cost difference highlights their distinct approaches towards implementation efficiency and flexibility.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
BMC Client Management
4.3 out of 5
BMC Client Management excels in support, offering comprehensive asset management and robust patching, while NinjaOne stands out in core features with an intuitive design and seamless integration. In comparison, NinjaOne's pricing is higher but justifies the cost with superior features and smoother deployment.
Download BMC Client Management vs. NinjaOne Report
BMC Client Management has a higher setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more affordable setup. This cost difference may impact budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC Client Management has a higher setup cost, while NinjaOne offers a more affordable setup. This cost difference may impact budget-conscious users.
NinjaOne Logo
LogMeIn Central
4.3 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
LogMeIn Central
4.3 out of 5
LogMeIn Central offers extensive features catering to complex business needs. In comparison, NinjaOne is favored for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. LogMeIn Central suits companies needing comprehensive control, while NinjaOne is ideal for those prioritizing ease of deployment and quick ROI.
Download LogMeIn Central vs. NinjaOne Report
LogMeIn Central has an initial setup cost that is typically higher, whereas NinjaOne offers a more straightforward setup with lower costs. This makes NinjaOne more appealing for budget-conscious users compared to LogMeIn Central.
View comparison
Pricing
LogMeIn Central has an initial setup cost that is typically higher, whereas NinjaOne offers a more straightforward setup with lower costs. This makes NinjaOne more appealing for budget-conscious users compared to LogMeIn Central.
NinjaOne Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
GFI LanGuard excels in comprehensive vulnerability scanning and patch management, offering cost-effective solutions with responsive customer service. In comparison, NinjaOne is appreciated for its robust remote monitoring, flexibility, automation capabilities, and quick deployment. Both offer significant ROI, with GFI LanGuard being budget-friendly and NinjaOne providing advanced features.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. NinjaOne Report
GFI LanGuard users find setup costs high while NinjaOne is praised for its affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
GFI LanGuard users find setup costs high while NinjaOne is praised for its affordable setup.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
Faronics Deep Freeze
3.5 out of 5

Deep Freeze boosts user productivity by offering 100% workstation availability.

View comparison
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
Qualys Patch Management
4.5 out of 5
NinjaOne is recognized for its competitive pricing and excellent support. In comparison, Qualys Patch Management is valued for its advanced features and extensive coverage, justifying its higher price. A tech buyer might choose NinjaOne for cost-effectiveness or opt for Qualys for its robust capabilities.
Download NinjaOne vs. Qualys Patch Management Report
NinjaOne has lower setup costs, while Qualys Patch Management's setup is more complex and may incur higher costs.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne has lower setup costs, while Qualys Patch Management's setup is more complex and may incur higher costs.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform
4.8 out of 5
NinjaOne is valued for its intuitive patch management, remote monitoring, and automation capabilities. In comparison, SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform excels with its vulnerability management, threat detection, and compliance reporting. A tech buyer seeking cost-effectiveness may prefer NinjaOne, while those prioritizing comprehensive cybersecurity could choose SanerNow.
Download NinjaOne vs. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Report
NinjaOne's setup cost is praised for its simplicity and low entry barrier, while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform's setup cost is noted for its affordability and quick implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne's setup cost is praised for its simplicity and low entry barrier, while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform's setup cost is noted for its affordability and quick implementation.
NinjaOne Logo
Pulseway
4.3 out of 5
NinjaOne Logo
Pulseway
4.3 out of 5
Pulseway excels in ease of deployment and customer service, while NinjaOne offers stronger features and a robust ROI. In comparison, Pulseway benefits from real-time monitoring and strong scripting, and NinjaOne is preferred for automated workflows and comprehensive reporting.
Download NinjaOne vs. Pulseway Report
Pulseway offers a lower setup cost, making it economical, while NinjaOne has a higher setup cost, reflecting advanced feature investments. The pricing clearly sets NinjaOne apart as a premium option compared to the more budget-friendly Pulseway.
View comparison
Pricing
Pulseway offers a lower setup cost, making it economical, while NinjaOne has a higher setup cost, reflecting advanced feature investments. The pricing clearly sets NinjaOne apart as a premium option compared to the more budget-friendly Pulseway.
NinjaOne Logo
NinjaOne Logo
Ivanti Security Controls
4.3 out of 5
NinjaOne is favored for its intuitive dashboard and ease of use, while Ivanti Security Controls offers robust security and advanced threat protection. In comparison, NinjaOne needs better reporting, whereas Ivanti Security Controls requires smoother updates. NinjaOne’s cost efficiency contrasts Ivanti’s justified advanced feature pricing.
Download Ivanti Security Controls vs. NinjaOne Report
NinjaOne is praised for its straightforward setup cost, while Ivanti Security Controls is noted for its higher initial investment, highlighting a clear cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne is praised for its straightforward setup cost, while Ivanti Security Controls is noted for its higher initial investment, highlighting a clear cost difference.

Related categories

Network Monitoring Software
Server Monitoring
IT Service Management (ITSM)